Enhanced reservoir management in the oil/gas sector via new algorithms for large-scale optimization
Submitting Institution
Heriot-Watt UniversityUnit of Assessment
Computer Science and InformaticsSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Numerical and Computational Mathematics, Statistics
Information and Computing Sciences: Computation Theory and Mathematics
Summary of the impact
Research in the HWCS Intelligent Systems Lab since 2006 has developed
approaches to
accelerate and improve large-scale optimization. This has led to new
algorithms that enable
multiple high-quality solutions for complex problems, either more quickly,
with better solution
quality than previously obtainable, or both. These algorithms, combined
with uncertainty
quantification techniques from related research, have been adopted by both
British Petroleum Plc
(BP) and Epistemy Ltd (an SME serving the oil/gas sector). Impact for BP
includes improved
business decision-making (relating to ~$330M in turnover),and impact for
Epistemy includes sales
of £230k.
Underpinning research
Large-scale optimization has been a thread of HWCS research since 2006. A
'large-scale' problem
either involves many parameters, a time-intensive cost function, or both,
and the challenge is to
provide good results quickly. Even more significant in many applications
is the need to generate a
diverse collection of good alternative solutions (again, quickly). This
requires novel ways to
accelerate 'diversity-enhanced' and exploratory optimisation techniques,
which is particularly
challenging since such techniques are time-hungry.
The oil/gas sector provides pertinent examples. One is 'history
matching', where we identify the
oil/gas reservoir parameters that, when simulated, lead to production
figures that match historical
production. Another is reservoir development planning, where we aim to
find the most
economically effective schedule for development of a reservoir, in terms
of the location and timing
of future production processes. In both cases, future, typically
billion-dollar decisions need to be
based on a representative set of diverse plausible solutions.
Corne has addressed the underpinning challenges by exploring novel ways
to use machine
learning within optimization. One thread of this research explores how
learning methods, such
as decision trees or Bayesian networks, can be used during optimization to
derive, adaptively and
dynamically, models of good solutions, and these models can then be used
to bias progress
towards better solutions. For example, in [1] we presented a hybrid of
evolutionary search and
decision tree learning that outperforms state of the art algorithms,
increasingly so for larger scale
problems. A KTP project (06/11--08/12, £86k) developed further variants of
this approach, and
supported its deployment in Epistemy Ltd.'s current 'Raven' software
product for the oil and gas
sector.
In parallel, and supported partly by a BP-led TSB project (11/09--08/13,
£698k to HWU, £290k
to HWCS) as well as a SEAS DTC award with BAE Systems (07/09--03/10,
£26k), we have
explored how to accelerate the diversity-enhanced exploration provided by
probabliistic and/or
multiobjective search. Relevant outcomes include effective approaches for
problems with many
optimization objectives [5], and approaches to multiobjective optimization
when the cost function is
particularly costly [6]. The TSB project explored this thread specifically
for both the 'history
matching' and reservoir development planning tasks; in [2] we showed how
Bayesian Optimization
could be successfully designed and adapted to outperform previous
history-matching techniques.
Subsequent work explored further algorithmic developments for these
problems, including an
entirely novel way to engineer particle swarm optimization for large-scale
problems where prior
knowledge of parameter-interaction can be exploited [3], and novel ways to
hybridize Bayesian and
particle-swarm optimization [4], Translation of the underpinning research
into impact was enabled
by conjunction with uncertainty quantification underpinnings by HWU's
Institute of Petroleum
Engineering (IPE).
In brief, HWCS research provided methods to obtain multiple high-quality
distinct solutions quickly,
while IPE research provided techniques to reason about and visualize those
solutions to support
decision-making. Key researchers involved (excluding those focussed
entirely on uncertainty
quantification) were Prof Christie (IPE), Prof Corne (HWUCS), A
Abdollahzadeh,
A. Reynolds, and M. Tapley (RAs, joint IPE and HWCS).
References to the research
1.Sheri, G., & Corne, D. (2010, July). Learning-assisted
evolutionary search for scalable function
optimization: LEM (ID3). In Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2010
IEEE Congress on (pp. 1-8).
IEEE. (The IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation is one of the three
major international,
archival events in this field, and the most prestigious IEEE one. It was
rated `A' in the commonly
used Australian Research Council ERA exercise.)
2. Abdollahzadeh, A., Reynolds, A., Christie, M. A., Corne, D., Davies,
B. & Williams,
G. "Bayesian Optimization Algorithm Applied To Uncertainty
Quantification" Sep-2012 SPE
Journal. 17, 3, p. 865-873 http://dx/doi.org/10.2118/143290-MS
(the SPE (Society of Petroleum
Engineers) Journal is one of the few primary media for scientific
publications relevant to the oil/gas
engineering sector)
3. Reynolds, A. P., Abdollahzadeh, A., Corne, D. W., Christie, M.,
Davies, B., & Williams, G.
(2012). Guide Objective Assisted Particle Swarm Optimization And Its
Application To History
Matching. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN XII (pp.
195-204). Springer Berlin
Heidelberg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32964-7
(PPSN is one of the three major
international, archival events in this field, and the major
European-centred one. It was rated `A' in
the commonly used Australian Research Council ERA exercise.)
4. Reynolds, A. P., Abdollahzadeh, A., Corne, D. W., Christie, M.,
Davies, B., & Williams, G.
(2011, June). A Parallel BOA-PSO Hybrid Algorithm For History
Matching. In Evolutionary
Computation (CEC), 2011 IEEE Congress on (pp. 894-901). IEEE. (see
notes for ref 1).
5. Corne, D. W., & Knowles, J. D. (2007, July). Techniques For
Highly Multiobjective
Optimisation: Some Nondominated Points Are Better Than Others. In
Proceedings of the 9th
annual conf. on Genetic and evolutionary computation (GECCO) (pp.
773-780). ACM. (GECCO is
one of the three major international, archival events in this field. It
was rated `A' in the commonly
used Australian Research Council ERA exercise. 122 citations to date)
6. Knowles, J., Corne, D., & Reynolds, A. (2009, January). Noisy
Multiobjective Optimization
On A Budget Of 250 Evaluations. In Evolutionary Multi-Criterion
Optimization (EMO) (pp.
36-50). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (EMO is the primary international
publication focussed
on evolutionary multiobjective optimization.)
Details of the impact
The underpinning research has led to impact primarily because (when used
in synergy with the
uncertainty quantification underpinnings via IPE) it has led to
significantly improved capability in
dealing with optimization problems in the oil/gas sector, validated by
many tests involving data
from real oil/gas fields. For example, both single and multi-objective
versions of the underpinning
algorithms have been tested on real field examples, including a Russian
field with 15 years of
history and 95 wells (http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/163580-MS
). These tests showed minimal 2 to 5-fold
speedup in efficiency over competing algorithms including BP's internal
highly efficient code.
Meanwhile refs [2,3,4] and others all show a combination of 2fold--5fold
speedup over previous
methods, usually in conjunction with obtaining both more and
better-quality solutions than previous
methods. In addition, the use of multiobjective approaches is new in the
oil industry (with benefits
in enabling users to visualise a range of salient trade-offs in potential
solutions, as well as
supporting efficient diverse search) and the underpinning work has led to
considerable internal
interest within BP, as well as helped Epistemy become the first to market
software to the oil/gas
sector that includes multiobjective approaches.
In detail, the research has led to two principal impacts in the
assessment period:
Impact: BP Plc.
BP implemented algorithms generated from this research in their internal
'TDRM' code base, and
some of their asset teams have applied the algorithms, leading to
reservoir management planning
decisions during 2013. In detail, the software implemented by BP (BOA,
MOBOA, see [2,3,4]) in
their internal TDRM code base were developed as part of the BP-led TSB
project at Heriot-Watt in
a joint activity between the IPE and HWCS. During 2013, BP has applied
this new code base to the
task of optimising locations of additional injection and production wells
in one of their North Sea
fields. The use of the multi-objective algorithms yielded an additional
three million barrels over the
optimised development plan produced by their engineer. This has translated
into a business
decision that has a positive $330M impact on BP's turnover. In this case,
our multi-objective
optimisation approach was of tremendous value as it allowed them to
optimise both short-term oil
(to recoup the cost of drilling the new wells), and long-term oil (to
maximise the profitability) of the
project. BP's comment on the project was "The collaboration between
Heriot-Watt and BP has
resulted in a step-forward in practical, multi-objective optimisation
capability for the industry".
Impact: Epistemy Ltd
Epistemy Ltd is an SME serving the oil/gas sector. Key algorithms from
the research described are
deployed in Epistemy Ltd.'s main software product, called `Raven', which
supports reservoir
engineers in history matching and reservoir development planning.
Specifically, Raven currently
includes versions of the Bayesian Optimization algorithm and its hybrids
with particle swarm
optimization (PSO), as well as multiobjective versions of each of these,
which were developed in
the BP-led TSB project (Epistemy were subcontracted to commercialise the
research). Relevant
sales in the period have been £230k, of which £107,000 is directly
attributable to the underpinning
research described above, and we know of at least one case where the
software has already been
deployed in history matching of real field data by engineers in one
company
(http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/164817-MS
). In addition, the underpinning research- via funding
procured on the basis of it, as well as its results, has been central to
Epistemy's maintenance of a
team of 3 software engineers, as well as a 6-month consultancy post and
four HWCS student
placements during the period.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Impact (i): Company is Epistemy, www.epistemy.com
, and software is sold through
www.useraven.com
Founder Director, Epistemy
Impact (i) Chief Technical Officer, London, JOGMEC (Japanese Oil and Gas
organization) is a
client of Epistemy, and can corroborate accounts of Raven's deployments in
Japan.
Impact (ii): BP, Reservoir Engineer