Research to inform prevention of child deaths and serious abuse and neglect
Submitting Institution
University of WolverhamptonUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Social Work
Summary of the impact
Vincent's research comprises a UK comparison of child death review
policy, development of a
Scottish evidence base and a comparative study of child death review
across six countries. The
research has had an impact on public policy to protect children. It has
stimulated international,
national and local policy debate and changed policy. It has also had an
impact on practitioners and
services. Professionals from a range of disciplines have used the research
findings in conducting
their work and it has had an influence on inter-agency child protection
guidelines and on multi
agency training.
Underpinning research
The impact that is being described in this case study relates to two
research studies that were
undertaken or completed by Sharon Vincent since she joined the University
of Wolverhampton in
December 2011 firstly an audit and analysis of significant case reviews
and secondly preventing
child deaths: learning from review.
Vincent undertook a programme of research into Child Death Review (CDR)
from 2008-2011 when
she worked at a previous institution. This work identified a significant
gap in knowledge in Scotland
and an urgent need for national data (Vincent 2012). In comparison with
England and Wales, and
despite a commitment to national learning within national guidance, the
findings from significant
case reviews (SCRs) were not being collated nationally in Scotland and the
Scottish Government
were not able to establish how many reviews were being undertaken. After
moving to the
University of Wolverhampton the Scottish Government, in recognition of
Vincent's previous
research and expertise in the area, invited her to submit a tender to
undertake an audit and
analysis of significant case reviews in Scotland. In January 2012 she was
commissioned to
undertake this research in collaboration with Professor Alison Petch from
the Institute of Research
and Innovation in Social Services (IRISS) in Glasgow. The findings from
the audit and review were
published in 2012 (Vincent and Petch 2012). They provide an important
evidence base for
Scotland and have had a significant impact on local and national policy
and practice in Scotland
which is outlined in Section 4 below.
In 2010 Vincent was awarded a Leverhulme research fellowship to undertake
a study entitled
`Preventing child deaths: learning from review'. This was a comparative
study of CDR across six
countries. Vincent completed this research and wrote up the findings of
the project at the University
of Wolverhampton. The findings have been published in a paper for Child
Abuse Review (Vincent,
2013) as well as in a book (Vincent 2013). As described below, Vincent's
work has contributed to
the international evidence base and been utilised by policy makers and
professionals engaged in
child death review, or in developing child death review procedures, in a
number of countries.
References to the research
Publications
Vincent, S. (2013) Child Death Review: a comparison of six
countries. Child Abuse Review.
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI:
10.1002/car.2276 (peer
reviewed journal article submitted to REF in 2014).
Vincent, S. (2013) Preventing Child Deaths: Learning from Review,
ISSN 1756-0691 Edinburgh,
Dunedin (peer reviewed book).
This book has been reviewed widely. For example:
1) `This current book is helpful in presenting the systems within each
country context, the
variation within and between countries in terms of processes, and the ways
in which policy
makers have sought to use the learning to shape the policy and practice
response. This
latter part of the book is particularly important, providing reference
points for
considering how the learning from individual reviews might be considered
in terms
of driving improvements in how individual practitioners and the systems
they work
within might become stronger. The book also helpfully argues that
much of the key
learning might better be considered from a public health perspective'
Devaney, J. (2013).
British Journal of Social Work (2013) 43, 1455-1461
2) `The book is an important contribution to the literature on child
health, child protection and
child deaths; it is unique in its international analysis of child
death review committees
and their role in overcoming child deaths. Its topic area is growing
in significance and
the book is one of the few policy guides available. It is relevant to all
university based
disciplines in the child health and welfare area and to all the policy
staff and professional
practitioners in these areas. It will challenge readers by raising
many complex issues
for consideration and it will also lead them to a great deal of
reflection and debate.'
Brown, T (2013) Children Australia.
Stafford, A; Parton, N; Vincent, S; Smith, C. (2012) Child
Protection Systems in the UK: A
Comparative Analysis, London, Jessica Kingsley (Chapter 8 on Child Death
Review was written
solely by Vincent) (peer reviewed book submitted to REF in 2014).
Favourable review including:
Saunders, B. (2013) The International Journal of Children's Rights, 21: 1,
171-174.
Vincent, S; Petch, A. (2012) Audit and Analysis of Significant
Case Reviews, Scottish
Government. This report has had considerable impact on policy and practice
to protect children
and young people in Scotland as evidenced below.
Research grants
2012 Audit and Analysis of Significant Case Reviews, Commissioned by
Scottish Government
£10,000.
Details of the impact
Impacts on public policy and services
Vincent's research has influenced government policy. Her research
findings led the Scottish
Government to rewrite national guidance on SCRs. Vincent is a member of
the working group
tasked with doing this and chair of the Family Involvement sub-group. She
has played a major role
in the rewrite.
Vincent presented the findings of the Audit and Review at a Child
Protection Committee (CPC)
Chairs Meeting attended by 60 representatives from all CPCs in Scotland
and at a Scottish
Government seminar attended by 50 civil servants and senior managers from
CPCs. The Western
Isles CPC organised their own seminar to consider the findings at which
Vincent presented to 50
policy makers, managers and practitioners. She also delivered the key note
presentation at a
Central and North East Scotland Child Protection Consortium Inter-Agency
Practitioner Seminar
attended by 120 practitioners, senior managers and councillors which
considered the implications
of the research for local policy and practice. Feedback forms provide
evidence that attendees
aimed to use the research findings to inform policy, practice or training.
Perth and Kinross CPC
benchmarked their local arrangements, policies and practices, against
Vincent's research. This led
to them reviewing their SCR Protocol; reviewing and updating Practitioner
Guidance on Information
Sharing; Confidentiality; and Consent; producing an OnLine Practitioner's
Toolkit; reviewing and
updating Practitioner Guidance on CPCC Meetings; Single and Integrated
Chronologies; and
Assessments; developing a training course to further develop joint working
between adult and
Children's Services; reviewing their approach to Children Affected by
Domestic Abuse, Parental
Mental Health and Parental Substance Misuse; and further developing their
use of CPC
Management Information and Statistics. North Ayrshire used the research
findings to inform
analysis of the data they collect; alongside local self-evaluation and
audit material to ensure they
are aware of common themes in cases of child death and serious abuse; to
inform the
development of a template for social service team managers to identify
risk when reviewing the
effectiveness of child protection plans; in the development of
multi-agency guidance for the sharing
of information between adult and children's services; and referenced it in
their roll out of the
National Risk Framework.
Vincent's research has also stimulated international policy debate.
Vincent has responded to
numerous requests for information and advice from people engaged in CDR in
Australia, New
Zealand, the US, Canada and South Africa. Some of these requests have come
from individuals
who have been asked to set up new CDR processes and her research has been
used to inform the
models they have selected. For example:
`I have come across your publication — Preventing Child Death as well
as a forthcoming publication
in the journal Child Abuse Review. I am really interested to
draw lessons from your work as it will
be critical to inform our process in South Africa' (Director of the
Children's Institute, South Africa,
August 2013).
Vincent was asked to provide a key note address at the Third Australian
Conference on Child
Death Inquiries and Reviews in Sydney in 2012. The conference was attended
by 200 individuals
involved in undertaking CDR across Australia and New Zealand. While in
Sydney she was also
invited to meet the New South Wales Minister for Family and Community
Services to discuss child
protection.
Impacts on practitioners and services
Professional guidelines and training have been influenced by the research
and practitioners have
used it in conducting their work. Perth and Kinross CPC use Vincent's
findings and cite her
publications in their Two-Day Inter-Agency Child Protection Training
Course. North Ayrshire CPC
has integrated the research into a number of their multi-agency child
protection training
programmes, including training aimed at managers. Vincent has received
email communications
from professionals who have attended her presentations or read her
publications stating that they
have used her research findings to inform their practice. For example:
`We have started to track risk factors present in the cases we review
for child welfare. Your section
on risk factors will be very helpful' (Member of the Death under
five Committee, Chief Coroner's
Office, Ontario, Canada, November 2012)
`I gave a presentation yesterday morning to the whole of my office on
my trip to Belfast. I presented
information from your slides in regard to the value of child death
inquiries.' (Project Officer, Office
of the Child Safety Commissioner, Victoria, Australia, May 2012)
`Without doubt the book and the research has informed our thinking,
has shaped our practice
arrangements and highlighted to us local risks.' (Child Protection
Inter-Agency Coordinator, Perth
and Kinross Council, January 2013).
Sources to corroborate the impact
Evidence of the impact and influence of the research is demonstrated by
the fact that Sharon Vincent
has been invited to participate in the following activities as a direct
result of the research she has
undertaken:
1) 2013 Invited to present at an international conference of policy
makers, professionals and academics
to address filicide in Prato, Italy.
2) 2012 Invited by the NSPCC to attend and speak at an expert seminar on
Serious Case Reviews in
London to inform NSPCC policy.
3) 2012 Invited to be a symposium chair and presenter at the keeping
Children safe in an uncertain
world: Learning from Evidence and Practice, BASPCAN Congress in Belfast
for policy makers,
professionals and academics engaged in protecting children.
Documentary evidence from Perth and Kinross Child Protection Committee:
4) Inter Agency Child Protection Training Extracts, copies available on
request
5) Central and North East Scotland Child Protection Consortium, Case
Review Seminar
Evaluations, copies available on request
6) Audit and Analysis of Significant Case Reviews - Dr Sharon Vincent,
copies available on
request
7) Perth and Kinross Child Protection Committee Business Activity Report,
copies available on
request