Socio-ecological systems: natural assets and people
Submitting Institution
University of SalfordUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Ecological Applications, Environmental Science and Management
Summary of the impact
Complex and adaptive socio-ecological systems (consisting of a
`bio-geo-physical unit' and its associated social actors) are critically
important to our well-being and economic prosperity. Urbanisation, in
particular habitat fragmentation and loss, affects the services provided
by ecosystems — which have been consistently undervalued in decision
making. Socio-ecological systems research at the University of Salford, in
partnership with communities, landowners, local authorities, governments,
environment and planning agencies, voluntary sector organisations, and
their service users, is focused on providing leadership in:
- Developing improvements in the management of ecosystems;
- Enhancing capacity for valuing ecosystems in policy and decision
making mechanisms;
- Developing innovative methods of implementing green infrastructure
frameworks.
Underpinning research
The key researcher and position held at the institution at the time of
the research is: Professor Philip James, Professor of Ecology, Head of Ecosystems and Environment
Research Centre (from 1994).
The impact of socio-ecological systems: natural assets and people
is underpinned by the following research:
-
1999-2003: The Cheshire Life ECOnet project [14], which
was later funded by the EU's Life programme, integrated
economic, social and environmental objectives. The study combined local
ecological knowledge with modelling (the Landscape ecological Analysis
and Rules for the Configuration of Habitat model [LARCH]), which was
used to assess the functionality of ecosystems within the networks) and
land use options, identified in partnership with public and private
landowners, leading to the establishment of ecological networks in
Cheshire, UK, and in two areas of Italy: Emilia-Romagna, and Abruzzo.
The study demonstrated that the creation of an ecological network has
significant socio-economic benefits to the local and wider regional
economies in terms of wealth generation, employment creation, and
quality of life improvements. In all three regions the Life ECOnet
project was followed by an implementation phase (James et al., 2000;
James & Boothby, 2002).
-
2006-2009: The concepts developed in the Life ECOnet project
were transferred to an urban location in developing an ecological
framework for Greater Manchester, funded by the Greater Manchester
Ecology Unit [11]. James developed an approach which identified
broad areas sharing similar ecological and land-use characteristics,
rather than concentrating on the recreation and connection of selected
habitat types [8,9]. Following this approach `Biodiversity
Opportunity Areas' were identified and options relating to policy
mechanisms, actions, and interventions to achieve effective habitat
creation and repair were identified [3]. Today, this work
continues to inform the development of ecological interventions across
Greater Manchester, and influences the work of the Local Nature
Partnership.
-
2006-2010: James identified a multi- and inter-disciplinary
framework for research in urban green space and investigated the links
between health and green spaces [2,5]. The latter addressed the
important links between health and well-being and the natural habitat in
urban areas, and resulted in a conceptual framework drawing these
aspects of the socio-ecological system together.
-
2005-2013: While the research described above was leading to
establishing networks, frameworks and conceptual frameworks, a second
strand of work was being undertaken in the Borough of Halton, North West
England, investigating, at a finer level, aspects of its
socio-ecological system [7]. From 2005-2010 James investigated
the ecological and social aspects of the pondscape in the borough [4].
Overlapping with this James explored the potential for species movement
through the terrestrial environments of the Borough. The ecosystem
system services associated with the urban tree infrastructure in Runcorn
were identified and valued during a third phase of research (2008-2012).
The fourth phase of research (2010-2013) focuses on the
social-ecological system associated with the salt marsh that is a
significant feature of the Mersey Estuary in the urban areas of Widnes
and Runcorn and a focus of concern due to the imminent construction of
the £2 Billion MerseyGateway.
- The further important focus of research is in China (2002-2013) where
research has investigated the economic and social development of
Shanghai and Chongming Island [6], the green infrastructure of
Nanjing [1] and is currently directed to the design and
development of regeneration areas in Beijing.
References to the research
Key outputs
1. Kong, F., Yin, H., Nakagoshi, N. & James, P. (2012). Simulating
urban growth processes incorporating a potential model with spatial
metrics. Ecological Indicators, 20 82-91. DOI
2. James, P., Tzoulas, K. Adams, M.D., Barber, A., Box, J., Breuste, J.,
Elmqvist, T., Frith, M., Gordon, C., Greening, K.L., Handley, J., Haworth,
S., Kazmierczak, A.E., Johnston, M., Korpela, K., Moretti, M., Niemelä,
J., Pauleit, S., Rose, M.H., Sadler, J.P. & Ward Thompson, C. (2009).
Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European
built environment. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 8 65-75. DOI
(REF 2)
3. Kazmierczak, A.E. & James, P. (2008). Planning for
biodiversity conservation in large urban areas: the Ecological Framework
for Greater Manchester. Salzburger Geographische Arbeiten. 42
129-149. URL
4. Gledhill, D.G., James, P. & Davies, D.H. (2008) Pond density
as a determinant of aquatic species richness in an urban landscape.
Landscape Ecology 23 1219-1230. DOI
(REF 2)
5. Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kazmierczak, A.,
Niemela, J. & James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human
health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review.
Landscape and Urban Planning 81(3) 167-178. DOI
6. Yuan, W., James, P., Hodgson, K., Hutchinson, S.M.& Shi, C.
(2003). Development of sustainability indicators by communities in
China: a case study of Chongming County, Shanghai. Journal of
Environmental Management 68 (3) 253-262. DOI
Key grants
7. 2010 and 2012: Halton
Borough Council Project, Halton Borough Council, £96,144 PI James
(100%).
8. 2008: Urban Green Space, Natural England, £2,000, PI
James (100%).
9. 2007: Support
for development of an Urban Green research portfolio, Natural
England, £2,080, PI James (100%).
10. 2007: SURegen
- Integrated Decision Support System for Sustainable Urban Regeneration,
EPSRC, £2,311,086 Co-PI James (2%)
11. 2006: An
ecological framework for Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester
Ecology Unit, £57,500, PI James (100%).
12. 2004: Enhancing
the Decision Making Process in Urban Spatial Planning Using Advanced ICT,
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, £21,280, PI James (60%)
13. 2000: Implications
of environmental legislation/policy for North West Water, North West
Water, £23,565, PI James (100%)
14. 1999: A demonstration model which integrates
environmental considerations in sustainable land use planning and
management through the use of ecological networks, Cheshire County
Council, £97,573 PI James (100%)
Details of the impact
Context: The Life ECOnet project has brought benefit to the three
study areas: Cheshire, UK; Emilio-Romagna, Italy; Abruzzo, Italy.
- The ecological network created in Abruzzo featured as a case study in
an ECNC (European Centre for Nature Conservation) report [a].
Since 2008 the key impacts of the research have been seen in the
development and implementation of planning policy in the UK and China.
- The work in Cheshire on the ECOnet, the original concept for which was
developed by James, has been included in a report by The Parliamentary
Office of Science and Technology [b] as a case study indicating
good practice in developing local ecological networks. The wider ECOnet
work in Cheshire led to a £3 Million investment in the Sandstone Ridge
ECOnet Partnership (SREP): the implementation phase of the project
covering a potential chain of interconnected woodland networks,
alternating with two interconnected heathland networks and two isolated
peatland networks.
- The ideas developed in this work are now embedded within the Lawton
Report, Making Space for Nature [c] and in the Natural
Environment White Paper. A direct result of the Life ECOnet
project was the inclusion in the North West Regional Planning documents
that all local authorities covered by the plan should develop an
Ecological Framework. The Greater Manchester Ecological Framework
(GMEF), completed in 2008, was adopted into the planning system of
Greater Manchester, for example by incorporation into the Greater
Manchester Minerals Plan and was a forerunner of work on the Green
Infrastructure of Greater Manchester [d] and in work informing
the Natural Economy Northwest initiative (NENW) [e].
- Working in partnership with Red Rose Forest (RRF), a Community Forest
serving Greater Manchester, the Forestry Commission and Natural England,
James's work from the Greater Manchester Ecological Framework (GMEF) has
been used to develop the overall approach to the Greater Manchester
Green Infrastructure (GI) Framework [f]. This work has shown how
different datasets may be brought together to model the benefits GI
could bring to the City-Region. It also highlighted the importance of
ways to improve the `urban matrix', work Red Rose Forest pursues with
street tree planting [g,h] and other interventions (including
green roof creation).
- The GMEF approach has been used in two major area strategies, the
Trafford Forest Plan and the Manchester City Centre Green and Blue
Infrastructure Plan. The University joined with the Red Rose Forest's
Greater Manchester Tree Audit Consortium, helping this ambitious idea
become a reality, and the use of the Greater Manchester Tree Audit is
yielding useful data to develop the Audit as a `live' project. The work
on ecosystem services has also helped formulate the approach for a new
piece of work identifying and prioritising Ecosystem Services for the
Mosslands area to the west of Salford. This work is informing the
development of a Local Nature Improvement Area (the Great Manchester
Wetlands) and a significant funding application to the Heritage Lottery
Fund which is currently being written.
- The research programme in Halton began in 2005 and as a result of the
early work the management of the ponds and urban trees within the
borough has been modified. Since 2008 the work has focussed on the
movement of species in the borough and on the saltmarsh. The outputs of
the work on species movement was used in informing the decision making
process related to the planning approval for the £600 million second
Mersey Crossing bridge. The work on the saltmarsh focused on the
ecosystem services associated with the environmental mitigation over
1,700 ha of land and estuary which will flow from the construction of
the bridge [i].
- In China, the main impact of Professor James's work is seen in the
planning and design of a new development in the Xicheng District in the
centre of Bejing. Xicheng is a major commercial district in central
Beijing. Professor James's work is breaking new ground as this is the
first time that urban eco-system services and urban ecological concerns
have been incorporated so prominently in a practical masterplan project
in China. This work has established the principles of integrating urban
eco-system services into the masterplanning agenda for this area. In
particular, the proposal for creating a series of linked urban green
spaces (some of which span an existing urban ring road) has attracted
keen interest from the Xicheng government. At the time of the writing
the proposals are being further studied by the policy makers in Xicheng.
Sources to corroborate the impact
a) European Centre for Nature Conservation (2003) European Corridors:
Strategies for corridor development for target species ECNC, Tilburg, the
Netherlands & Alterra http://www.ecnc.org/uploads/2012/10/2004-european-corridors.pdf
b) Postnote (2008) Ecological Networks The Parliamentary Office
of Science and Technology (POST), London February 2008, Number 300. POST
is an office of both Houses of Parliament, charged with providing
independent and balanced analysis of public policy issues that have a
basis in science and technology
http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/POST-PN-300.
c) Lawton, J.H., Brotherton, P.N.M., Brown, V.K., Elphick, C., Fitter,
A.H., Forshaw, J., Haddow, R.W., Hilborne, S., Leafe, R.N., Mace, G.M.,
Southgate, M.P., Sutherland, W.J., Tew, T.E., Varley, J., & Wynne,
G.R. (2010) Making Space for Nature: a review of England's wildlife
sites and ecological network. Report to Defra. p15. http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/biodiversity/documents/201009space-for-nature.pdf
d) Hodcroft, D. & Alexander, D. (2010) Ecological frameworks in North
West England Planning Practice and Research, 19 (3) 307-320
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/029745042000323238.
e) The Environment Partnership (2010) Greater Manchester's Green
Infrastructure: next steps towards a Green Infrastructure Framework
TEP, Warrington.
http://www.greeninfrastructurenw.co.uk/resources/1547.058_Final_Report_September_2008.pdf
f) Association of Greater Manchester Authorities (2011) Green
Infrastructure Framework, Final Report March
2011http://www.agma.gov.uk/cms_media/files/110506_final_gi_framework_may_2011.pdf.
g) Red Rose Forest, Green Streets
http://www.redroseforest.co.uk/web/content/view/43/143/
h) Red Rose Forest, Little Green Roofs
http://www.redroseforest.co.uk/web/content/view/244/400/
i) http://www.merseygateway.co.uk/2009/11/biodiversity-seminar-set-to-showcase-gateway-nature-reserve-plans/