Improving crop protection for brassicas through the development of in-field devices to detect fungal pathogens
Submitting Institution
University of WorcesterUnit of Assessment
Biological SciencesSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Biological Sciences: Genetics
Medical and Health Sciences: Immunology, Medical Microbiology
Summary of the impact
Brassica production contributed £245.7m to the UK economy in 2012 and is
growing year on year.i Research described below has led to the
development of simple to use hand-held devices which enable brassica
growers to identify the presence of a specific plant disease in the air
or soil. With this knowledge, the grower can make an informed decision
about when to plant a new crop or to spray an existing crop. This
benefits the grower economically through a decrease in losses to disease
and lower pesticide costs. Beyond the benefits for the grower, the
reduction in pesticide use is consistent with UK and European policy on
the environment.
Underpinning research
The National Pollen and Aerobiology Research Unit (NPARU) has an
established track record in research on the detection of fungal spores,
initially under the directorship of Professor Jean Emberlin (1993-2010)
and subsequently under the current director Professor Roy Kennedy (2010-
present).
Early research in NPARU on the modelling of changes in biological
material in the air was reported in the 2001 and 2008 assessment
exercises. NPARU developed expertise in fungal spore identification
initially at the genus level using microscopy which underpinned a body of
research on asthma and hay fever (Reference 1). EU-funded research
established a new approach to detecting and monitoring airborne allergens
(including fungal spores) utilising an innovative air sampler in
conjunction with immunochemical identification methods which allow
classification of fungal spores at the species level (Grant a).
The appointment of Kennedy as Director and of Alison Wakeham
(2010-present) extended NPARU's research in immunochemical identification
and redirected it towards crop protection. Their research, which began at
the University of Warwick but has been taken forward at Worcester, has
focused on the development of monoclonal antibodies that bind to the
spores of specific fungal species which have been exploited to produce
hand-held diagnostic devices. This required investigations of the kinetics
of the binding reactions to allow the development of competitive assays in
which components are immobilised on a filter through which sample material
is moved by capillarity. After a few minutes, positive reactions result in
the production of a coloured band; the intensity of the band is
proportional to the abundance of the fungal spore. A positive control has
been incorporated to produce a coloured band in a different position to
indicate that the device is working properly. This enables rapid detection
of the presence of a fungal pathogen and it underpins the selectivity of
the testing systems now deployed in the field.
Earlier methodologies developed by NPARU for sampling biological material
from the air (mainly pollen) required subsequent analysis of collected
samples in a laboratory (Reference 2); Kennedy and Wakeham's
research has allowed the development of hand-held monoclonal
antibody-based lateral flow devices (a `lab on a stick') which can be used
in the field. These tests not only forecast the risk of particular plant
diseases ahead of planting a crop but also assist in the management of the
disease throughout the growing season. On-going research, funded by the
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (Grants b, c &
d), has validated in-field tests for a series of fungal pathogens:
see, for example, Reference 3 which shows the efficacy of the
tests in identifying different pathotypes of Plasmodiophora brassicae
or clubroot.
The output from these tests has been shown to be easily applicable to a
range of pathosystems where there is one dominant pathogen present (Reference
4). Research has also shown that the deployment of tests in the
field can be enhanced by using them in association with mathematical
models. For example, the use of diagnostics within a mathematical model
output (Brassicaspot) enabled more effective control of the horticultural
brassica pathogen Albugo candida (Reference 5, grant e).
References to the research
1. Atkinson, R.W., Strachan, D.P., Anderson, H.R., S Hajat, S., Emberlin,
J. (2006) Temporal associations between daily counts of fungal spores and
asthma exacerbations. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63
(9), 580-90. DOI:10.1136/oem.2005.024448.
2. Carinanos, P., Emberlin, J., Galan, C. & Dominguez-Vilches, E.
(2000) Comparison of two pollen counting methods of slides from a Hirst
type volumetric trap. Aerobiologia, 16: 339-346. DOI:
10.1023/A:1026577406912.
3. Kennedy, R., Wakeham, A. Lewis, M., Keane, G., Petch, G., Proctor, M.
& John, S. (2013) Further development of in field tests for resting
spores of clubroot and the development of clubroot control based on
detection. Final Report to ADHB. [http://www.hdc.org.uk/sites/default/files/research_papers/FV%20349_Report_Final_2013.pdf]
4. Wakeham, A.J., Keane, G., Proctor, M. & Kennedy, R. (2012).
Monitoring infection risk for air and soil borne fungal pathogens using
antibody and DNA techniques and mathematical models describing
environmental parameters. In Mendez-Villas, A. (ed.), Microbes in
Applied Research — Current Advances and Challenges, World Scientific
Publishing, Singapore, 152-6.
5. Minchinton, E.J., Auer, D.P.F., Thomson, F.M., Trapnelli, L.N.,
Petkowski, J.E., Galea, V., Faggian, R., Kita, N., Murdoch, C., &
Kennedy, R. (2013) Evaluation of the efficacy and economics of irrigation
management, plant resistance and Brassicaspot™ models for management of
white blister on Brassica crops. Australasian Plant Pathology, 42,
169-78. DOI: 10.1007/s13313-012-0181-z.
Grants
a. Jean Emberlin (Co-I), MONALISA (MOnitoring Network of Allergens by
Immuno-Sampling), Life (EU Programme), (01/2005-04/2008), €667,362.
b. Roy Kennedy (PI), Further development of in field tests for resting
spores of clubroot and the development of clubroot control based on
detection, Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board — Horticulture
Development Company, (04/2009 - 05/2013), £200,000.
c. Roy Kennedy (PI), Further development and calibration of detection
tests for conidia of onion downy mildew in combination with MORPH forecast
model MILONCAST, Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board —
Horticulture Development Company, (10/2009 - 08/2012), £50,000.
d. Alison Wakeham (PI), Validation of the lateral flow detection devices
for the light leaf spot and powdery mildew, Agriculture and Horticulture
Development Board — Horticulture Development Company, (08/2012-07/2014),
£122,500.
e. Roy Kennedy (PI), Benchmarking predictive models, nutrients and
irrigation for management of downy and powdery mildews and white blister,
Department of Primary Industries, Victoria, Australia (2008-2011), A$
120,000.
The University is confident that the underpinning research meets the 2*
threshold. Reference 1 was returned to UoA6 in RAE2008 by St George's
Hospital Medical School: 95% of the Schools' research was rated at 2* or
higher. References 3, 4 & 5 were derived from funded research won in
open competition which is indicative of its excellence.
Details of the impact
The research has had an impact on production of brassicas by enabling
growers to make better informed decisions about when to utilise fungicides
as part of their disease control management, which has had associated
economic benefits for growers. It has also had environmental impacts
through a reduction in the use of fungicides. The Agriculture and
Horticulture Development Board state that: `This research [is] highly
important to Horticulture UK PLC...the daily availability of accurate
predictions relating to the occurrence of crop pathogens and their
control allows UK businesses and producers to better plan their
production schedules and reduce damaging impacts of diseases...In
addition to impacting on commerce and saving money, correct
identification of disease can prevent the unnecessary application of
fungicides which will have positive impacts on the environment'. (Source
A).
The outcome of the research fundamental to these impacts is the
development of the in-field rapid detection devices which allow the user
to determine whether a specific pathogen is present. The device can be
used on its own by growers or in tandem with mathematical models that
predict when infection of crops from fungal pathogens is likely to occur.
NPARU itself provides such a model for brassica growers (Source B).
The model establishes whether a crop is theoretically at risk of
infection; then, where a risk is apparent, the grower (or alternatively a
consultant providing information to an agricultural network) can go into
the field and use the device to identify the specific pathogen in the air
and spray crops accordingly.
The primary impact of the research is thus on crop protection. The vital
importance of diagnostics in crop protection is emphasised by
recommendations arising from a 2013 Food Research Partnership Stakeholder
Workshop (Source C). Specifically the impact is on brassica crops.
A 2010 report produced for DEFRA predicts a £43.1m potential increase in
value to the brassica industry if 100% control of fungal pathogens could
be achieved.ii Brassica producers, through use of this diagnostic
system, are now in a better position to limit significantly the impact
of fungal pathogens on their crops.
The extent to which this diagnostic system is used in the UK is evidenced
in a number of ways:
- In 2012-13 approximately 1500 test kits were sold for the fungal
pathogen Mycosphaerella brassicicola which causes ringspot, a
major leaf disease in vegetable brassicas.
- The 2013 Red Tractor Crop-Specific Protocols for Broccoli, Brussels
Sprouts, Cabbage and Cauliflower each explicitly require its growers to
use this system (Source D). Red Tractor provides a Farm Assurance
Fresh Produce Scheme that allows retailers and consumers to have
confidence in the quality of the produce. Many major retailers expect
growers to have this assurance; crop protocols act as a template for
good practice that growers must follow to gain this assurance and the
wider market access that comes with it. 78,000 farm enterprises are
signed up to the overall scheme.
- A number of networks provide information to growers on a regional
basis using this system. To give two examples:
- the `Brassica Alert' operated by the Allium and Brassica Centre and
sponsored by Syngenta Ltd. (see http://www.syngenta-crop.co.uk/brassica-alert/)
disseminates information on the three major fungal pathogens (Alternaria
brassicae, Mycosphaerella brassicicola, Albugo
candida) to over 70 producers and growers in the Lincolnshire
region on a weekly basis (Source E).
- Kettle Produce Ltd, a major producer of horticultural brassica crops
in Scotland, provides an information network for its 50 growers,
representing approximately 2,500 hectares. In this case, information
relates to the light leaf spot pathogen caused by Pyrenopeziza
brassicae. Kettle Produce Ltd have stated that `combining
this information with the appropriate fungicide spray regime and
variety has improved control of this disease in our production
system...The continual improvements you have provided...have given
us an invaluable tool in our battle against light leaf spot and have
radically improved our control of this disease helping us to
increase yields and secure the economic sustainability of Brussels
sprouts' (Source F).
- The benefits of the diagnostic system have been disseminated to
vegetable growers through trade magazines such as The Vegetable
Farmer which has approximately 6,000 readers per month (Source
G).
The associated economic benefits for brassica growers are clear through
the increased yield arising from more effective protection of crops and
the decrease in costs through the reduction in fungicide use that goes
hand in hand with this approach (Source H). An evaluation study of
the use of integrated pest management techniques in an Australian context
predicted that the use of such a diagnostic system increased farm profit
by 15% per hectare (Source I).
The environmental benefits of this diagnostic system are also apparent.
Evidence has shown that use of such a system leads to a significant
decrease in the number of fungicide sprays required: fourteen to just two
in this example (Source I). This is in line with UK Government and
European Union policy on the rationalisation of fungicide use.
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Letter of Support from the Agriculture and Horticulture Development
Board.
B. NPARU's BRASSICASPOT Forecast: http://www.worcester.ac.uk/discover/6273.html.
C. Government Office for Science (2013) New Innovative Approaches to
Crop Protection Report from Food Research Partnership Stakeholder
Workshop, Theme 4 Recommendation 4. http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/goscience/docs/i/13-892-innovative-approaches-crop-protection.pdf
D. Red Tractor Assurance for Farms 2013 — Fresh Produce Scheme
Crop-specific Protocols:
Broccoli: http://assurance.redtractor.org.uk/resources/000/706/417/Broccoli_031013.pdf
Brussels Sprouts: http://assurance.redtractor.org.uk/resources/000/713/012/Brussels_Sprouts_031013.pdf
Cabbage: http://assurance.redtractor.org.uk/resources/000/711/851/Cabbage_031013.pdf
Cauliflower: http://assurance.redtractor.org.uk/resources/000/713/013/Cauliflower_031013.pdf
E. Letters of support from:
(i) Allium and Brassica Agronomy Ltd
(ii) Syngenta Ltd.
F. Letter of support from Kettle Produce Ltd.
G. "Brassica Disease Control", The Vegetable Farmer June 2012,
17-20.
H. "Brassica Disease Control", The Vegetable Farmer June 2011,
14-17.
I. Minchinton, E.J., Auer, D.P.F., Thomson, F.M., Trapnelli, L.N.,
Petkowski, J.E., Galea, V., Faggian, R., Kita, N., Murdoch, C. &
Kennedy, R. (2013) Evaluation of the efficacy and economics of irrigation
management, plant resistance and Brassicaspot™ models for management of
white blister on Brassica crops. Australasian Plant Pathology, 42, 169-78.
DOI: 10.1007/s13313-012-0181-z.
i DEFRA (2013)
Basic
Horticultural Statistics. United Kingdom areas, production,
valuations and trade statistics
for fruit and vegetables to 2012 with historic statistics for
ornamental plants and flowers.
ii DEFRA (2010),
Impact
of changing pesticide availability on horticulture and an assessment
of all impacts and
priorities on a range of arable, horticultural and forage crops,
p.23 (Table 5).