Improving treatment for heart attack patients
Submitting Institution
University of SheffieldUnit of Assessment
Public Health, Health Services and Primary CareSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Nursing, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Between 2006 and 2008 an evaluation carried out by the University of
Sheffield of the National Infarct Angioplasty Pilot showed that primary
angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (heart attack) is
feasible, cost-effective and acceptable to patients and carers. As a
direct result, a new national strategy using primary angioplasty was
published in the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease.
National audit data has since shown the proportion of patients receiving
primary angioplasty increasing from 42% to 73% and mortality falling from
10.6% to 8.7%. An impact assessment based on our economic analysis
estimated a £294 million net benefit to the NHS.
Underpinning research
Prior to research carried out at the School of Health and Related
Research (ScHARR) at the University of Sheffield, the standard treatment
for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) was intravenous
thrombolysis. Randomised controlled trials undertaken in a number of
international centres showed that primary angioplasty could produce better
outcomes than intravenous thrombolysis, provided reperfusion with
angioplasty was achieved within 90 minutes of when it could have been
achieved by thrombolysis. However, research was necessary to determine
whether primary angioplasty could be delivered in an acceptable, effective
and cost- effective manner.
The National Infarct Angioplasty Pilot was funded by the Department of
Health to test the feasibility of implementing primary angioplasty for
acute ST-elevation MI at ten pilot hospitals in the UK. The National
Institute for Health Research funded Professor Steve Goodacre (ScHARR
since 1999) and colleagues from ScHARR between 2006 and 2008 to undertake
[R1]:
- Descriptive analysis of the data from these pilot sites
- Cost-effectiveness modelling using data from the ten pilot sites and
four control sites
- Exploration of patient and carer perspectives.
ScHARR researchers also collaborated with researchers from the Institute
of Work Psychology at the University of Sheffield to assess organisational
and workforce issues. Fiona Sampson (ScHARR, since 1996) undertook the
descriptive analysis and showed that primary angioplasty was provided in a
timely manner when patients were transported directly to the catheter
laboratory of a specialist hospital, but not when transported via other
hospitals or departments [R2].
Professor Allan Wailoo (ScHARR, since 2000) undertook the economic
analysis and showed that primary angioplasty-based care was more expensive
than thrombolysis-based care, but at £4,520 per quality-adjusted life year
gained would be considered cost-effective by the NHS [R3]. Cost-
effectiveness of angioplasty was only assured if direct transport to a
specialist hospital catheter laboratory was used.
Fiona Sampson and Professor Alicia O'Cathain (ScHARR, since 1997)
undertook analysis of patient and carer satisfaction, and showed high
overall levels of satisfaction with primary angioplasty and
thromoblysis-based care [R4]. Patients at pilot sites reported higher
levels of satisfaction than control sites with the time waited (80% v 67%
rated excellent, p<0.001) and the efficiency of treatment (83% v 74%,
p=0.009), whereas satisfaction with information given on how to manage the
condition in the future was lower in pilot sites than control sites (38% v
46%, p=0.049). Interviews undertaken by Sampson identified important
issues for patients and carers, and provided insights into their
perceptions of primary angioplasty [R5].
The organisational study undertaken in collaboration with Dr Angela
Carter from the Institute of Work Psychology [R6] showed that establishing
the full 24-hour primary angioplasty service from the start appeared to
work better than incremental expansion, identified requirements for staff
working patterns, training, pay and conditions, identified potential
knock-on effects and highlighted the importance of on-going audit.
Our studies showed that primary angioplasty could be implemented
successfully with acceptable time delays, was likely to be cost-effective
in most circumstances, was acceptable to patients and carers, and
identified key workforce and organisational issues that need to be
addressed during implementation.
References to the research
R2. Goodacre S, Sampson F, Carter A, Wailoo A, O'Cathain A, Wood S,
Capewell S, Campbell S. Evaluation of the National Infarct Angioplasty
Project: Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service
Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO), 2008.
R3.Wailoo A, Goodacre S, Sampson F, Hernandez M, Asseburg C, Palmer SJ,
Sculpher M, Abrams K, de Belder MA, Gray H. Primary angioplasty versus
thrombolysis for acute ST- elevation myocardial infarction: an economic
analysis of the National Infarct Angioplasty Project. Heart
2010;96:668-672. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.167130
R4.Sampson FC, O'Cathain A, Goodacre S. Is primary angioplasty an
acceptable alternative to thrombolysis? Quantitative and qualitative study
of patient and carer satisfaction. Health Expectations 2010;13:350-358.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00589.x
R5.Sampson FC, O'Cathain A, Goodacre S. Feeling fixed and its
contribution to patient satisfaction with primary angioplasty: a
qualitative study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2009;8:85-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2008.07.003
R6.Carter AJ, Wood S, Goodacre S, Sampson F, Stables RH. Evaluation of
the workforce and organisational issues in establishing primary
angioplasty in the National Infarct Angioplasty Project. J Health Serv Res
Policy 2010;15:6-13. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009019
Details of the impact
Our research led to a substantial change in the treatment of acute
ST-elevation MI in the NHS. Primary angioplasty has replaced thrombolysis
as the standard treatment. This has resulted in improved outcomes for
people with ST-elevation MI.
Impact on policy
In 2008 the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)
was updated to set out the new national strategy using primary angioplasty
instead of thrombolysis [S1]. We reported our research directly to the
Department of Health CHD Policy Team and as a result the update cited our
independent research (pages 10-11) that concluded that national roll-out
of primary angioplasty was feasible and likely to be cost-effective. NHS
Improvement was then tasked with facilitating the national roll-out of
primary angioplasty for patients with ST-elevation MI [S2].
Impact on practice
- Treatments provided: National audit data show that following our
research, primary angioplasty replaced thrombolysis as the standard NHS
treatment for people with ST-elevation MI. The Myocardial Infarction
National Audit Project (MINAP) is a national audit of management of MI
in England, Wales and Northern Ireland [S3]. According to the Tenth
MINAP Public Report published in 2011 [S4], 82% of patients in England
who received any reperfusion treatment between April 2010 and March 2011
received primary angioplasty compared to 63% in 2009/10. Increases were
also seen in Wales (22% to 30%) and Belfast (59% to 99%). An interim
report on the national roll-out of primary angioplasty published by NHS
Improvement in 2010 [S5] and based on MINAP data showed that between
2008 and 2010 the proportion of patients in England receiving any
reperfusion treatment who were treated with primary angioplasty
increased from 42% to 73%.
- Patient management pathways: In accordance with findings from our
economic analysis the model for providing primary angioplasty proposed
by the National Service Framework and promoted by NHS Improvement
involved direct transfer of patients to the catheter laboratory of
specialist hospitals. This represents a substantial change from previous
practice of taking all patients with MI to the nearest hospital
emergency department. According to the MINAP report [S4] 75% of patients
that were treated with primary angioplasty in 2010-11 were admitted
directly to a specialist hospital with a catheter laboratory in England,
79% in Wales and 60% in Belfast.
- Achieving time targets: In 2010-11 90% of eligible patients in
England, 68% in Wales and 87% in Belfast were treated with primary
angioplasty within the target of 90 minutes of arrival at the heart
attack centre [S4]. Furthermore, 81% of eligible patients in England,
75% in Wales and 90% in Belfast were treated with primary angioplasty
within 150 minutes of calling for professional help. The findings of the
organisational evaluation assisted the process of implementation and
helped to ensure that time targets for providing primary angioplasty
were achieved.
Impact on patient outcomes
After our findings were reported and implemented through the National
Infarct Angioplasty Pilot in 2007, mortality from ST-elevation MI in the
NHS fell from 10.6% in 2006-2007 to 8.7% in 2010-11 [S4]. Randomised
trials have shown that primary angioplasty reduces mortality compared to
thrombolysis, so although other factors may have contributed to this
improvement, it is reasonable to attribute some of the improvement to
increased use of primary angioplasty.
Economic impact
An impact assessment based on our cost-effectiveness analysis was
undertaken by the Department of Health in 2008 [S7] and estimated that
over three years the policy would cost £44.4 million and would yield
£337.9 million in benefits, measured as discounted quality-adjusted life
years (QALYs) to patients and monetised on the basis of an estimate of
social value of a QALY at £40,000.
Impact on older patients
Primary angioplasty has not been restricted on the basis of age and
reductions in mortality have been seen in older people with ST-elevation
MI. In-hospital mortality reduced from 30.1% in 2003 to 19.4% in 2010 in
those aged 85 or more (relative risk = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.75, P<
0.001) [S6].
Impact on the wider clinical community
Although implementation of primary angioplasty is driven by national
policy, we believe that it is important to engage the clinical community.
Thus, in addition to publications in clinical journals outlined above, we
have produced an overview of our findings for ambulance paramedics [S8]
and have engaged directly with clinicians through presenting our findings
at clinical conferences, such as the College of Emergency Medicine Annual
Scientific Meeting [S9,S10].
Sources to corroborate the impact
S1. Department of Health Coronary Heart Disease Policy Team. The Coronary
Heart Disease National Service Framework: Building on excellence,
maintaining progress. Progress report for 2008. Our independent evaluation
is cited on page 10 and our findings cited on page 11.
S2. NHS Improvement. A Guide to Implementing Primary Angioplasty (2008).
S3. The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). Herrett E,
Smeeth L, Walker L, Weston C, on behalf of the MINAP Academic Group. Heart
2010;96:1264-1267 doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.192328.
S4. How the NHS cares for patients with heart attack: The Myocardial
Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) Tenth Annual Public Report.
University College London, 2011.
www.ucl.ac.uk/nicor/audits/minap
S5. NHS Improvement. National roll-out of Primary PCI for patients with
ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: An interim report (2010).
S6. Gale CP, Cattle BA, Woolston A et al Resolving inequalities in care?
Reduced mortality in the elderly after acute coronary syndromes. The
Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project 2003-2010 Eur Heart J first
published online October 18, 2011 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr381.
S7. Department of Health. Impact Assessment of Treatment of Heart Attacks
— National Guidance (2008).
S8. Sampson F, Goodacre S, Carter A, Wailoo A. Improving call-to-balloon
times for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of Paramedic
Practice 2011:3:625-631.
S9. Carter A, Wood S, Goodacre S, Sampson F. Emergency medicine and
primary angioplasty: Organisational analysis. Emerg Med J 2008;25:A19.
S10. Sampson F, O'Cathain A, Goodacre S. Is primary angioplasty an
acceptable treatment for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction?
Emerg Med J 2008;25:A19.