Impact on Northern Ireland policymaking from the use of findings on community relations
Submitting Institution
University of UlsterUnit of Assessment
Psychology, Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Sociology
Law and Legal Studies: Other Law and Legal Studies
Summary of the impact
This case study refers to the body of survey research evidence on public
attitudes to community
relations, gathered over a period of two decades in Northern Ireland. The
thesis on `impact' is
that this body of work influenced government policies, public debate and
good practice in
equality procedures during the period 2008-2013. The survey results have
become ubiquitous
within debates and reports within/from government, political parties,
journalists, lobbyists and
NGOs and as a consequence have had significant and wide-ranging effects on
Northern Ireland
society.
Underpinning research
The underpinning research is the body of surveys that have taken place in
Northern Ireland over
the period 2002 to 2012. This has revealed a times-series in public
attitudes to community
relations that has had an impact on government policy, public debate and
good practice in
equality procedures. The Northern Ireland Life and Times survey (NILT) is
an annual public
attitudes survey covering a wide variety of social issues year on year.
NILT follows the same
methodology as its predecessor the Northern Ireland Social Attitudes
survey (fielded between
1989 and 1996). A random sample of individuals (approximately 1200) are
selected and
interviewed face to face from across Northern Ireland. A range of social
topics are included on
the survey including the key time-series questions on politics and
community relations that have
been asked each year since 1989. Results are made publicly available on
the NILT website six
months after the end of fieldwork as are the key time-series on political
attitudes and community
relations. Key to the impact of the NILT research is that results are made
publicly available
online in lay-friendly tables so that any user from any sector may use the
data free of charge
and without permission. Policymakers, schoolchildren, journalists and
lobby groups form part of
the 3690 page views monthly (2012). Even apart from the impact of the body
of work on
community relations the NILT `brand' has become a recognised and trusted
reference for
practitioners and users from all sectors.
The context for this area of research is key to the significance of the
impact. Very little is of
more importance to Northern Ireland society than that there should be no
return to the conflict
that dogged the thirty year period from 1968 to 1998. This body of
research has therefore been
critical in the post devolution period. Between 2002 and 2010 the Northern
Ireland Life and
Times Survey (NILT) results have shown a rise in the perceptions that
relations between
Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland have improved and are
improving. Findings also
show a consistent and increasing desire for mixed religion neighbourhoods,
schools and
workplaces. Other time-series indicate a shift in identity - particularly
for young Protestants
from a `British' to a `Northern Irish' identity. Many more people in
Northern Ireland now see
themselves as British and Irish and an increased Irish
identification among Catholics, and
particularly among the young, go hand in hand with a steady or even
falling voiced desire for
Irish reunification. Results also reveal the extent to which people
believe that the Northern
Ireland government is meeting its targets in terms of the Good Relations
strategy. The most
recent 2012 survey shows the dip in public confidence following the 2012
flag disputes.
Key Researchers
Professor Gillian Robinson, Professor University of Ulster, 2008-2013
Dr Paula Devine, Senior Research Fellow, Queen's University Belfast,
2008-2013
References to the research
The key outputs are the NILT Databases themselves published online
between June 2008 and
June 2013. Authors for all are Gillian Robinson (University of Ulster) and
Paula Devine (Queen's
University Belfast).
The quality of this research is evidenced by the ESRC grant (2006-2011) ARK
Access Research
Knowledge (formerly ARK : A Social and Political Archive for Northern
Ireland) (of £2.7m) Award
Reference RES-060-23-0015 which effectively endorsed the ARK open-access
model and
specifically funded Paula Devine as NILT Director between 2006 and 2011.
It also funded
Professor Robinson as ARK Director. Individual modules of fieldwork were
funded by the Office
of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister (OFMDFM) with grants of
210K in 2007/8, 90K in
2010 and 319K in 2012.
Details of the impact
NILT databases have had impact because their regular production and open
access has helped
frame policies around an unsteady peace. This impact is significant
because the stakes
around a return to violent conflict are so high. The Community Relations
Council referred to the
NILT time-series (see attached letter):
This aspect of the NILT survey is very valuable to our work given the
serious impact of a failure
to identify a change in attitudes that might herald a return to violent
conflict... and given the
highly charged political environment, it would be hard to overstate the
importance of factual
information and the role of long range research such as the NILT survey.
The impact is wide-reaching because NILT data have become
ubiquitous within debates and
reports within/from government, political parties, journalists, lobbyists
and NGOs. The Research
Director of the Northern Ireland Peace Monitoring Report (see attached
letter) notes:
...I cannot think of any serious analysis of Northern Ireland as a
post-conflict society that doesn't
make reference to its survey data.... Not to include NILT survey data
suggests a lack of concern
for the lived experience of the people of Northern Ireland. That's how
central its research has
become.
The history to the specific impact presented in the case study begins In
March 2005 when the
Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister (OFMDFM) published
`A Shared Future:
The policy and strategic framework for good relations in Northern
Ireland'. A total of forty six
NILT indicators were identified in this action plan. In January 2007, a
baseline report was
produced which contained 96 citations of NILT data. Subsequently reports
were produced in
2008, 2009, 2010 and 2013.
However it is the use of NILT data by non-governmental users that
evidences the reach of this
impact. With the resumption of devolution in May 2007, OFMDFM initiated
the development of a
new programme on Cohesion, Sharing and Integration (CSI) but with
seemingly ever long
delays in its publication. During spring 2010, discussions in the Northern
Ireland Assembly on
CSI (or the lack of it) where Life and Times data were cited featured on
18th Feb 2010; 2nd
March 2010 and 23rd June 2010.
The public consultation on (CSI) was launched on 27 July 2010 and
generated enormous
controversy. Twelve of the responses to the consultation made mention of
ARK survey data
(Alliance Party, Worker's Party, Commission for Victims and Survivors,
Irish Peace Centre,
Integrated Education Fund, Chartered Institute of Housing, NI Federation
of Housing
Associations, Pubic Health Agency, Sharing Education Learning Forum,
Volunteer Now, Youth
Council for Northern Ireland) but of particular influence was the damning
response from the
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust (by Jennifer Todd and Joseph Ruane). This
analysis used
NILT data to evidence her criticism of the jettisoning of the goal of
`reconciliation' emphasised in
Shared Future. She warned that CSI posed a practical danger and in
this context it is `easy to
revert to sectarian opposition'.
Alongside the CSI debate there was continuing demand for government
action in specific areas
of community relations. Five Assembly questions were tabled citing NILT
data. One particular
committee debate in October 2010 drew the comment:
If there is an academic case, if the Life and Times survey supports
it, if Bain indicates it, and if
the financial rationale is already known, what is really of interest is
why it is not happening.
(Basil McCrea, 20th October 2010)
In May 2012 the Alliance party pulled out of CSI talks while in July 2012
the Secretary of State
expressed his disappointment that there was still no publication of the
strategy. The flags
dispute in late 2012 further increased demand for action and elicited the
comment from the
editor of one local paper:
All the political parties would do well, if they haven't already done
so, to study the research from
the University of Ulster/Queen's University's ARK project and from the
Institute of British and
Irish Studies in Dublin.
(Ed Curran, Belfast Telegraph 2nd October 2012)
In April 2013 the new Secretary of State Theresa Villiers again urged
progress on the new
strategy in a Commons debate and paid tribute to ARK and other
organisations helping people
to understand the past:
Yesterday I visited the University of Ulster to learn more about its
CAIN-ARK network... I
encourage anyone who wants to understand Northern Ireland's past to
visit the website.
(Theresa Villiers April 23rd April 2013, Column 813)
By May 2013 the controversial CSI strategy had finally disappeared and
the Executive brought
forward its new policy Together-Building a United Community. NILT
is cited a number of times
in this key policy document and the Director of the United Community
Division in OFMDFM
affirms that NILT will continue to be invaluable when monitoring the
impact of the new strategy
(see attached letter).
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Letter from Chief Executive of Community Relations Council
- Letter from Director, United Community Division, OFMDFM
- Letter from Research Director of the Northern Ireland Peace Monitoring
Report.
Good Relations Indicators 2009 Update
http://www.ofmdfmni.gov.uk/good_relations_indicators_-_2009_update.pdf
Reference
on pages 7,8,9,10,12,20,22,24,25,26,27,28,31,32,34,35,40,41,42
Good Relations Indicators 2012 Update
http://www.ofmdfmni.gov.uk/gr-pubs
Reference page 2 Priority outcome 1
Reference page 1 Priority outcome 2
Reference page 1, 2 Priority outcome 4
Reference page 1, 2 Priority outcome 5
Reference page 1, 2 Priority outcome 6
Reference page 1 Priority outcome 7
Reference page 1 Priority outcome 9
Programme for Cohesion, Sharing and Integration: Consultation Document
http://www.ofmdfmni.gov.uk/reformatted_final_print_version_csi_-_26.07.10.pdf
Reference
on pages 13,19,29,36,44,47,76
Together: Building a United Community
http://www.ofmdfmni.gov.uk/together-building-a-united-community-strategy.pdf
Reference
on pages 19, 54, 71, 86
Sample response to CSI Consultation
http://www.ofmdfmni.gov.uk/csiresponses2010_alliance_party_of_northern_ireland.pdf
Reference
on pages 4 and 22
Sample response to CSI Consultation
www.jrct.org.uk/core/documents/download.asp?id=429
Assembly Question
http://aims.niassembly.gov.uk/questions/printquestionsummary.aspx?docid=68365
Reference
in answer to Assembly Question from Naomi Long
Assembly Private Members' Business
http://archive.niassembly.gov.uk/record/reports2009/100302.htm
Reference in Private members' business - Cohesion, Sharing and
Integration Strategy - D Kelly
Parliamentary Business
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm130423/debtext/130423-
0002.htm#13042381000001
Reference
by Theresa Villiers Column 812