Improving Aircraft Safety in the Presence of Ice Build-up
Submitting Institution
University of East AngliaUnit of Assessment
Mathematical SciencesSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Engineering: Interdisciplinary Engineering
Summary of the impact
Aircraft icing is a significant factor in many aircraft accidents and
incidents. Ice accretion on the
wings has adverse aerodynamic effects, such as loss of lift and control,
and ice can also block
inlets into key flight sensors. Work by Richard Purvis and his Research
Associate, Peter Hicks at
UEA, in collaboration with AeroTex UK and QinetiQ, led to
better understanding of how the impacts
and splashing of water droplets influence the ice that forms on aircraft
wings. This led to improved
computer prediction codes, which are used by industry to improve design
and help satisfy
certification requirements.
Underpinning research
Mathematical research by Dr Richard Purvis and colleagues uses a
combination of numerical and
analytical techniques to gain a fundamental understanding of what happens
when a water droplet
hits a moving object, notably the wing of an aircraft. The objective was
to better understand the
splashing process, and thereby inform the empirical models of splashing
that were traditionally
used in icing prediction software.
Several important processes must be understood before an accurate model
of splashing can be
incorporated into more wide-ranging icing models. Two issues of particular
importance are (i)
predicting how much liquid gets splashed off the wing surface by a droplet
impact, and (ii)
establishing if, and where, that splashed liquid mass re-impinges further
back on the wing. The
research was partly supported by EPSRC and Nuffield Foundation grants to
Purvis (2007-2009).
The main underpinning research includes using a novel Volume-of-Fluid
numerical technique to
investigate which parameters influence the splash, focussing mainly on the
ratio of droplet size to
layer depth [1]. It offered a prediction of how much water is splashed
from the surface during an
impact event for a variety of droplet sizes, impact speeds and impact
angles. It was found that
much of the splashed water is displaced from the relatively warm water
lying on the wing rather
than the colder water originating in the droplet. This finding has
implications for the speed of ice
growth, especially because previous tentative splash models had assumed
that all the splashed
water would be cold; a deficiency that has now been corrected.
Additionally, the study [1] describes
experimental results carried out in the Cranfield icing wind tunnel and
draws comparisons with
Purvis' numerical solutions. Excellent agreement was found between the
experiments and
numerical predictions in the early stages after impact, until the
influence of the local airflow
becomes dominant. This, and other experimental findings, identified the
importance of air
behaviour during the droplet impact process.
A more theoretical basis was used in [2], to consider an analytical
asymptotic small-time study,
capturing the initial behaviour as a large droplet enters a thin water
layer. This is of interest as a
validation to the numerical approaches and for estimating the initial
impact pressure that may
erode any surface coating of the wing that might be used to prevent ice
build-up.
The research described in [3, 4 and 5] identified and examined the
importance of air cushioning in
droplet impacts. These studies focused on the entrapment of air bubbles as
impact is approached
onto both dry and wetted wings. Considering the local behaviour near
touchdown of a droplet onto
a substrate or water film, a coupled viscous-inviscid model was developed
by exploiting the large
density and viscosity differences between air and water. The research
identified the important
parameter ranges for air cushioning and these compare favourably to
experimental measurements.
Research Personnel
Lead academic: Dr Richard Purvis - UEA 2005 to date.
Postdoctoral Research Associate: Dr Peter Hicks who worked on droplet
impact and splashing at
the UEA from 2007-2009, funded by an EPSRC award to Purvis. He
subsequently moved to
University College London and then worked on a secondment in industry at AeroTex,
helping to
develop new icing codes. He now holds a lectureship in Engineering at the
University of Aberdeen.
References to the research
Research Papers
(UEA authors in bold)
[1] M. Quero, D.W. Hammond, R. Purvis and F.T. Smith (2006)
Analysis of super-cooled water
droplet impact on a thin water layer and ice growth. Paper
AIAA-2006-466 of 44th AIAA
Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 9-12 January 2006, Reno Nv, USA.
ISBN: 1563478072;978-156347807-9
[2] S.D. Howison, J.R. Ockendon, J.M. Oliver, R. Purvis and F.T.
Smith (2005) Droplet impact on
a thin fluid layer, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 542, 1-23
doi:10.1017/S0022112005006282.
[3] P.D. Hicks and R. Purvis (2010) Air cushioning and
bubble entrapment in three-dimensional
droplet impacts, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 649, 135-163
doi:10.1017/S0022112009994009.
[4] P.D. Hicks and R. Purvis (2011). Air cushioning in
droplet impacts with liquid layers and other
droplets. Physics of Fluids, 23, 062104
doi:10.1063/1.3602505.
[5] P.D. Hicks, E.V. Ermanyuk, N.V. Gavrilov and R. Purvis
(2012) Air trapping at impact of a
rigid sphere onto a liquid, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 695,
310-320
doi:10.1017/jfm.2012.20.
External Funding
(Purvis was Principal Investigator on both grants)
Research Grant: EPSRC "Three-dimensional droplet impacts and
aircraft icing." £156,762 (2007-
2009)
Research Grant: Nuffield Foundation "Air effects on high-speed
droplet impacts and aircraft
icing." £5000 (2006-2007)
Details of the impact
During flight through clouds, suspended super-cooled water droplets
impact onto the wings and all
forward facing parts of an aircraft, and then turn to ice. Unchecked, this
icing can lead to loss of lift
and ultimately control, with very serious safety implications. The total
loss of an ATR72 of
American Eagle flight 4184 in 1995 at Roselawn which killed all 68 people
on board, was primarily
due to aircraft icing. This was despite the aircraft being certified as
safe to fly in the weather
conditions of the time, and the anti-icing systems being fully functional.
It was ultimately
understood that, while the existing certification and icing models were
effective in conditions with
clouds of small droplets (~20 microns), they were not valid for larger
droplets (up to 1500 microns).
Although rare, this is not an isolated incident. A similar fate befell
Aero Caribbean flight 883 in 2010
where icing caused by large droplets was again the primary cause of the
accident, with the loss of
68 lives.
The added complications of larger droplets, such as droplet distortion
and, especially, of splashing
meant the predictions of existing trusted models were wrong. They
significantly over-predicted the
rate of ice growth and did not predict ice formation as far back on the
wing as seen in practice.
Initial attempts to include simple empirical models failed to
significantly improve the situation. Since
2003, much research effort worldwide has been focussed towards
understanding the fundamental
problems in large droplet impacts and how they relate to icing.
The impact of the research described here has been primarily achieved
through collaboration with
AeroTex UK. This is an SME established out of the aircraft icing
and rotorcraft group at QinetiQ, a
large defence company that originated from the Defence Evaluation and
Research Agency
(DERA). AeroTex offer consultancy to the aircraft industry in the
field of aircraft icing, including ice
prediction, icing protection and design. They develop icing prediction
codes, and help to design
and certify ice protection systems. Whilst details of their customer base
are confidential, they have
confirmed that it includes several major aircraft manufacturers and
equipment suppliers (see
corroborating source [A]).
Our fundamental research on large droplet impacts and splashing has
enhanced understanding
and offered crucial insight into a critical, and previously little
understood, aspect of aircraft icing. It
has fed into and informed AeroTex expertise, helping them to
establish themselves as leading
consultants in their field. The knowledge garnered from our research has
enabled AeroTex to
improve the products they can offer their clients by more accurately
incorporating the influence of
splashing into their prediction codes.
The value of the UEA research to AeroTex is confirmed in a
supporting letter from the founder of
AeroTex UK and Aircraft Icing Consultant:
"The research undertaken at UEA has contributed to an improved knowledge
of large
droplet and splashing dynamics and has enhanced AeroTex expertise.
It helped us to
produce improved numerical models. As a result we can offer ice prediction
and icing
protection design software which is better than our competitors.
Specifically we provide
prediction codes, AID (Aircraft Icing Design) and DRT (Droplet Residence
Time), which
include aspects of super-cooled large droplet behaviour that the UEA
research, along with
other theoretical and experimental investigations, has helped inform."
Additionally, Hicks spent a year working at AeroTex UK, helping
to develop further numerical
models. Hicks' research and expertise in aircraft icing was developed
during his postdoctoral
position at UEA, making him ideally placed to help AeroTex UK with
their product portfolio. This
resulted directly in the development of new design tools, particularly for
thermal and mechanical
anti-icing systems (see corroborating source [B]).
By providing fundamental insights into the basic physics of droplet
impacts and splashing, UEA
research has aided industry to further their understanding of aircraft
icing and to develop better
design tools, ultimately leading to improved air safety.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[A] Letter of support from the Founder and Aircraft Icing Consultant, AeroTex
UK
(held on file at UEA)
[B] C. Hatch, R. Moser, R. Gent and P.D. Hicks (2011)
The Building Blocks for a Hybrid ElectroThermal-ElectroMechanical
Simulation Tool
SAE Technical Paper, 2011-38-0035
doi:10.4271/2011-38-0035