Preventing blood clots in Children undergoing kidney dialysis
Submitting Institution
Newcastle UniversityUnit of Assessment
Mathematical SciencesSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Following research carried out at Newcastle, a new anticoagulant is used
in 12 of the 14 paediatric kidney units in the UK and Ireland. Substantial
distress and delay to therapy can be caused to children undergoing
haemodialysis when the central venous lines (CVLs), by which their
treatment is delivered, are blocked by blood clots. Our research has shown
that preventative use of a new anti-coagulant, alteplase (also known as
Rt-PA), is much more successful than the traditional agent, heparin, in
preventing blockages. The clinical trial which established the superiority
of alteplase required a novel form of optimal crossover design. In one
hospital, the annual probability of CVL replacement due to thrombosis was
0.7 prior to our work. During the reporting period, no lines have had to
be replaced because of thrombosis. This represents a remarkable reduction
in the levels of distress to children and allows haemodialysis.
Underpinning research
Matthews, a member of staff at Newcastle University (from 1987 to the
present), devised and applied the statistical methodology for a study to
help improve a treatment for children with renal failure by comparing
different anticoagulants used to maintain patency in central venous lines
used for haemodialysis.
Peritoneal dialysis is the preferred treatment for children with renal
failure but when this is not suitable, or has failed, haemodialysis is the
only other option. Haemodialysis requires attendance at the dialysis unit
two or three times weekly, where the patient's blood is dialysed
externally. Access to the circulation is usually through an in-dwelling
venous central line and it is paramount that this line is kept free from
clots between treatments.
The assessment of any aspect of paediatric haemodialysis is likely to be
constrained by the limited number of patients available for study.
However, as they are obliged to attend often, the shortage of patients is
partly compensated by observing each patient many times. As such the
application is ideal for a crossover design [P1]. However, fewer than 10
patients, but who can be studied on tens of occasions, is an extreme case
even for a crossover trial. Designs using more than six periods are
unusual, and there are very few in the literature for more than 12 periods
[P2]. Consequently this study required a specially tailored 30-period
design to be derived using optimal design theory [P3].
The bespoke crossover clinical trial compared the standard anticoagulant
(heparin) with alteplase in haemodialysis patients at the Children's
Kidney Unit in the Royal Victoria Infirmary (RVI) in Newcastle in
2005 [P4]. The aim was to reduce the weight of clot removed from the line
prior to the next treatment. The model for the data assumed that the mean
response allowed for the possibility of (i) systematic differences between
patients and (ii) the treatment allocated. The modeling of the period
effect, a topic discussed in references [P1] & [P2] below, required a
special formulation which took account of the point in the dialysis cycle
when the observation was made. The information matrix for the treatment
effect depends on the design matrices for treatment, dialysis cycle and
patient, respectively. The information in the reduced model, where patient
terms are omitted, exceeds that in the full model, unless a form of
orthogonality applies to the components of the design matrix. The research
thereby identified designs which maximised the information from the full
model. These designs required equal replication of the treatments on each
patient and equal replication on each day of the dialysis cycle. Further
details can be found in [P3].
The trial found [P4] that a clot was 2.4 times more likely to form when
the line was treated with heparin than alteplase and, if a clot did form,
it was 1.9 times heavier when heparin had been used.
The trial was conducted by Dr M.G.Coulthard (Consultant Paediatric
Nephrologist), Dr N.S.Gittins (Research Specialist Registrar) and Mr
Y.L.Hunter-Blair (Senior Pharmacist) all of Newcastle Hospitals NHS Trust
and Professor J.N.S.Matthews (Professor of Medical Statistics, School of
Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle University).
References to the research
[P1] Matthews, J. N. S. (1994). Modelling and optimality in the design of
crossover studies for medical applications. Journal of Statistical
Planning and Inference, 42(1), 89-108. (Google scholar: 29 citations)
(Impact Factor: 0.713) [*Key reference]
[P2] Matthews, J. N. S. (1994). Multi-period crossover trials.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 3(4), 383-405. (Google scholar:
18 citations) (Impact Factor:2.364 ) [*Key reference]
[P3] Matthews, J. N. S. (2013) An optimal multi-period crossover design
for an application in paediatric nephrology. Statistics in Medicine,
doi:10.1002/sim.5981. (Impact Factor: 2.044) [*Key reference]
[P4] Gittins, N. S., Hunter-Blair, Y. L., Matthews, J. N., &
Coulthard, M. G. (2007). Comparison of alteplase and heparin in
maintaining the patency of paediatric central venous haemodialysis lines:
a randomised controlled trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 92(6),
499-501. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.100065 (Google scholar: 19 citations)
(Impact Factor: 3.051)
Details of the impact
Following the trial, the Children's Kidney Unit at the Royal Victoria
Hospital (RVI), Newcastle changed its policy, so that alteplase was
used in place of heparin as the routine `lock' (i.e. preventative dose of
anticoagulant) for venous central lines. In the intervening period, most
of the paediatric kidney units in the UK and Ireland have followed the
practice at Newcastle and switched to using alteplase. A blocked central
line is traumatic, causes delays in treatment and incurs costs for the NHS
through taking up the time of medical and nursing staff. The line is used
repeatedly and, without anticoagulation, the lumen would become occluded
by blood clots between treatments. Repeated blockage of central lines
requires re-siting, a traumatic procedure that cannot be repeated
indefinitely. If haemodialysis (HD) becomes impossible, the consequences
for the child are dire.
Impact in significant reduction of re-siting
Prior to the Newcastle trial, any child with a central line in for a year
would need to have it re-sited for thrombosis with probability 0.7. This
failure rate is consistent with rates found elsewhere [E1]. After our
research, from 2008 to 2012, similar numbers of children were treated at
Newcastle, but none of the lines has been replaced for thrombosis.
There are about 10 HD patients at any one time at the unit and each
patient needs about 50-150 doses of alteplase per annum, usually until a
renal transplant becomes available. Some indication of the financial cost
is given by Canadian figures, where one dose costs around $50 whilst the
cost of one catheter replacement is estimated to be around $1200, but may
incur a further $6000 for hospital treatment costs if there are
complications (caused by bacterial infections in a few percent of clotting
events) [E1]. The high cost of the drug is therefore partially offset by
savings in treatment regimen.
Impact on practice in other units
Following the research, information was obtained from all 14 paediatric
kidney units in the UK and Ireland [E2]. This revealed that 12 have
changed to using alteplase. Five centres (Newcastle, Cardiff, Guy's,
Glasgow, Manchester) use it as their routine treatment, three times
weekly: a further five centres (Nottingham, Belfast, Great Ormond Street,
Birmingham, Liverpool) use it three times weekly in some patients and in
others use it once per week with heparin on the other two occasions to
minimise the expense. The two centres, Dublin and Bristol, use heparin
initially, but move to using alteplase three times weekly if they
encounter any problems, which is quite common (for example, alteplase is
used for eight of the ten children currently treated in Dublin (June,
2012)). Typically, at any given time, the total number of children being
haemodialysed in these units is around 100.
Supply of alteplase
The letter [E2] provides evidence, in the form of an e-mail survey, of
the effect of the research on this usage of alteplase across the UK and
Ireland.
Confirmation that the preventative use of alteplase spread from the RVI
is provided by the distribution of alteplase from the RVI to other
hospitals. At the time of the research, alteplase was marketed as a
treatment for pulmonary emboli in adults and was supplied in much larger
quantities than required for paediatric HD. Since 2009, the RVI pharmacy
has been breaking 300mg ampoules down into 2mg doses suitable for locking
dialysis lines and these have been supplied to other NHS trusts. The table
below shows the number of alteplase units repackaged and issued by the RVI
to other NHS trusts [E3]. The numbers have increased substantially in
Newcastle for various reasons including some longer term HD patients. In
the other trusts, the numbers are reducing because small doses are now
available in a commercial product. This approach means that the drug costs
in Newcastle are substantially lower than the Canadian figure quoted
above.
|
Newcastle Hospitals |
Other Trusts |
Alteplase issued by the RVI 04/2010-03/2011 |
1692 UNITS |
5350 UNITS |
Alteplase issued by the RVI 04/2011-03/2012 |
2470 UNITS |
3491 UNITS |
Prevention of harm
Further reinforcement of the importance of changing to alteplase is given
in [E4] which notes that "Clots form easily in relatively large central
lines, such as those used for haemodialysis, presumably because blood
enters the distal lumen", and that "Owing to the risk of
pulmonary embolus, it is routine practice for children's dialysis lines
to be aspirated before every use — it is apparent that small subclinical
clots must be occurring, as evidenced by cardiac and post-mortem studies
in children with lines for at least 3 months".
The significance of the problem is also indicated in the article:
"Cumulatively, these small clots may cause morbidity. A child having a
clot weighing about 14mg dislodged on 60% of days would have 3g of
thrombus showered into their lungs annually.......If cumulative small
thrombi did cause the gradual development of pulmonary damage, this
might be difficult to detect, or even suspect clinically, especially in
children whose other serious disorders had necessitated the use of a
long-term central line".
Use of alteplase for locking dialysis lines is beginning to spread to
other countries. For example, a US review article from 2012 on tunnelled
catheters (TC) [E5], cites Newcastle research in concluding that "Since
the introduction of TCs in the late 1980s, heparin catheter lock has
been the standard prophylactic regimen for the prevention of TC
dysfunction. More recently, alternative catheter locking agents have
emerged, and in some cases have shown to be superior to heparin lock
with respect to improving TC patency and reducing TC-associated
infections."
Sources to corroborate the impact
[E1] Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, M.D., Ph.D., Louise M. Moist, M.D., Charmaine
E. Lok, M.D., Marcello Tonelli, M.D., S.M., Braden J. Manns, M.D., Rachel
M. Holden, M.D., Martine LeBlanc, M.D., Peter Faris, Ph.D., Paul Barre,
M.D., Jianguo Zhang, M.Sc., and Nairne Scott-Douglas, M.D., Ph.D., (2011),
"Prevention of Dialysis Catheter Malfunction with Recombinant Tissue
Plasminogen Activator", New England Journal of Medicine. 364,
303-312.
[E2] Corroboration from Honorary consultant paediatric nephrologist, NHS.
[E3] Corroboration from Pharmacist, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Trust.
[E4] Short Report. Malcolm G Coulthard and Roderick Skinner, (2007) "Should
paediatric central lines be aspirated before use?", Archives of
Disease in Childhood, 92(6): 517-518. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.100073
[E5] Review Article. Timmy Lee, Charmaine Lok, Miguel Vazquez, Louise
Moist, Ivan Maya, and Michele Mokrzycki, (2012), "Minimizing
Hemodialysis Catheter Dysfunction: An Ounce of Prevention".
International Journal of Nephrology. Article ID 170857,
doi:10.1155/2012/170857