Submitting Institution
University of CambridgeUnit of Assessment
EducationSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Education: Curriculum and Pedagogy, Specialist Studies In Education
Summary of the impact
The research conducted through the C.Ind.Le project, between 2002 and
2006, was the first to reveal and catalogue the metacognitive and
self-regulatory abilities of children in the 3-5 age range. The project
outcomes included an observation instrument, now widely used by teachers
in early years educational settings, and a training course on pedagogies
supporting development of these abilities in young children. This research
has had direct regional impact on practice at the Foundation Stage in
Cambridgeshire, national impact through its influence on the 2012 revision
of the DfE framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage, and
international impact through consultancy to the LEGO Foundation and other
collaborations.
Underpinning research
Key Researchers
David Whitebread (Principal Investigator) Senior Lecturer in Psychology
& Education (University of Cambridge Faculty of Education
2001-present).
Penny Coltman, Lecturer in Education (University of Cambridge Faculty of
Education 2001- present).
Underpinning Research Project
The Cambridgeshire Independent Learning in the Foundation Stage (C.Ind.Le)
project was conducted between 2002 and 2006.
The emergence and development of young children's metacognitive abilities
and self-regulation (referred to within the education arena as `learning
how to learn' or `independent learning') has been Dr Whitebread's
long-term research focus. It was well established, through a considerable
body of research over the last 40 years, that metacognitive abilities
(enabling us to be aware of and in control of our own cognitive
processing, and to build up metacognitive knowledge) are crucially
significant predictors of academic achievement. Prior to Whitebread's
C.Ind.Le project the mainstream position within the developmental and
educational psychology communities was that metacognitive abilities are a
complex set of skills which children do not begin to develop until around
the age of 8-10 years. However, previous work had largely depended upon
self-report, or laboratory-based data, which is now recognized to
systematically under-estimate the abilities of younger children.
The aims of the C.Ind.Le project were to:
- Demonstrate and catalogue the metacognitive and self-regulatory
abilities of children in the 3-5 age range [3.1]
- Establish a model of the development of children's independent
learning to underpin the design of an audit/assessment tool [3.4]
- Identify the kinds of experiences and interventions that are most
effective in encouraging children's independent learning abilities [3.3]
- Devise practical classroom activities, procedures and teaching
strategies which have a demonstrable impact on children's development of
self-regulation [3.1] [3.2] [3.5]
The C.Ind.Le project collected naturalistic observational data, of around
1,440 three-five year old children from 32 Foundation Stage classes in
Cambridgeshire which resulted in over 700 video files, recording episodes
of metacognitive and self-regulatory behaviours in these subjects. This
study was the first to demonstrate the emergence of metacognitive
abilities in younger children. The key outcomes of the project were: •
Data illustrating the range of metacognitive and self-regulatory
behaviours exhibited by 3- 5 year olds [3.2] [3.4]
- Analyses of contextual factors which appear to support the emergence
and practice of these abilities, including child-initiated activities,
play contexts of various kinds, problem-solving and collaborative
activities [3.3] [3.5]
- A model and coding framework for self-regulation in young children,
enabling the systematic analysis of observational data containing
episodes of metacognitive and self-regulatory behaviours [3.4]
- The identification of non-verbal and verbal indicators of these early
abilities [3.4]
To secure impact on professional practice, these were translated into:
- An observational instrument (CHILD: Checklist of Independent Learning
Development), for use by teachers, to assess the metacognitive and
self-regulatory abilities of children in this age range, and as an
instrument to assess their own pedagogical practices. [3.4]
- A 30 hour training course for Foundation Stage teachers, incorporating
a double CD resource of video and other material illustrating the range
of behaviours they should observe in their children, the pedagogical
practices that support them, and the use of the observational instrument
as an assessment and audit tool. [3.1]
References to the research
Project title
Cambridgeshire Independent Learning in the Foundation Stage (C.Ind.Le)
(PI: Whitebread)
Grants received
£120,000 from Cambridgeshire Local Authority between 2002 and 2006;
£2,000 from the Vicky Hurst Trust, in 2006
Publications
3.1 Whitebread, D., Anderson, H., Coltman, P., Page, C., Mehta, S. &
Pino Pasternak, D. (2006) The C.Ind.Le Project: Supporting young children
in becoming self-regulated learners. CD-ROM resource: University of
Cambridge/Cambridgeshire Care and Education Partnership.
3.2 Whitebread, D., Anderson, H., Coltman, P., Page, C., Pino Pasternak,
D. & Mehta, S (2005). Developing Independent Learning in the Early
Years, Education 3-13, 33, 40-50. DOI:10.1080/03004270585200081
3.3 Whitebread, D., Bingham, S., Grau, V., Pino Pasternak, D. &
Sangster, C. (2007). Development of Metacognition and Self-Regulated
Learning in Young Children: the role of collaborative and peer-assisted
learning, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6, 433-
55. DOI: 10.1891/194589507787382043
3.4 Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pino Pasternak, D., Sangster, C., Grau,
V., Bingham, S., Almeqdad, Q. & Demetriou, D. (2009) The development
of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated
learning in young children, Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63-
85. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1
3.5 Whitebread, D. & Coltman, P. (2010) Aspects of pedagogy
supporting metacognition and mathematical learning in young children;
evidence from an observational study, ZDM: The International Journal
on Mathematics Education, 42 (2), 163-178. DOI:
10.1007/s11858-009-0233-1.
3.1 was directly devised for the potential practitioner user audience and
3.2 was published in a peer-reviewed research journal that reaches a
substantial practitioner user audience. The key papers reporting the
research, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5, were published in international research
journals recognised as having particularly high standards of peer review.
For example, Metacognition and Learning [3.3] received its first
impact factor in 2010, which was 2.038, when it was ranked 12th
of 184 journals in the ISI category of Education & Educational
Research. In the first 3 months of 2012 the C.Ind.Le project article was
the most highly downloaded from the journal, with 813 downloads.
Details of the impact
Regional
The C.Ind.Le project produced a double CD-ROM pack, launched in 2006, which
has been the central training resource in a 30 hour advanced professional
certificate course, sponsored by Cambridgeshire Local Authority (and a
shorter 6 hour `taster' course), which were together attended by around 200
Foundation Stage Cambridgeshire practitioners from 2008 to 2010. The courses
were extremely positively evaluated by participants, with many attesting
significant change in their practice. Between 2008 and 2010 the short course
was used by Cambridgeshire Early Years' Service as a pre-OFSTED training for
Foundation Stage settings, and this resulted in significantly improved
outcomes for many settings. All this is evidenced in the letter from the
Early Years' Service within Cambridgeshire Local Authority [5.1].
National and international
This training resource has also been purchased for use in other regions of
the UK (to date the original printing of 500 copies are all sold, and
around 20 copies have been reprinted). Courses have been personally
delivered by Dr. Whitebread & Mrs. Coltman in Peterborough and in
Harrow (both in 2008) and by Dr. Whitebread and others abroad (e.g.:
Australia, 2008; Jordan, 2009; Turkey, 2010; Canada, 2010 & 2013;
Cyprus, 2008-13 and Chile 2008-13). In further cases this dissemination
has been carried out by Masters and PhD students, some of whom worked as
temporary research assistants on the C.Ind.Le project.
As a consequence of this national and international dissemination of the
outcomes of the C.Ind.Le project among the early years teaching profession
(including the CHILD observational tool), Dr. Whitebread's advice was
sought by the recent Tickell Review of the UK Early Years Foundation Stage
(2011), commissioned by the Department for Education. The section of this
report headed `characteristics of effective learning' heavily reflected
this research. This work, in turn, influenced some of the amendments to
the revised Early Years Foundation Stage (DFE, 2012). All this is
evidenced in the letter from a member of the DFE National Strategies team,
adviser to the Tickell enquiry, and subsequently author of Development
Matters in the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) (DfE, 2012), the
non-statutory guidance material accompanying the revised Statutory
Framework for the EYFS (DfE, 2012) [5.2].
Letters from members of the Executive Committee of TACTYC: the
Professional Association of Early Years Educators also testify to the
influence of Dr. Whitebread's research on the UK Foundation Stage [5.3 and
5.4].
Dr Whitebread has also been asked to undertake international consultancy
with the LEGO Learning Institute (now the LEGO Foundation) on the
importance of early metacognitive processes and how these are supported in
constructional and imaginative play, and particularly in collaborative
problem-solving activities. For example, he is currently advising on the
development of a school-based assessment tool which draws directly from
the insights emerging from the C.Ind.Le project, and is undertaking
research with local primary schools, funded by the Lego Foundation,
examining the impact of constructional and pretence play on children's
writing [5.5]
Sources to corroborate the impact
Supporting documents
5.1 Letter from Cambs Early Years Advisory Service [Supporting document 1]
5.2 Letter from ex-member of the DFE National Strategies team,
author of Development matters, and now independent early years consultant.
[Supporting document 2]
5.3 Letter from Chair of TACTYC, testifying to the influence of
Dr. Whitebread's research in the UK Foundation Stage. [Supporting document
3]
5.4 Letter from Editor of Early Years, testifying to the
influence of Dr. Whitebread's research in the UK Foundation Stage.
[Supporting document 4]
5.5 Letter from Director, LEGO Learning Institute itemizing Dr.
Whitebread's work advising LEGO.
[Supporting document 5]