Promoting citizen interests in information society policy
Submitting Institution
London School of Economics & Political ScienceUnit of Assessment
Communication, Cultural and Media Studies, Library and Information Management Summary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Data Format
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Robin Mansell's research has impacted on government policy and corporate
strategy in the areas of copyright and the Internet, investment in
broadband networks, and arrangements for achieving network security and
individual privacy protection. These are all key components of what has
come to be known as information society policy. Her work has challenged
policy makers to respond to the legitimate interests of citizens as well
as to those of government and corporate stakeholders. These impacts are
particularly visible in shifts in information society policy at the
international level to include greater attention to citizen interests and
in national policy debates about the future of copyright and business and
government responses to the need for secure networks that also protect
citizens' privacy.
Underpinning research
Research Programme and Key Findings:
Innovations in digital technologies and the diffusion of the Internet and
mobile telephony are often expected to bring an end to poverty, to boost
economic growth, and to lead to socially inclusive societies. Professor
Robin Mansell's research has challenged this one-dimensional view that
markets and technology will deliver these benefits. The research
underpinning the impact has three main strands: the development of
policies for digital technology; the dynamics of copyright infringement;
and network security and citizens' privacy.
With respect to policies for digital technology, the
proliferation of digital media and information applications is spawning
high hopes for economic prosperity and countless improvements in citizens'
lives. The dominant claim in policy forums is that the diffusion of
digital technologies in the market will address problems of uneven access
to networks and services, enabling everyone to participate in society.
Professor Mansell's research has demonstrated that these accounts are
informed by a one-dimensional model of technological change. Policies
developed from them lead to imbalances where citizens' interests in open
access to the Internet and trusted information services are neglected in
favour of corporate interests in the commercial value of digital
information, or state interests in monitoring citizens' online activities
to prevent crime and terrorist threats. For example, her research has
analysed information society policies aimed at creating incentives for
network infrastructure development, the expansion of creative output using
the Internet, and policies for data protection at the global, regional and
national levels. She has shown how they often privilege market-led
developments, the financial goals of companies, or the interests of the
state in security. There is far less concern in developing policies and
strategies for the design and use of digital technologies and services
that take account of the interests of citizens and of distinctive local
economic, political or social aspirations. This research has demonstrated
that innovations in the digital world are not the inevitable outcome of
technology or the market, but the result of the complex interaction of
cultural, social, political and economic choices [1, 2, 3]. Mansell also
has examined justifications for public and private investment in broadband
networks, in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, showing that policy
overemphasises supply side measures (the push for faster broadband
networks) and neglects the demand side (fostering skills and online
participation). She has shown that the result is continuing barriers to
inclusive digital services, creating challenges for citizens to
participate in the online world effectively [4].
Mansell's research on the economic and behavioural determinants of copyright
infringement has challenged assumptions underpinning claims about
the scale of the impact of digital `piracy' on the creative industry. Her
work has shown why the industry claims about citizen responses to the
criminalisation of online copyright infringement are flawed in the light
of evidence of actual online behaviour and the emergence of a strong
online sharing culture. Her analysis of evidence on the online culture and
the varied experiences of countries has shown that the impact of
legislation that targets illegal downloading of music, films and
television programmes by citizens is ambiguous at best. It neglects the
fact that the creative industry is changing its business models and
adapting to the online world in innovative ways that, in some cases, build
on the sharing culture. Legislation aimed at suppressing this culture can
be counterproductive for the industry and inhibit citizen use of the
Internet [5].
Her research on the technical and social factors that influence network
security and citizens' online privacy has shown decisively why there
is a risk that some of the technical capabilities of the Internet which
enable the monitoring of citizen online activities, or result in
inadvertent or intentional disclosure of their information, could be used
in ways that threaten privacy. The Internet provides the means to analyse
this information for targeted advertising and to monitor individuals. Her
research has revealed the differences between policy makers' assumptions
about how these technologies are being used to combat online crime and
terrorist threats, and how they actually are being used by companies,
states and individuals. She has shown that policy makers often place undue
trust in technology to protect citizens and assume that prevailing digital
technology uses are consistent with citizens' democratic rights to privacy
and freedom of expression, showing the real danger that the technology
could be used in ways that infringe on citizens' rights. [6]
Key Researcher: Professor Robin Mansell has been at LSE since
January 2001.
References to the research
[1] Mansell, R. et al. (2007) `The Challenges of ICTs' in R. Mansell, et
al. The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies,
Oxford University Press, pp. 1-28, peer reviewed manuscript, sales 1,536
(11/07-03/13). http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/20604/
[2] Mansell, R. and Raboy, M. (2011) `Introduction: Foundations of the
Theory and Practice of Global Media and Communication Policy', in R.
Mansell and M. Raboy (eds) The Handbook of Global Media and
Communication Policy, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1-20, peer reviewed
manuscript, sales 560 (08/11-03/13) http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29153/
[4] Mansell, R. and Steinmueller, W. E. (2013) `Digital Infrastructures,
Economies and Public Policies: Contending Rationales and Outcome
Assessment Strategies' in W. H. Dutton (ed) The Oxford Handbook of
Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 509-530, peer
reviewed by external readers. DOI: 10.1177/1461444812470429
[6] Mansell, R. and Collins, B. S. (eds) (2005) Trust and Crime in
Information Societies, Edward Elgar Publishers, pp.11-55, Sales 556
(04/05-03/13), reviewed by Office of Science and Technology Foresight
participants in the Cyber Trust and Cyber Crime Foresight project.
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/9000/
Evidence of Quality: peer-reviewed publications; research funding
since 2001 from the UK Government's Department for International
Development, Prime Minister's Strategy Unit, and Office of Science and
Technology, the European Commission, the Centre International Development
Research Canada, and the Dutch Ministry for Foreign Affairs.
Details of the impact
Mansell's research has impacted on information society policies by
influencing policy makers to acknowledge the complexity of change in the
digital world and the legitimate claims of all stakeholders,
including citizens. In the mid-1990s, the narrative emphasised rapid
change in digital technologies and the rate of diffusion in the market. It
neglected citizen interests in trusted services, privacy and affordable
access. Drawing on Mansell's research, in 2005, UNESCO signalled a major
shift towards information, or knowledge, society policy with a focus on
people, fairness and equity in the digital world. Mansell's research had
demonstrated that when citizen interests are neglected, the chances of
achieving inclusive policy goals are much reduced. Her persistent advocacy
of citizen-centred policy in United Nations agency forums has influenced
subsequent policy; as a result, policies implemented by government and
third sector organisations more often reflect privacy, safety, online
freedoms and equitable access to networks. For example, Mansell's work for
UNESCO was reflected its 2008-13 Medium-Term Strategy [A]. She authored
UNESCO's World Report, Renewing the Knowledge Societies Vision in
2013 [B]. Many of her recommendations were repeated in UNESCO's
recommendations for the United Nations review of the Millennium Goals [C].
The report is approved for publication by UNESCO and world distribution in
Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Portuguese, Spanish and Russian in 2014,
in time to influence the final deliberations on the Millennium Goals that
bear on how policies concerned with digital technologies can contribute to
inclusive development.
The impact of Mansell's research on policies aimed at increasing investment
in broadband networks has extended to regions such as
Latin America and the Caribbean. Policies in this region increasingly are
incorporating the idea of `open development'. This gives much greater
attention to demand, diverse user needs, open (in contrast to proprietary)
digital services, and equitable access. Based on her research on regional
strategies aimed at developing network infrastructures in the US and
Europe, she was invited to present her recommendations on behalf of
regional civil society organisations, and the Canadian International
Development Research Centre, at the Fourth Ministerial Meeting on the
Information Society for Latin American and the Caribbean Region in Uruguay
in 2013.
Mansell's research has impacted on measures aimed at curtailing copyright
infringement resulting in moderation of ill-conceived measures to
combat online `piracy' and agreement to independently assess the impact
of the Digital Economy Act 2010 in the UK. The creative industry
argues that legislation is needed to reduce online `piracy' or copyright
infringement. The Act introduced measures to monitor the activities of
Internet users suspected of infringing copyright. This was challenged in
the Administrative High Court by Internet Service Providers (who are
obliged to provide data about their customers under the Act) because of
its implications for citizen privacy and their competitiveness. Mansell
served as expert witness on behalf of British Telecom and TalkTalk in the
Judicial Review. Her evidence was used to challenge claims by creative
industry about the costs of copyright infringement to their businesses and
to support the argument that copyright enforcement must be proportional,
taking into account changing online cultural norms [D]. Her evidence was
quoted and found to be very finely balanced with government and creative
industry counterarguments [E]. The court accepted the case for an initial
one year implementation of the Act so as to assess whether the measures
have the impacts on copyright infringement claimed by the industry. The
implementation of the Act by the regulator, Ofcom, has been delayed and is
not to be introduced until at least 2015. The impact here was to credibly
challenge the creative industry and government claims about the
proportionality of the Act.
In policy concerned with Internet security and privacy,
Mansell's research influenced policies concerning the use of intrusive
surveillance technologies. Post 9/11, some police authorities and
politicians strongly advocated swift implementation of privacy invasive
uses of the Internet to combat serious online crime and terrorist threats.
Mansell's report on Cyber Trust and Crime Prevention for the Office of
Science and Technology Foresight concluded that strategies to improve the
security and trustworthiness of networks must minimise breaches of citizen
privacy if they are to be effective and consistent with democratic values
[F]. The social science input to a twelve-month deliberation process,
involving stakeholders from the Home Office, MI6 and technology and
digital service specialists, was led by Mansell as lead expert
representing all the social sciences, including economics. The result of
this work was that stakeholders started to see why technical fixes to
security risks are very partial answers to the development of online trust
and the protection of citizen rights to privacy. This work continues to
influence policy debates. For example, when the Communications Data Bill
2013 in the UK was proposed, it was seen by civil society groups as
increasing the risk to citizens' rights to privacy, resulting in
evidence-based objections which drew partly on Mansell's work for the
Foresight project.
Wider Implications: When citizen interests are neglected by those
who make policy around digital information, there is a high risk that
people will be excluded from the local and global benefits that come with
access to the Internet. The risk is also high that they will be subject to
intrusive surveillance and threats to their privacy. Mansell's emphasis on
a citizen-centred policy has influenced choices about how digital networks
and services are developed and used. This has material consequences for
whether citizens benefit from their information societies. With moves by
governments to suppress copyright infringement, to allow inspection of
emails and private communications, and to promote massive investment in
broadband networks, effective advocacy of citizen-centred policies based
on systematic empirical evidence is vital. It is one means of restraining
the excesses of state and business enthusiasm for digital technologies
that put citizens at risk. These impacts are important to foster consent
in democratic societies.
Sources to corroborate the impact
All Sources listed below can also be seen at https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/case_study/view/83
[A] Mansell, R. (2008) Communication and Information: Towards a
Prospective Research Agenda, Report on a Workshop, UNESCO, Paris, 20-21
December 2007
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/programme_doc_iamcr_report.p
df.
[B] Mansell, R. and Tremblay, G. (2013) `Renewing the Knowledge Societies
Vision',
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/wsis/WSIS_10_Event/UNESCO_KS_11_February_2013.pdf.
[C] UNESCO (2013) `Towards Knowledge Societies for Peace and Sustainable
Development', First WSIS+10 Review Event, Final Recommendations', 25-27
Feb,
http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/wsis/WSIS_10_Event/wsis10_recommendations_en.pdf
[D] Mansell, R. and Steinmueller, W. E. (2010) `British
Telecommunications plc ("BT") and TalkTalk Telecom Group Limited v
Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills ("BIS") In the
matter of an intended claim', prepared for BT, London, 1 July and further
evidence in 2011
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/36152/1/British_Telecommunications_plc_(author_version).pdf
[E] BT & TalkTalk v. S. S. Business, Innovation and Skills and
Interested Parties, [2011] EWHC 1021 (Admin), 20 Apr, at http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/bt-v-bis.pdf
[F] Collins, B. S. and Mansell, R. (2004) `Cyber Trust and Crime
Prevention: Synthesis of the State of the Art Science Reviews', OST
Foresight Project on CyberTrust and Crime Prevention, at http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/foresight/docs/cyber/synthesis%20of%20the%20science%20reviews.
pdf
Testimonial: Director Knowledge Societies Division, UNESCO. Source file:
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1027
Testimonial: Facebook, Director of Policy, UK and Ireland. Source file:
https://apps.lse.ac.uk/impact/download/file/1028
Individuals who have agreed to be contacted.
Program Leader, Information and Networks, International Development
Research Centre (IDRC/CRDI), Canada.
Deputy Head, Government Office for Science (GO-Science) BIS.