Improving Foreign Language Teaching in England
Submitting Institution
University of OxfordUnit of Assessment
EducationSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Education: Curriculum and Pedagogy, Specialist Studies In Education
Language, Communication and Culture: Linguistics
Summary of the impact
Research by Macaro and collaborators since 1999 led to the distillation
of eight principles
regarding foreign language pedagogy, and to the development of video- and
paper-based
materials to support the application of these principles in teacher
pedagogy and in teacher
education programmes in England. The application in Schools and Higher
Education Institutions
was facilitated through an ESRC-funded impact project involving language
teachers and teacher
educators, and it was extended and sustained through the creation of
practitioner clusters based
on the research. Teachers report that changes have taken place in their
modern languages
departments following engagement with the research, with benefit to
student learning; these
changes have included much greater, and better quality, interaction in the
foreign language, and a
greater focus on processes and strategies in skills development. Teacher
education programme
providers have incorporated the research-based principles into their
programmes, with impact on
their student-teachers' practice.
Underpinning research
Oxford Team: Professor Ernesto Macaro (employed by Oxford since 1999), Dr
Lynn Erler
(Research Officer Sept 2002-2004 and Feb 2006-2009), and Dr Robert Woore
(Research Fellow
from Sept 2007, Departmental Lecturer from May 2012).
The underpinning research focused on two key areas of Foreign Language
(FL) learning: (1)
teacher-learner interaction, and (2) language learner strategies.
(1) In a number of research-based publications, beginning with research
published in 2001 [R1],
Macaro's findings pointed to the fact that exclusive use of the target
language by the teacher did
not lead to greater target language use by learners; that learners
benefited from first language
explanations of new lexical items [R2]; and that pedagogy should
thus focus on quality interaction
in the target language, rather than its exclusive use. These findings
challenged national and
international foreign/second language policies of the 1990s, which argued
for exclusive use of the
target language. Macaro is now considered an international expert on the
subject of `principled
teacher codeswitching' (limited first language use for justifiable
pedagogical functions).
(2) Macaro also co-led a research project on Language Learner Strategies
(LLS), the learners'
strategic use of their linguistic knowledge in tasks, through an
international research network on
LLS (International Project on LLS) and also a national network (UK Project
on LLS). Specifically for
the UK, the Oxford team, led by Macaro, found that many learners
demonstrate poor strategic
behaviour when faced with learning tasks [R3] and that they become
demotivated when they are
unable to modify their strategic behaviour [R4]. Important
findings by the team included young
learners' poor decoding ability, and the observation of a significant lack
of progress with decoding
between years 7 and 9, indicating that beginner French learners are faced
with a process akin to
dyslexia because of the complex relationship between the graphemes and
phonemes of French,
compounded by the transfer of that relationship from their first language
(English). Very
importantly, a link was found between poor decoding ability, a lack of
decoding strategies, and a
lack of motivation to continue with language learning at KS4 [R5].
This LLS research led to
interventions in reading strategies [R6], and, in collaboration
with Suzanne Graham (University of
Reading), interventions in listening strategies [R7], all of which
showed signs of being successful in
bringing about change in strategic behaviour, and hence attainment.
A recent research project (ESRC, 2010-11) brought the two areas of
research together and
demonstrated that learners appear to use inadequate strategies when faced
with teacher second
language input (see: ESRC Report 2011; Hennebry, Macaro, Rodgers &
Murphy, 2014
forthcoming).
References to the research
[R1] Macaro, E. (2001a) Analysing Student Teachers' Codeswitching
in Foreign Language
classrooms: Theories and decision making. The Modern Language Journal,
85/4. 531-548.
[R2] Tian, L. and Macaro, E. (2012). Comparing the effect of
teacher codeswitching with English-
only explanations on the vocabulary acquisition of Chinese university
students: A Lexical
Focus-on-Form study. Language Teaching Research.16/3, 361 - 385
[R3] Macaro, E. (2007) Do beginner learners of French have any
writing strategies? Language
Learning Journal. 35/1, 23-36.
[R4] Macaro, E. (2001b) Learning Strategies in second and
foreign language classrooms. London:
Continuum.
[R5] Erler, L. and Macaro, E. (2011). Decoding Ability in French
as a Foreign Language and
Language Learning Motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 95/4.
496-518
[R6] Macaro, E, and Erler, L (2008) Raising the achievement of
young-beginner readers of French
through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics. 29/1, 90-119.
[R7] Graham, S. and Macaro, E. (2008) Strategy instruction in
listening for lower-intermediate
learners of French. Language Learning. 58/4, 747-783.
[R1, 2, 5, 6, & 7] are articles in international peer-reviewed
journals of the highest quality and have
been cited extensively by other researchers both nationally and
internationally. The 2001 book
[R4] has become a standard textbook in many teacher education
institutions.
Much of the above research stemmed from ESRC funded grants with Macaro as
PI:
Learner strategies in reading and writing (01/10/02-30/09/04):
Rated `outstanding'; led to [R3, 6].
Strategy training in year 12 French (01/10/03-31/12/05): Rated
`outstanding'; led to [R7].
Decoding French, learner motivation and language learning
(01/02/06-30/04/07): Rated
`outstanding'; led to [R5].
Teachers' use of first language in second language classrooms
(01/07/09-3107/10): `very good'.
These projects were submitted as evidence of quality when making a
successful ESRC application
for follow-on funding to promote further impact (with University of
Reading).
Details of the impact
Macaro and collaborators have distilled 14 years' worth of findings
(including R1-R7) from the two
extensive areas of research (interaction and learner strategies) into
eight key pedagogical
principles accessible to end-users: language teachers, teacher educators,
and policy
makers/advisers in Modern Foreign Languages (MFL) [C1]. The impact
process began with the
generation and communication of pedagogical research-based principles,
moved through the
creation of resources (video and paper) and generation of professional
development through
practitioner workshops, to stimulate wider practitioner engagement. Each
stage was documented
and evaluated. To give this impact process greater focus in 2012, Macaro
and collaborators
obtained ESRC follow-on funding to carry out and evaluate impact
activities resulting from the
research outlined above.
1) Impact on teachers' pedagogy and that of their departments
A `Consortium for Professional Development in MFL' was established in
2012, initially comprising
teacher educators from Oxford and Reading, and teachers from Oxfordshire,
Berkshire,
Herefordshire and Cambridgeshire, but with the aim of creating a `snowball
effect'. Development
materials, illustrating how to address the eight key principles, were
refined and produced (March-
May 2012). The principles and materials were then used by members of the
Consortium (teams of
researchers and school teachers) at 7 national workshops (June 2012-March
2013) attended by
over 300 teachers and teacher trainers as well as representatives of
government agencies
(Department for Education; Ofsted). In addition, Macaro and Graham were
invited to work through
the principles and connected pedagogy with practitioner members of the
Harris Federation
Academies (a group of 27 primary and secondary academies, educating 20,000
pupils in and
around London) in October 2012. Two Consortium members were invited to
present at a
conference for MFL department heads run by Leeds Learning Partnership (Feb
2013). The
Consortium established and is continually developing a website [C1]
through which practitioners
can access, discuss and contribute to the principles and the materials,
and, importantly, which they
can then use to work with their department teams, or teacher education
teams. As of 31st July
2013, the Consortium website and blog had received over 10,000 hits.
As a result of the workshops, 219 teachers agreed to implement the
pedagogical principles in their
respective school departments. The Consortium provided follow-up support
for these departments
(via email, the website and in some cases through face-to-face contact).
Questionnaires,
complemented by interviews and reports gathered from many of the schools
who undertook to
implement the principles, indicated a statistically significant increase
in teachers' favourable
attitudes to the principles pre- and post-workshop, an increase in part
sustained by a third
questionnaire administered six months later [C2].
In April 2013, 102 teachers who had implemented the principles
voluntarily reported success in
changing or developing FL pedagogy in their departments [C2],
including much greater and better
quality second language interaction, and a greater focus on
process/strategies in skills
development. In a subsequent additional survey (N = 40):
92% had used some or all of the principles in their pedagogy;
85% had made or were intending to make changes to their curriculum based
on the principles;
64% reported greater use of quality second language in teacher-students
oral interaction;
54% reported improved reading skills among students.
Teachers from the schools where the principles have been implemented
describe changes to their
pedagogical practice, developing practical applications, "being inspired",
and sharing their own
development with colleagues in their departments. Examples include:
- "I've found the principles have given me a fresh look at different
aspects of my pedagogy...
Most excitingly, it has spurred me on to further develop reading and
writing."
- "I have changed the way I `correct' pupils in my Year 7 class — I
have actively encouraged
them to use their fledgling German for `genuine' communication (i.e.
effectively get a
message across) [...] I am astonished at how a `little and often'
focus on key structures in
Year 7 combined with actively promoting them to re-use these
structures in all kinds of
contexts, often unrelated to the work at hand, has had a great effect
on their ability to write
confidently and enjoy using `real' German."
- "I used the `Hiding Out' text idea and created stories (attached if
they're of interest) to fit in
with their topics, with French/Spanish inserted so that we can work on
inferring meaning -
they love being `language detectives'! From there, they have grown
increasingly confident to
tackle whole sentences in the target language in the same way."
- "[We are] rewriting the schemes of work with a focus through the
eyes of the principles."
- "I certainly bought into it (the principles) on the course, and
then my faculty have really
bought into it..."
Teachers also report changes in the way students approach language learning:
- "Overall it has really improved some of the students' abilities —
especially reading."
- "Students are more aware now of how to go about their tasks and
what processes they need
to go through in order to help them learn something."
- "Students are more open to longer and more challenging texts, the
strategies we identified
have been very useful for them."
- "Very positive levels of engagement from students, across different
ability levels [...]
Teaching the strategies explicitly was a success."
- "Students said they liked the challenging nature of the texts and
that they enjoyed the
responsibility of working more independently [...] they achieved a
good understanding of the
texts. Many indicated that they were pleasantly surprised that they
could access the material
and that it had given them confidence going forward."
- "Many of them gained confidence and a better oral fluency in
Italian."
The Consortium website [C1] hosts teaching resources developed by
teachers who worked with
the principles, ranging from multimedia activities to worksheets, writing
tasks, reading materials,
and display ideas (http://pdcinmfl.com/resources-made-by-you/).
Following a visit to one of the
schools implementing the principles, the Chief Executive of the National
College for School
Leadership noted how the research-based principles had been "shared ...
round the school and
the results were going up" [C3]. Ofsted have been kept
updated of the work of the Consortium, and
encouraged to make teachers aware of the website materials. In recently
published Ofsted
guidelines "Judging the Use of the Target Language by Teachers and
Students" (2013), the
language used to describe "good" and "outstanding" practice is very
similar to that used in the oral
interaction section of the principles, published on the project website.
By March 2013, the snowball effect intended had become evident. The active
Consortium
expanded from 10 to 35 members by enlisting the help of teacher educators
and other leading
figures in the world of language education. This created not only the
desired snowball effect but a
consolidation and, above all, greater sustainability of the changes,
accomplished through
engagement with the research. As a result, from February 2013, the
`original' Consortium helped
the `expanded' Consortium set up `local clusters' of teachers from
different schools and teacher
educators, whereby they rolled out the principles and the materials to
other schools in their locality,
including those in Birmingham, Walsall, Nottingham, Derby, Cheltenham,
Reading, Abingdon,
Oxford, West Oxfordshire, Newcastle, Lincoln, Sussex, Portsmouth, and
Durham. For example, in
Portsmouth, following a successful initial cluster meeting, the PGCE MFL
course leader
(Portsmouth University) set up a Google Group where teachers share
resources related to the
principles. Macaro and collaborators continue to support the clusters and
have applied for
additional resources with which to do this as effectively as possible.
2) Impact on MFL Language Teacher Education Programmes
The principles have been adopted in teacher education programmes such as
at Nottingham
University, Sheffield Hallam University, Sussex University, Portsmouth
University, Birmingham City
University, Newman University, Birmingham University, and Newcastle
University. This adoption of
the principles has resulted in hundreds of future MFL teachers
experimenting with the distillation of
the research in their teaching practice. For example, at Nottingham
University, according to the
PGCE MFL course leader [C4], the principles have been incorporated
into the conceptual model of
the course; while at Sheffield Hallam University they have led to "a
permanent change in the way
that we think about language teaching and language learning",
reflected in the fact that tutors
"actually rewrote the session to draw on the more strategic approach
that had been flagged up in
the workshop." [C5] A teacher trainer from Newman University
emphasises that "the principles and
materials provide a strong framework from which student teachers in
particular can interrogate
their understanding of how modern language teaching is delivered in
schools. It supports them in
questioning the status quo and in evaluating the quality of pupil
interactions in the classroom." [C6]
Another PGCE tutor (Nottingham University) comments on the portability and
sustainability of
changes achieved in light of the principles: "I am moving over to Teach
First and will be embedding
the above in my teaching sessions and in conversations at school with
the student teachers and
their mentors."
The President of the Association for Language Learning (ALL) [C7],
who is also a teacher, sums
up the impact of this research as follows: "I think this project has
done more to bridge the gap
between research and teaching than any other project I know of. Perhaps
this is because the
principles distil succinctly some key methodological pointers and
describe them in such a way that
teachers can immediately take hold of them[...].I have no doubt that the
[workshops] day was
instrumental in seeding the changes that I have witnessed in my project
colleagues over the past
year." The Languages Professional lead at the CfBT Education Trust
(and former ALL President)
adds: "this project, involving a wide range of teachers across a whole
spectrum of schools, has
been [...] very effective in terms of the impact that it has had. It is
very clear, from the teacher
responses I have seen, that the eight Principles and their associated
pedagogical materials have
been very well received and have pushed teachers to interrogate and
alter their practice." [C8]
Sources to corroborate the impact
[C1] Eight pedagogical principles, via the Consortium for
Professional Development in Modern
Foreign Languages (PCD in MFL): http://pdcinmfl.com.
[C2] Impact evaluation dataset (integrating 309 questionnaires
completed by teachers and teacher
educators post-workshops, 67 questionnaires completed by participants 6
months after workshops;
14 transcribed interviews with participants) (copy on file).
[C3] Speech by the Chief Executive, the National College for
Teaching and Leadership (13 June
2013) http://www.education.gov.uk/nationalcollege/index/events/conference2013/conference2013-
charlie-taylor-a-school-led-system.htm).
[C4] PGCE Modern Foreign Languages course leader University of
Nottingham (statement on file).
[C5] PGCE Modern Foreign Languages tutor, Sheffield Hallam
University (statement on file).
[C6] PGCE Modern Foreign Languages tutor, Newman University (statement
on file).
[C7] President of the Association for Language Learning (statement
on file).
[C8] Languages Professional Lead, CfBT Education Trust/ past ALL
President (statement on file).