Changing Perceptions of King James’ Bible
Submitting Institution
University of SheffieldUnit of Assessment
Theology and Religious StudiesSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies, Literary Studies
Philosophy and Religious Studies: Religion and Religious Studies
Summary of the impact
Utilising the pioneering research in reception history at the University
of Sheffield, and in
partnership with Sheffield Cathedral and Museums Sheffield, exhibition
materials and educational
guides were designed for the 400th anniversary of the King
James Bible in 2011. These
educational outreach materials were used by 30 English cathedrals and
other greater churches
throughout the UK, and the Church of England would not otherwise have been
able to develop
them; significantly, the material's content deliberately cut across many
National Curriculum
disciplines to provide teachers with a multifaceted resource. Taking
feedback from Sheffield
Cathedral as sample evidence, all participants in the adult education
outreach programme
registered changed perceptions of the King James Bible following
engagement with the resources
and the exhibition.
Underpinning research
The exhibition and educational resources were primarily focused on the
use and influence of
biblical texts. Up until the past ten years, research on the reception of
the Bible in the arts,
literature, politics, and popular culture was rarely undertaken outside
Sheffield, at least not in any
sustained way, and the `original' context and theological interpretation
were the dominant
emphases in the field. The Department of Biblical Studies pioneered
research in reception history
over the past twenty years through individual researchers, past (e.g.
David Clines, Philip Davies,
Cheryl Exum, Stephen Moore, Jorunn Økland, Keith Whitelam) and present
(Pyper, Crossley,
Finney, Chalcraft, and Edwards), research centres (Bible and Cultural
Studies [completed 2000])
and the Bible and the Modern World [2000-2009]), and the founding (2012)
of the journal, Biblical
Reception, by Sheffield Phoenix Press (with Crossley on the
editorial board). In addition to over 30
publications, Sheffield hosted the Cultural Studies/Biblical Studies
colloquium in 1997, bringing
together a number of international experts. The proceedings were published
in 1998 (edited by
Moore and Exum) in what is widely regarded as a landmark publication in
the field. In 2011,
Crossley published an open access article with Relegere (with over
1500 downloads) placing
reception history at the heart of a manifesto for Biblical Studies. The
distinctively `Sheffield'
contribution and approach to biblical reception has shown how biblical
texts have survived and
transformed in both `secular' and `religious' contexts while intersecting
with gender, nationalism,
ethnicity, and politics. Though this approach has helped transform
Biblical Studies into a field of
study far broader than it was twenty years ago, there remains no major
centre in the UK other than
Sheffield with such a concentration of expertise in areas relating to the
use and influence of the
Bible.
Crossley and Pyper (along with the Project Coordinator, Iona Hine) were
responsible for writing the
exhibition boards and educational resources in light of Sheffield's
distinctive approach and their
own specific research between 2005 and 2011. During this period, Pyper's
research had used
memetics in order to show the ways in which the Bible, including the King
James Version, has
survived and grown over the centuries through translations, editions and
canons, thus generating
its own means of survival [R1]. He has also shown how the Bible has been
adapted in language,
literature, children's literature, postcolonial contexts, sport, politics,
nationalism, and the arts, and
how such cultural appropriations defy dominance by religious and secular
groups [R1, R2]. During
this same period, Crossley analysed the ways in which the biblical texts
have been embedded in
dominant ideological discourses in Britain and America, covering uses by
prominent public
intellectuals or politicians through to more `obscure' figures, including
the King James Version-only
American `fundamentalist' preacher Peter Ruckman [R3, R3, R4]. These ideas
of the embedded
nature of biblical texts, and their survival, underpinned the overarching
narrative of the reception of
the Bible in the exhibition materials, and specific examples from the
research of Crossley and
Pyper (e.g. Ruckman, children's literature, politicians, colonialism) were
used in the exhibition
materials.
To help facilitate the impact of this research, Crossley and Pyper were
successful in acquiring
funding. A £9,704 award from the Knowledge Transfer Rapid Response Fund
(University of
Sheffield, June 2010-June 2011; PI: Crossley) was granted for funding the
Project Coordinator
(Hine) and the generation of the exhibition resources and educational
guides. A £10,784 HEIF-4
Knowledge Transfer award (May 2010-May 2011; PI: Crossley) was made
available for a
conference for teachers and educationalists on biblical literacy (May
2011). A £3850 Subject
Centre for Philosophical and Religious Studies award (July 2010-January
2011; PIs: Crossley and
Pyper) was secured for the collaboration with Museums Sheffield in order
to help develop the
educational resources.
Papers relating to additional research carried out for the cathedral
resources were presented to,
and discussed with, academics, educationalists and cathedral outreach
officers at the May 2011
conference. These were then written up for a special edition of Postscripts
(edited by Crossley and
Hine) which reflected on the conference [R5]. Crossley's contribution
focused on the ways in which
the King James Bible, especially its idiomatic language, has been
understood in the context of
liberal capitalism and democracy, allowing him to show that its survival
is linked with the
impression that it represents English nationalism and the related values
of democracy, tolerance
and freedom. Crossley's paper—initially prepared in 2011 and revised in
2012 for publication- was
a more detailed and analytical expression of that which was developed for
the exhibition materials.
References to the research
R1. Hugh Pyper, An Unsuitable Book: Bible as Scandalous Text
(Sheffield: Sheffield Academic
Press, 2005); submitted to RAE 2008
R2. Hugh Pyper, The Unchained Bible: Cultural Appropriations of
Biblical Texts (London: T&T
Clark, 2012) [this book collected research carried out and presented
nationally and
internationally between 2005-2011]; submitted REF 2014
R3. James Crossley, Jesus in an Age of Terror: Projects for a New
American Century (London:
Equinox, 2008); submitted RAE 2008
R4. James Crossley, Jesus in an Age of Neoliberalism: Quests,
Scholarship and Ideology
(Durham: Acumen, 2012) [the research for, and final draft of, this book
were completed by
2011]; submitted REF 2014
R5. James Crossley, `Biblical Literacy and the English King James Liberal
Bible: A Twenty-First
Century Tale of Capitalism, Nationalism and Nostalgia', Postscripts
(forthcoming; available
publicly in advance in the White Rose Repository)
Details of the impact
Sheffield's collaboration with the English Cathedrals originated in 2009
when Pyper and Crossley
began informal discussions with the 2011 Cathedral Sub-Group. There was
enthusiastic
agreement for Sheffield to provide exhibition and educational resources
based specifically on the
distinctive departmental approach to the reception of the King James Bible
rather than simply its
seventeenth-century origins. The Sub-Group and the King James Bible Trust
(www.kingjamesbibletrust.org)
were particularly enthusiastic because most English cathedrals
lacked the intellectual and financial resources for this landmark
anniversary [S2]. According to the
then new Director of the King James Bible Trust, the resources offered by
Sheffield, `gladden my
heart...I can say without hesitation that we would be grateful to make
extensive use of these
resources throughout the year - indeed, even before.' [S1]. In 2010,
Pyper and Crossley, along
with Hine, wrote the exhibition and educational resources which were then
discussed with Sheffield
Cathedral [S2] and Museums Sheffield in order to make them suitable for
the National Curriculum,
adult education and museum audiences. The Humanities Research Institute at
the University of
Sheffield provided access to their Exhibitor software package so that the
exhibition resources could
be made available as an interactive DVD.
The overtly interdisciplinary and reception-historical approaches to
Biblical Studies at Sheffield
made it possible for the exhibition and education resources to cut across
educational disciplines,
including those listed in the National Curriculum (Art, Citizenship,
English Language, English
Literature, Geography, History, Music, R.E., and Technology). The specific
research of Pyper and
Crossley was particularly shown in the following major topics in the
resources for the educational
outreach programmes at each cathedral:
- controversial texts and 'wars of translation'
- the Bible and nationalism, including English and Scottish nationalism
- the use of the Bible in Empire, colonization, justifications for
slavery, and even as source of
liberation
- the King James Bible in the United States, and its influence on
American politics
- `KJV-only-ism', Peter Ruckman and their place in American culture
- the Bible in the Arts, namely its depiction and interpretation in
music, literature, sports,
visual arts, and popular culture
- the ongoing use of KJV idioms
- different versions of the Bible which developed and survived as the
influence of the King
James Bible was seemingly in decline
While the exhibition was promoted in North America by the Society of
Biblical Literature, one of the
most popular biblical studies blogs, and a Knoxville newspaper [S6, S7,
S8], English cathedrals
and their visitors were the main beneficiaries [e.g. S4, S5, S9]. Telling
Tales exhibitions were
available at 30 English cathedrals and some greater churches throughout
the UK, with displays
lasting from one week to 12 months. Organisation varied locally. For
instance, major venues such
as Canterbury Cathedral held extended 12 month exhibitions while the
exhibition was taken on tour
around the Diocese of Llandaff (Church in Wales) throughout 2011.
Resources were made
available for free download on the departmental webpages. On these
webpages, images of the
exhibitions at churches and cathedrals were also provided, as well as the
locations of, and
information about, the exhibitions:
http://www.shef.ac.uk/kjv/exhibition/locations
The resources and accompanying new research were presented to the
conference, Biblical
Literacy and the Curriculum: Celebrating 400 Years of the King James
Bible (University of
Sheffield, May 2011). The conference was aimed at teachers,
educationalists and cathedral
outreach officers and there were about 100 participants. Each participant
involved was provided
with a copy of the DVD and sessions were led by Crossley, Pyper and Hine
to discuss the ways in
which the reception of the Bible could be, or was being, used in teaching
and the curriculum. This
included research presented by Crossley which has since been revised for
publication.
It is impossible to know the number of visitors who saw the exhibition,
or what proportion visited
cathedrals because of the exhibitions. However, there are some general
figures about Cathedral
visitors which indicate the scope of the impact made by the resources that
Sheffield provided to an
audience otherwise unfamiliar with their contents. In 2004, the English
Heritage and the
Association of English Cathedrals jointly launched a report on The
Economic and Social Impacts of
Cathedrals in England. According to the report, almost 9 million
people visited England's 42
Anglican cathedrals annually (compare 6.2 million people visiting
Blackpool Pleasure Beach, 3.7
million people visiting the London Eye and 4.5 million people visiting the
British Museum in 2003),
with more than 300,000 organised educational visits annually.
(http://hc.english-heritage.org.uk/content/pub/CathedralsresearchHeritageCount2004.doc).
Sheffield Cathedral's adult educational outreach programme was used as a
specific test case for
analysing changing perceptions [S3]. Feedback sheets were completed by all
participants and
covered questions including: `Did the course fulfil its stated aims?';
`What did you know about the
King James Version after the course that you did not know before?'; `Name
one other thing you
learned during the course'; and `How would you rate the exhibition on a
scale of 1-5, where 1 is
poor and 5 is excellent?' The feedback was overwhelmingly positive. Every
participant believed
that the course fulfilled its stated aims and every participant listed
something new they had learnt.
All evaluations of the exhibitions materials were ranked 3-5, with nothing
lower. On things learnt
and appreciated, comments included: `Just one? Difficult to choose';
`Its fascinating impact on
English and world history through colonial and missionary use; `the
complexity of translating
accurately...The exhibition was excellent, most informative'; `Problems
for translators...bias
caused by belief/political situations'; `The biblical origin of some
everyday expressions'; `I did not
know as much as I previously thought I did'; `it reflects a political
stance about authority...I enjoyed
all of it'; `that language in subsequent translations of the Bible
reflected the society and outlook of
those to whom the "new" translation was directed. Fascinating!...It was
all very interesting'; `how
the Bible has influenced our culture and "idiom"; `A LOT!...the subtlety
of what appears to be very
modest changes in translation between versions of the Bible — and the
origins of the NIV!'; `I had
not realised that so many of our common sayings come from the KJV...I
liked it all'; `that we were
not only looking backwards to the KJV but that there was an input into
the reading of the Bible
today'; `a realisation of the difficulties of translation'; and `the
scholarship, the history and the
various interpretations of the Scriptures. I enjoyed and appreciated all
the course in equal
measure'.
Sources to corroborate the impact
S1. Director of the King James Bible Trust (http://www.kingjamesbibletrust.org/).
S2. Chair of the Cathedral Committee (minutes available on the approach
to the University of
Sheffield to provide exhibition resources)
S3. Education and Learning Director, Sheffield Cathedral
S4. Report on Telling Tales on the Sheffield Cathedral website
(http://www.sheffieldcathedral.org/events/king-james-bible.php)
S5. Strong recommendations by the Bishop of Worcester for the Worcester
Diocese to use the
resources (http://www.cofe-worcester.org.uk/pdf_lib/482.pdf)
S6. http://www.sbl-site.org/meetings/2011KJV.aspx
provides information on the website of the
Society of Biblical Literature (approximately 9000 members)
S7. Report in the Knoxville Examiner (http://www.examiner.com/christianity-culture-in-knoxville/the-400th-anniversary-of-the-king-james-bible)
S8. Recommendation by the popular (about 6000 hits per day) biblical
studies blog, Zwinglius
Redivivus (http://zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/telling-tales-discussing-the-kjv-bible-on-its-400th-anniversary/)
S9. http://www.kingjamesbibletrust.org/community/resources-for-churches,
a link to the exhibition
resources on the King James Bible Trust website