Use of Goal Programming Models to Assist Strategic Financial Investment Decision Making
Submitting Institution
University of PortsmouthUnit of Assessment
Mathematical SciencesSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Mathematical Sciences: Statistics
Economics: Applied Economics
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Banking, Finance and Investment
Summary of the impact
This statement details the impact of research undertaken by members of
the Logistics and Operational Research Group (LORG) at the University of
Portsmouth in the area of strategic financial investment portfolio
selection. A set of goal programming models was developed, which for the
first time allowed the investment fund managers to consider a wider range
of objectives beyond the usual risk and return paradigm. As a result, the
decision making capabilities of key investment fund managers and advisors
including those working for the Kuwait Sovereign Wealth Fund were
enhanced, resulting in improved decision making capabilities.
Underpinning research
The initial underpinning research was conducted in the period 1991-2008
by academic staff in the Logistics and Operational Research Group (LORG),
which has grown from the former Logistics and Management Mathematics
Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Portsmouth, under the
leadership of Professor Mehrdad Tamiz (Professor of Operational Research,
1991-2008). The key academic co-investigator was Professor Dylan Jones
(1997-present; Principal Lecturer during the research).
LORG members have been internationally leading in developing the theory
and applications of goal programming since 1995 until the present day.
Amongst the key developments have been joint work with Prof. Carlos Romero
(Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain) on the connections between and
use of different goal programming variants which are used to model
different underlying philosophies such as optimisation, satisficing,
balance, fairness, and ordering. Prof. Romero provided the economic
expertise and Profs Tamiz and Jones the mathematical and computational
expertise that enabled this work. This research provided utility
interpretations of the major goal programming variants and demonstrated
their connectivity (R1). These goal programming variants were subsequently
expanded and combined with other Operational Research and Artificial
Intelligence techniques for symbiotic advantage (R2). Particularly novel
was the bridging of the gap between discrete and continuous multi-criteria
models with the mixed modelling concept of using a discrete method
(ELECTRE) to rank alternatives generated by a continuous method (goal
programming) (R5).
One important application area that LORG members have specialised in is
that of portfolio selection and dynamic re-optimisation. The initial work
in the application domain concentrated on the use of a dual phase goal
programming model that was novel as it used goal programming in a combined
descriptive manner (phase 1) to analyse past data and in a prescriptive
manner as a portfolio selection tool (phase 2). The model minimises the
risk against movements in a range of economic indices such as interest
rates, exchange rates, and the oil price under a number of scenarios and
was applied to a selection of a portfolio of shares from the British FTSE
100 index (R3). Between 1997 and 2000 research was undertaken into
incorporating transaction costs into a dynamic portfolio selection model
(R4). More recent research has concentrated on the selection of portfolios
comprised of mutual funds. A three-phase mixed modelling methodology used
statistical analysis, goal programming, and the ELECTRE method in order to
select a portfolio of Spanish mutual funds (R5). The underpinning research
continued, as demonstrated by (R6) in which Egyptian mutual funds were
also modelled using different goal programming variants.
This work also considers the use of goal programming to compose a minimal
portfolio of shares that is able to accurately track a market index such
as the British FTSE 100, and examines the three major variants of goal
programming: weighted, lexicographic, and Chebyshev for portfolio
selection, and provides guidance as to under which circumstances each
should be used. Thus, an effective framework for incorporating financial
decision maker and investors' goals, objectives, and priorities has been
built by LORG members.
References to the research
The three references marked (*), R1, R5, and R6, best represent the
quality of the research.
R1(*): Romero, C, Tamiz, M and Jones, DF. (1998) Goal programming,
compromise programming, and reference point method formulations:
linkages and utility interpretations, Journal of the Operational
Research Society,49, 986-991.s DOI:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600611
R3: Tamiz, M, Hasham, R, Jones, DF, Hesni, B, Fargher, EK. (1996) A two
staged model for portfolio selection, Lecture notes in Economics and
Mathematical Systems, M.Tamiz(ed), Springer, 432, 286-299. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-87561-8_19
R5(*): Perez Gladish B, Jones DF, Tamiz M, and Bilbao Terol A (2007)
An interactive three stage model for mutual fund portfolio selection,
Omega, 35, 75-88.
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.04.003
R6(*) Tamiz M, Azmi R, Jones DF (2013) On Selecting Portfolio of
International Mutual Funds using Goal Programming with Extended Factors,
European Journal of Operational Research, 226, 560-576. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.004
R1, R4, R5, and R6 are papers in highly-ranked and well-respected
Operational Research journals: the journal Omega is ranked 3rd highest in
SJR rankings for Operations Research and Management Science and has a 2012
5-year Impact Factor of 3.474. The European Journal of Operational
Research is ranked 9th in SJR and has has a 2012 5-year Impact Factor of
2.524.
Finally, the Journal of the Operational Research Society is ranked 23rd
in SJR - within the SJR top quartile - has a 2012 5-year Impact Factor of
1.282, and is the premium publication of the UK OR Society.
Details of the impact
The impact relates to the use of goal programming models developed by
LORG members to aid in investment companies' strategic financial decision
making. Members of LORG were approached by an advisor to the Kuwait
Investment Authority (who are responsible for the Kuwaiti Sovereign Wealth
Fund) in 2008 as she had read the group's underpinning work on portfolio
selection and wished to see a set of models developed that pertained to
the type of multi-objective quantitative decisions she faced in the Kuwait
Sovereign Wealth Fund, as well as aiding her work as a freelance
investment advisor. The Kuwait Sovereign Wealth fund is the world's oldest
and most well established wealth fund, although the actual amount of its
investments is not made public.
A set of goal programmes for multi-objective portfolio optimisation was
thus developed by LORG members, applying the techniques developed in the
underpinning research (R1-R5) in accordance with the specifications of the
advisor (Dr Azmi). These models were capable of producing balanced finance
portfolios for deciding the level of investment in mutual funds that
included a range of goals specified by the decision including desired
levels of risk, return, and maturity of the funds being invested in. They
also took into account the GDP, inflation rate, and regional priorities of
the country when deciding on the investments to be made. The models were
trialled against a set of Egyptian mutual funds as a demonstration of
their potential. The advisor worked with LORG in the period 2008-2010 in
order to assist in ensuring that the models built upon the research of
LORG staff accurately reflected the objectives, priorities, goals, and
constraints that a real-world portfolio investment company is faced with.
The impact has occurred on two levels. The first level is through direct
collaboration between University of Portsmouth staff and professionals
with responsibility for portfolio management in financial companies to
apply the underpinning research to their specific problem domains. Prof
Tamiz has had direct contact with portfolio managers in investment
companies and institutions, having previously worked for the Nomura
investment bank in London in the 1990's. Dr Azmi has been working as an
economic advisor to the sovereign wealth fund of Kuwait (source 1) in the
period 2008-2013. She also has a range of business contacts due to her
supplemental position as a freelance trainer and consultant. In these
capacities she has advised and had various formal and informal meetings
with fund managers who acknowledged the use of a quantitative model in
their investment decision making, in a similar vein to the goal
programming models developed by LORG members in R1-R5 (Due to the nature
of the investment banking industry, fund managers are not prepared to
publicly state the nature of quantitative models they use or the results
that these models yield). LORG members have also been active in presenting
seminars and promoting the results of the models in a range of forums
frequented by investment fund managers in order to enhance the use of the
goal programming models developed by LORG members in the financial
investment sector (Source 1). In addition, our results have guided
financial decision making and investment advice given to the Kuwait
Sovereign Wealth Fund and other investment funds by the knowledge of the
quantitative skills and dynamics of the working of the goal programming
models gained during the liaison with LORG members (Source 1). Dr Azmi has
also been instrumental in promoting the concepts of achieving fairness by
the use of goal programming, as detailed in references R1 and R2, to the
issue of developmental planning at the United Nations, proposing goal
programming models be used to achieve better levels of gender equality
worldwide (Source 1).
The second source of impact is through dissemination of the results of
applying the research to specific domains in scientific conferences,
academic journals, and industry related publications. The work has been
placed in sources S2-S3; the specialised Arab Journal of Academic Sciences
(Source 2); and the Banking and Financial Systems eJournal (source 3) in
order to achieve good dissemination amongst the academic and practitioner
communities in the field. The results of the research have been presented
at the Multi-Attribute Portfolio Selection (Montreal, 2007 - containing
around 80% investment bankers and 20% academics) and MOPGP08 (Portsmouth,
2008), and MOPGP10 (Tunisia, 2010) conferences.
The research has been cited in case studies relating to the Iranian stock
market (source S4) and the Chinese stock market (source S5), the Kuwait
stock exchange (source S6) and in Spain relating to socially responsible
investment (source S7).
Sources to corroborate the impact
1) Factual Statement from Advisor, Strategy & Planning Department,
Kuwait Investment Authority.
2) Article in Sovereign Wealth Quarterly. January 2011, Pages 20-23.
3) Azmi RA: Accepting the challenges of the ongoing financial crisis and
global market integration:
highlighting the role of cooperative finance for sustainability, Banking
and Financial Institutions eJournal, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1583273
4) Amiri, Maghsoud; Ekhtiari, Mostafa; Yazdani, Mehdi. (2011) Nadir
compromise programming: A model for optimization of multi-objective
portfolio problem, Expert Systems With Applications, 38, 7222-7226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.061
5) Li, Jun; Xu, Jiuping (2009) A novel portfolio selection model in a
hybrid uncertain environment, Omega-International Journal Of Management
Science, 37, 439-449.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2007.06.002
6) Al-Qaheri H and Hasan MK (2010) An End-User Decision Support System
for Portfolio Selection: A Goal Programming Approach with an Application
to Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE), International Journal of Computer
Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 2.
7) Ballestero E, Bravo M, Perez-Gladish B, Arenas-Parra M, Pla-Santamaria
D (2012) Socially Responsible Investment: A multi-criteria approach to
portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives, European
Journal of Operational Research, 216, 487-494.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.011