Incorporating Socio-Economic Group Rights Within Global Development Goals
Submitting Institution
Middlesex UniversityUnit of Assessment
LawSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Political Science
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
Emerging from investigations of social exclusion during the 1990s, the
Unit's research into minority rights has led to outputs and consultancy
ranging across political participation, identity, rights protection and
international criminal law. The impact claimed here falls in two main
channels. Firstly, research on socio-economic group rights, amplified by
Castellino's work as co-chair of the relevant UN delegated group, has made
a significant input into the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
2015-30. Secondly, research has been incorporated into practice and
capacity- building through projects involving judiciaries, advocates,
statutory bodies, and NGOs. Beneficiaries include the public across 194
states who will benefit from implementation of SDGs over their 15 years
lifespan; and civil society bodies and their users.
Underpinning research
Human rights are conceptualised as civil/political rights accruing to
individuals, realised through legal challenge: an approach that has failed
the world's Bottom Billion. With access to law restricted, the approach
has led to increased inequality. Research in the Unit has collected
evidence and sustained arguments for strengthening socio-economic rights -
hitherto deemed non- justiciable - and making them collectively available
to vulnerable groups. Studies concerned with these issues have been
conducted by the Unit in domestic jurisdictions in different continents.
The present emphasis of this research emerged in a series of steps from
work on social exclusion at Middlesex during the 1990s. That work
consisted initially of Sargeant's analysis of the mis- articulation of
public policy that led to workplace exclusions [1]. From 2007, Castellino
introduced a focus on socio-economic underpinnings of exclusion,
highlighting remedies in administrative systems in different states. Other
contributors to concern with exclusion included Howard (religious
identity); Wray (immigration); Dominguez-Redondo & Keane (minority
rights); Schabas (genocide, international criminal law); and Leach
(litigation).
The resulting body of research takes a distinctive comparative approach
to the critique of vulnerable groups' access to law. Special emphasis is
placed on `Southern law', challenging legal systems that derived from the
colonial experience. Publications have examined constitutional,
administrative and legislative measures in jurisdictions that have tackled
problems of exclusion in land ownership, freedom of religion, political
participation, gender, immigration and education. Together, the Unit's
studies propose models that could be incorporated into legal systems as
solutions, while demonstrating how courts remain beyond the reach of
vulnerable groups.
The Unit's research is closely linked to advocacy. The researchers work
to mainstream rights in administrative legal policy, to bring together
investigation of collective dimensions of rights with remedies and with
capacity-building among lawyers and activists. Along with associated
professional activity derived from the research, the studies described
have played a significant part in facilitating the Unit's links with
legislators, bar associations, and NGOs.
Notable in the broader impact of the Unit's research, a specific impact
on UN policy stems from research initially published in a special issue of
the International Journal of Human Rights entitled `Millennium
Development Goals and Human Rights' [2]. That issue, edited by Doyle,
contained contributions from Castellino and Dominguez-Redondo [3] which
argued for broadening the scope of goal-setting towards collective rights.
The perspective put forward in those articles has since been elaborated in
an assessment of constitutional models developed in successive volumes of
the Oxford University Press (OUP) Minority Rights Series, co-written by
Castellino (lead author) with Dominguez Redondo (Asia) and with Keane
(Pacific) [4]. The third volume in this series (co- written with
Cavanaugh, 2013) examines the Middle East [5]. On the strength of the
collective work of this group of researchers, Castellino was invited to
join the Leadership Council of the United Nations Sustainable Development
Solutions Network (UNSDSN), and now co-chairs the group `Social Exclusion,
Human Rights and Gender'. Castellino's contribution in this role has led
to incorporation of collective human rights as a projected goal, and his
wording is reflected in the UN Secretary General's Report, September 2013
[6].
References to the research
[1] Sargeant & Tucker `Layers of Vulnerability in Occupational Health
and Safety for Migrant Workers: Lessons from Canada & the UK' Policy
and Practice in Health and Safety, 2, (1997) 51- 73.
[2] 13(1) The International Journal of Human Rights, Special
issue, `Millennium Development Goals and Human Rights' (2009), guest
editor Doyle. There were substantive contributions by Castellino,
Dominguez-Redondo & Doyle ( all Middlesex) as well as
Sepulveda-Carmona, subsequently UN Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty
& Schmidt-Traub, subsequently Executive Director, United Nations
Sustainable Developments Solutions Network.
[3] Castellino `The MDGs and International Human Rights Law: A View from
the Perspective of Minorities and Vulnerable Groups', 13(1) International
Journal of Human Rights (2009) 10-28; Dominguez-Redondo, `The MDGs
and the Human Rights Based Approach: Reflecting on Structural Chasms
within the United Nations system', 13(1) International Journal of
Human Rights (2009) 29-43
[4] Minority Rights Book Series: Castellino & Keane Minority
Rights in the Pacific: A Comparative Legal Analysis (OUP, 2009);
Castellino & Dominguez Redondo, Minority Rights in Asia: A
Comparative Legal Analysis (OUP, 2006).
[5] Castellino & Cavanaugh, Minority Rights in the Middle East: A
Comparative Legal Analysis (OUP, 2013)
[6] UNSDSN Secretariat, Social Inclusion Gender and Human Rights'
submission to the High Level Panel on Sustainable Development (Their
Excellencies Cameron, Ono, Sirleaf-Johnson) Meeting in Bali, Indonesia,
February 2013.
All these publications were subject to stringent editorial standards and
peer review. The book series was reviewed by Oxford University Press
delegates, advised by specialist external reviewers, with each volume
evaluated by academic peers prior to publication.
Research which led to capacity-building projects, has been supported by a
number of competitively won grants, including: (a) Foreign &
Commonwealth Office £99,000 (Leach, Castellino, Central Asian Defenders
Project) 2008; (b) DelPhe Project £47,000 (Dominguez-Redondo, Castellino,
Duhok University) 2011; (c) Banco Santander, £23,000 (Castellino,
Dominguez-Redondo, Latin America Indigenous Project) 2008.
Details of the impact
Impact from the body of research described above falls into two streams:
(1) contribution to international policy formulation; and (2) research-led
training of actors whose practice has been made more effective by
engagement with collective rights.
1. Formulation of a new UN SDG, `Gender, Social Inclusion and Human
Rights' Castellino's (and his colleagues') critique of dominant
approaches to rights, and proposals for alternative formulations around
group rights derived from non-Western legal systems, led to his
appointment as Co-chair of the Social Exclusion, Human Rights and Gender
group, as indicated above. This position called for his input into
formulation of the SDGs [1] with input into the High Level Panel [2]
reflected in the report of the UN Secretary-General [3]. Inclusion of a
human rights goal based on vulnerable groups, as advocated by Castellino,
contributes to the establishment of a global framework for poverty
eradication, hitherto an exclusive concern of development economists.
The SDG formulated is informed by research produced by the Unit and by
Castellino's public advocacy as lead researcher to NGOs and end-users [4]
as well as Governments [5]. The model avoids traditional rights foci on
the individual and emphasizes co-operation rather than censure. Each of
these aspects involves a significant departure from the orthodoxies of
contemporary human rights politics; underpinned by publications that had
led to Castellino's appointment as Co- chair of the UN Group in the first
place, and which guided his co-chairing of that Group, and impacted the
deliberations of the High Level Panel chaired by Their Excellencies
Cameron (UK), Johnson Sirleaf (Liberia) and Yudhoyono (Indonesia).
Research in the Unit is now engaged in analysis of the unfolding impact
of the SDGs e.g. in relation to criticism from human rights lobbies wedded
to censure, (`naming and shaming' procedures, see Dominguez-Redondo,
Output 3). Compliance with the SDGs will follow the practice associated
with the earlier Millennium Development Goals, i.e. annual world-wide
monitoring. The ultimate impact of the Unit's research, accordingly, as
amplified by the goal it has helped to shape through publications and
Castellino's UN involvement, will be the requirement on 194 states to
provide evidence of progress to the UN over the 15 year span of the SDGs.
Potential impact is therefore on millions, to the extent that national
policies adhere to the SDGs, and UN goals are reflected by agencies whose
activities and funding will be shaped to implement them.
2. Training programmes aimed at capacity-building related to
group-oriented human rights To connect the Unit's contribution to
policy formation with professional practice, a range of programmes have
been designed and delivered by researchers to advocates (a), judges (b),
civil servants (c) and emerging policy makers (d),as below:
a. 2009. The Human Rights Defenders Network (Central Asia)
created by the European Human Rights Advocacy Centre and other researchers
in this Unit, and funded by the Foreign & Commonwealth Office.
The Network consists of 18 professionals from Kyrgyzstan,
Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, but also extends to Tajiks and Turkmen and is
hosted by the Kazakh Human Rights Lawyers Association, Almaty.
Continued academic support provided by Middlesex researchers consists of
updates training and facilitation of networking between international
organizations [6].
b. 2010. Two-day judicial colloquium, Equality Law: Global
Approaches, co-hosted with Equal Rights Trust (UK) and Human Rights
Law Network (HRLN, India). This event was attended by Lord Walker, then
President, UK Supreme Court; Lord Lester QC, and Lord Justice Sedley (via
video-link) [7]. The case analyses presented were drawn from Middlesex
research, adapted to requirements of the Supreme Court of India. Impact
took the form of increased professional awareness and enhanced expertise
on the part of 40 High Court and Supreme Court judges. The programme also
led to a successful bid by HRLN (India), funded by KIOS (Finland), to
deliver training in conjunction with Middlesex staff to the judiciaries of
Bangladesh (October 2013) and Nepal (April 2014) [8].
c. 2011. Human rights programme designed to assist the re-building
of Iraqi Kurdistan, delivered by Dominguez-Redondo and others (funded by
British Council, facilitated by DelPhE). This programme was delivered to
20 civil servants and judges, and became the model on which the first LLM
Human Rights Law in Iraq was directly based (Duhok University, first award
made in 2012 to 20 recipients) [9].
d. 2012. Closed sessions at Wilton House, Sussex, delivered by
Castellino, on human rights considerations involved in drafting new
constitutions. These sessions derived from Castellino's research in
comparative constitutional law, and functioned as catalysts to continuing
work on drafting by nine Arab delegations. The delegations consisted of
MPs, leaders of opposition parties, activists and journalists, selected by
the British Council based in Bahrain. The event was devised in response to
an approach by Shevolution on behalf of the British Council and Foreign
& Commonwealth Office [10].
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Secretariat of the UN SDSN. For details on Thematic Group 3, (Social
Exclusion, Human Rights & Gender) see
http://unsdsn.org/thematicgroups/tg3/
- Website of the High Level Panel on Post 2015, confirming acceptance of
framing documents for the High Level Panel process: http://www.un.org/sg/management/hlppost2015.shtml
- United Nations, Report of the UN Secretary General to the United
Nations, UN.Doc. A/68/202 (26 July, 2013) containing substantial
language derived from the cited papers: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/68/202
- See for instance, Public Lecture by Castellino `From Courtroom to
Street: Minorities & Poverty' for Tom Lantos Institute (Budapest,
Hungary) and Central European University, full telecast available at http://tomlantosinstitute.hu/content/video-and-photos-our-latest-public-lecture-
delivered-dr-joshua-castellino
- Castellino address to the United Nations Human Rights Council, at the
First Ever Minorities Thematic Discussion, Geneva, available at
http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/webcast/2012/03/panel-on-minorities-32rd-meeting-19th-
session-human-rights-coucnil-2012.html
- See Description of the Project
https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/hrsj/training-
and-consultancy/$ppcahrd.cfm. There was also a conference report from
2009, available at: https://metranet.londonmet.ac.uk/fms/MRSite/Research/HRSJ/2009-conf/conference-report-
2009.pdf
- Programme for the Judicial Colloquium, available on request.
- Corroboration of Impact of Research on NGOs, by Mr. Colin Gonsalves,
Founding Director, Human Rights Law Network, New Delhi, India, available
on request.
- Terms of Reference DELPhE and Programme Report available on request.
- Terms of Reference and Programme and corroborating statement from Ms
Lesley Abdela, MBE, CEO, Shevolution http://www.abdela.co.uk/About_Us/about_us.htm,
available on request.