The development of physical activity guidelines for public health
Submitting Institution
University of UlsterUnit of Assessment
Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and TourismSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Summary of the impact
Research undertaken at the Centre for Physical Activity and Health
Research within the Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Institute has
directly contributed to changes in public policy surrounding the health
benefits of exercise and has informed the development of international and
national physical activity guidelines.
Underpinning research
Over the past 50 years epidemiological, clinical, and applied research
demonstrates that engaging in physical activity reduces the risk of
coronary heart disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and other chronic
diseases. Over a similar period public health recommendations for the
amount and type of physical activity have been developed to reflect our
understanding of the health benefits of exercise. These pronouncements
from government agencies (e.g. DoH), professional bodies (e.g. ACSM) and
authoritative global organisations (e.g. WHO) have attempted to delineate
the quantity and quality of physical activity required to gain the health
benefits associated with exercise. Successive refinements to these
guidelines have emerged, concomitant with evolving scientific research.
During the 1970s-80s vigorous-intensity exercise in the pursuit of
cardiorespiratory fitness was advocated. The 1990s witnessed a paradigm
shift by exploring the amount of physical activity necessary to produce
significant health benefits; with moderate-intensity exercise emerging as
sufficient to yield health benefits. Professor Murphy's work has
contributed to the evolution of the physical activity guidelines to
advocate accumulating short bouts of brisk walking as an effective means
of accruing the health benefits of physical activity.
Professor Murphy leads the Centre for Physical Activity and Health
Research. Her research has focussed on establishing the optimal type,
duration, and intensity of exercise required to elicit health benefits.
Results from her research, including randomised controlled trials,
systematic literature reviews, and meta-analysis, have directly
contributed to changes in public policy surrounding the health benefits of
exercise.1-6 Since 1998 Professor Murphy has contributed to
crucial research questions regarding the nature of the relationship
between physical activity and health, as well as being at the forefront of
international, national and local bodies responsible for the
transformation of such research into guidelines for physical activity. Two
unifying themes have underpinned this research: type of activity and
duration of activity bouts. In terms of the former, walking was identified
as an ideal activity because it is accessible to all, requires no skill,
has low injury risk, and has been identified as the most popular exercise
choice. Since `lack of time' is habitually cited as a barrier to physical
activity, a crucial issue was to investigate whether the established
health benefits of a single bout of continuous exercise could be
replicated by accumulating shorter bouts of the same intensity of exercise
throughout the day.1,4,5,6 Murphy's work has made a substantial
contribution to the evidence base for walking as a cornerstone of physical
activity promotion internationally and her seminal work in accumulated
bouts of walking6 has resulted in her being regarded as a
leading research authority in this area.
Murphy's research findings on accumulated exercise and the role of brisk
walking for health benefit provides evidence that healthy but sedentary
individuals undertaking a programme of regular brisk walking will improve
a range of cardiovascular disease risk factors.1,2,4,5,6
Moreover, self-selected walking speeds have been shown to effectively
increase fitness in this population.3 This research programme
has contributed to the evidence base underpinning physical activity
guidelines in the UK, Ireland and the USA, in addition to being cited in
the Canadian and Australian guidelines.1,5,6 Specifically,
these guidelines now include a recommendation for activity accumulated in
bouts of 10 minutes or more and a specific reference to the role of
walking at a moderate to vigorous intensity activity and cite Murphy's
work as an important part of the evidence base for this recommendation.1,6
Furthermore, worldwide recognition of her research has precipitated
Murphy's invitation onto various national and international scientific and
advisory panels responsible for devising public policy documents where the
evidence base for walking and/or accumulated exercise is being examined.
References to the research
1. Murphy MH, Blair SN, Murtagh EM. Accumulated vs Continuous
Exercise for health benefit: A review of empirical studies. Sports
Medicine. 2009;39(2)33-41. (77 citations).
3. Murtagh EM, Boreham CAG, Murphy MH. Speed and Exercise
Intensity of Recreational Walkers. Preventive Medicine.
2002;35:397-400. (78 citations).
4. Murphy MH, Nevill AM, Biddle SJH, Neville C, Hardman AE.
Accumulating brisk walking for fitness, cardiovascular risk and
psychological health. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise.
2002;34(9)1468-74. (185 citations).
5. Murphy MH, Nevill AM, Hardman AE. Different patterns of brisk
walking are equally effective in decreasing post-prandial lipaemia. International
Journal of Obesity. 2000;24(10) 1303-09. (61 citations).
6. Murphy MH, Hardman AE. Training effects of short and long
bouts of brisk walking in sedentary women. Medicine and Science in
Sports and Exercise. 1998;30(1)152-57 (228 citations).
Professor Murphy's research has been supported by grants from national
and international agencies and research councils including the Northern
Ireland Chest, Heart and Stroke Association (£57K, 2012-2013), and the MRC
NPRI programme (£4K, 2009-2012).
Details of the impact
Globally, ill-health attributable to physical inactivity is economically
costly. Physical inactivity has been estimated to cost the National Health
Service more than £1.06 billion per year with physical inactivity being
responsible for more than 35,000 deaths each year in the UK. In America,
direct medical costs associated with physical inactivity were $76.6
billion in 2000. Emerging estimates from European studies suggest that
physical inactivity costs €300 per citizen per year. Consequently, many
countries advocate the development of national activity guidelines as part
of public policy and health services with a view to saving public money by
avoiding health care costs and increasing productivity through a healthier
population.
The research carried out by Professor Murphy and colleagues at Ulster
between 1998 and 2013 has unequivocally contributed to the scientific
evidence base underpinning the development of such national activity
guidelines (Sources 2, 3, 5 and 6). Individually, Professor Murphy has
been directly involved in drafting the physical activity guidelines for
the UK and Ireland (Sources 7 and 8); additionally, she is an invited
expert on two international advisory panels convened by the World Health
Organisation. (Source 1)
The significance of establishing that walking is a suitable physical
activity from which to derive health benefits should not be
underestimated. Public health policy guidelines are necessarily directed
at a considerable portion of the population who may be obese, sedentary,
at risk of cardiovascular disease and for whom more strenuous forms of
exercise may be unsuitable. Prior to Murphy's 1998 study the research
evidence for the health benefits of accumulated bouts of walking was
inconclusive. A key finding of this seminal research was to establish that
previously sedentary individuals who participate in short bouts of brisk
walking improve cardiovascular fitness and several other known risk
factors of cardiovascular disease.
The discovery by Murphy and colleagues that accumulated bouts of exercise
are as beneficial as one longer continuous bout has had an impact on
public policy initiatives by making physical activity more amenable to the
population as a whole by allowing it to fit more easily into busy lives.
A concomitant and complementary impact is evident by Murphy's direct
involvement in various international, national and local scientific and
advisory panels responsible for drafting public policy documents and
initiatives:
— Invited member of the scientific advisory group for the Department of
Health review of the current UK physical activity guidelines and a member
of the small editorial team which produced the 2011 guidelines issued by
the 4 Chief Medical Officers (DoH 2011 Start Active Stay Active - Murphy
responsible for writing adult guidelines). (Source 7)
— Invited member of the British Association of Sport and Exercise
Sciences expert panel which reviewed the scientific evidence and provided
a widely cited consensus statement on the health benefits of physical
activity (The ABC of Physical Activity)
— The World Health Organisation has invited Murphy onto two different
European scientific panels: i) the International Advisory Group
responsible for developing a Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for
walking (Source 1) which agreed a tool to be used in assessing the cost
effectiveness of the development of walking paths for the European
population; ii) the Physical Activity Networking (PHAN) group which was
responsible for writing the case studies and reviewing available evidence
on the promotion of physical activity in socially disadvantaged groups
— As a direct result of her research Murphy was the only member from NI
invited onto the UK Government's Department of Health Obesity Review Group
chaired by the Parliamentary Undersecretary for Public Health. The group's
role is to advise on policy and practice for tackling obesity in England.
— Invited member of a pressure group of experts responsible for
convincing Ireland's Department of Health of the need for a National
Physical Activity Plan and subsequently for advising and writing the
Physical Activity Guidelines for Ireland (DHC, Get Ireland Active).
(Sources 6, 7 and 8)
The research and policy documents contributed to by Professor Murphy and
colleagues are frequently cited as impacting on other worldwide
initiatives relating to physical activity guidelines for adults in USA,
Canada, and Australia.
Sources to corroborate the impact
-
http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0003/155631/E96097.pdf
and http://www.heatwalkingcycling.org/
(World Health Organisation acknowledges Murphy's work in developing HEAT
for walking)
-
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/116/9/1081.full.pdf
(American Heart Association references Murphy's work in updated
guidelines 2007)
-
https://www.presidentschallenge.org/informed/digest/docs/200406digest.pdf
(USA references Murphy's work when updating the previous guidelines for
children)
-
http://healthwellventures.com/activity.pdf
(American College of Sports Medicine references Murphy's work in public
policy initiative)
-
http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/39
(Reviewers for Canadian physical activity guidelines reference Murphy
and colleagues)
-
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4080994
(UK Chief Medical Officer's report references Murphy's work)
-
http://www.paha.org.uk/File/Index/858ea512-2e1d-4b77-a3eb-9f1d00fcd0fd
(Murphy named as author and expert panel member)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3098122/
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/136/
http://www.bhfactive.org.uk/userfiles/Documents/startactivestayactive.pdf
-
http://www.getirelandactive.ie/content/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Get-Ireland-Active-Guidelines-GIA.pdf
(Murphy named as author and advisor on developing Irish guidelines)
Individual users/beneficiaries who could be contacted by the REF team to
corroborate claims.
- Chair, British Association of Sport & Exercise Sciences
- Head of Physical Activity, Department of Health, Health Improvement
and Protection Directorate
- UWA Lead for the UK PA Guidelines, University of Western Australia