Conflict management and post-conflict reconstruction in Casamance, Senegal
Submitting Institution
University of ChesterUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Political Science
History and Archaeology: Historical Studies
Summary of the impact
Martin Evans' research concerns conflict and its aftermath in the
Casamance region of southern Senegal — the scene of West Africa's
longest-running insurgency. His work has influenced policy, humanitarian
and development activity in the region and beyond, and has informed
Western governments, international agencies and non-governmental
organisations in their interventions to support peacebuilding and
`post-conflict' reconstruction. In addition, Evans has provided expert
testimony in relation to asylum claims made in Western countries by
Casamançais fleeing persecution. Building on his previous work, Evans has
conducted the underpinning research for this activity while at Chester as
a lecturer (February 2009-July 2011) and senior lecturer (August
2011-present).
His work has a lasting impact because of the situation's intractability
and the need to address ongoing violence and human displacement. The
conflict also retains the capacity to destabilise neighbouring countries.
Underpinning research
Casamance is Senegal's southwestern limb, sitting between The Gambia to
the north and Guinea-Bissau to the south. The civil conflict there is
rooted in a separatist rebellion, now over 30 years old.
Evans' research has been funded largely by a British Academy grant and
has focused on two areas. First, his fieldwork carried out from June to
August 2009 continued his long-term study of the dynamics of return and
reconstruction amid people formerly displaced by violence from along the
Guinea-Bissau border. The research showed how the role of international
aid in this process is equivocal and sometimes divisive. Contrary to
claims made by the aid community, return and reconstruction is primarily
endogenous, with the initiative, resources and labour coming mostly from
displaced communities themselves. Evans' findings show that aid tends to
follow rather than lead the process. However, aid can still reshape
political space at different scales from the village to the administrative
region. Local political entrepreneurs seek greater access to such aid,
producing contestations between and within particular villages — between
returning and resident populations, for example — amid heightened poverty
and disputed land tenure. The presence of aid also feeds a struggle for
resources between national and regional government and the resulting
political restructuring creates benefits for some officials and the people
in certain areas, while alienating others, including the Casamance
separatists. In addition to Evans (2009), listed below, a further
publication expands on and synthesises this research: Evans, M.
(forthcoming 2014) `Contested spaces, new opportunities: displacement,
return and the rural economy in Casamance, Senegal'. In Hammar, A. (ed.) Displacement
economies: paradoxes of crisis and creativity in African contexts.
London: Zed.
The second area of research took a more explicitly historical approach in
seeking to understand the Casamance conflict's cross-border dynamics. The
role of The Gambia in the conflict has been particularly under-researched.
Colonial history and its modern geopolitical repercussions were explored
in partnership with David Perfect, Visiting Research Associate at the
University of Chester, on how Senegal and The Gambia respectively perceive
and manage their combined geographical space (Perfect and Evans, 2013).
Research with Charlotte Ray (then at Coventry University), which involved
joint fieldwork in July 2010, also took the long view, situating different
aspects of The Gambia's linkages with the Casamance conflict in the
context of broader historical and contemporary relationships. These
included the evolution of formal cross-border cooperation vis-à-vis the
conflict, the development of a transnational `war economy', ethnic
solidarities, and the impacts of the conflict on The Gambia through the
movement of Casamance refugees, rebels and arms onto its territory. Again,
the conflict is exploited by various individuals on the ground,
particularly refugees and transnational migrants, in their use of
political and economic spaces on both sides of the border (Evans and Ray,
2013).
Another aspect of this historically-focused research, conducted by Evans
between June and August 2009, looked at rural communities in the
little-studied Balantacounda area of Middle Casamance, which has been
affected by but politically marginal to the conflict. It found that people
there view the contemporary situation through deeper histories of violence
particular to their area and pre-dating the rebellion, especially
cross-border insecurity during the Liberation War in Guinea-Bissau from
1963 to 1974. Comparing this with similar research done elsewhere in
Casamance created a broader understanding of the relationship and at times
dissonance between Senegalese nationalist, Casamançais separatist and
local historiographies (Evans, 2013).
References to the research
Publications
Evans, M. (2013) `Historiographies, nationalisms and conflict in
Casamance, Senegal'. In Griffiths, C. (ed.) Contesting historical
divides in Francophone Africa: 93-119. Chester: University of
Chester Press.
Evans, M. (2009) `Flexibility in return, reconstruction and livelihoods
in displaced villages in Casamance, Senegal'. GeoJournal 74(6):
507-524.
Evans, M. and Ray, C. (2013) `Uncertain ground: The Gambia and the
Casamance conflict'. In Saine, A., Ceesay, E. and Sall, E. (eds) State
and society in The Gambia since independence: 247-287. Trenton NJ:
Africa World Press.
Perfect, D. and Evans, M. (2013) `Trouble with the neighbours?
Contemporary constructions and colonial legacies in relations between
Senegal and The Gambia'. In Griffiths, C. (ed.) Contesting historical
divides in francophone Africa: 59-91. Chester: University of Chester
Press.
Research grants
British Academy Small Research Grant, ref. SG-50255, `Reconstituting
space in a post-conflict society: return and reconstruction in Casamance,
Senegal', £4959, June 2009-June 2011. Principal Investigator: Martin
Evans.
African Studies Association of the UK (ASAUK) Sponsorship for Conferences
and Workshops Fund, `Contesting historical divides in Francophone Africa',
£494, September 2010. Organisers: Martin Evans, Claire Griffiths, Brenda
Garvey.
Quality indicators
The research on which the references above are based was largely funded
by the British Academy grant indicated. On submission of the final report
for the grant, the British Academy offered `many thanks for the report
which is ideal and provides exactly what we needed to close this grant. It
was great to read about your research and the many presentations you have
made about Casamance, including at the FCO' (email, 18 April 2013). The
chapters Evans (2013) and Perfect and Evans (2013) were originally
presented at a colloquium organised at Chester in September 2010. This was
funded by the conference grant from ASAUK, recognised as a `learned
society' since 2007.
Details of the impact
This research has been informing the national and international policy
community. Its impact should be contextualised by noting that successive
Senegalese governments under President Abdoulaye Wade, who was in office
from 2000 to 2012, sought to lower the international profile of the
Casamance conflict by suppressing domestic and foreign media coverage. He
also blocked two books on the conflict that were published in France from
entering and circulating in Senegal. In this context, the importance of
getting information on the conflict to wider policy communities was
heightened. Since the election of President Macky Sall in April 2012,
Senegalese policy on resolving the conflict has become more open to
international involvement at the same time as broader concerns about
instability in the sub-region have emerged. Recent military operations by
West African and French forces against insurgents in Mali — the latter
have been found with arms apparently trafficked to them from Casamance
separatists — and related terrorism in Algeria have highlighted the need
for analysis of conflict in West Africa informed by field research.
Evans' research has informed British policy on Senegal mainly through
briefings to diplomats at the request of the Africa Research Group at the
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and of the British Embassy in Dakar,
capital of Senegal, which also covers Guinea-Bissau. Her Majesty's
Ambassador to Senegal was briefed in post in Dakar in August 2009,
following an earlier presentation to him in London with six FCO staff and
external analysts present. His replacement was briefed in London in April
2011 with three additional representatives present. Besides thereby
providing information supporting small aid projects in Casamance funded by
the British Embassy to Senegal, the research has increased British
government understanding of problems on the ground, the motivations of the
Casamance separatists, and the need for British diplomatic and aid efforts
in support of the peace process. Evans has emphasised that these efforts
should be better coordinated with those of other European countries,
principally France and Portugal, the former colonial powers in Senegal and
Guinea-Bissau respectively.
At international policy level, Evans provided information and analysis on
events in Casamance to the Africa II Division of the Department of
Political Affairs at the United Nations in New York as it mooted a
peace-building initiative between December 2009 and September 2010. More
recently, this has been superseded by two new initiatives. One is a World
Bank programme funding peacebuilding and return of the displaced in
Casamance, where Evans acted as a peer reviewer for the programme proposal
(submitting advice to a panel of 15 people, March 2012) and as a member of
an expert panel giving advice on research underpinning this programme
(four people, June 2012). The other is a peace-building initiative by the
US Department of State, for which Evans briefed the diplomat concerned,
and his advisor, before he embarked on his mission in September 2012.
Evans has also provided advice to international aid and advocacy agencies
and NGOs, informing them on security and political conditions in
Casamance. This has included the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre
in Geneva (February 2009 to November 2011; see IDMC, 2010) and Y-Care
International in London from December 2010 to the present day. Another
important channel through which the research has been disseminated to
users in the aid and policy sectors is the specialised media, particularly
IRIN (Integrated Regional Information Networks), the highly respected news
and analysis service of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs, for which Evans has given a number of commentaries
on events in Casamance and Guinea-Bissau (see for example IRIN, 2009a-c).
In addition, Evans has given an interview to the South African
Broadcasting Corporation (SABC, 2009), notable because of South Africa's
important political role on the African continent.
Evans' detailed, first-hand knowledge of the political and social
conditions in Senegal has also been called upon in the provision of expert
reports and other advice on the claims of Casamançais and other Senegalese
asylum seekers in the UK, US, Canada and Belgium. His testimony affected
the cases of at least seven individuals from May 2009 to January 2011.
Given the low profile of the Casamance conflict internationally and
limited expertise on it in Western countries, particularly
English-speaking ones, such testimony has been highly sought after and
valued by the government agencies and legal firms concerned.
Sources to corroborate the impact
Selected media and NGO reports
IDMC (2010) New displacement and challenges to durable solutions in
Casamance. Geneva: Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. Retrieve
from http://www.internal-displacement.org/8025708F004BE3B1/(httpInfoFiles)/9A0C63B752E940FCC125774600275651/$file/Senegal_Overview_June10.pdf. [This cites Evans' research
and direct communications with IDMC about the nature of displacement in
Casamance and the situation of the displaced.]
IRIN (2009a) `Analysis: Closer to war than to peace in Casamance?'
Integrated Regional Information Networks, United Nations Office for the
Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Retrieve from http://www.irinnews.org/Report/86217/Analysis-Closer-to-war-than-to-peace-
in-Casamance. [This includes commentary from Evans based on his
field research on the situation of the displaced; and on the problems of
the peace process, based on his discussions with the Casamance separatist
movement.]
IRIN (2009b) `Senegal: Fresh violence in Casamance'. Integrated Regional
Information Networks, United Nations Office for the Coordination of
Humanitarian Affairs. Retrieve from
http://www.irinnews.org/Report/84832/SENEGAL-Fresh-violence-in-Casamance.
[Evans' commentary here considers the impacts of an upsurge in violence on
the local economy — another key area of his research.]
IRIN (2009c) `Guinea-Bissau-Senegal: Assassinations breed uncertainty in
neighbouring Casamance'. Integrated Regional Information Networks, United
Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Retrieve from
http://www.irinnews.org/Report/83320/GUINEA-BISSAU-SENEGAL-Assassinations-breed-
uncertainty-in-neighbouring-Casamance.
[Evans comments on the implications of violent political instability in
Guinea-Bissau for the conflict in neighbouring Casamance.]
SABC (2009) `Uneasy calm in southern Senegal as new regime takes over'.
South African Broadcasting Corporation FM broadcast (19 channels), 19
August. [In this radio interview, conducted in Dakar at the end of a long
period of fieldwork, Evans analyses the situation on the ground in
Casamance.]