Transforming visitor experience across museums and heritage sites Museum organisation and evaluation
Submitting Institution
Nottingham Trent UniversityUnit of Assessment
HistorySummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies
History and Archaeology: Curatorial and Related Studies
Summary of the impact
The last twenty years has seen a gradual transformation of museums from
being collections-focused to becoming audience-centred organisations.
Graham Black, a `practitioner academic' with a proven commercial track
record, has played an important role in enabling this change. His research
has been instrumental in developing alternative approaches to display,
activities and events, and online provision. Black argues that the speed
of change in the external world - a `perfect storm' involving rapid
demographic change, generational shift and the influence of new media
—must be matched by an equally speedy response in the definition, mission
and public practice of museums (`Developing Audiences for the
Twenty-First-Century Museum', 2013). Through publications, talks and
exemplar design practices his work has helped to shape public debates on
museums and user participation/user generated content, and on museums and
civil engagement, in the UK, Europe and beyond.
Underpinning research
Black's research focuses on the role of the museum as a centre for
informal learning, and specifically how the museum exhibition and
associated programming performs this function. This means combining
research on museum audiences, and their expectations and motivations, with
applied learning theory and research specifically on visitor behaviour in
the museum environment (The Engaging Museum: Developing Museums for
Visitor Involvement (2005)).This is then evaluated within a
contemporary environment of demographic change, generational shift and the
impact of new media to establish a working paradigm for future museum
display approaches (`Target groups for art and cultural education in the
digital era', Berlin, 2011). He has a particular concern for the role of
museums as centres for public history, where the curatorial teams work
with their communities to explore the relevance of the past to the
present, bringing multiple contemporary perspectives to bear on that past
(`What makes great history in a city history museum?', Vancouver 2012).
One of Black's key operational concepts is that the creation of an
exhibition is only the beginning - that work really starts when the public
gain admission. A major focus of his new book, Transforming Museums In
The 21st Century, is that museums must concentrate on establishing
long-term relationships with their audiences. Since 2008, his
research has focused on developing techniques to achieve this,
particularly through building in an on-going events and activities
programme and making user-generated contributions integral to content
(e.g. ' Embedding civil engagement in museums', 2010).
Black recognises that once history leaves the confines of the academy in
the search for a broader audience, it tends to become simplified in ways
that historians often think `dumbs down' their research. He recognises,
too, the potential conflict between being historically `correct' and
communicating to a broad, diverse audience. Yet in echoing the words of
Wendell Berry (A Continuous Harmony, 1972), he speaks of his fear
of a 21st century society `adrift in the present', and of the
importance of the democratisation of history as a counter to this. He
wants those previously silenced, spoken for or marginalised, to reclaim
ownership of their own, and their communities', pasts. He wants, too, to
see these pasts represented centrally in museum displays, and their voices
heard through their inclusion. He, therefore, celebrates both the desire
of communities to research and record their own pasts, and the growing
expectation amongst them to be able to contribute their life experiences
and reflections to museum content. He acknowledges that this makes for a
`messy history' when compared to the authoritative voice offered by the
professional historian. Museum collections, however, are in effect the
cultural memory of humankind. He believes museums must encourage their
audiences to see themselves primarily as active participants on a learning
journey. What is required is much clearer focus on supporting active
engagement with content (Transforming Museums, 2012).
For Black, generating `great city history' in the museum environment
(Vancouver, 2012) means:
a) having a clear vision, and meeting the needs of diverse audiences;
b) presenting a vivid sense of the past which locates the city's
development in time and space;
c) using a broad range of sources of evidence, and ensuring multiple
perspectives are represented;
d) that museums can, and should be, be authoritative without being
authoritarian.
He recognises that communities will have different understandings and
uses of the past than professional historians. However, he argues strongly
for the quality of the history being represented, and against historical
demagoguery and dominant narrative (Museums, Memory and History', Cultural
and Social History, 8 (2011), 415-27). All our cities and
communities have potentially toxic pockets of disputed history, but it is
a core to his advocacy that museums must be trusted to present disputed
history that counters myth and invention, nostalgia, the false, the
romanticised, the unchallenging, the selective, the biased.
Research is now focused on the importance of small-scale interventions in
existing exhibitions to augment user engagement and participation, and the
ability of these to transform the visitor experience. Supported by Arts
Council England, pilots began in early 2013 (see section 4.1).
References to the research
1) Monograph: Transforming Museums In The 21st Century
(Routledge, 2012), pp. 276 (also translated into Turkish). This monograph
has been top of the Amazon museology best-sellers list, various dates
2012-2013.
2) Invited paper: `What makes great history in a city history museum?', International
Committee for the Collections and Archives of Cities, International
Council of Museums, annual conference, Vancouver, 24 - 26 October
2012.
3) Monograph: The Engaging Museum: Developing Museums for Visitor
Involvement (Routledge, 2nd Edn. 2005), pp. 320 (translated into
Greek and Chinese). This monograph has also been top of the Amazon
museology best-sellers list, various dates since its publication. For
positive academic reviews see review, Collection Management 30,4
(2007), 106-8; and
http://www.york.ac.uk/ipup/projects/audiences/discussion/black.html.
4) Book Chapter, `Developing Audiences for the Twenty-First-Century
Museum', in C. McCarthy (ed.), The International Handbook of Museum
Studies. Volume IV: Practice (Wiley, 2103), 1-28.
5) Journal Article: `Embedding civil engagement in museums', Museum
Management and Curatorship 25 (June 2010),129-146, republished as Ch
22 Museums and Civil Engagement, in Anderson, G. (ed) Reinventing the
Museum (AltaMira, 2nd edition, 2011), 271-290. This text
is used by every museum studies course in the USA.
6) Key Note Address: `Target groups for art and cultural education in the
digital era', The Influence of Digital Media on Innovative Art and
Cultural Education Concepts Conference, European Foundation Genshagen,
Berlin, 23-25 November 2011.
Details of the impact
Black's research has been instrumental in resetting the museum and
heritage display agenda over the last twenty years, placing audiences
rather than collections at the centre of the engagement process. His
approach combines overview/analysis/evaluation/debate around practice,
with action research through the development of policy documents,
interpretive plans and exhibitions. Examples include current and past
collaborations with the National Trust, and Birmingham, Cardiff, Leicester
and Nottingham City Councils, and work with the Stoke Potteries Museum on
the re-display of the Staffordshire Hoard (see section 5.4), and most
recently with an AHRC funded KTA to support the small independent
Framework Knitters' Museum, Ruddington in developing a masterplan for its
future (see section 5.8). Most of Black's past work, however, has involved
substantial Heritage Lottery Fund grants (e.g. Galleries of Justice,
Nottingham (see section 5.6); Tyntesfield, National Trust; and Newarke
Houses Museum, Leicester) as part of wider grant aid from the EU and UK
Regional Development Agencies, with a total spend to date in excess of
£80million.
Black's impact on display and content practice is reflected in the
continuing demand for his services from high-profile practitioner
groups to offer keynote speeches in the UK and Europe. In the last
two years these have included: European Foundation, Berlin (Nov., 2011),
European Campus of Local and Regional Authorities for Culture (Oct.,
2012), the UK Association for Heritage Interpretation (Oct., 2012), UK
Association of Independent Museums (June 2012), UK Visitor Studies Group
(Feb., 2012), The Public History of Science, Technology, Engineering and
Medicine, Science Museum, London (April, 2013), and to Danish curators at
the National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen (Sept., 2013) (see section
5.3). It is also reflected in his high citations levels in practitioner
publications (see section 5.10).
Importantly, his contributions are not created in isolation, but through
working with project managers, design companies, museum or heritage
organisation personnel and local communities.
Most recently, Black has concentrated on the practical application of his
approach in relatively small institutions, including those that are
community based, through limited scale interventions to augment user
engagement and participation. This is reflected in the four current
activities instigated over the last twelve months outlined below:
1. Action research on display that stimulates user contributions
(on-going from 2013):
Supported by an Arts Council England Strategic Fund grant of £105,000
Black, with colleagues from the Centre for Public History, and Museum and
Heritage Management, and the East Midlands Museums Service, has
distributed small grants and mentor support to a number of local museums
to pilot and evaluate display approaches that stimulate self-reflection
amongst visitors and generates user contribution, which in turn become
part of the displays. The projects test approaches to content acquisition
and institutional participatory practice according to the precepts
outlined in Black's book Transforming Museums in the 21st
Century and subsequent conference papers. Approximately £50,000 is
committed in the current financial year (April 2013-March 2014) to four
distinct museum projects across the East Midlands, and an associated
website and blog.
2. Developing an interpretation strategy for a `Heritage Gateway' in
Northampton:
Black worked alongside project managers Focus Consultants (see section 5.1),
architect (Purcell), Northamptonshire County Council, Northampton Borough
Council, the Churches Conservation Trust, the Friends of Northampton
Castle and Spring Boroughs Residents Association to develop and cost a
`high level' interpretive approach to support a history and heritage
driven regeneration of the west side on Northampton. The recommendations
reflect approaches Black outlined in his two books. Full implementation,
with considerable community involvement, will take four to five years.
Black is currently working on phase two of this project, looking at
proposals and costs in detail, and has just been confirmed as a key member
of a team charged with redefining a `Northampton Cultural Quarter'.
3. Developing a 2020 vision for Tullie House Museum & Art
Gallery:
Black ran workshops with the curatorial and education teams at Tullie House which were instrumental in
re-visioning the future role of the museum, and representing this
visualisation in a form that could be submitted to the Heritage Lottery
Fund as the core part of a multi-million pound bid (c£12m), submitted in
November 2013 (see section 5.2)
4. Non-user studies and focus groups for local museums:
In
2012-13, aided by a small grant from the East Midlands Audience Development Officer, Claire Browne, Black
was able to train MA students in preliminary non-user visitor studies for
two museums: the volunteer-run Ashby-de-la- Zouch Museum and the local
authority-funded Rutland County Museum. The studies focused on local
audience disengagement and ways in which this could be redressed. This
resulted in a series of recommendations, the bulk of which have since been
adopted (see section 5.5). As importantly, the studies gave museum
personnel an understanding of the importance of on-going visitor research
and both sites now carry out their own survey work. The project will be
extended in the academic year 2013-14, with a number of museums now
queuing up to be included.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Individuals
1) Founding Partner, Focus Consultants, Nottingham. This company
has project-managed a number of the museum developments upon which Black
has worked. It can testify to Black's ability to galvanise museum curators
to establish clear future directions for their institutions through the
creation of master plans.
2) Director of Tullie House Museum & Art Gallery. Graham Black
was commissioned to run `visioning' workshops for the museum, in
preparation for the development of proposals for the re- development and
re-display of its content. The result was the museum's `2020 Vision'
document.
3) Head of Learning and Exhibition Development at the National Museum
of Denmark, responsible for overseeing the redisplay of the Museum.
Graham Black was commissioned to run workshops with the curatorial team to
support the development of display approaches for all the galleries in the
Museum.
4) Head of Interpretation at the Potteries Museum & Art Gallery,
Stoke. She has responsibility for the display of the Staffordshire Hoard,
a remarkable Anglo-Saxon find of international significance. She
commissioned Black to run workshops for the curatorial team that resulted
in a very different approach to the displays.
5) Regional Museum Development Manager for East Midlands Museums
which accepted an innovative proposal from Black and now funds his MA
students to work with small local museums to carry out audience research.
Numbers of museums now want to participate in this scheme.
Awards
6) Galleries of Justice: Joint winner of the Museums Heritage
Award for Educational Initiatives, 2013; £100,000 Museum Prize 2004;
Gulbenkian Prize 1998; English Tourist Board East Midlands Attraction of
the Year 1998. Black has a long-term role as an advisor to the museum.
7) Royal Albert Memorial Museum: £100,000 Art Fund Prize (the
re-named Museum Prize) 2012. Graham Black was commissioned to run
workshops with the history and archaeology curatorial team to support the
development of display approaches for the history galleries in the museum.
8) Framework Knitters' Museum, Ruddington: winner of an AHRC
Knowledge Transfer Award (£4,500), where Black has acted as advisor on the
long-term master plan, and has been active also in fund-raising for the
museum extension (2012 on-going).
9) Weston Park Museum, Sheffield: Guardian Family-friendly Museum
of the Year, 2008; Shortlisted for the Art Fund Prize, 2008. Acting as a
consultant Black ran workshops underpinning the interpretation for the
total re-display of what were the old Sheffield City Gallery and Mappin
Art Gallery. Total spend circa £19m.
Practitioner Engagement
10) The Engaging Museum: cited by practitioners, non-academics and
academics as a major supporting tool when planning new museum exhibitions.
http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=The+Engaging+Museum&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5