The management of landslides and rockfalls
Submitting Institution
University of DurhamUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Earth Sciences: Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
Engineering: Civil Engineering, Resources Engineering and Extractive Metallurgy
Summary of the impact
A long-term research programme into landslides and rockfalls by DU
researchers, focused on the use of novel field and laboratory techniques,
has had impact on UK and foreign government authorities, NGOs, and
businesses. The work has provided frameworks for managing hazard
associated with deep-seated landslides in New Zealand and a
landslide-dammed lake in northern Pakistan. Research on coastal cliff
erosion in North Yorkshire has provided critical support for high-value
mining activities at the UK's largest non-hydrocarbon extractive mine, and
has underpinned local government strategies for shoreline hazard
assessment and management.
Underpinning research
The ability to forecast landslides and rock avalanches is the biggest
challenge in slope stability research. DU Geography researchers Petley (DU
staff 2000-), Rosser (PDRA 2002-7, RCUK Fellow 2007-12, Lecturer 2012-),
Dunning (PDRA 2004-8), Lim (PhD 2002-6, PDRA 2007-10), Carey (PhD
2003-2011), Higuchi (PDRA 2000-2005) and Massey (PhD 2003-2010), have
addressed this problem from two complementary perspectives, showing that
different types of landslide have quantifiably different patterns of
acceleration before failure (References 1 & 2), and thus that
monitoring very small-scale precursory movements offers the prospect of
forecasting a landslide or rock avalanche. The novelty of our approach is
in the development of pioneering laboratory and field-based techniques to
assess hazards associated with rock slopes, soil slopes, and unstable
natural dams (References 3-6).
Laboratory testing: DU research has led to the development
of new laboratory equipment that is capable of simulating conditions
within landslides more realistically than has previously been possible.
This equipment has permitted investigation of how geology and failure
mechanism influence landslide behaviour immediately before slope collapse
(Reference 1). Laboratory work has focused on defining how such
pre-failure behaviour is controlled by groundwater pressure and the
progressive loss of material strength through time (Reference 2).
Constraining this behaviour is important because it allows us to establish
the ways in which hillslope material deforms immediately before a
landslide occurs, and thus provides testable predictions about the kinds
of precursory movements that could be observed in the field. This research
was enabled by collaboration with GDS Instruments Ltd, a UK-based SME, who
designed and built new back-pressured direct shear cells to our
specification. Uniquely, these laboratory cells allow real-world
groundwater pressure and shear strain conditions to be controlled. The
cells enabled us to establish the micromechanical controls on first-time
landslide failure and to forecast the conditions under which landslides
behave as either catastrophic/brittle (high risk) or slow/ductile (low
risk), based upon material stress-strain behaviour alone.
Novel field-based monitoring and modelling: Motivated by
the movement patterns predicted by laboratory simulations (References 1
& 2), a second area of DU research has focused on the ability to
predict landslides and rockfalls based on the capture, interpretation and
forecasting of small-scale pre-collapse movements and the evolution of
failed material. This work has followed three separate strands related to
reactivated (deep-seated) landslides, rock avalanche deposits, and
rockfalls:
(1) Detailed analysis of a reactivated landslide in New Zealand led to a
framework for using monitoring data — in this case, surface displacements
derived from continuous GPS measurements — to identify the mechanisms
responsible for landslide movement, and showed a complex link between
rainfall and landslide movement (Reference 3).
(2) A second strand of work has investigated the sedimentology and
evolution of large rock-avalanche deposits. Such deposits often dam rivers
in mountain valleys, creating lakes that can unleash catastrophic floods
if the dam fails. By modelling seepage and pore water pressure, we have
shown that the stability of such dams is sensitive to the grain size and
structure of the material, and that failure may occur within days to weeks
of lake filling (Reference 4).
(3) We developed a now widely-used protocol to extract detailed 3D models
of rockfalls using repeat terrestrial laser scanning, and have used this
approach to identify characteristic patterns of pre-collapse movement in
coastal cliffs and other settings. This work has enabled unprecedented
resolution in monitoring rock cliff erosion rates, allowing quantitative
rockfall risk assessment and providing the first insights into the
mechanics that control rockfall timing (References 5 & 6).
References to the research
(Bold denotes Durham University staff at time of research, underline
denotes DU research student. Journal impact factors and citations are from
Web of Science as of 31/7/2013.)
4. Dunning SA, Armitage PJ (2011) The
grain-size distribution of rock-avalanche deposits: implications for
natural dam stability. In: Evans SG, Hermanns RL, Strom AL, Mugnozza
S. (Eds.), NATO Science Series: IV Earth and Environmental Sciences —
Natural and Artificial Rockslide Dams (NATO Advanced Research Workshop,
Bishkek 2005); Springer, Dordrecht, Chapter 8. (2 citations). NB this work
was carried out in 2005-2006, but delays in publication mean that the
paper was published after Dunning left DU.
Details of the impact
The impact of DU research into landslides and rockfalls has been achieved
via two distinct pathways. In the first, laboratory-derived understanding
of landslide behaviour has led to better quantitative interpretation of
field data and to the design and installation of landslide early-warning
systems in New Zealand, while in the second, our monitoring techniques
have allowed ongoing and near-real time management of landslides and
landslide-prone areas.
1. From laboratory to forecasting: landslide management and early
warning
Our laboratory research on landslide behaviour has improved early warning
systems by providing a better understanding of failure mechanisms. The
bespoke instrumentation developed in collaboration with GDS Instruments
Ltd was used to provide the first proper behavioural forecasting of large
landslides and is now sold commercially by GDS, who state that the
instruments were "developed in conjunction with the University of Durham"
(Source 1).
A key example of the direct application of landslide behaviour research
for early warning is our collaboration with GNS Science, the New Zealand
government hazards research agency. DU research on landslide failure
mechanisms in the laboratory (Reference 2) and observations of the
patterns of precursory motion on the ground (Reference 3) allow GNS
Science to interpret landslide surface movement data in terms of the
material stress-strain behaviour, enabling a quantitative and
process-based assessment of risk (Source 2). As a direct impact of this
research, GNS Science has installed movement and early warning systems in
large landslides at Taihape (in operation from 2007-2011) and Utiku
(2007-present) on New Zealand's North Island. These landslides were chosen
as exemplars of more than 7,000 similar landslides with areas of
>10,000 m2 that occur in Neogene rocks across New Zealand
(Source 2). The landslide at Taihape underlies much of the town, while
that at Utiku underlies State Highway 1 and the North Island Main Trunk
railway line, which links New Zealand's capital (Wellington) with its
largest city (Auckland) and is the central target of a NZ$4.2bn
`turnaround plan' (2010-2020). Source 2 states that "GNS Science used the
techniques and approach articulated in two papers authored by Professor
Petley [References 1-2] as the basis for the methodology used to develop
the monitoring networks installed on the Taihape and Utiku landslides...
GNS Science researchers used the approaches described in these papers and
others to analyse the monitoring data to parameterise the relationships
between surface and sub-surface landslide movement patterns and the
factors that trigger movement." This monitoring has allowed GNS Science to
establish more realistic alerting thresholds than were hitherto possible,
and to make quantitative landslide behaviour forecasts for landslide risk
management. As stated by Source 2, "in the case of the Taihape landslide,
the analysis allowed a recognition that a very large-scale and rapid
failure event is unlikely, which secured the future of this part of the
town. At Utiku, the monitoring data is currently being used by KiwiRail as
the basis for an alert system, to warn when the section of track that
crosses the landslide may be prone to deformation".
2. From field-based monitoring to hazard management
DU innovations in field-based monitoring and modelling allow better
assessment of unstable slopes that pose risks to human life and
infrastructure. We illustrate this direct impact with two examples. In our
first example, Focus Humanitarian Assistance (FHA), a NGO in Pakistan,
commissioned DU to collaborate on the management of the January 2010
Attabad landslide in the Karakorum Mountains of northern Pakistan, along
with the World Bank. This collaboration was based upon prior DU research
(Reference 4), as stated by Source 3: "we were aware of the work that
Professor Petley had undertaken with his researcher Stuart Dunning on the
stability of rockslide dams and on the dynamics of rockslope failure". The
landslide created a 180 m high dam which blocked the Hunza River in a
particularly narrow section of its valley, creating a lake which filled
gradually at first due to low river flows but grew to 21 km long by June.
Based on modelling of the deterioration of similar landslide dams
(Reference 4), notably the short times (days to weeks) between lake
overtopping and catastrophic breaching of the dam, DU staff proposed an
upgraded monitoring system, along with early warning systems and
evacuation plans that were implemented by 17 downstream communities, an
area encompassing the homes of c. 25,000 people. Potential
scenarios and associated risks posed by the breach of the dam and
subsequent downstream flooding were used by DU staff to establish a series
of alert states linked to lake levels and flow over the dam. This alert
system "was endorsed by the World Bank [Source 4, p. 2 and Annex 3] and
was adopted by the government in their response to the crisis" (Source 3).
FHA and the National Disaster Management Agency, Government of Pakistan,
successfully used the early warning system to predict the time at which
the dam began to overtop, and evacuated 15,000 people with no loss of life
(Source 3). Monitoring continued until the dam breach risk was reduced
when the spillway was re-engineered in 2012. As stated by a senior
administrator at FHA (Source 3), "the research of Professor Petley and his
colleagues underpinned the response to the Attabad crisis, and Professor
Petley's expertise was used directly to both plan the response and to
safeguard the local population."
In our second example, rock slope monitoring techniques pioneered by DU
research (References 5 and 6) are a primary management tool used by a
range of UK commercial and governmental bodies. These include Cleveland
Potash Ltd (CPL), owner of the UK's largest non-hydrocarbon extractive
mine. CPL produces around 50% of the UK's potash, an organic agricultural
fertilizer, and is one of only three UK suppliers of rock salt for
de-icing roads. CPL employs more than 1,000 people and is the largest
single employer in the North York Moors National Park, contributing £26
million to the local economy annually (see www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tees-22152699).
The background to the impact was summarised in 2006 by the British
Geological Survey for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (www.mauk.org.uk/sites/default/files/public_files/mpfpotash.pdf
), noting that "The proximity of underground workings to the sensitive
coastline of the National Park has become an issue. This is because of
concern amongst some parties that minor subsidence at the surface
associated with extraction might exacerbate rates of coastal erosion...
Cleveland Potash has entered into a collaborative research and development
project with the University of Durham to gain a better understanding of
the natural and anthropogenic influences on the coast."
Within the REF2014 period, CPL has used our longitudinal research on
coastal cliff processes to underpin all environmental impact assessments
associated with proposed future mine developments. Since 2008 DU research
on cliff retreat rates modelled from intensive 3D monitoring has been a
fundamental component of impact-mitigation measures associated with
successive planning proposals (note that the associated scale and value of
these proposals is commercially confidential). The permission to extract
granted on the basis of these planning proposals is critical for
converting mineral reserves to resources and sustaining the medium-term
viability of the mine. As the general manager of CPL notes in relation to
a large recent proposal by CPL: "The value of this work to CPL is
demonstrated in our recent successful planning application for mineral
extraction in the 1.5 km `coastal corridor'. The research and findings
generated by the Durham research formed the basis of the environmental
impact assessment that was fundamental in securing this lucrative proposal
by providing the best possible dataset on coastal processes and the likely
impacts of mining. This dataset was vital in securing this permission,
allows us to answer any questions that arise on the impacts of our
activities, and demonstrates CPL's commitment as a responsible mining
operator. The extraction of this considerable high-grade deposit will form
a key part of our ongoing development over the coming decade" (Source 5).
The impact of our work with CPL has cascaded into a series of
complementary local projects funded by members of the Northeast Coastal
Authorities Group (NECAG), a coalition of all local authorities in
northeast England and southeast Scotland, the Environment Agency (EA), and
Natural England. Our detailed monitoring work before the REF2014 period
redefined the Shoreline Management Plan that covers this 150 km stretch of
the UK coast by updating the baseline erosion rates used in prediction
calculations, forcing predicted future shoreline positions to be redrawn
and enabling continued domestic property insurance for the coastal village
of Staithes. This plan (Shoreline Management Plan 2: River Tyne and
Flamborough Head 2007, http://www.northeastsmp2.org.uk),
which was enacted in 2007 but remains in force to present, stipulated that
"the rates of erosion of the cliff [at Staithes] remain uncertain" and
mandated continued long-term monitoring and intervention for effective
management, recommending continued support for DU surveys (p. 398). As a
result of this policy, in 2011 Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (RCBC)
developed an EA-funded active management strategy, using a real-time
monitoring network installed and maintained by DU that provides a rockfall
alert system for the Cowbar area of Staithes. This proactive approach is
based upon 3D monitoring of rockslope failure to provide forewarning of
potential impacts on the cliffs and infrastructure above, allowing
adaptive management of coastal erosion at this site (Source 6). NECAG
affirm that "RCBC commissioned Durham to develop an ongoing, proactive
management strategy for Cowbar based upon high-resolution monitoring. This
includes the installation of a system in September 2011 and regular visits
to site to collect 3D data of the cliff face, which continue to the
present. Uniquely, the data generated by this research has enabled us to
identify specific locations of increasing erosion, to better determine the
long-term rate and the underlying causes of erosion at Cowbar; to my
knowledge this is now perhaps the most intensively monitored section of
coast in the UK, if not beyond. Regular data capture allows us to keep
tabs on activity at Cowbar and to respond as and when appropriate, which
would otherwise be impossible to achieve." (Source 6).
Sources to corroborate the impact
Source 1: See http://www.gdsinstruments.com/gds-products/gds-shearbase-system;
http://www.gdsinstruments.com/__assets__/products/000031/GDSSS_Datasheet.pdf;
http://www.gdsinstruments.com/gds-products/dynamic-back-pressure-shearbox
Source 2: Testimony letter dated 6/8/13 from Acting CEO and Director of
Natural Hazards Division, GNS Science
Source 3: Testimony letter dated 6/8/13 from CEO of Focus Humanitarian
Assistance Pakistan
Source 4: Palmieri A (2010) Attabad landslide dam — risk management
suggestions. World Bank:
http://www.ndma.gov.pk/Documents/Hunza_Landslide_Report/Report%20by%20Mr.%20Allessandro%20%20Palmeiri,%20Lead%20Dam%20Specialist%20of%20World%20Bank%20on%20Hunza%20Land
slide.pdf
Source 5: Testimony letter dated 7/8/13 from Managing Director, Cleveland
Potash Limited
Source 6: Testimony letter dated 3/6/13 from Coastal Engineer, Redcar and
Cleveland Borough Council (and member of Northeast Coastal Authorities
Group