Dementia Friendly Care & Support in extra care housing and acute hospital settings
Submitting Institution
University of WorcesterUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Nursing, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
There are an increasing numbers of people living into very old age. At
the same time there is a drive to enable people to live within their own
homes for as long as possible. Consequently, health and social care
services that previously would have experienced very few people with
dementia now have this as part of their core function. Yet there is no
tradition in these services of supporting people with dementia and there
are many reports of inadequate care. For example, Valleley reports that
over half of people living in extra-care housing with dementia were
admitted to other care settings during the first two years due to
challenging behaviour, conflicts with staff and other residents, and
distress on the part of the person with dementia.i Similarly,
hospital patients with acute and chronic medical conditions concomitant
with dementia are consistently reported to experience poorer quality
outcomes than patients with similar conditions without dementia.ii
The research described below has had significant benefits for those living
with dementia both in extra-care housing and in hospital settings,
primarily at the national level but also internationally. It has enhanced
quality of life for individuals living with dementia, improved the
practice of professionals working with people with dementia and had
economic benefits.
Underpinning research
Professor Dawn Brooker (Director of the University of Worcester
Association for Dementia Studies, 2009-present) has a long track record of
research focused on the development of person-centred care for people with
dementia in practice contexts. While this work began when Brooker was part
of the Bradford Dementia Group at the University of Bradford (2001-2009),
it has continued apace at Worcester. This case study focuses on this
research in two specific contexts: in a long-term care setting and in an
acute hospital setting.
Long-term care setting
Brooker undertook research (which began at Bradford but was completed at
Worcester) to design a multi-level intervention, the Enriched
Opportunities Programme (EOP) in conjunction with the Extra Care
Charitable Trust (ECCT), the objective of which was to develop a
sustainable activity-based model for people with dementia living in
long-term care. An action research methodology was adopted, whereby the
devised programme was subjected to a repeated measures evaluation in four
practice development sites — three specialist nursing homes and one extra
care housing scheme.iii This was followed by a
cluster-randomised controlled trial in 10 extra care housing schemes. This
study compared the experience of people living with dementia and other
mental health problems in extra care housing schemes that utilised EOP
with schemes that employed an active control intervention. It showed that
EOP-participating residents rated their quality of life more positively
over time, were less likely than residents in the active control sites to
move to a care home or to be admitted to a hospital in-patient bed and
were more likely to be seen by a range of community health professionals
(see Reference 1).
Acute hospital setting
Brooker undertook a project funded by the Department of Health West
Midlands, in conjunction with Professor Dominic Upton (University of
Worcester, 2006-present), to develop and implement (see grant a)
and evaluate (see grant b) an intervention to improve the quality
of care for and safety of patients with dementia in an acute hospital
setting, known as the Dementia Care Bundle (DCB). The same methodological
approach was adopted as in the long-term care setting: the DCB was
developed through a literature review and collaboration with an expert
group, a multi-disciplinary Person Centred Care Group at the study site
(New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton). A quasi-experimental design was used
to address the early impact of the interventions on patients, their
families, staff and volunteers working in the hospital and key
stakeholders in developing and sustaining the programme of work as a
whole. Questionnaires, interviews, observations of practice and surveys
were undertaken prior to the intervention and at different time points
during the intervention to assess change over time. Patient, family and
staff outcomes were evaluated pre- and post-intervention alongside
on-going patient data to monitor the impact of the DCB at an individual
patient level for 183 patients with moderate to severe dementia and
concomitant physical health problems over a 19 week period (see Reference2).
References to the research
1) Brooker D., Argyle, E., Clancy, D. & Scally A. (2011) Enriched
Opportunities Programme: A cluster randomised controlled trial of a new
approach to living with dementia and other mental health issues in extra
care housing schemes and villages. Aging and Mental Health 15 (8):
1008-17. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2011.583628.
2) Brooker, D., Leung, D., Bowley, K., Etches, C., Bray, J., Smith, P.
Willoughby, J., Hampson, G., Bowen, T. and Upton, D. (2013) Improving the
quality and safety of hospital care for patients with acute physical
illness who have co-existing dementia: Development of the Dementia Care
Bundle. [https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/2684/].
Grants
a) Brooker D., Delivering Excellence in Acute Care for People with
Dementia, NHS West Midlands, 2009-11, £41,000.
b) Upton D., Evaluation of Delivering Excellence in Acute Care for
People with Dementia, NHS West Midlands , 2010-11, £66,000.
The University is confident the underpinning research meets the
excellence threshold. Reference 1 is returned to REF 2014 with Output ID
"Brooker1". Reference 2 is currently under review but has been `published'
on the University's research repository (WRaP) in advance. The research
which underpinned this article was funded through a grant won through
competitive tender and the University contends that this is indicative
that it meets the 2* quality threshold.
Details of the impact
The research described in Section 2 was designed to bring benefits to
those living with dementia and it has done so in a number of ways both
nationally and internationally.
The potential impact of the EOP is to a significant extent reflected in
the research itself, particularly the RCT study (see Reference 1)
which clearly highlights the benefits of the programme for those living
with dementia in extra care housing as well as the economic benefits:
there was an overall cost saving of £15,383 over a six month period,
compared to a cost increase of £55,376 at the control sites. This is
further emphasised by a technical report from the National Audit Office
which also highlights the economic benefits of the programme: "This EOP
initiative has demonstrated that by providing a proactive and integrated
service between health, social care and housing services, people with
dementia could be effectively cared for in extra care housing. Furthermore
our analysis...indicates that if the EOP programme is rolled out to all
extra care homes in England, over a two year period the savings to the
public through reduced inpatient care and less utilisation of more
intensive housing care provision could be around £21 million, shared
between local government (for housing) and NHS (health care)" (Corroborating
Source A).
The EOP has subsequently been rolled out in ECCT's 14 retirement villages
and 17 smaller housing developments where it has had a direct impact on
the lives of over 2000 tenants (Corroborating Source B). It is
included on the Housing LIN (Learning Improvement Network) dementia in
focus website which is the best used source of innovative information for
housing with care services (Corroborating Source C).
The development of the DCB had an immediate impact on the study site.
Upton's evaluation of the intervention shows how it both significantly
improved patient outcomes and changed the practice of nurses and doctors
for the better (Corroborating Source D). The impact on practice is
further borne out by personal testimony. For example, a modern matron at
the hospital stated: "The impact on me personally is I now
understand how to care for patients in a person centred way. The impact
on the Trust is an appreciation of skills and knowledge to care for
patients with dementia, not seen as Cinderella service anymore. Person
centred care is on the Nursing and Midwifery programme and Safeguarding
plan for the Trust. Patient care has benefitted through improved
outcomes and better experience" (Corroborating Source E). In
addition, an external evaluation was undertaken by Dementia Care Matters
to assess the continued impact of the research. Their CEO reflecting on
practice at New Cross post-intervention states: "The service is
exceptional and nursing staff inspired and led by passionate medical and
nursing leaders achieve the very best of dementia care seen in the
NHS...We all commented that it is rare to find in a Trust so many very
passionate people committed to proving how much dementia care really
matters" (Corroborating Source F).
The impact of the intervention on patient safety has been highlighted in
a number of ways: the Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust won the 2012
Patient Safety in Clinical Practice for its dementia care initiative;
while the DCB is a featured case study on the Health Foundation's Patient
Safety Resource Centre (Corroborating Source G).
The impact of the research has moved beyond the Royal Wolverhampton
Hospitals NHS Trust. It was always intended by NHS West Midlands that New
Cross would act as a demonstration site and that lessons learnt could be
adopted by other NHS Trusts. A 12 month adoption programme ran over
2012-13 which led to 12 NHS Trusts signing up to implement elements of the
intervention. All the Trusts have implemented dementia education
programmes and have developed the "This is Me" patient passport
information systems that were advocated as the first element of DCB. Four
Trusts have commenced pilots of the DCB with plans to commence in 3 others
(Corroborating Source H).
The research has also fed into four Dementia Leadership Education
Programmes which the Association for Dementia Studies won the contract to
deliver. These have been delivered in Surrey, Sussex, Hampshire and
Oxfordshire to 75 dementia care leads in health across 15 NHS Trusts
during 2012-13. One of the course participants states: "The
Programme...enabled me to gain an understanding of person centred
approaches in caring for people with dementia and how this can be
implemented within the acute hospital environment. I am also developing
a dementia training programme for Trust employees to ensure that all
staff have the knowledge and confidence to care and work with people
with dementia, their families and carers...the educational programme I
attended has given me the knowledge to be able to fulfil my new role and
to successfully make a positive change to dementia care within my trust"
(Corroborating Source I). This reflects how the research will feed
into practice across these trusts and change this practice for the better.
The research has also had impact internationally. The German charitable
trust the Robert Bosch Foundation have funded a programme to improve the
quality of care for those living with dementia in German hospitals which
has incorporated key elements of the DCB (Corroborating Source J).
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. National Audit Office (2010) Improving Dementia Services in England —
an Interim Report. Technical Paper MARCH 2010. Economic model to assess
the financial impacts of the Enriched Opportunities Programme for people
with dementia in an extra2011care housing setting http://www.housinglin.org.uk/_library/Resources/Housing/Support_materials/Other_reports_and
_guidance/EOP_Nat_Audit_Office_Tech_Paper.pdf.
B. Statement from Guy Page, Enriched Opportunities Coach/manager, ECCT
2009-2013.
C. Housing Learning Improvement Network Website: http://www.housinglin.org.uk/Topics/browse/HousingandDementia/Practice/Workforce/?parent=5154&child=5357
D. Upton, D., Krishnan, N., Bray, J., Bowen, T. & Foote, C. (2012) Report
to NHS West Midlands: An evaluation of quality and cost effectiveness of
a newly defined suite of care interventions for patients with dementia
and their carers in the acute hospital setting developed by The Royal
Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Vols. 1-2. http://www.worcester.ac.uk/documents/Dementia_evaluation_report_for_New_Cross_Vol_1.pdf.
http://www.worcester.ac.uk/documents/Dementia_evaluation_report_for_New_Cross_Vol_2.pdf.
E. Statement from Karen Bowley, Modern Matron, Royal Wolverhampton NHS
Trust.
F. Statement from David Sheard, CEO Dementia Care Matters.
G. Brooker, D., Leung, D., Bowley, K., Etches, C., Bray, J., Smith, P.
Willoughby, J., Hampson, G., & Upton, D. (2013). The Dementia Care
Bundle: Improving the quality and safety of hospital care for patients
with acute physical illness who have co-existing dementia. Health
Foundation Patient Safety Resource Centre. http://patientsafety.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/the_dementia_care_bundle.pdf
H. Hampson, G. (2013) Delivering Excellence in Dementia Care in Acute
Hospitals: The West Midlands Adoption Process of the Royal Wolverhampton
NHS Trust Dementia Care Bundle and Associated Composite Elements Report
on the 12 Month Adoption Programme.
I. Statement from Rachel Hayden, Dementia Specialist Nurse, Hampshire
Hospital Foundation Trust.
J. Statement from Dr Bernadette Klapper, Head of Health Section, Robert
Bosch Foundation.
i Vallelly, S et al. (2006)
Opening doors to independence: A
longitudinal study exploring the contribution of extra care housing to
the care and support of older people with dementia London: Housing 21.
ii See for example: Francis, R. (2013)
Report of the
Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry London: The
Stationery Office.
iii Brooker, D. & Woolley, R. (2007)
Enriching Opportunities for People living with Dementia: The Development
of a Blueprint for a Sustainable Activity-Based Model of Care.
Aging
and Mental Health, 11(4): 371-383.