Driving the Worldwide One Health Response to the Threat of Avian Influenza
Submitting Institution
Royal Veterinary CollegeUnit of Assessment
Agriculture, Veterinary and Food ScienceSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Public Health and Health Services, Other Medical and Health Sciences
Summary of the impact
Pioneering interdisciplinary research at the Royal Veterinary College
(RVC) has enabled governments internationally and global health
authorities to respond swiftly to the outbreak of a disease that causes
huge economic losses, threatens the livelihoods of vulnerable populations
in the developing world and endangers human lives. Supported by proactive
dissemination, it has shaped the control policies and risk management
strategies of the United Nations and governments across Asia, Africa and
Europe, as well as a national contingency plan for the UK. And it has
demonstrated that costly vaccination campaigns and mass culling programmes
can be avoided in efforts to bring the disease under control.
Underpinning research
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is a highly transmissible
disease of poultry with a flock mortality approaching 100% in vulnerable
species. Since its emergence in 2003, 63 countries have reported outbreaks
of HPAI subtype H5N1 in domestic and wild birds. The virus constitutes a
major public health risk; nearly 600 human infections have been reported,
with a mortality of 60%.
In 2003, the RVC's Veterinary Epidemiology and Public Health (VEPH) team,
headed by Dirk Pfeiffer, Professor of Veterinary Epidemiology (since
1999), embarked on a series of epidemiological field studies, theoretical
research and data analysis to inform global policy recommendations to
fight the disease, resulting in more than 30 journal papers in the last
five years. Since its founding in 1999, the VEPH team (since 2010 VEEPH,
to additionally include Economics) has expanded to 11 academic staff and
more than 30 PhD students, research assistants and postdoctoral
researchers. The team's diverse skill sets, covering economics, risk
analysis and surveillance, enable their research to be responsive to
policy needs.
The VEPH team has undertaken, as lead group and/or in collaboration with
colleagues overseas and other UK HEIs, research to determine the
demographic, spatial and socio-economic characteristics of poultry systems
and risks associated with H5N1 outbreaks in Asia, Africa and Europe. They
showed that farming systems in Asia's Mekong delta, involving domestic
water birds and rice production, represented ideal conditions for the
spread of infection. Analysis suggested that vaccination campaigns in
countries such as Vietnam contributed to transmission of infection [1],
either through ineffective vaccination or via the people administering the
vaccinations, and that disease incidence peaked before holiday periods.
Based on the second epidemic wave in Thailand, Pfeiffer was a major
contributor to a statistical risk model, developed in an international
collaborative effort led by Université Libre de Bruxelles which is
applicable to countries with similar agro-ecological conditions such as
Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia [2]. With Javier Guitian, (appointed Lecturer
in 2002 and progressing to Professor of Veterinary Public Health in 2010),
as PI, VEPH, in collaboration with Imperial College, demonstrated that
HPAI H5N1 could be sustained silently within live bird markets, but that
frequent rest days were an effective means to reduce transmission,
negating the need to close the market [3]. In Europe, as part of an
international research team, RVC academics, led by Katharina Staerk,
(Professor of Veterinary Public Health since 2007), demonstrated the
effectiveness of ducks as sentinels for avian influenza virus infections
[4].
Collaborative work, again with Imperial, in the UK showed that planned
interventions based on movement restrictions would control the majority of
outbreaks; neither localized reactive vaccination nor culling were likely
to have a substantial impact [5]. Globally, the RVC team, including
Jonathan Rushton, (from 2009, Senior Lecturer and since 2013, Professor of
Animal Health Economics), demonstrated that confined food animal
production systems can increase animal and public health risks and
geographical variations in poultry density and production systems must be
taken into account to inform preventative measures [6]. In addition, a
region's socio-economic conditions, including human behaviour, and
incentives for bioexclusion and biocontainment, give a full understanding
of the circumstances in which the virus circulates [7,8]
Other Quality and Relevance Indicators
Pfeiffer, D. Various grants for HPAI research over REF research period
from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (UNFAO), UK
Departments for International Development (DfID) and for Environment, Food
and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) £1.5m.
References to the research
1. Pfeiffer, DU, Minh, PQ, Martin, V, Epprecht, M, Otte, MJ. 2007 An
analysis of the spatial and temporal patterns of highly pathogenic avian
influenza occurrence in Vietnam using national surveillance data.
Veterinary Journal;174(2):302-9 DOI: org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.05.010
2. Gilbert, M, Xiao, X, Pfeiffer, DU, Epprecht, M, Boles, S, Czarnecki,
C, Chaitaweesub, P, Kalpravidh, W, Minh, PQ, Otte, MJ, Martin, V,
Slingenbergh, J. 2008 Mapping H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza risk
in Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
USA;105(12):4769-74 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710581105
3. Fournié, G, Guitian, FJ, Mangtani, P, Ghani, AC. 2011 Impact of the
implementation of rest days in live bird markets on the dynamics of H5N1
highly pathogenic avian influenza. Journal of the Royal Society Interface;
8(61):1079-89. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0510
4. Globig, A, Baumer, A, Revilla-Fernández, S, Beer, M, Wodak, E, Fink,
M, Greber, N, Harder, TC, Wilking, H, Brunhart, I, Matthes, D, Kraatz, U,
Strunk, P, Fiedler, W, Fereidouni, SR, Staubach, C, Conraths, FJ, Griot,
C, Mettenleiter, TC, Stärk, KD. 2009 Ducks as sentinels for avian
influenza in wild birds. Emerging Infectious Diseases;15(10):1633-6 DOI:
10.3201/eid1510.090439
5. Truscott, J, Garske, T, Chis-Ster, I, Guitian, J, Pfeiffer, DU, Snow,
L, Wilesmith, J, Ferguson, NM, Ghani, AC. 2007 Control of a highly
pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza outbreak in the GB poultry flock.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B — Biological Sciences;
22;274(1623):2287-95 doi:
10.1098/rspb.2007.0542
6. Leibler, JH, Otte, J, Roland-Holst, D, Pfeiffer, DU, Soares Magalhaes,
R, Rushton J, Graham, JP, Silbergeld, EK. 2009 Industrial food animal
production and global health risks: exploring the ecosystems and economics
of avian influenza. Ecohealth;6(1):58-70 DOI: 10.1007/s10393-009-0226-0
7. Rushton, J, Viscarra, RV, Taylor, NM, Hoffmann, I, Schwabenbauer, K.
2010 Poultry sector development, highly pathogenic avian influenza and the
smallholder production systems. Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary
Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, CABI.2010 5 No 030 DOI:
org/10.1079/PAVSNNR20105030
8. Hinrichs, J, Otte, J, Rushton, J. 2010 Technical, epidemiological and
financial implications of large-scale national vaccination campaigns to
control HPAI H5N1. Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science,
Nutrition and Natural Resources, CABI.2010 5 021 DOI:
org/10.1079/PAVSNNR20105021
Details of the impact
Research at the RVC has provided global health organisations and
governments with scientific evidence urgently required to manage the
threat posed by one of the most high-profile viruses in recent history.
Policies based directly on findings from cross-continental research into
the HPAI H5N1 virus have had profound social and economic implications,
enabling more efficient allocation of limited resources for disease
control and reducing the devastating economic damage from the culling of
domestic birds. In Southeast Asia alone, virus outbreaks have caused the
destruction of 140 million birds, equating to losses of around $10bn and
putting low-income families' livelihoods at risk.
To fill-in data gaps and promote science-based policy implementation, the
RVC's VEPH team carried out a number of studies as part of a DfID-funded
programme on Pro-Poor HPAI Risk Reduction Strategies, including risk
assessments for eight governments in Asia and Africa [a]. The
studies identified risk factors and geographic hot spots for infection;
the advantages and disadvantages of vaccination campaigns; and the
effectiveness of rest days in live bird markets. The risk assessment
exercises facilitated the formulation of existing scientific evidence into
risk mitigation strategies. Programme findings were presented at the final
research meeting in October 2010, held in conjunction with the Animal
Production and Health Commission for Asia and the Pacific (APHCA) in
Thailand, attended by senior policy makers from fourteen countries; key
findings were also reflected in the ten key messages arising out of the
Programme's Southeast Asia research, and presented to APHCA in November
2010 [b,c].
The VEPH team's studies were closely aligned with global disease control
policy, resulting in the rapid translation of Programme findings into risk
management strategies. Consequently, governments have been able to tailor
control measures for high-risk areas, adapt vaccination campaigns to
minimise the risk of infection and safeguard traders' livelihoods.
Thailand, Vietnam and Africa have now modified their HPAI control
strategies, with more focused vaccination and culling campaigns. The UNFAO
Senior Animal Production and Health Officer for Asia and the Pacific
commented: "The RVC's research [...] demonstrated how a number of
characteristics [...] contribute to disease risk in poultry systems.
[It] also contributed to the understanding of the social and economic
context within which poultry producers operate. The RVC's risk
assessments were therefore critical in informing the Programme's ten key
messages" [d]. Recommendations to introduce market rest days as
opposed to full closure are also likely to have restricted the spread of
the H5N1 virus. The introduction of rest days has helped secure buy-in
from local communities for disease control efforts. (Draconian moves to
force market closures spawn black markets and the creation of favourable
conditions for the virus.)
Research activities have been complemented by major capacity building
work, with veterinary staff from over 70 countries worldwide being trained
by researchers from the RVC, utilising the underpinning research findings.
These UNFAO-supported activities were focused on improved surveillance for
HPAI in endemic and disease-free countries and improved international
coordination of national surveillance and control efforts [a]. Findings
were communicated at a UNFAO-backed workshop in Thailand in 2008, attended
by 80 participants, including government representatives from China,
Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam [e]. Pfeiffer co- edited
the book Health and Animal Agriculture in Developing Countries (Natural
Resource Management and Policy, Vol. 36) (Springer, 2011), which has been
translated into Chinese and Japanese.
The VEEPH team's work on risk assessments and surveillance has been
referenced in various poultry publications and other media
internationally, including a feature in the British Medical Journal in
2011, indicating the penetration of the research outcomes encapsulating
the One Health approach, with broad reach to relevant stakeholders,
including the human medical profession [f].
RVC research guided the formulation of guidelines issued in 2011 by
OFFLU, a network established by the World Organisation for Animal Health
(OIE) and the UNFAO, on avian influenza surveillance at country level [g].
The Chairman of OFFLU comments: "In particular, the RVC's demonstration
of the demographic, spatial and socio-economic characteristics of
poultry systems and their associated risks [...] can be evidenced in
OFFLU's guidance on targeted risk-based sampling for on-farm
surveillance." [h]
In Europe, Pfeiffer has been a member of the European Food Safety
Authority's Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. Risk assessments relating
to HPAI involving the RVC team have shaped guidelines contained in a
series of Scientific Opinions issued by the EFSA, such as the May 2008
Statement, in response to a European Commission request, on the animal
health and welfare aspect of avian influenza and the risk of its
introduction into the EU poultry holdings. Guidance given in these
Statements has remained in force throughout the REF impact period [i].
VEEPH's work was also incorporated into risk management guidelines that
incorporate value chain analysis, adopted and promoted by the UNFAO, with
Rushton one of the two main authors. [j].
In July 2012 the United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO)
awarded the RVC the status of FAO Reference Centre in Veterinary
Epidemiology, a reflection of the global recognition of the RVC as a
centre of excellence in veterinary epidemiology [k].
The research findings and RVC's expertise in this field continue to
impact upon policy discussion in the UK and internationally: Pfeiffer was
invited to make a presentation on avian flu to the UK Parliamentary Labour
Party Health Group in January 2013 [l]. He was one of 30 international
experts invited to an emergency meeting held under the auspices of the
UNFAO's EMPRES (Emergency Prevention System) Animal Health team in April
2013 to address epidemiology, surveillance and risk management of H7N9 —
the newly emergent strain of avian influenza responsible for the most
recent outbreaks in China [m], which was recorded, with webcasts available
from the UNFAO website [n].
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. FAO, 2011. Pro-Poor HPAI Risk Reduction Strategies. Final Report. Held
by RVC.
b. DfID, 2010. Research meeting: Pro-Poor HPAI Risk Reduction: Lessons
from Southeast Asia and Africa. (Phuket, Thailand).
http://www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/PDF/Outputs/HPAI/WKS101025_puket_proceedings.pdf
[accessed 19 Aug 2013]
c. APHCA, 2010. Ten Key messages from the Pro-Poor HPAI Risk Reduction
Project in Southeast Asia. (http://www.aphca.org/index.php?view=article&catid=87%3Aanimal--human-health&id=75%3Aten-key-messages-from-the-pro-poor-hpai-risk-reduction-project-in-southeast-asia&tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page=&option=com_content&Itemid=197)
[accessed 19 Aug 2013]
d. Statement provided by Senior Animal Production and Health Office for
Asia and the Pacific, UNFAO. Held by RVC.
e. FAO/Cirad/RVC International Workshop on `Research Activities on Avian
Flu and other Transboundary Animal Diseases in South-east Asia', Bangkok,
Thailand, January 21-22, 2008.
(http://www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/PDF/Outputs/HPAI/mtg080121_abstracts.pdf)
[accessed 19 Aug 2013]
f. http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d4117.full
[accessed 19 Aug 2013]
g. http://www.offlu.net/fileadmin/home/en/publications/pdf/OFFLUsurveillance.pdf
[accessed 19 Aug 2013; published May 2013]
h. Statement from Chairman, OFFLU Steering Committee (OIE-FAO Network of
Expertise on Animal Influenza). Held by RVC.
i. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/715.htm [accessed 17 Oct
2013
j. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2198e/i2198e00.pdf
[accessed 19 Aug 2013]
k. http://empres-i.fao.org/eipws3g/index.html?animalProdNetwork=yes
[accessed 19 Aug 2013]
l. Invitation by email from the Right Honourable Frank Dobson MP, dated 3
September 2012. Held by RVC.
m. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/empres/news_190413.html
[accessed 19 Aug 2013]
n. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/empres/H7N9/
[accessed 19 Aug 2013]