Henry VIII’s Court and its Politics: Using Drama to Enhance Visitor Experience and Inform Policy at Hampton Court Palace
Submitting Institution
Oxford Brookes UniversityUnit of Assessment
English Language and LiteratureSummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies, Literary Studies
Philosophy and Religious Studies: History and Philosophy of Specific Fields
Summary of the impact
The impact detailed here demonstrates how, through his work with Historic
Royal Palaces and Goat and Monkey and Schtanhaus theatre companies,
Professor Tom Betteridge has helped to inform and influence the
relationship between historical, literary and performance-based research
with visitor experience at a major heritage site. Through the research-led
collaboration between Oxford Brookes and Edinburgh Universities,
Betteridge has enhanced public interaction with Tudor dramatic culture,
developed visitors' imaginative appreciation of Tudor cultural history and
produced new modes of visitor and audience engagement. This work has
enriched visitor numbers at Hampton Court Palace and also contributed to
Historic Royal Palaces' research policies and public engagement strategy.
Underpinning research
Professor Thomas Betteridge's (Professor of Early Modern English
Literature and Drama, Oxford Brookes University 2007-2013) research
expertise in English Reformation literature has provided vital insights
for the projects detailed here, in particular in the field of English
Reformation drama (especially the dramatist John Heywood),1 the
Tudor court2 and performance as research.3,5,6 His
research has provided crucial insights which underpin the
investigation-through-performance of Henry VIII's court and its spatial
politics in three collaborative undertakings.
The first collaborative undertaking was the Arts and Humanities Research
Council (AHRC) funded project `Henrician Court Drama' (2007)3
which produced original research on the use of performance in a heritage
context using principally Heywood's The Play of the Weather, a
neglected but highly significant text in relation to the Henrician
Reformation. It was almost certainly produced and performed at Henry
VIII's court in the winter of 1532/33. Betteridge's research on religious
debates in the English Reformation informed the understanding of the key
religious context of Heywood's drama.4 `Henrician Court Drama'
used a small cast to perform key scenes from the play in alternative ways,
addressing the potential for either subversion or promotion of Henrician
royal authority through different performance styles, modes of audience
interaction and uses of the performance space. The research insights from
this project informed the basis for further AHRC-funding for a second
collaborative undertaking, `Staging the Henrician Court', a full
production of The Play of the Weather at Hampton Court Palace.
`Staging the Henrician Court' (2008)5 produced the first
performance of a Henrician interlude in the Great Hall and was used by
Historic Royal Palaces to pilot the use of performance research as part of
their curatorial and interpretative work. The project was an
interdisciplinary collaboration between Betteridge, Professor Greg Walker
(Edinburgh University), Historic Royal Palaces (the charity that manages
Hampton Court), and employed a postdoctoral research assistant (Dr Eleanor
Rycroft) and a Research Community Developer (Dr Dan Goren) who were both
based at Oxford Brookes University. Research outcomes generated through
`Henrician Court Drama', in particular those relating to the management of
court space through drama, were tested in performance. Rehearsals for the
Play of the Weather were made part of the visitor experience at
Hampton Court Palace; signage and guides' commentary pointed out that such
performances were part of the cultural life of the royal palace in order
to enhance visitors' appreciation and understanding of Henrician court
culture and its material heritage. Further research by all collaborators
was published on the project website: https://stagingthehenriciancourt.brookes.ac.uk/
Betteridge's work on Tudor drama, and in particular John Heywood, formed
the backbone of the third undertaking, a Wellcome Trust funded research
project, `Medicine, Birth and Death at the Tudor Court', (2009),6
in collaboration with Greg Walker, the leading international expert on
Henrician Literature. The research from `Medicine, Birth and Death at the
Tudor Court' underpinned Goat and Monkey's immersive drama production, A
Little Neck, which was staged at Hampton Court Palace in 2009. A
Little Neck was an innovative theatrical production which ran for
three weeks in September 2009. It demonstrated the potential for immersive
and original drama simultaneously to create new knowledge on how Hampton
Court worked as a Tudor palace and innovate in terms of public engagement.
A Little Neck took place throughout the Tudor part of Hampton Court
Palace. After the opening scene the audience was divided into four groups
following specific Tudor characters including Dr William Butts. Drawing on
original history of medicine research the production staged the miasma of
medical rumours and misogynistic fantasies that surrounded the fall of
Anne Boleyn. This performance-as-research undertaking produced specific
understandings about the experiential politics of women's bodies within
the physical and ideological spaces of the Tudor Court.
References to the research
1. `John Heywood and Court Drama', in The Oxford Handbook to Tudor
literature, 1485 - 1603, ed Cathy Shrank. Mike Pincombe, Oxford
University Press, 2009, pp.170-86, DOI:
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199205882.013.0011, ISBN 9780199205882.
2. `The Tudor Court: Dust and Desire' in Tudor Court Culture, ed.
Tom Betteridge and Anna Riehl, Susquehanna University Press, 2010,
pp.59-74 ISBN 1575911183.
3. AH/E002323/1 `Henrician Court Drama', Arts & Humanities Research
Council, Principal Investigator: Thomas Betteridge, £43,567, 2007. http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk/project/87663FA8-ECC1-4C85-B30A-5C498A8D427A
Final grant report available from Oxford Brookes University Research
Support Office on request.
4. `William Tyndale and Religious Debate', Journal of Medieval and
Early Modern Studies 40.3 (Fall 2010), 439-461. DOI
10.1215/10829636-2010-002
5. AH/F018290/1 `Staging the Henrician Court', Arts & Humanities
Research Council, Principal Investigator: Thomas Betteridge, £382,288,
2008 - 2011. http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk/project/0D894244-D3E6-4400-A0EB-36A409D90EA3
Final grant report available from Oxford Brookes University Research
Support Office on request.
6. `Medicine, Birth and Death at the Tudor Court', Wellcome Trust Public
Engagement project, Principal Applicant: Thomas Betteridge, £59,400, 2009.
http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_publishing_group/documents/web_document/WTVM051825.pdf
Final grant report available from Oxford Brookes University Research
Support Office on request.
Details of the impact
The application of historical, literary and performance research
initiated by `Henrician Court Drama' has led to both cultural life and
practice benefits. This is evidenced through the improved visitor
experience and visitor numbers at Hampton Court Palace, as well as the
contribution to Historic Research Palaces' research policies and public
engagement strategy.
`Staging the Henrician Court' and `Medicine, Birth and Death at the Tudor
Court' (through A Little Neck) have had a lasting impact on the
practices of Historic Royal Palaces, who benefited through collaboration
in research-led performances that both embodied research and piloted new
modes of audience and visitor engagement through performance.7,8
Through the public rehearsals, curators gained insights into how
interpretative staff might inform their own research practice, and how
their work might both be informed by and enable performance research.
Historic Royal Palaces' commitment to the projects was reflected by their
in-kind contribution of £104,441 to `Staging the Henrician Court'.
The Chief Executive of Historic Royal Palaces comments that, "`Staging
the Henrician Court' had an important impact upon Historic Royal Palaces'
research into the Great Hall at Hampton Court Palace and more generally
the court of Henry VIII. Within Historic Royal Palaces it demonstrated the
value of performance as research as a methodology for investigating public
spaces, particularly where there are limited textual and archival
records."7 He identifies three distinct areas of impact arising
from `Staging the Henrician Court' `research, research management and
visitor experience' and states that `it is no exaggeration to say that Staging
the Henrician Court has had a pivotal role in helping to motivate
and inform H[istoric] R[oyal] P[alaces]'s development of a New Research
Strategy'.7
Betteridge has informed and influenced Historic Royal Palaces' policies
through an improved understanding of the relationship between research and
visitor experience. Prior to `Staging the Henrician Court', Historic Royal
Palaces felt that engaging in large scale research projects in public
space would be detrimental to the visitor experience; however the project
demonstrated that this was not the case, in fact day visitors responded
positively to public rehearsals. Furthermore, subsequent projects within
Historic Royal Palaces have adopted the research and public engagement
strategy of `Staging the Henrician Court/'A Little Neck' e.g. `The Rover',
by Aphra Behn, 2012 for which Betteridge was dramaturge. Following the
success of `Staging the Henrician Court' Betteridge (with Rawlinson)
produced a strategy paper for the Historic Royal Palaces' board, `Theatre
and the Performance of History at Historic Royal Palaces'. Historic Royal
Palaces are now applying for Independent Research Organization status.
Betteridge's status as an international expert in the field of Tudor
studies was reflected in 2009 when he became joint chair of the research
advisory panel established by Historic Royal Palaces to provide support
and advice on the representation of Hampton Court Palace for the
commemoration of the succession of Henry VIII. The research advisory panel
had a key role in helping develop new visitor's attractions, in particular
the restoration of the Henry's council chamber and the decision to focus
the interpretative offering on the wedding of Katherine Parr. The Research
Advisory Panel also had an important role in staging a major international
conference on Henry VIII at Hampton Court Palace and in the design of a
series of public lectures given at Hampton Court Palace.9
Audiences of 140 Historic Royal Palace professionals and public attended
the productions of The Play of the Weather in The Great Hall
during 2009/2010. The total audience for A Little Neck was 2,100
and was sold out for its entire run. Historic Royal Palace's target for
increased visitor numbers in 2009 was 50,000 (10%) and the actual increase
was 115,287 (43%).7 The project's impact has been further
extended via successful transfer into other media, including films of the
performances on the project website,8 interviews with
researchers and participants, and a wiki.
AHRC Assessors of `Staging the Henrician Court' noted that these
additional resources `give [the project] lasting value as a teaching and
research tool...I am not aware of any other similar academic website that
currently offers this kind of interactivity' and `The website and wiki
will be the main lasting outcome. Websites with a performance element
embedded are rare, so this is an innovative suggestion which could set a
standard for comparable projects in future.'5 The project is
highlighted in the AHRC's Summer 2009 newsletter,12 and offered
in the AHRC's Annual Report and Accounts for 2010-11 as a case study of
good practice in `Supporting the Cultural Sector'10 and in the
Research Councils UK publication What's in it for Me?: the Benefits of
Public Engagement for Researchers.14
Through the historical, literary and performance research outlined in
this case study Historic Royal Palaces are better informed to understand
the court of Henry VIII and its spatial politics. Furthermore, this
research-led approach has demonstrated the increasing value of
interpretive practices and performance research to the policies and
strategies of major heritage sites.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Corroborative statement author 1. Letter from Chief Executive,
Historic Royal Palaces.
- https://stagingthehenriciancourt.brookes.ac.uk/
- http://www.hrp.org.uk/NewsAndMedia/hcpresources/TheHenryVIIItalks
- AHRC Annual Report and Accounts, 2010-11, p.10. http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/News-and-Events/Publications/Documents/Annual-Report-2010-11.pdf
- http://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/how/case-studies/staging-henrician-court
- Henry VIII at Hampton Court : http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/News-and-Events/Publications/Publications-archive/Documents/Podium/Podium-12-Summer-2009.pdf
- `A Little Neck: Staging Immersive theatre at Hampton Court Palace'
http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_publishing_group/documents/web_document/wtvm056126.pdf
-
What's in it for Me?: the Benefits of Public Engagement for
Researchers (RCUK, 2010), p.22 http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/scisoc/RCUKBenefitsofPE.pdf