Paying for Nature's Services: Developing the UK Peatland Code
Submitting Institution
Birmingham City UniversityUnit of Assessment
Architecture, Built Environment and PlanningSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management
Biological Sciences: Ecology
Summary of the impact
This case study shows how research on ecosystem service governance is
directly supporting the Government's promotion of Payment for Ecosystem
Services (PES) schemes. These aim to pay for nature's services through the
involvement of business and the wider public. Specifically, research has
informed the development of a pilot UK Peatland Code to stimulate private
investment in peatland restoration. The pilot Code, which was published
for public feedback in June (and launched in September 2013 by the
Environment Minister), sets out guidance and quality standards for
sustainable business investment in peatlands. It has implications for
chartered surveyors, planners and others advising clients on future land
use and income generating opportunities. According to Defra's Deputy
Director of Sustainable Land and Rural Evidence and Analysis, lessons from
this research have "made a significant contribution" towards
Defra's PES agenda, "provid[ing] us with valuable lessons for the
development of PES schemes in the UK" (Testimonial 1).
Underpinning research
Since August 2012, research into Payments for Ecosystem Services schemes
(PES) in peatlands has been conducted by Professor Mark Reed in
the Centre for Environment & Society Research (CESR) at Birmingham
City University (BCU) and is ongoing. UK peatlands are an important place
to explore the potential to pay for multiple benefits from nature, or
"ecosystem services", given the range of services they provide to UK
society and the high proportion of peatlands that are degraded.
Reed joined BCU in 2012 as a recognised expert in the field of
peatland restoration as a result of leading the flagship RCUK Rural
Economy and Land Use programme (RELU) Sustainable Uplands project. On
joining BCU, he was invited to join the Roster of Experts for the second
phase of Defra's Ecosystem Markets Taskforce, and secured funding to:
develop a PES scheme for peatland restoration with South West Water
(funded by NERC and South West Water); scope a place-based PES scheme for
the South Pennines (funded by Natural England and Defra); and lead two
Defra PES pilot research projects to develop a UK Peatland Code and
explore the potential for Visitor Giving schemes to elicit payments for
peatland ecosystem services from members of the public.
The underpinning research used case study research in the South Pennines
and elsewhere to explore how Payments for Ecosystem Service schemes may be
designed to deliver a range of complementary ecosystem services in the
same location (e.g. climate, water, biodiversity and recreational benefits
from peatland restoration), whilst avoiding trade-offs between ecosystem
services where possible (for example, sequestering carbon via exotic
conifer plantations at the expense of native biodiversity). The research
explored the potential to elicit payments for carbon, biodiversity, water
quality and recreational benefits associated with peatland restoration,
including a scenario-based assessment of possible trade-offs (up to 2030)
and an assessment of market and governance needs.
This research clearly demonstrated that over appropriate timeframes (e.g.
30-100 year contracts) good practice peatland restoration can deliver
significant climate change mitigation benefits, with typical costs of
restoration between £53,300-£70,600 for a 100 hectare site. With typical
Greenhouse Gas emission reduction benefits of between 3.9-4.2 tonnes CO2
equivalent per hectare per year, this would equate to 11,700-12,600 tonnes
CO2 equivalent over a 30 year contract (equivalent to a year's
emissions of over 7,000 average family cars). If this investment were
turned into an asset, the investment would break even by the end of a 30
year contract if the carbon was worth £7.50 per tonne. If carbon prices
were higher than £7.50 per tonne, then this would represent a return on
investment. At the same time, this work would deliver improvements in
water quality (primarily reductions in brown colouration caused by
Dissolved Organic Carbon), biodiversity (in particular blanket bog
specialists) and recreational access (primarily due to restoration of deep
gullies). The research has demonstrated that there is a strong interest in
sponsoring peatland restoration from the private sector (notably from food
and drink, hospitality and horticulture) and corporations are willing to
pay a premium for UK-based projects that deliver climate change mitigation
alongside biodiversity and water benefits. However, the research investors
need appropriate Government-backed guidance to give them confidence that
their investments will deliver these benefits, and guidance is needed to
ensure landowners follow good practice restoration. Reed has
therefore led the development of a UK Peatland Code, funded by Defra and
supported by the Environment Minister, with the support of Environment
Ministers from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
References to the research
BCU affiliated publications (indicating BCU staff in bold):
1. Reed MS, Hubacek K, Bonn A, Burt TP, Holden J, Stringer LC,
Beharry-Borg N, Buckmaster S, Chapman D, Chapman P, Clay GD, Cornell S,
Dougill AJ, Evely A, Fraser EDG, Jin N, Irvine B, Kirkby M, Kunin W, Prell
C, Quinn CH, Slee W, Stagl S, Termansen M, Thorp S, Worrall F (2013)
Anticipating and managing future trade-offs and complementarities between
ecosystem services. Ecology & Society 18(1): 5 http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04924-180105
2. Reed MS, Bonn A, Broad K, Burgess P, Fazey IR, Fraser EDG,
Hubacek K, Nainggolan D, Roberts P, Quinn CH, Stringer LC, Thorpe S,
Walton DD, Ravera F, Redpath S (2013) Participatory scenario development
for environmental management: a methodological framework. Journal of
Environmental Management 128: 345-362
4. Reed MS, Bonn A, Evans C, Joosten H, Bain C, Farmer J, Emmer
I, Couwenberg J, Moxey A, Artz R, Tanneberger F, von Unger M, Smyth M,
Birnie R, Inman I, Smith S, Quick T, Cowap C, Prior S, Lindsay R (2013) Peatland
Code Research Project Final Report, Defra, London.
http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=11566_DefraPESPilotPeatCodeFinal
Report.pdf
5. Reed MS, Rowcroft P, Cade S, Savege S, Scott A, Black J, Brace
A, Evely AC, White C (2013) Visitor Giving Payment for Ecosystem
Service Pilot Final Report, Defra, London.
http://ekn.defra.gov.uk/resources/programmes/pes-pilots/
6. Reed MS, Cowap C, Hirst V, Smith SM (2012) Case study:
developing a place-based Payment for Ecosystem Service scheme for South
West peatlands, ESKTN/NERC.
https://t.co/Zf6kSzvrq1
Publication 1 is available in REF2, and all other papers are available
upon request.
BCU funding (showing role of Mark Reed):
DEFRA (2012-2013) PES Pilot: UK Peatland Code (PI, £25,000)
DEFRA (2012-2013) PES Pilot: Visitor Giving (PI, £25,000)
NERC (2012-2013): Peatland restoration PES scheme with South West Water
(Project Manager, £25,000)
DEFRA/Natural England (2012-2013) Developing a Place-Based Payment for
Ecosystem Services Scheme for the South Pennines (Co-I, £40,000)
NERC Valuing Nature Network (2011-12): Assessing and valuing peatland
ecosystem services for sustainable management (University of Aberdeen PI;
completed project at BCU, £50K)
Details of the impact
It is vital to find ways to protect and pay for ecosystem services at a
time when Governments around the world are operating under tighter
economic constraints, and there is growing interest in Payment for
Ecosystem Service schemes internationally. Reed led the
development of a UK Peatland Code that could facilitate private investment
in peatland restoration, providing guidance and quality standards for
potential investors and for the landowners and managers who are paid to
restore peatlands. The Code gives corporations the opportunity to sponsor
UK-based projects linked to their brands as part of their Corporate Social
Responsibility portfolio, with the potential to turn these investments
into future assets if the Code becomes part of the Government's GHG
Accounting Guidelines (as the Woodland Carbon Code did), making it
possible to include GHG emission savings in corporate carbon accounting,
or if it becomes financially viable to trade the carbon on the
international voluntary carbon market. The Code also provides an
opportunity for landowners and managers to generate financial rewards from
restoration.
The Government's 2011 Natural Environment White Paper emphasised the
creation of new markets to pay for nature's services. It announced the
formation of Defra's Ecosystem Markets Taskforce, which was tasked with
identifying business opportunities for nature. The Taskforce ranked a UK
Peatland Code as their joint top opportunity out of 44 submitted
opportunities (http://www.valuing-nature.net/taskforce).
In October 2012, Reed was invited to join the Roster of Experts
for the second phase of the Taskforce's work. In its final report in May
2013, the Taskforce recommended the development of a robust code for
peatland restoration (http://www.defra.gov.uk/ecosystem-markets/files/Ecosystem-Markets-Task-Force-Final-Report-.pdf).
The Natural Environment White Paper committed to producing a Payment for
Ecosystem Service Best Practice Guide, which Defra published in May 2013
co-authored by Reed, featuring the Peatland Code as a case study,
based directly on Reed's research at BCU (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/
payments-for-ecosystem-services-pes-best-practice-guide). The
White Paper committed to producing a Payment for Ecosystem Service Action
Plan, which Defra also published in May 2013, and which drew specifically
on Reed's research to highlight peatland restoration via the
Peatland Code as one of five opportunity areas (reference 1, section 5).
This committed Defra to a number of actions, including the launch of a
pilot Peatland Code (reference 2, section 5), and publication of metrics
to underpin the research developed in collaboration with Reed
(reference 3, section 3). In July 2013, the Committee on Climate Change
(an independent, statutory body established under the Climate Change Act
2008) highlighted the development of a Peatland Code as a "key priority",
drawing on evidence from Defra's PES Action Plan (http://www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/ASC-2013-Chap4_singles_2.pdf).
Since joining BCU in July 2012, Reed has been Research Manager
for IUCN's UK Peatland Programme. The government's commitment to the
Peatland Code is further illustrated by a letter to the IUCN UK Peatland
Programme (5th February 2013), from the four country Ministers, which sets
out a framework for action, including co-operation and co-ordinated action
to support the development of the Peatland Code (http://www.iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org/sites/all/files/20130205
Joint DA letter to IUCN.pdf). This intention was re-iterated
in the UK Government's National Adaptation Plan in July 2013
(https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/
209866/pb13942-nap-20130701.pdf). Reed is now
supporting Welsh Government to co-ordinate peatland restoration under the
Peatland Code across the country and integrate payments with their Rural
Development Programme.
Defra funded Reed to carry out the necessary underpinning
research and develop the Peatland Code, and Reed is now on Defra's
commissioning team to fund continued research to support the next phase of
Code development. The Code was published online for public consultation in
June 2013 (for responses see appendix 2, publication 4, section 3), and
was launched by the Environment Minister, Richard Benyon, at an
International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) conference on 10th
September 2013 (http://iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org/news/230).
The
Code has the potential to become a template for similar initiatives
internationally, and with this in mind in June 2013, Reed was
invited to present progress on developing the Code to a conference
organized by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) in
co-operation with the European Network of Heads of Nature Conservation
Agencies (ENCA) (http://www.bfn.de/0103_conferenzce-biodiversity0.html).
Since then, Defra asked Reed to design and organize a conference
to bring together all their PES Pilot projects to help them evaluate the
research programme, and identify cross-cutting lessons and implications
for policy (http://ekn.defra.gov.uk/2013/10/04/ecosystems-knowledge-network-event-practical-experiences-with-pes/;
the event attracted over 70 participants and was over-subscribed). The
Living with Environmental Change partnership commissioned Reed to
write two Policy & Practice Notes integrating his team's research with
findings from across the partnership: one on Payments for Ecosystem
Services generally, and another translating this work for the professions,
titled "Natural capital for land management professionals" (http://www.lwec.org.uk/resources/policy-and-practice-notes).
Defra's Deputy Director of Sustainable Land and Rural Evidence and
Analysis stated (Testimonial 1, section 5): "Professor Reed's work
since joining BCU has made a significant contribution to the Payment for
Ecosystem Services agenda within Defra, with work he led on the UK
Peatland Code featuring prominently in the Defra PES Action Plan.
Moreover, the success of the research has been helped considerably by
Professor Reed promoting a collaborative and a multi-disciplinary
approach. Overall this research has made a considerable contribution and
provided us with valuable lessons for the development of Payment for
Ecosystem Service schemes in the UK."
Sources to corroborate the impact
References:
- Defra PES Action Plan:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200889/pb13918-pes-actionplan-20130522.pdf
- Pilot UK Peatland Code: http://iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org/peatland-code
- Government response to Ecosystem Markets Taskforce Final Report,
citing underpinning research by BCU:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/236879/pb13
963-government-response-emtf-report.pdf
Testimonial letters are available from:
- Defra's Deputy Director of Sustainable Land and Rural Evidence and
Analysis, responsible for commissioning CESR research on PES, and for
the PES policy area within Defra
- Head of Profession for the Ecosystem Approach, Natural England, who
commissioned the Natural England work to develop a place-based PES
scheme for the South Pennines
- The former Government Rural Advocate and head of the Commission for
Rural Communities, who can corroborate our influence on Government
policy around peatlands and PES.
- The Director of IUCN's UK Peatland Programme, who can also corroborate
our influence on Government policy around peatlands and PES.