Cities, Infrastructure and Security: leading public discourse and policy debate
Submitting Institution
Newcastle UniversityUnit of Assessment
Architecture, Built Environment and PlanningSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration, Sociology
Summary of the impact
Two decades of research in the Global Urban Research Unit at Newcastle
University has significantly shaped public awareness and political
understanding of the links between technology, infrastructure and security
within highly urbanised societies. Research into the role of cities as key
sites of security and war and the spread of `the surveillance society' are
two interlocking foci that have generated impacts with global reach. Of
particular significance are: a) research and scholarship to develop key
concepts and a language that captures and communicates how urban
landscapes are being infiltrated by military technologies. We specifically
highlight the publication of Cities Under Siege as the culmination
of this work and its impact on national and international public debate,
and; b) specific studies into surveillance technologies in Britain that
impact directly on public debate and the formation of specific national
policy.
Underpinning research
The research that underpins the impacts described in section 4 emanates
from work undertaken by staff at Newcastle University from the early 1990s
to the present day. A key moment was the initiation of a research centre,
the Centre for Urban Technology (CUT), in 1994, led by a small group of
young researchers, in particular, Simon Guy (Lecturer, Senior Lecturer,
Professor to 2005); Simon Marvin (Lecturer, Senior Lecturer, to 2001) and
Steve Graham (Lecturer, Reader, Professor to 2005; and Professor, 2010 -).
CUT's work made a major contribution to shifting the study of urban
infrastructure from an area dominated by very `technical' research, often
aligned with engineering and policy studies, to an exciting new focus for
urban and social theory. This in part reflected societal processes such as
the marketization of urban infrastructure, but also how CUT researchers
were able to conceptualise infrastructure as `Urban Technology' and apply
a new set of socio-technical ideas with which to consider its significance
to the politics of urban life. During the 1990s, CUT staff worked on a
number of funded research projects, including a very significant ESRC
e-society grant and a host of industry-funded projects with the likes of
British Telecom and major energy and water companies. This work cohered
into a substantial body of written scholarship including the seminal
publication, Splintering Urbanism (1), which placed a new
set of influential terminologies in the public domain, including the
phrase `splintering urbanism' itself.
In 2001, Graham took over the Directorship of CUT and led a merger with
two other centres to become the Global Urban Research Unit (GURU) at
Newcastle University in 2002. In 2001 David Murakami-Wood joined GURU as
Earl Grey Fellow on a project to examine Algorithmic Surveillance
(then Lecturer, 2004-09; Reader, 2009) and GURU's urban technology
research consolidated into a focus on cities and security, e.g. (2, 3,
4) which continues to the present day. Graham's British Academy
funded readership (2002-2004) The UK as a Software Sorted Society,
was a particular highlight demonstrating that the sites, spaces,
structures, symbols and experiences of cities and urban life were now
central to political struggles over security and surveillance. Graham and
Murakami-Wood in particular reinforced Newcastle University's position as
a lead organisation in cities and security research during this period,
with both heavily involved in the founding of the academic Surveillance
Studies Network (SSN) as well as being two of the five founding editors of
the open-access academic journal Surveillance and Society.
(Murakami- Wood as the Managing Editor).
GURU's work on urban security in the 2000s also included the €1m EU
funded Social Polis platform on cities and social cohesion (2007-10, with
Gilroy, Vigar from this UOA), wherein Murakami-Wood led a
trans-disciplinary work programme on urban security that included a number
of stakeholders from civil society, policy and industry in co-designing a
research programme. Murakami-Wood's ESRC Fellowship Cultures of Urban
Surveillance further consolidated GURU's work in this field.
The key research output in this period in terms of policy impact was
however the 2006 report (5) to the UK Information Commissioner's
Office (ICO) — the UK Government's surveillance regulator — on the
surveillance society and a series of follow-up publications; Murakami-Wood
led the four- person team of main authors drawing heavily on GURU's work
of the previous ten years.
In 2010, Graham returned to Newcastle University and published his major
book Cities under Siege (6), a culmination of his previous
eight year's research on cities and security. The book unites the normally
separate academic discourses around the urbanisation of security on the
one hand, and the politics of cities and urban life on the other, and is a
major exposé of the tightening connections across the world between urban
life, militarism and security politics. In this "the central role of
cities within the new imperialism - the resurgence of aggressive, colonial
militarism focusing on the violent appropriation of land and resources in
the South" (p.xxviii) is emphasised. This is a scholarly publication, long
in the making, which draws directly from much of the cited research
undertaken during Graham's time at Newcastle and from research undertaken
at Newcastle in the 2005-10 period by others. For example, the use of the
term `Cities under Siege' to capture Graham's agenda first appears in
print in his 2006 article (4) written at Newcastle University and
the article's content is particularly apparent in chapter 2 `Manichean
Worlds'; a 2003 article Lessons in Urbicide (New Left Review) is
reproduced, in modified form, in chapter 7 of the same name; and the paper
in Critical Social Policy (2) heavily influences chapter 4
`Ubiquitous Borders'. The introduction of geopolitical thinking into his
earlier urban studies approach is obvious in some of his writing in the
early 2000s while at Newcastle, e.g. (3, 4) but his time at Durham
University (2005-2009) contributed to the book inasmuch as it honed
Graham's understanding of the critical geopolitical dimensions of his
earlier research and writing.
References to the research
1. Graham,S., Marvin,S., (2001), `Splintering Urbanism: Networked
Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition,
London: Routledge. [over 2000 Google citations as of 20/10/2013].
Available from HEI on request.
3. Graham, S. (2004), (Eds.). Cities, War and Terrorism: Towards an
Urban Geopolitics, Oxford: Blackwell. Available from HEI on request.
4. Graham, S. (2006) `Cities and the ``war on terror'''. International
Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30(2), 255-76. DOI:
10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00665.x
5. Surveillance Studies Network (2006), D. Murakami-Wood, and Ball, K
(eds). A Report on the Surveillance Society for the Information
Commissioner. Available from HEI on request.
6. Graham, S. (2010), Cities Under Siege: The New Military Urbanism,
London: Verso. REF2 output: 154395.
Details of the impact
Academics at Newcastle have been successful in generating impact from
their research on cities and security in the 2008-2013 period, both in
their own rights and as lead partners in the Surveillance Studies Network
(SSN). Two types of impact of their work - on public debate, and on policy
formation - are described below.
Impacts on Public Debate, Awareness and Understanding
The cities and security research at Newcastle has impacted upon public
understanding and awareness of such issues. The most significant element
of this is the development of a research- informed lexicon, starting with
`splintering urbanism', and including research to support the idea of the
UK as a `surveillance society', to capture and communicate some of the
most fundamental processes underway in cities for consumption by public,
policy and research audiences. In addition: the founding of the SSN; the
founding, editing and contributions to its open access journal Surveillance
and Society; and the co-creation of SSN's four major international
conferences and a number of other networking events which have attracted
hundreds of delegates from both academic and non-academic backgrounds,
have all been contributions to the impact of Newcastle University's urban
security research.
The most significant vehicle for shaping public debate has, however, been
the publication of Graham's book, Cities under Siege: the New Military
Urbanism in 2010. Although written by an academic and drawing
heavily on his research, this book was produced and marketed for a much
wider target audience. At 31 July 2013, 3,500 copies of the English
edition had been sold, including 1,500 in the USA (IMP1).
Translations into many languages, including Mandarin, Arabic, German and
French are in progress or completed. The French version `Ville Sous
Contrôlé' has now sold 1200 copies. The global reach of the research
messages was enhanced by book reviews not only in the UK, but also in the
press of many other countries - for example, La Découverte (IMP2)
provides extracts from six prestigious French reviews; and a 4500 word
article for the United Arab Emirates newspaper, Alkhaleej (IMP3).
It was further promoted when Nicholas Lezard chose it as book of the week
in the Guardian (IMP4).
The high profile of Cities under Siege and the linkage of the
book's themes by many commentators to global events such as the Arab
Spring and movements such as `Occupy', which both had intensely urban
roots and impacts, meant that Graham's research insights were high profile
in the media. For example, he was the `talking head' for a major
documentary The Fear has a Thousand Eyes screened on the tenth
anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on the main terrestrial channels in
Germany and Switzerland (IMP5), and was interviewed twice on the
influential US global daily news show, Democracy Now, to discuss
the Occupy `protests'. The Editor of the programme commented that "his
book Cities Under Siege exposes like no other how cities are being remade
into security landscapes. His analysis in the first interview was so
insightful, and resonated so well with so many people around the world
involved in the protests, that we asked him back the next day for another
interview. We have repeated segments of hi[s] interviews several times
since they remain a remarkably incisive analysis of the current politics
of cities around the world" (IMP6).
Such exposure of Graham's research insights have led to lively public
debate of his ideas. For example, more than 1,000 tweets are found in a
Twitter search using `Lockdown London Guardian', from the title of
Graham's Guardian article on the London Olympics 2012. It is also clear
that Graham's terminologies to describe his concepts such as `splintering
urbanism' and `new military urbanism' have become part of the lexicon of
public discourse. More than 500 tweets have used the `new military
urbanism' terminology (IMP7) to discuss issues of cities and
security, particularly when framing their arguments in terms of dissent.
Impacts on Policy Formation and Debate
Researchers at Newcastle have influenced the development of a regulatory
framework in the UK which addresses surveillance and information security.
The primary conduit of influence was two reports of the Surveillance
Studies Network (SSN).
The first report (2006) was co-ordinated by Murakami-Wood (5);
and Graham provided an `expert report' for the publication. The report was
the lead item on BBC Radio 4's Today Programme on 2 November 2006 and
featured heavily in news coverage of the time. The report was translated
into 5 languages, and sparked official inquiries by both the House of
Commons Home Affairs Committee and the House of Lords Constitution
Committee. Murakami Wood coordinated submissions from the Surveillance
Studies Network for both and gave a seminar at the House of Lords
introducing the range of surveillance technologies that they should
consider. He also gave oral evidence to the Lords' Committee cementing a
process whereby the term `surveillance society' became used in policy
debate throughout the World during the period to 2013.
The report was later submitted as evidence to the Home Affairs
Committee's Inquiry into the Surveillance Society in 2008 by SSN, but had
already had influence on that Inquiry: in Volume 1 of the Inquiry report
it refers to the SSN work in the introduction, stating that "our aim was
not to duplicate that work but rather to build on it in exploring the
large strategic issues of concern to the general public" (p.8) (IMP8).
From this central position in the Inquiry process, the findings of the SSN
report pervade the recommendations of the Home Affairs Committee, and
where these were accepted by government, formed the basis of revisions to
the regulatory process. According to the Information Commissioner, the
report had "led to increased parliamentary, media and public interest in
the increased surveillance of people's daily lives" (p.2) (IMP9).
The report contributed to the debate that fed into the UK elections in
2010 where surveillance became for the first time a national election
issue.
The second, updated, SSN report in 2010 (Wood and Graham as two of the
six authors) was included as Part B of the Information Commissioner's 2010
Annual report to the House of Commons (IMP9), and described as
"the centrepiece of this report" (p.4), demonstrating the continuing
influence SSN research has had on the Information Commissioner's Office.
The Information Commissioner's report was presented to the Home Affairs
Committee on 11 November 2010 and received national media attention - for
example, the Guardian (IMP10) - so furthering Parliamentary and
public understanding of the surveillance research insights raised by Wood,
Graham and SSN colleagues. It was incorporated into the ICO's annual
report to the House of Commons in 2011 and remains highly influential in
policy and public discourse.
Sources to corroborate the impact
IMP1 Personal correspondence from Verso Publishers, 25 July 2013.
Available on request.
IMP2 La Découverte, http://www.editionsladecouverte.fr/catalogue/index-Villes_sous_controle-9782707171276.html
IMP3 Personal correspondence from Editor in Foreign Affairs of
Alkhaleej Newspaper, 21 November 2011. Available on request.
IMP4 Book of the Week in the Guardian. Available at:
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/dec/13/cities-under-siege-stephen-graham
IMP5 Documentary The Fear has a Thousand Eyes (2011).
Available at: http://www.german-
documentaries.de/films/50143
IMP6 Personal Correspondence from Editor, Democracy Now. Available
on request.
IMP7 Steve Graham research page. Available at:
http://www.ncl.ac.uk/apl/staff/profile/steve.graham#tab_research
IMP8 House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, A Surveillance
Society? Fifth Report of Session 2007-8, Volume 1, London: The Stationery
Office. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmhaff/58/58i.pdf.
IMP9 UK Information Commissioner's 2010 report (published
1.3.2011). Available at: http://www.ico.org.uk/about_us/research/reports_to_parliament.
IMP10 Guardian article available at: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/nov/11/surveillance-society-soon-reality