Applications of inhibin A and inhibin B immunoassays and their impact in human medicine
Submitting Institution
Oxford Brookes UniversityUnit of Assessment
Biological SciencesSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Biological Sciences: Biochemistry and Cell Biology
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
Summary of the impact
Pioneering new immunoassays for inhibin A and B, developed by Professor
Nigel Groome at
Oxford Brookes University, have contributed to a significant improvement
in the accuracy of pre-
natal screening for Downs Syndrome. Use of inhibin A in the `Quad' and
`integrated' tests,
protected by international patents, is widespread in the US (c.3million
screened annually) and was
recommended by the NHS in 2010, leading to a significant increase in the
use of the assays
(c.120,000 annually) in the UK. They are also used in clinical diagnostic
and monitoring
applications for male and female infertility, abnormalities in sexual
development in children and
ovarian granulosa tumours. Commercialisation has led to royalty income to
Brookes from sales
which totalled approximately c.£5million in the period January 2008 to
December 2012, indicative
of the c.US$135million earned in worldwide sales in the same period.
Underpinning research
Building upon earlier commissioned work to develop antibodies to inhibin,
funding in 1994 from the
MRC (grant no. G9330239/1) enabled the development of monoclonal
antibodies, assay
development and validation which was carried out at by Nigel Groome in his
Brookes lab. At the
time, the only methods for measuring inhibin were bioassays which were
often inaccurate and
inconvenient to use and a radioimmunoassay from Monash University which
was unable to
distinguish bioactive inhibin A & B from the free alpha subunit. The
bioactive endocrine role of
inhibin is to inhibit production of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) by
the pituitary gland.
Groome's research enabled the development of a series of highly specific
and robust
immunoassays which enabled for the first time the specific measurement of
inhibin A and B in
human blood samples. It took several years before the assays could be
validated for use on
human serum and other fluids and the novelty of the inhibin immunoassays
from Brookes was to
define the biology of inhibin and then to search for clinical
applications. This involved overcoming a
number of scientific and technical challenges which a number of other labs
had failed to achieve.
In 1994 the new inhibin A assay was shown to be able to define the
pattern of inhibin A secretion in
the menstrual cycle for the first time ever [1]. In 1996, the inhibin B
assay was shown to be
applicable of defining the pattern of inhibin B secretion in the menstrual
cycle, again, for the first
time [2]. In 1996 it was shown for the first time in men a negative
correlation between a form of
inhibin (inhibin B) and serum FSH levels. This demonstrated for the first
time that inhibin B was the
bioactive relevant inhibin in male physiology [3]. Up to this point the
roles of inhibin A and B in men
and women and their patterns of secretion had been a mystery and it was
only the provision of the
Brookes assays which provided the catalytic tools to advance the field.
Groome was proactive in
finding clinical research collaborators in numerous countries, providing
assay materials, and
contributing to project design and interpretation leading to many
co-authored papers, and started
commercialisation of the assays in 1995 with kits put together at Brookes
and sold via Serotec.
The assays made a net profit every year since then. Further work funded by
the MRC (1997,
G9627479/1) and later by the EU (1998, BMH4989574) with the same or
related inhibin assays
developed the first immunoassays for activin A and B, which are dimers of
one of the inhibin
subunits.
Inhibin as a marker for Down's Syndrome screening:
Working in collaboration with Dr Euan Wallace at Edinburgh University, it
was discovered in 1994
that inhibin A is a very useful pre-natal screening marker for Down's
Syndrome (DS). This was
confirmed in many subsequent papers [4]. A patent application filed in
1994 was subsequently
granted in the US in 1999 and many other countries followed. This has been
the major commercial
clinical application of inhibin assay.
Inhibin in the male:
Following on from the initial inhibin B assay validation in the male [3],
it was subsequently shown
that there is often a very good correlation between sperm count and serum
inhibin B and therefore
inhibin B can be used as a surrogate marker for Sertoli cell function and
sperm count in population
studies of infertility in males [6]. Sperm cells are nurtured by the
Sertoli cells and inhibin B is an
indicator that the Sertoli cells are functioning correctly. If inhibin B
levels in a man are undetectable
then it is unlikely he is capable of sperm manufacture. Some men with
normal inhibin B and sperm
production may nevertheless have a blockage preventing sperm appearing in
ejaculate.
Inhibin in the female:
A long-recognised defining endocrinological feature of women approaching
menopause is an
increase in follicular phase serum FSH. Groome's work provided for the
first time a hormonal
explanation for this. The reason for the rise in FSH in early follicular
phase is that the lower inhibin
B levels in older women, associated with loss of ovarian reserve, releases
the pituitary from
negative inhibition [7].
References to the research
[1] Groome, NP; Illingworth, PJ; O'Brian, M et al, (1994)
Detection of Dimeric Inhibin throughout
the human menstrual cycle by 2-site enzyme immunoassay, Clinical
Endocrinology, Vol. 40
Issue 6, Pages: 717-723 (357 citations on WoS on 20/05/2013)
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb02504.x
[2] Groome NP, Illingworth PJ, O'Brien M et al (1996) Measurement
of dimeric inhibin B throughout
the human menstrual cycle, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &
Metabolism. Vol. 81 issue 4,
Pages 1401-5, (646 citations in WoS on 20/05/2013)
DOI: 10.1210/jc.81.4.1401
Submitted to RAE2001, Oxford Brookes University, UoA14-Biological
Sciences, RA2, NP Groome,
Output 1.
[3] Illingworth, PJ; Groome, NP; Byrd, W; et al., (1996),
Inhibin-B: A likely candidate for the
physiologically important form of inhibin in men, Journal of
Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism,
Vol. 81, Issue 4, Pages: 1321-1325 (257 citations on WoS on 20/05/2013)
DOI:10.1210/jc.81.4.1321
[4] Aitken, D; Wallace, E; Crossley, J; Swanston, I; Van Pareren, Y; Van
Maarle, M; Groome, NP;
Macri, J; Connor, JM, (1996), Dimeric Inhibin A as a marker for Down's
Syndrome in early
pregnancy, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 334, no.19, (87
citations in WoS on
20/05/2013)
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199605093341904
[5] Groome, NP and Wallace, E (1999), Method of genetic
testing: US patent number 5952182 N
(with other patents worldwide) Patent for Downs screening.
[6] Anawalt, BD; Bebb, RA; Matsumato, AM; Groome, NP;
Illingworth, PJ; McNeilly, AS; Bremner,
WJ (1996) Serum inhibin B levels reflect Sertoli cell function in
normal men and in men with
testicular dysfunction. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &
Metabolism, Vol. 81, issue 9, pages:
3341-3345 (260 citations on WoS on 20/05/2013)
DOI: 10.1210/jc.81.9.3341
[7] Klein, NA; Illingworth, PJ; Groome, NP; et al.,
(1996) Decreased inhibin B secretion is
associated with the monotropic FSH rise in older, ovulatory women: A
study of serum and
follicular fluid levels of dimeric inhibin A and B in spontaneous
menstrual cycles, Journal of
Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol. 81, Issue 7, Pages:
2742-2745, (266 citations in WoS
on 20/05/2013)
DOI:10.1210/jc.81.7.2742
Details of the impact
It is through the development of novel immunoassay tools and a very
collaborative style of working
that Brookes has made its contribution to the inhibin field. Irrespective
of the database searched,
Groome will be found to be the most published and most cited author in the
inhibin field. Initially
antibodies and assays were not available from elsewhere and had a
catalytic effect on the whole
inhibin field. The patent obtained on the application of inhibin A to DS
screening [5] enabled
effective commercialisation as a clinical diagnostic tool.
Commercialisation was launched in 1998
through an Brookes/Serotec spin-out venture (Oxford Bio-Innovation Ltd),
and licenses passed on
by acquisitions first to Diagnostic System Laboratories (Houston) and then
to Beckman Coulter Inc.
Licences for the DS patent and worldwide sales of the Brookes antibodies
have been exclusive to
Beckman Coulter since 2005. Royalty income generated for Brookes by the
sales and licences has
increased steadily each year since 2000 [a]. The assays remained unique in
the marketplace until
2010.
Impacts on Commerce:
Gross royalty income to Brookes from sales of the inhibin assays amounted
to £4,937,278 in the
period January 2008 to December 2012. For the same period, worldwide sales
reported by
Beckman Coulter totalled US$134,980,885. In 2012 the antibodies were sold
in 61 countries.
Brookes has reinvested some of the income into providing studentships and
lab equipment to train
the next generation of researchers [a]. At least 15 students gained
doctorates in Groome's
laboratory many in areas related to inhibin. The bulk of the income
(around 98%) derives from
sales related to Down's Syndrome screening, but some is from other
clinical applications as
described below.
Impacts on Health and well-being: adoption of a new diagnostic
technology;
Down's Syndrome Screening:
This has become the prime clinical application of the inhibin
immunoassays. The assay was
incorporated onto Beckman Coulter's automated high throughput clinical
assay platform and the
patent protected the sales for this application. The assay is either used
in the second trimester with
three other markers as the `Quad' test or in combination with first
trimester markers as the
`integrated' test.
The greatest use of the inhibin A assay for DS screening has been in the
USA. The 2012 College
of American Pathologists (CAP) report [b], shows that most respondent
clinics use the second
trimester Quad test with a significant number using the full integrated
test. The total usage of the
quad or integrated test in 2011 in the USA was over 3 million women
screened.
In the USA, it can easily be deduced that the inclusion of inhibin A in
the screening for DS has
contributed to a significant cost-saving for healthcare. This is through
the increased detection rates
of the screening kits over the earlier `triple' test. Modelled predicted
detection rates and false-
positive rates show that for a 1:270 cut-off, the use of inhibin A in the
Quad test has provided a 5%
increase in the detection rate while simultaneously reducing the
false-positive rate by 0.8% [c].
This improvement over the triple test was confirmed in prospective studies
in the USA [c].
Importantly, for affected pregnancies, the average risk is higher when
Inhibin A is incorporated
while for unaffected pregnancies the risk is lower [c], i.e. the Quad test
provided a stronger
indication that invasive testing was indicated for affected pregnancies
while providing greater
reassurance in unaffected cases. When an average DS birth rate of 1 in 700
is assumed, then with
no screening programs in the US with 4 million live births a year there
would be over 5,700 DS
births a year. It can be estimated that lifetime care costs of a DS child
would be circa $900,000 per
child. The 5% gain in detection as result of adding inhibin-A therefore
translates into a potential
saving of over $250 million per year. Given the current trend for women to
choose to have children
later (where there is a high correlation between increasing maternal age
and increased instances
of DS), this will only become a greater saving. There are also health
implications because the
amniocentesis procedure carries a 0.5-0.8% chance of provoking a
miscarriage; the greater
accuracy of the screening means that fewer women have to take that risk
[c].
In the UK, the Quad test became the recommended standard of care for
second trimester
screening in 2010 and is now offered by all but 3 of over 160 NHS trusts.
In the period April 2011
to September 2011, Quad and integrated testing increased and accounted for
72.8% of all second
trimester tests compared with a previous cycle rate of 49.7%. This
represents an estimated
119,360 annual screening rate using the inhibin A test, out of an annual
545,445 total pregnancies
screened [d].
Female infertility investigations:
Inhibin A & B assays are important tools in clinics for a full
infertility diagnostic workup in women of
all ages, due to the importance of Inhibin A&B in the menstrual cycle
and ovarian reserve, as
described in section 2 [e-g].
Male infertility investigations and environmental monitoring:
Inhibin B assays are used in clinical investigations into male infertility
and inhibin B is the only
circulating biomarker correlating significantly with sperm count. It has
been used to monitor males
who are exposed to potentially harmful environments through their
occupations [f,g] and to monitor
gonadal toxicity after chemotherapy for testicular cancer.
Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumour monitoring:
Inhibin A & B gives an early indicator of tumour reoccurrence (up to 1
year ahead of symptoms
occurring), meaning that treatment can commence earlier leading to a
better prognosis for the
patient, and potentially saving on treatment costs [h].
Inhibin antibodies in immunopathology:
The R1 monoclonal antibody to the alpha subunit used in the inhibin A and
B assays was found in
many research studies also to be a useful tool in routine immunopathology
to diagnose metastatic
or recurrent ovarian and/or adrenal tumours. It is sold by Serotec and
Dako [i] for immune-staining
of pathology sections. It can help identify ovarian origin for certain
metastatic tumours and is used
to classify and diagnose adrenal and ovarian cancers. It is used routinely
and widely around the
world for this purpose.
Applications in diagnosing abnormal sexual development in children:
As the research shown above indicates, inhibin is integral to the
physiological reproductive
physiological processes, and in the same way that measured levels can be
used as markers for
underlying problems in adult males and females, they can also be used in
diagnostic work-ups
concerning abnormal sexual development in children [e-g].
Sources to corroborate the impact
[a] Information available from Brookes showing the income from royalties
on Inhibin A & B, 2008-
2013.
[b] College of American Pathologists 2012 FP-A Survey. Copy available on
request from Brookes'
Research and Business Development Office.
[c] Corroborative statement author 1. Statement from Professor of
Genetics and Developmental
Biology and Director of Diagnostic Human Genetics Laboratories, University
of Connecticut
Health Center on pre-natal screening for Downs in America (including
references to studies
demonstrating the figures given). Copy available on request from Brookes'
Research and
Business Development Office.
[d] UK Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme report 2011-12;
http://fetalanomaly.screening.nhs.uk/getdata.php?id=11702
[e] Beckman flyer on inhibin A in fertility workups;
https://www.beckmancoulter.com/wsrportal/bibliography?docname=DS14763A%20Access%20Inhibin%20A%20US%20DATA%20Sheet.pdf
[f] Arup Labs clinical information sheet on inhibin B;
http://www.aruplab.com/Testing-Information/resources/TechnicalBulletins/Inhibin%20B.pdf
[g] DSL Laboratories (former licence-holders before purchase by Beckmann)
information sheet on
inhibin B; http://snhs-plin.barry.edu/Research/InhibinBPoster.pdf
[h] Mayo Clinics' description of diagnostic uses of inhibin B in
granulosa cell tumour monitoring;
http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/test-catalog/Clinical+and+Interpretive/88722
[i] Dako product description;
http://www.dako.com/uk/ar38/p118850/prod_products.htm?setCountry=true&purl=ar38/p118850/prod_products.htm