Sharing expertise: community archaeology and training in north-east England
Submitting Institution
University of DurhamUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Built Environment and Design: Architecture
History and Archaeology: Archaeology
Summary of the impact
Archaeological enquiry in north-east England has been a strategic
objective at the heart of our research vision for six decades. Responding
to the erosion of the industrial identity of the region, academic staff
working alongside our commercial unit Archaeological Services (ASDU) are
enhancing community archaeology skills and projecting heritage as a core
element of local identity. At our Binchester Field School we distill
academic and commercial knowledge and best practice in a high-profile
participatory research project that has generated spin-off bespoke
practical workshops and structured programmes of co-enquiry, thereby
empowering local communities to access their regional past.
Underpinning research
Since 1993 we have integrated the expertise of our commercial unit
Archaeological Services into a wide programme of research-driven field
excavation throughout the world (eg. Nepal, Ukraine, Egypt). In north-east
England, this has led to an unparalleled knowledge of our regional
archaeology. Major research themes have been addressed, including the Iron
Age to Roman and Roman to Medieval transitions (eg. excavations at
Stanwick, Melsonby, Rock Castle and Ingram: Ref 1-Haselgrove;
Wearmouth-Jarrow: Cramp), resulting in specialist knowledge of
methodologies specific to regional challenges, for example the value of
integrated, state-of-the-art techniques on multi-period sites (eg.
Traprain Law: Haselgrove, Hale and ASDU), and the use of
large-scale geophysical survey on Roman sites and their hinterlands
(Whitley Castle: Ref 2-Hale).
We have also set a modern agenda for community engagement, debating what
kind of experiences of heritage the public want and deserve. The arrival
of Skeates in 2000 created fresh input in terms of our
participatory work: his book Debating Archaeological Heritage
instigated debate about, and change in, our own community participation
and delivery (Ref 3-Skeates). Through publication, we have realised
the benefits of collaborative ventures in the completion of major
multi-period projects founded on the premise of participatory work with
local groups (eg. Ref 4-Gerrard-Shapwick, described by reviewers as
`a great example of public archaeology' and `a model for others to follow
in their own communities' http://www.amazon.co.uk/Interpreting-English-Village-Landscape-Community/dp/1905119453).
In combination this expertise has positioned Durham Archaeology as the
lead in a distinctive, regional programme of collaborative and
participatory research. In 2002-6 we co-produced the North East Regional
Research Framework for archaeology with Durham County Council (Gerrard
and Petts— Shared Visions —http://www.durham.gov.uk/pages/Service.aspx?ServiceId=6666).This
English
Heritage-funded venture, drew on on 73 projects and publications by Durham
staff and students. It established the future intellectual and practical
framework for all sectors of the discipline, including curators,
contractors and community groups and specifically responded to Durham
research in calling for:
- survey and excavation, on forts and associated civil settlements (p.
144);
- the prioritisation of research on the Iron Age to Roman transition
(p. 146-7);
- long-term, large-scale projects capable of discerning continuities
and discontinuities in the shaping of early medieval/medieval settlement
patterns (p. 157);
- a programme of participatory community projects addressing key
research questions (pp. 229-36).
We responded by developing the Binchester International Field School
(2008-) in partnership with the Archaeological and Architectural
Society of Durham and Northumberland (AADNS) and Stanford
University. This draws materially on Durham research to meet regional
needs, using our expertise in regionally-specific field methodologies (eg.
Ref 2), to answer the big questions defined by our research on the Iron
Age-Roman-Medieval transitions (eg. Ref 1) in a participatory framework
shaped by our state-of-the-art understanding of successful pathways for
community engagement (Ref 3 & 4). With the expertise of ASDU at its
heart and closely involved from the outset, Binchester fully integrates
the public in an ideal `laboratory' that is exploring the chronologies and
integration of civilian and military archaeology at a major fort and its
civil settlement (Ref 5-Petts). Providing enhanced opportunities
for public participation and training, including spin-off partnerships
with local groups, Binchester is significantly widening and deepening
public engagement, empowering local communities to access and benefit from
their regional heritage.
Key researchers at Durham: Haselgrove, Lecturer-Professor,
1977-2005; Hale, Senior Geophysisist, Archaeological Services,
2000-13; Skeates, Lecturer then Reader, 2000-present; Gerrard,
Lecturer-Professor, 2000-present; Petts, Lecturer, 2007-present.
References to the research
[Ref 1] Haselgrove, C. 1999. Iron Age Societies in Central
Britain: retrospect and prospect. In B. Bevan (ed.). Northern
Exposure: interpretative devolution and the Iron Ages in Britain,
253-278. Leicester Archaeology Monograph, 4. University of Leicester:
Leicester. http://dro.dur.ac.uk/8253/
• `Dr Haselgrove observes, in assessing the 14 other papers in Northern
Exposure, that, north of the Midlands, Iron Age Britain has long been
dismissed as a backwater. The core of this refreshing book comprises
critical reviews of districts and regions, opening new approaches to
evidence for social organization and symbolism as well as more traditional
topics such as trade.' James, N. 2000. Among the New Books. Antiquity
74 (283): 224.
[Ref 2] Hale, D. 2009. Whitley Castle, Tynedale,
Northumberland: Geophysical Surveys. Unpublished Archaeological
Report 2149. Archaeological Services. Durham University. Hard copy housed
at Durham University, Dept. of Archaeology.
• The survey is core to the publication of the full project by D. Went
and S. Ainsworth as an English Heritage research report (2009. Whitley
Castle, Tynedale, Northumberland. An Archaeological Investigation of the
Roman Fort and its Setting. English Heritage Research Department
Report Series no. 89). The extensive geophysical survey features as Figs
44-47 (pp. 121-4) and the acknowledgments thank and congratulate `Duncan
Hale and the team from Durham University...for the quality of the
geophysical surveys cited in this report.'
http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/089-2009WEB.pdf
[Ref 3] Skeates, R. 2000. Debating the Archaeological
Heritage. London: Duckworth. Hard copy housed at Durham University,
Dept. of Archaeology.
• `A masterful summary of complex topics in an accessible format; highly
recommended.' Review in CHOICE 39.3 (2000): 555.
• `The most striking aspect of the book ... is the critical assessment he
offers, with much plain speaking, of attitudes adopted by archaeologists
towards heritage. Herein lies the book's main value, not least because its
strictures are international.' Gathercole, P. 2001. Values, knowledge and
ownership. Antiquity 75: 443-4.
[Ref 4] Gerrard, C. 2012. Interpreting the English Village:
Landscape and Community at Shapwick, Somerset. Oxford: Windgather
Press. Hard copy housed at Durham University, Dept. of Archaeology.
• Returned for RAE 2014.
• REF return 2014.
• Anonymous peer review comments to European Journal of Archaeology
in 2012: `The paper represents an impressive piece of research... its
subject-matter is of regional and national importance. There is also an
international dimension, because the transition from Roman provincial
government to royal polities is poorly understood, particularly from the
point of view of settlement patterns.'
Grants
Petts, D. 2011-13. (PI). North-Eastern Heritage Partnership. AHRC
£9326.
Details of the impact
In 2007 we appointed David Petts as a Lecturer in North East Archaeology
and Director of Research for ASDU. With a remit to respond to Shared
Visions he developed a programme of co-productive, participatory
research in the region which united academic, commercial and public
interests. Recognised as a distinctive initiative by a Beacon North-East
Fellowship award for community engagement (2012), Petts successfully
reconnected local communities with their regional archaeology by cascading
skills training to the public in three particular ways that draw
materially on our research.
(i) Co-production with the Archaeological and Architectural
Society of Durham and Northumberland (AASDN) at Binchester Field School
(2008-13) responds directly to the research priorities identified in Shared
Visions and draws upon the participatory ethos advanced in our
research (Ref 3) to open up an internationally important research
excavation to over 600 regional volunteers. Public participants range in
age from 16 to 60+, among them AASDN members, local schools, youth
projects and the `Know Your Hadrian's Wall' heritage initiative (Sources 1
& 2). An English Heritage capacity-building grant, secured with AASDN,
has facilitated widening participation in training and development
opportunities at the Field School (2010, £21,382: So1). Participants
testify to acquiring new archaeological skills, allowing full engagement
in all aspects of on-site investigation (eg. So3, Qu. 2: survey,
recording, excavation); and they acknowledge improved well-being through
opportunities for team-work, companionship and collaboration in an
enterprise in which diversity and socio-economic inequalities are
recognized (eg. So3, Qu. 4: working alongside like-minded people, the
sharing of knowledge informally between staff and volunteers,
opportunities to meet people and learn about other volunteer
opportunities). An on-site blog runs concurrent with the project and
allows volunteers and the wider public to follow daily progress. By
helping people stay in touch, public involvement is broadened and
deepened, with 82,762 hits during 2008-13 (So4). The partnership is
`exceptionally valued' by AASDN and `important to the health and success
of the society', a claim realised in the doubling of the society's
membership since 2008-11 (159 new members). English Heritage recognise the
initiative as having `a long lasting and beneficial impact', `transforming
many local people from simple "consumers" of expert historical and
archaeological knowledge into active participants in the production of
their own history and archaeology' (So1).
(ii) We have also developed a distinctive suite of training
opportunities. The North-East Heritage Partnership (NEHP 2012-13),
led by Petts and funded by the AHRC, has delivered a programme of skills
and research training, widening and enhancing community knowledge and
experience (So5). Eight hands-on events have provided tuition in research
techniques eg. historic landscapes, buildings and human and animal
remains. In parallel, `master classes' have been delivered as spin-offs
from Binchester, including sessions on geophysical prospection (Hale) and
environmental and finds processing (ASDU). These make direct use of our
research expertise, for example, large-scale geophysics at Whitley (Ref
2); Shapwick as a multi-period, village-based research project (Ref 4);
our investigation of the Roman/early medieval transition (Ref 5); and we
have deepened and enriched volunteer experience by making our equipment,
facilities, expertise and research knowledge freely available. 50
individuals from 10 community groups have attended, acquiring new skills
and knowledge (So6 and 7: techniques for standing building recording, use
of historical archives, geophysics and post-excavation techniques).
Informal systems of third-party training also disseminate expertise beyond
the attendees; elected members of local groups participated in the
training workshops and then shared knowledge and practice with members of
their heritage group (So6). NEHP training was also enhanced by free online
training guides (www.ne-heritage.org.uk).
(iii) The participatory frameworks of Binchester and the
NEHP initiative have stimulated an increased number of co-productive
partnerships with local societies. These take our research expertise out
to the community to provide bespoke training direct to on-going projects
that are already in process (eg. delivery of training in combined
geophysical prospection techniques; excavation and grant application
writing at West Hagg, Swaledale). This draws significantly and materially
on our research expertise (eg. Haselgrove (Ref 1): prehistoric-Roman
transition; Hale (Ref 2): geophysics; Petts (Ref 5): Roman to medieval
transition). With an in-kind contribution valued at £19,273, we supported
16 such programmes from 2008 to July 2013 (So8).Co-enquiry in 2012 with
the North Pennines Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty has also facilitated
the HLF-funded project `Altogether Archaeology' and over 400 volunteers to
date have benefitted from training in geophysical survey, expertise which
has developed directly out of the research and commercial experience of
Hale and others (So9).
Sources to corroborate the impact
[Source 1] Letter from Planning & Conservation Director North East,
English Heritage.17/05/13.
[Source 2] Letter from the Vice President, Architectural and
Archaeological Society of Durham and Northumberland). 25/3/2013.
[Source 3] Summary notes from Binchester Focus Group — conducted by an
external consultant on behalf of Durham Archaeology with participating
volunteers. 13/03/13.
[Source 4] Roman Binchester Blog. http://binchester.blogspot.co.uk/.
Google Analytics Screen Dump. 25/7/13.
[Source 5] Copy of AHRC grant application and programme of North East
Heritage Partnership training workshops 2012-13.
[Source 6] Questionnaires and reponses from NEHP and Binchester field
school workshop attendees. 3/2013-7/2013.
[Source 7] Summary notes from NEHP Focus Group — conducted by an external
consultant on behalf of Durham Archaeology with participants in the
training sessions. 16/03/13.
[Source 8] Spreadsheet of co-productive partnerships with community
groups 2008-13 specifying in-kind contributions and their value.
[Source 9] Letter from the Historic Environment Officer, North Pennines
AONB Partnership, on the Altogether Archaeology initiative.
23/4/2013.