Building a case for extending social pension schemes in developing countries
Submitting Institution
University of East AngliaUnit of Assessment
Anthropology and Development StudiesSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Economics: Applied Economics
Studies In Human Society: Sociology
Summary of the impact
Social pensions targeting poor households have emerged as a major
anti-poverty policy for developing countries. Since 2008, programmes
have been established or extended in Bangladesh, Mexico, Peru, Uganda
and the Philippines. Collectively, these programmes provide regular cash
payments to at least six million households not previously covered by
formal social protection. DEV research significantly contributed to this
by (i) raising awareness of social pensions among NGOs, UN agencies and
key policy makers; (ii) providing robust evidence of the effects of
existing social pension programmes; and (iii) more recently, identifying
limitations of existing schemes and the need for complementary
interventions.
Underpinning research
Peter Lloyd-Sherlock, Professor of Social Policy and International
Development at the University of East Anglia, was joint principal
investigator with Armando Barrientos (Manchester University) of the
first-ever international study of social pensions. The study included a
quantitative survey, in 2002, of over 2,000 households containing older
people in rural and urban catchments in Brazil and South Africa
[Research Reference (RR) 1]. Lloyd-Sherlock jointly led all quantitative
and qualitative aspects of the research including its conception,
design, analysis, interpretation and dissemination. The survey was
complemented with in-depth qualitative interviews with a subset of the
sample households, and key informant interviews with stakeholders,
including national and international policymakers. The study
demonstrated that social pensions were effective in reaching households
in deprived settings, that a high proportion of pensioners lived with
young grandchildren, and that in over 80 per cent of cases pensioners
shared most of their benefit with other household members. The study
found pensions significantly reduced the intensity of poverty and
enhanced the financial resilience of older people's households [RR2;
RR3]. These positive effects were consistent for Brazil and South
Africa, indicating the international potential for social pensions as a
pro-poor policy option.
Lloyd-Sherlock was also joint principal investigator on a follow-up
survey of the same households in 2008/9 [RR4]. This combined a
questionnaire survey with 50 in-depth interviews. Lloyd-Sherlock jointly
led all aspects of the research. The second survey showed that the
effect of social pensions on household economic circumstances reported
for 2002 had been sustained [RR3, 5]; it also found that social pensions
are associated with high levels of subjective wellbeing in older people.
However, the study households' overall economic situation was strongly
influenced by the wider economic context; reduced employment
opportunities for younger members of coloured households in South Africa
had led to increased impoverishment. A key finding of the second survey
is that although social pensions made a significant contribution to
household wellbeing, this effect was strongly mediated by the wider
context of labour market dynamics, appropriate health policies and the
promotion of financial literacy among pensioners. These results called
for a broader approach to social protection.
The findings of the second study have fed into new, on-going studies on
the relationship between social protection and health policy for older
people. These include research collaborations with the World Health
Organisation (WHO), an advisory position with the Department for
International Development (DFID) and a new ESRC funded research project
led by Lloyd-Sherlock on pensions, health and wellbeing for older people
in developing countries. They also include NGO collaborations: for
example, in 2011 Lloyd-Sherlock was a senior adviser for a HelpAge
International scoping study on the extension of social pensions in
Indonesia.
References to the research
[all available at www.uea.ac.uk/international-development/impact]
1. 2001-2003: `Non-contributory pensions and poverty prevention in
developing countries? A comparative study of South Africa and Brazil'
(joint principal investigator with Armando Barrientos). Funded by DFID,
£200,000. Rated as outstanding/successful in DFID's post- award
evaluation. http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/research/ageingandwellbeing/ncpps/Papers/NCPPSleaflet1.pdf
2. P. Lloyd-Sherlock (2006) `Simple transfers, complex outcomes. The
impacts of pensions on poor households in Brazil', Development and
Change 37(5).
http://www.bwpi.manchester.ac.uk/Pensionwatch-briefing-7.pdf
3. P.Lloyd-Sherlock et al. (2011) `Pensions, poverty and wellbeing in
later life: comparative research from South Africa and Brazil', Journal
of Ageing Studies 26 (3): 243-252.
4. 2007-2011: `Ageing, well-being and development. A comparative study
of Brazil and South Africa'. Funded by ESRC (joint principal
investigator with Armando Barrientos). £270,345. ESRC evaluation very
good; ESRC reviewer comment: "having access to, and being listened by,
the variety of audiences represented by governments (UK, Brazil, South
Africa), international organisations (ILO, WHO, UN), international
media, and global civil society (INGOs like HelpAge) lends this study
the kind of social impact that academic research rarely achieves".
5. P. Lloyd-Sherlock, J. Saboia and B. Ramirez-Rodriguez (2012) `Cash
transfers and the wellbeing of older people in Brazil', Development
and Change 43 (5):1049-1072.
Details of the impact
The impact of this research has mainly been achieved through an
intensive process of engagement with a wide range of key international
non-academic stakeholder organisations.
HelpAge International (HAI): Our research facilitated HAI's
impact in this policy arena and affected HAI's own priorities in
numerous ways:
(i) HAI had not engaged with social pension issues before the first
research project, which played a critical role in establishing its
interest in this field. The initial research idea was first conceived at
a meeting between Lloyd-Sherlock, Barrientos and Mark Gorman, then Chief
Executive of HAI [Impact Reference (IR)1]. HAI fed into the development
of the research proposal. It agreed to be a formal partner in the
project and the subsequent 2008-9 study, and was involved in all stages
of the work.
(ii) The studies provided HAI with robust, credible data on social
pensions, which it used in policy engagement [IR 2, 3]. Lloyd-Sherlock
continues to engage with HAI weekly, both formally and informally,
advising and supporting its work on social pensions in multiple ways. In
2009 he presented the results of the 2008/9 survey to a
specially-convened meeting of HAI social pension country officers, and
in 2012 he participated in a HAI expert meeting on income security in
old age. The questionnaire used for the 2002 and the follow-up surveys
has been drawn on for the development of separate HAI surveys of older
people's wellbeing in countries such as Bolivia.
HAI is now recognised as the lead international organisation that has
driven the social pension agenda, with strong support from DFID and
working closely with national governments and other international
organisations (http://www.helpage.org/download/510158401a9cc/).Between
2007 and 2011 HAI significantly contributed to the implementation or
extension of social pension schemes in 18 developing countries,
affecting over 12 million older people. According to the CEO of HAI,
2006-13:
`The longitudinal study on Brazil-South Africa social pensions in
particular has shaped our thinking on the inter-generational impacts of
social pensions - on older people and their families - and helped to
support the broader social protection agenda. Peter and Armando's work
is well respected in the policy and donor community, and their studies
are regularly cited in key policy debates and policy consultation on
social protection' [IR4].
UN agencies: The finding that social pensions had similar effects
in different countries was of particular interest to the International
Labour Organisation (ILO). According to an ILO Senior Social Security
Specialist, the research "strongly helped underpinning argumentation in
favour of non- contributory pensions...that a south-south learning
approach is feasible...and ideas to move on regarding solutions to similar
countries can be shared with similar benefit among developing countries"
[IR5] In 2011 Lloyd-Sherlock presented to a specially-convened social
protection seminar at the ILO HQ, Geneva.
Following the first study, Lloyd-Sherlock was lead author of the Global
Guide for the Implementation of the Madrid International Plan of Action
on Ageing, published by the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs
in 2008 and circulated to all UN member states [IR6]. In 2010/11
Lloyd-Sherlock was seconded to WHO, in part to develop strategies
linking social pensions to interventions to enhance older people's
health [IR 7].
DFID was both a funder and a non-academic stakeholder in the
2001-3 study. In 2011-2012 Lloyd- Sherlock was engaged by DFID as a
Senior Research Fellow, partly to advise on social protection issues
including social pensions. According to the Senior Social Development
Adviser, (DFID), the research:
"showed that DFID pensions can be an effective entry point to reducing
the economic vulnerability and poverty of whole households....it
evidenced social pensions/cash transfers for older persons, particularly
women, as a less politically contentious route into wider benefits for
entire households. It also alerted DFID to the need to understand the
effects of pensions within a wider social development context....The
fact that DFID then engaged Peter Lloyd-Sherlock as a research fellow
ensured that the evidence coming out of this research contributed to
DFID's wider understanding (research) and application (policy) of
inter-generational or life course approaches to reducing poverty and
vulnerability" [IR8].
The governments of Brazil and South Africa have both been receptive to
the research findings, with invited presentations to government
agencies. For example, in 2011 South Africa's Department of Social
Development devoted a four hour meeting attended by over 400 officers to
a presentation by Lloyd-Sherlock and the study team.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[all available at www.uea.ac.uk/international-development/impact]]
- Statement from the Director of Strategic Development, HelpAge
International. "I am entirely satisfied that the case study provides
an accurate account of the research and its impact on HelpAge
International".
- HelpAge International (2003) `Non-contributory pensions and poverty
prevention. A comparative study of Brazil and South Africa'. London:
HelpAge International
http://www.helpage.org/silo/files/noncontributory-pensions-and-poverty-prevention-a-comparative-study-of-brazil-and-south-africa-.pdf
- Armando Barrientos and Peter Lloyd-Sherlock (2011) `Pensions,
poverty and wellbeing. The impact of pensions in South Africa and
Brazil, a comparative study'. HelpAge International Policy
Brief [569 downloads July 2012 to July 2013].
http://www.helpage.org/resources/publications
- Statement from the Chief Executive Officer, HelpAge International,
2006-2013.
- Statement from the Senior Social Security Specialist for the
Americas and the Caribbean, ILO.
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York
(2008) `Guide to the national implementation of the Madrid
International Plan of Action on Ageing'.
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/ageing/documents/papers/guide.pdf
- Director, Department of Ageing and Life Course, World Health
Organisation. "I am happy to verify that Peter Lloyd-Sherlock has
shared the contents of his REF impact case study with me and that they
present an accurate description of the influence of his research"
(email dated 19.09.13).
- Statement from the Senior Social Development Adviser in Governance,
Social Development and Conflict Team in the Research and Evidence
Division, DFID, 2006-12.