Meeting patients’ information needs to improve health outcomes
Submitting Institution
University of SalfordUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Research in the area of meeting patients' information needs to improve
health outcomes is concerned with improving the effectiveness of
information in support of improving people's health in a range of areas,
demonstrating the following impact:
- The development of user responsive health information and enhanced use
of digital media by healthcare providers;
- Increased patient involvement in their health care leading to better
health outcomes;
- The development of evidence informed policy and strategy focused on
patients' information needs.
Underpinning research
The key researchers and positions they held at the institution at the
time of the research are as follows: Dr Paula Ormandy (from 1998),
Member of School of Nursing,
Midwifery and Social
Work (from 2006) and Professor Ben Light (from 2009) School of Arts
and Media. Building on a theoretical and empirical foundation of
identifying, developing services to meet patients' information needs, and
equipping health professionals with the skills to engage patients in their
own health management, Meeting patients' information needs to improve
health outcomes focuses on using information more effectively in
managing long-term conditions and public health. The impact of this case
study is underpinned by the following research:
-
2006-2007: Identifying chronic kidney disease (CKD)
patients' priorities and preferences for information topics:
funded by the British Renal Society and in partnership with Salford
Royal NHS Foundation Trust, the University of Manchester and a Patient
Advocate, identified the information preferences and priorities for CKD
patients. Generating an evidence base for information provision,
exposing the contextual influences of information need, Ormandy extended
the working definition of information need, developing a conceptual
framework to guide healthcare practitioners when meeting patient
information priorities in practice.
-
2011-2012: Shared Decision-making Project in Renal Services:
funded by National Kidney Care and in partnership with Salford Royal
Foundation NHS Trust, Ormandy was co-opted as an expert advisor to guide
the implementation of a patient-led approach to information sharing
models, empowering patients to identify their readiness to accept
condition specific information. The project introduced motivational
interviewing training to increase clinicians' engagement skills,
implemented a shared-decision making agenda, and evaluated
shared-decision making between patients and health professionals,
developing a cultural change from a paternalistic to a collaborative
working approach.
-
2009-2011: Facilitating the engagement of boys and young
men in sexual health using new media: funded by a Knowledge
Transfer Partnership, Technology Strategy Board, the Economic and Social
Research Council and in partnership with Brook Manchester, Light and
Ormandy harmonised client and clinic activity data to improve management
information, developing a clear evidence base. The project implemented
new-media services to engage boys and young men in the maintenance of
their sexual health, including an education App for iPods to deliver
sexual health education focused on condom use; an on-line `chat room'
for sexual health advice; and staff training regarding the use of
digital media. It integrated evaluation methods to align service
delivery with outcomes and created an evaluation and guidance toolkit
for practitioners using digital media.
-
2010-2011: Lesbian, Gay & Bisexual (LGB) Women in the
North West: a multi-method study of cervical screening attitudes,
experiences and uptake: funded by the Department of Health
National Cervical Screening Programme and in partnership with the
Lesbian and Gay Foundation, a 12 month digital media campaign to
increase awareness and uptake among LGB women was implemented (Are
you ready for your screen test?), Light and Ormandy identified
reasons why women don't engage with cervical screening, finding that
myths and lack of accurate information influenced women's decisions as
to engagement, and evaluated the digital media campaign, measuring the
impact of digital media interventions to effect behaviour change.
-
2012-2013: Promoting Cervical Screening in the North West:
A Digital Media Based Approach funded by the NHS Executive,
Ormandy and Light conducted a multifaceted digital campaign to address
issues facing 24-29 year old women with respect to their knowledge of
cervical cancer and confidence in the uptake of cervical screening, The
campaign was inspiring through offering many ways for women to engage
and educate each other via website,
Facebook,
Twitter, Pinterest,
and YouTube.
This approach allowed women to create share and access campaign
materials, and key health messages on their terms, rather than through
traditional didactic health promotion methods.
References to the research
Key Outputs
1. Ormandy P, Hulme CT, Caress AL, Macdonald J, O'Donoghue D, Crane D.
2007.
Identifying chronic kidney disease patients' priorities and preferences
for information topics. Salford Centre for Nursing, Midwifery and
Collaborative Research, Institute for Health and Social Care Research,
University of Salford. Report, April: ISBN 9781905732265. Report for
British Renal Society
2. Ormandy P. 2008a. Information topics important to chronic kidney
disease patients: a systematic review, Journal of Renal Care, Mar;
34(1): 19-27, DOI
(REF2)
3. Ormandy, P. 2008b, Chronic kidney disease: Patient information
needs, preferences and priorities, PhD Thesis, University of
Salford. URL
4. Ormandy P. 2011. Defining information need in health — assimilating
complex theories from Information Science. Health Expectations,
14(1): 92-104, DOI.
5. Light B, Ormandy P. 2011. Lesbian, Gay & Bisexual Women in the
North West: A multi-method study of cervical screening attitudes,
experiences and uptake. Lesbian & Gay Foundation and University
of Salford Report, July: ISBN 9781907842139. Report for the Department of
Health Cervical Screening Programme. (REF2)
7. Ormandy P, Hulme C. 2013. Measuring patient preferences and
priorities for information. Information Research. URL
(REF2)
8.
Key Grants
9. 2006-2007: Identifying chronic kidney disease (CKD)
patients' priorities and preferences for information topics. P
Ormandy, C Hulme with J Macdonald, D O'Donoghue (Salford Royal NHS
Foundation Trust), AL Caress (University of Manchester), D Crane (Patient
Advocate). Funding: British Renal Society, £26,986
10. 2009-2011: Facilitating the engagement of boys and young
men in sexual health using new media. B Light, P Ormandy with S
Mallas (Brook Advisory Clinic, Manchester). Funding Body: Knowledge
Transfer Partnership — Technology Strategy Board, Economic and Social
Research Council, £120,000. Finalist, Brook National Innovation Award
2011.
11. 2010-2011: Lesbian, Gay & Bisexual (LGB) Women in the
North West: a multi-method study of cervical screening attitudes,
experiences and uptake. B Light, P Ormandy with R Cookson, A Emery
(LGF). Funding Body: Department of Health National Cervical Screening
Programme, £108,000. Winner, Jo's Cervical Trust Award 2011.
12. 2012: Impact
of using social media to increase patient information provision,
networking and communication, P
Ormandy, C Vasilica, K Pennington (Patient) Funding Body: British
Renal Society, £16,745.00.
13. 2012-2013: Promoting Cervical Screening in the North
West: A Digital Media Based Approach. P Ormandy, B Light. Funding
Body: Department of Health North West Cervical Screening Quality Assurance
Reference Centre (£75,000), and Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale
PCT(£25,000) total budget £100,000
Details of the impact
The development of evidence informed policy and strategy focused on
patients' information needs:
-
2008, 2011-2012: Directly informing national guidelines in
patient management, research findings by Ormandy et al. identified the
key information needs preferences and priorities for people with CKD in
the UK. The National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions used
these findings to guide NICE recommendations for healthcare
practitioners on what to consider when meeting the information needs of
people with CKD in practice settings: (NICE 2008: p181-182) http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG73/Guidance/pdf/English
- Ormandy led a workshop for the Department of Health Senior Renal
Advisory Group on patient engagement to enhance the skills of health
professionals. As an expert advisor Ormandy, in partnership with Salford
Royal Foundation NHS Trust, assisted clinicians to secure funding from
National Kidney Care for a local shared decision-making project in
clinical practice. This project implemented a patient-led approach to
information provision through introducing agenda setting within clinics,
improving patient confidence to make clear their information needs
within consultations to facilitate decision making.
- In partnership with the local Kidney Patients Association, to
facilitate improved information provision, Ormandy & Vasilica (PhD
student) secured grant funding in 2013 to develop a user-led online
digital and social media CKD information hub, tailored to meet the needs
of patients by patients, using digital and social media to facilitate
patient to patient information provision, networking and communication
for people with CKD. This network is established and patients are
generating and adding content, www.gmkin.org.uk
The development of user responsive health information and enhanced use
of digital media by healthcare providers:
-
2009-2011: The deployment of digital media for sexual health
education is extensive, however many interventions are undertaken in the
absence of methods for impact evaluation. The Brook sexual health
education through digital media KTP project, developed digital media
based interventions embedded with evaluation mechanisms to continually
assess the impact and the value of interventions in practice. Client and
clinic activity data naturally occurring within the different Brook
services was harmonised to allow the generation of regular reports,
numbers of young people targeted, activity undertaken, as a clear
evidence base of sustained activity to provide for potential increase in
uptake of initiatives. The ethos of the service shifted to understanding
what works, why and how they could do things differently, as a result of
the embedded evaluation training deployed across the organisation.
- The KTP improved engagement with the free condom service for boys
through digital media (iPod, videos). The
Condom Demonstration `app' provides a mechanism for educating a
wider population on condom use, whilst gathering automated data through
a reporting system on the use of the app, ethnicity of people that use
it, and capturing behavioural changes. The condom demo `app', was
nominated for a Brook 2011 National Innovation Award and shortlisted as
a finalist, and publicised by the BBC where it was promoted on the Radio
(by Light and Vasilica). The `app' is available through the national
organisation website and the iPhone App store. The outcomes of the KTP
have been taken up nationally with Brook National extending trials of a
Web 2.0 based community site.
- Knowledge has been exchanged throughout Brook as the project
progressed leading to a significant cultural change locally enabling
Brook National staff to lead the way in accessible social media sexual
health education, securing a Department of Health Virtual Health project
(£170K), increasing the organisation's ability to secure new service
contracts in an increasingly competitive environment.
Increased patient involvement in their health care:
-
2010-2011: The "`Are You Ready For Your Screen Test?',
initiative, which included humorous short films on You Tube based on
blockbuster movies like Star Wars, Love Actually and Dirty Dancing, was
launched by the Lesbian and Gay Foundation in partnership with the
University of Salford and funded by the NHS Cervical Screening
Programme. The campaign used You Tube films, booklets, posters and
radio, print, online and social media advertising and information with
the Hollywood theme and had a massive impact. Analysis of the 12 month
North West campaign was undertaken by Ormandy and Light and findings
from the 1,000 women surveyed included;
o Only 49% of respondents of an eligible age (25-64) had been for a
cervical screening test within NHS recommended time scales, rising to
73% post-campaign;
o 51% reported some form of positive behaviour change as a result of
the campaign;
o 96% felt that the campaign was effective.
- The Lesbian & Gay Foundation's campaign encouraging women not to
ignore a test which could mean the difference between life and death
earned the Manchester-based group top billing in the Jo's Cervical
Cancer Trust 2011 Cervical Screening Awards.
-
2012-2013: Promoting Cervical Screening in the North West:
A Digital Media Based Approach engaged women in the 24-29 age
group and has embedded evaluation mechanisms throughout to constantly
audit its performance, and adjust its methodology to maximise its
impact. The campaign
is improving this age group's awareness, knowledge and confidence in
cervical screening. Starting from a zero base in March 2013, in terms of
community/network, to date the campaign website has received over 3000
unique views, Facebook has 2200 likes with an associated audience of
over 120,000 and our YouTube videos have had almost 9500 views. Over 450
women have completed our evaluative survey and our initial analysis is
that 82% report that they think the campaign is effective, 50% report
that it has had a positive effect on their knowledge, confidence or
behaviour, 45% reported no change as they already went for screening.
Sources to corroborate the impact
a) Programme Manager at the Lesbian and Gay Foundation:
"Countless lives have been put at risk for years because of the myth
that lesbian and bisexual women don't need cervical screening. Cervical
cancer claims the lives of three women every day in the UK and sees a
woman diagnosed every three hours, yet cervical cancer is preventable
and the NHS screening programme plays a vital role in saving around
4,500 lives in England each year. But less than half of lesbian and
bisexual women of eligible age surveyed in the North West had been for
cervical screening during the recommended three to five years
previously. The success of Are You Ready for Your Screen Test?
highlights the overwhelming need for, and benefit of, targeted campaigns
on a wider scale."
b) Director, NHS Cervical Screening Programme: "We
have been delighted to work with The Lesbian & Gay Foundation in
Manchester and the University of Salford on a pilot programme of
campaigning and information giving to see how this change of policy
could be turned into real life action. This report gives an account of
that pilot; records what worked and what didn't, and allows other parts
of the country to learn from this exercise."
c) Director of
Jo's Cervical Cancer Trust, said: "I and the rest of the judges
were hugely impressed with this wining application. It was innovative,
creative and very well targeted. The results of this project are already
proving to be very positive and of course this is a great example of
best practice that can be shared with other organisations across England
and the rest of the UK."
d) Corroboration from the Chairman of the Hope Kidney
Patients Association
e) Link to guidelines for the NHS by NICE, the National
Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG73/Guidance/pdf/English
f) Link to final report Light, B and Ormandy, P
2011, http://ripassetseu.s3.amazonaws.com/www.lgf.org.uk/_files/documents/sep_11/FENT__13
16185576_north-west-lgb-women-cervical-.pdf
g) Link to summary community report http://ripassetseu.s3.amazonaws.com/www.lgf.org.uk/_files/documents/sep_11/FENT__13
16185513_are-you-ready-for-your-screen-.pdf