Embedding participatory research in museum practice
Submitting Institution
University of DurhamUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
History and Archaeology: Curatorial and Related Studies
Summary of the impact
DU researchers have delivered their innovative model of participatory
action research (PAR) with Tyne and Wear Archives and Museums Service
(TWAM, a major regional museum service in the North east, comprising seven
museums and galleries) to further social inclusion and deepen
participation from socially marginalised groups. Research findings have
led to: (1) enhanced income generation for TWAM, with bids citing DU
research bringing in more than £0.5m at a time of shrinking resource for
the museum sector; (2) the development of a major new museum gallery,
which opened in July 2013; and (3) changes to professional practice
consequent upon intensifying the practice of participatory working within
TWAM.
Underpinning research
DU research has been at the forefront of pioneering and developing
participatory approaches to geographical research since the 1990s. Our
work has spanned a variety of sub-fields, including social and cultural
geography. Pain (DU staff 2000-) has played a leading role in developing
participatory action research (PAR) in geography, making a series of
contributions which have delivered PAR into diverse areas of research
(Reference 1). In this ICS we report on one area of our PAR work, with
museums.
Our PAR work with museums is framed by a policy context in which, under
the influence of New Labour's Social Exclusion unit, the museum sector was
charged with becoming more socially inclusive. A national level review in
2009, funded by the Paul Hamlyn Foundation (PHF), worked to gauge the
effectiveness and nature of public engagement within the museum sector (`Whose
Cake is it Anyway?', 2011). The PHF report is part of a wider move
to develop participatory practice in museum services. Engagement had
occurred on the margins and fringes of museum services, typically via
`downstream' outreach activities. The report proposed that participation
should instead move `upstream', becoming central to core museum practice,
including curatorial practice. The Tyne & Wear Archives and Museums
Service (TWAM) comprised part of the PHF study. Within the museum sector,
TWAM has a longstanding reputation as a pioneer of social history from
below, focused particularly on white, working class identities. The policy
turn to social inclusion together with the drive to participation within
the museum sector saw TWAM commission research with DU's Centre for Social
Justice and Community Action (2009-2010), recognising Pain's expertise in
PAR (Reference 2) and involving Matthijsse (DU researcher 2006-2010). The
research sought to develop a whole-institution participatory approach to
its services. It involved staff, stakeholders and particularly
`hard-to-reach' audiences and non-visitors. Distinctive elements of DU's
PAR approach were incorporated into the research design. A focus on space
and scale enabled connections to be drawn between local, regional and
global identities and community concerns; our emphasis on the importance
of participatory ethics and the importance of the principles of
reciprocity, accountability and mutual benefit shaped the ways in which
key external groups were involved in the research; and the research drew
on the critical appraisal of visual techniques. The research was
conceptualised as a `contact zone' of inter-cultural encounter,
facilitating meaningful dialogue and interaction between different social
groups (Reference 3).
The research involved 262 visitors, 151 non-visitors, 18 external
experts, 11 funders and stakeholders, and 88 museum staff and volunteers.
TWAM staff were trained in PAR by the Durham researchers and conducted
peer research. In addition to the development and transfer of a
participatory methodology, key findings for museum practice were: (1)
feelings of emotional connection with the regional and local identities
articulated via the museum's galleries were important for visitors.
Traditional visitor groups felt strong connections with TWAM's
museums/galleries, which provided a space for intergenerational learning;
(2) in contrast, socially marginalised groups felt excluded from the
perspectives represented (largely white, working class and grounded in the
North east), and were less likely to visit these museums and galleries.
Local Black Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) community members, and
marginalised young people, identified a number of social, cultural and
physical barriers to access (Reference 2).
Subsequent to this research, TWAM commissioned a further piece of
research on participatory museum practices via a ESRC-funded PhD Case
studentship between DU and TWAM (Morse, DU PhD student 2010-), supervised
by Pain and Crang (DU 1994-) with co-supervisors Macpherson and Edwards
from TWAM. This research has involved a placement at TWAM as well as
contributions to an evaluation of the Heritage Lottery-funded `Stories
of the World' project and to the UK-wide Museum Ethnographers'
Group's `Engaging Curators' project.
References to the research
(Bold denotes DU researcher at time of research; citations and
journal impact factor are as of 31 July 2013)
1. Kindon S, Pain R, Kesby M (Eds.) (2007) Connecting People,
Participation and Place: Participatory Action Research Approaches and
Methods (London: Routledge). 176 Google Scholar citations.
3. Askins K, Pain R (2011) Contact zones: participation, materiality and the messiness of interaction.
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29, 803-821. ISI
journal impact factor 1.92; 26 Google Scholar citations.
Details of the impact
TWAM has a longstanding reputation in the museum sector for community
participation built up throughout the 1990s, and is now recognised
nationally as a beacon of best practice. It is described by Source 1 as:
"... unarguably one of the UK's most successful museums services. It has a
deservedly high reputation within the sector for innovation and audience
engagement. It has set particularly high standards for reaching a wide
local audience ...".
Independent testimony confirms TWAM's contribution to debates in the
museum sector around participation, stating that the PAR project with DU
(Reference 2) meant that
"TWAM was uniquely well placed to contribute to emerging discussions and
projects around public participation and co-production" (Source 2).
Senior TWAM staff have disseminated the research within the museum sector
nationally and internationally, through conference papers. Source 3
states:
"I very regularly refer to that Revisioning work as an important milestone
in our journey. And we talk about the concept in terms of developing other
services and facilities [ ...]. When you get a really good piece of
research — and I think it was a really good piece of research — lots and
lots of things spin out from it".
The DU-TWAM research collaboration has had direct impact on three areas
of activity within TWAM:
1: Income generation. The research reported in Reference 2 is
cited in successful bids which, at a time of shrinking resources for the
sector, have thus far brought in £552,300 from five grants (Source 4). The
successful bid documents make extensive use of the research findings and
the overall development of participatory practice in the museum. The
impact on funding activities within TWAM is made clear by Source 5:
"The Discovery Revisioning gave us a powerful document to invoke when
applying for investment ... It has generated evidence of gaps in the
service we provide and shown us things we didn't know... It is a powerful
approach and the findings have great authenticity" (Source 5).
Source 2 states that the Discovery Revisioning research "clearly became an
important element in the development of Discovery`s plans, the report
helping support and win funding for the new Destination Tyneside gallery".
2: The development of a new permanent gallery: Destination
Tyneside. `Destination Tyneside' opened on 12 July
2013. It documents recent immigration to the North east region. The
instigation, planning and design of this gallery were directly informed
both by the research findings and by the adoption of PAR within TWAM.
Source 6 states that Destination Tyneside was
"hugely influenced by the [...] Revisioning Project. Through its work with
local communities [we] found some of the gaps that we have in Discovery
Museum. One of the biggest being that a number of participants from
minority ethnic communities felt that their stories, histories and voices
were not represented within the museum and the staff felt that this was
having an impact on our visitor demographics".
Source 5 confirms that:
"The [DR process] helped [us] identify people from BAME groups who felt
that there was nothing in the Discovery Museum that was relevant [to
them]. It provided powerful evidence that was important for writing bids
and putting human voices — and voices of local communities — into it. And
so it helped us develop [new] content in the museum."
In the first week of its opening 1409 people visited the gallery. A joint
DU-Discovery Museum evaluation of the new gallery (12-31 July 2013), based
on 160 visitor questionnaires, showed that 65% of visitors surveyed said
that they had found the exhibition interesting and enjoyable, they had
learned something new, and increased their knowledge and/or deepened their
understanding of migrants and migration. The gallery promotes feelings of
inclusion and connection with museum content among BAME groups and
educates the local white community about the reality of migration on
Tyneside, challenging stereotypes by forging emotional connections.
Already, the gallery has attracted new BAME audiences: one-third of those
surveyed were visiting for the first time, with 85% coming explicitly to
see the new gallery, 50% of whom were non-White/British. BAME visitors
remark positively on their experience, saying:
"It has made me realise that migration is something that should be
celebrated" (Female, 30-49, White British Latino) and "It is nice to know
that I'm not alone. In fact having visited this gallery I feel I belong to
the international culture of Tyneside" (Male, 18-29, Arabian).
For TWAM's core visitor demographic, the gallery has increased knowledge
and understanding, and led to changes in attitudes towards migrants and
migration. Visitors comment:
"It educates people about the diversity of our region and challenges
stereotypes about migration" (Male, 30-49, White) and "It changed my views
of why people come to this country". Migrant storytellers whose stories
feature in the gallery said in interviews that their involvement in the
process of creating the gallery had been an overwhelmingly positive
experience, acting to recognise and cement their identities and to pass
understanding of these on to their children, grandchildren and the wider
public:
"Participating in the DT process made me realise that Poland is no longer
my home, this is my home. This is where I belong" (Anna, Polish
storyteller).
3: Changes in professional practice. The findings from the
Revisioning project led to changes in both curatorial and working
practices within TWAM. The research led to: (1) the implementation of a
number of recommendations on infrastructure (Reference 2) within Discovery
Museum, regarding customer care, visitor orientation, the building, events
and learning programmes; and (2) the adoption of PAR training and peer
research within the organisation which has enhanced the skills base and
capacity of TWAM staff. Staff members have built PAR into their day-to-day
practice for planning, research and decision-making within TWAM museums.
Interviews with the gallery curator, Museum director and manager show that
PAR was embedded in the curatorial process for Destination Tyneside:
"A number of staff who were involved with Revisioning were trained in
participatory techniques which then involved setting up for a day down in
the museum and speaking to visitors, asking them about the museum what
they wanted from it and about Newcastle and how they viewed it [...] We
used that technique when we were developing Destination Tyneside and
members of the project team went downstairs, spoke to visitors and asked
them what they knew about migration, the kind of things they'd like to
find out ..." (Source 6).
PAR skills and techniques have also influenced the way that staff work,
with the Discovery manager and Outreach Team using participatory methods
directly in ongoing research with visitors.
"Staff who were involved in the project got some real confidence building
in terms of going out and working with groups in different ways. And the
fact that it wasn't just Outreach and Communities staff but actually a
much broader range of staff. That's had some long term benefits" (Source
3).
The success of the Revisioning project in turn led TWAM to commission a
further piece of participatory research with the unit, via Morse's ESRC
CASE PhD studentship The project focuses on creating the institutional and
infrastructural conditions to support and sustain participatory ways of
working with socially marginalised communities. Alongside Morse and TWAM's
involvement in a range of national initiatives (such as the Heritage
Lottery Funded `Stories of the World' project), Source 2 states that the
collaborative studentship
"has brought to TWAM a space for critical reflection upon the practical
and institutional barriers to participatory work (as well as the
possibilities)".
A co-authored article written by Morse with Macpherson and Robinson has
appeared in a special issue of the practitioner-facing journal Museum
Management and Curatorship. It examines the challenges of fully
embedding engagement and co-production throughout TWAM and other museum
services and, as a co-produced output, exemplifies changes to professional
working practices within TWAM. The emphasis on upstream participation has
had further material change on TWAM's wider engagement with national
museum programmes, particularly through involvement in the Paul Hamlyn
Foundation-funded project `Our Museums — Communities and Museums as active
partners'. This three-year project began in February 2012 and involves
nine national museums (muhttp://ourmuseum.ning.com/). Source 2 confirms
that "Morse's work at TWAM helpfully fed through into these discussions
nationally (to which she frequently presented) and into the wider debates.
Thus the overall impact of the Durham University collaboration has been to
keep alive the idea that the craft of engagement is worth critically
reflecting upon, analysing and learning!".
Morse is a member of TWAM's Our Museums' steering group and her 2013
report `Museums and Community Engagement: Baseline Report on
Perceptions of Community Engagement in Tyne and Wear Archives and
Museums Staff' was the basis for TWAM's presentation at the Our
Museum Peer Review Event (24 April 2013) (Source 7).
Source 2 states the overall value of the DU-TWAM collaboration in the
context of the challenges facing the museum sector:
"A collaboration such as that between Rachel Pain and Nuala Morse at
Durham presents a model and paves the way for further fruitful
collaboration between museums and higher education, to the benefit of
both. More importantly, such a strong and creative collaboration is to the
benefit of the public, as we attempt to make these institutions more
useful and relevant to these challenging times".
Sources to corroborate the impact
Source 1: Deputy Director of the Museums Association, "No one is safe",
27/11/2012 http://www.museumsassociation.org/maurice-davies-blog/27112012-maurice-davies-no-one-is-
safe-newcastle-cuts-budgets [Independent Reporter]
Source 2: Testimony letter from Museum Writer, Researcher and Consultant,
19/8/2013. [Independent Reporter]
Source 3: Director of Tyne and Wear Archives and Museum Service.
Confirmed transcript of phone interview, 27/2/2013 [Participant and
Reporter]
Source 4: Bid documents which cite DU research: (a) (2011)
"Influx — The Making of Modern Newcastle", DCMS/Wolfson Museums &
Galleries Improvement Fund 2011-15, Round 1 2011-12. £250,000 awarded
January 2012; (b) (2011) "What's Your Story? Discovering Family History",
Heritage Lottery Fund. £45,000 awarded in June 2011 (71% of project cost).
November 2011 to Feb 2014; (c) (2011) "Home and Away — North East Sport
and the Olympics". Heritage Lottery Fund. £48,500 awarded August 2011 (72%
of project cost). Project ran June 2012 - Jan 2013; (d) (2012) "Our Museum
— communities and museums as active partners", Proposal to the Paul Hamlyn
Foundation. £150,000 awarded in February 2012, over three years; (e)
(2012) "My Tyneside: Stories of Belonging", Heritage Lottery Fund. £58,800
awarded July 2012 (90% of project cost).
Source 5: Principal Development and Trading Officer, Tyne and Wear
Archives and Museum Service. Transcript of face-to-face interview
15/2/2013. [Participant and Reporter]
Source 6: Project Manager Destination Tyneside Gallery, Discovery Museum,
Transcript of video interview 31/7/13 [Participant and Reporter] see
11'50"-12'24" and 14'24" - 15'07" for key quotes
Source 7: Transcript of presentation by Director of Tyne and Wear
Archives and Museum Service at `Our Museums' Peer Review Event, Cardiff.
24/4/2013. [Participant and Reporter]