Lean management for manufacturing SMEs: Improving practice, performance and infrastructure in the North Sea Region of Europe
Submitting Institution
Newcastle UniversityUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Information Systems
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Business and Management
Summary of the impact
In order to address the issue of why so many small and medium enterprises
(SMEs) find it difficult to put the principles of Lean production into
practice, research at Newcastle developed a `bite-size' methodology suited
to their requirements. The research has had impact in three areas: on the
practice of 25 SMEs involved in an international project in the North Sea
Region of Europe; on the performance of these companies on such measures
as cost and productivity; and, in the form of six new Innovative
Productivity Centres, on the regional infrastructural support for SMEs.
Underpinning research
Research context
Research at Newcastle helps manufacturing and service providers improve
their competitiveness through enhanced Lean/agile supply and operations
strategy. Those whose work is featured here are Professor Christian Hicks
(1987-), Dr Tom McGovern (1988-), Dr Adrian Small (2010-), Colin Herron
(PhD student 2003-2006), and Paul Braiden (1983-).
Emerging from techniques developed in the automotive industry, many
manufacturing organisations have increased their competitiveness through
the adoption of Lean Production techniques. The Lean approach is focused
upon minimising waste and synchronising processes to increase performance
and competitiveness. It allows companies to improve quality, whilst
simultaneously reducing costs and lead-times. However, existing literature
demonstrates that many companies have been unable to successfully
implement and sustain Lean. The way in which Lean has been implemented has
neglected to take into account contextual factors such as the size of a
business and the associated resource constraints.
Implementing Lean based on company needs
Research at Newcastle developed a new diagnostic tool that could be used
to help direct Lean interventions. The research found that by adding a
stage to the Lean process, i.e. identification of needs, the existing Lean
model could be implemented more successfully (1-3). The tool
comprises needs analyses in the areas of productivity, manufacturing and
training. This three-stage process is designed to match appropriate tools
and measures with companies' manufacturing problems. This was necessary
because the previous Lean consultancy approach trained participants in the
techniques of Lean, but it did not allow companies to identify priorities.
Businesses were therefore in a position where they understood the
principles of Lean and how to implement it, but they did not necessarily
know how best to target their resources at the most important productivity
problems.
Revising Lean for application in SMEs
The North East Productivity Alliance (NEPA) was established by One
NorthEast, the regional development agency in North East England, to
improve the efficiency of SMEs in the region through applying Lean
manufacturing management practices and knowledge. Hicks, McGovern and
Parry-Jones undertook an evaluation of the Manufacturing Advisory Service
(MAS)/NEPA framework for transferring Lean practices into firms in North
East England (4) (Grant 1). Their research showed that while the
results of this transfer were positive for some of the larger companies
involved, smaller companies were unable to benefit from this approach. The
researchers recognised that small firms lacked the resources and expertise
to adopt Lean and that what they needed was an approach tailored to their
requirements.
European Regions for Innovative Productivity (ERIP)
Building on the earlier research (1-3), the Newcastle team took
the lead in a large-scale project to support the transfer of Lean into
SMEs from across the North Sea Region (Grant 2). The ERIP project was part
of the larger EU-funded Interreg programme which advocated a transnational
approach to addressing issues of productivity and efficiency in SMEs.
Because Newcastle research had identified exactly how Lean manufacturing
tools and techniques have been transferred into companies, they were
selected to be the lead partner in this six-country project.
The objective of the ERIP project was thus to build on the research base
created at Newcastle to develop a methodology that could be used by SMEs
across the North Sea Region. The Newcastle team were responsible for
organising how data were collected, used and analysed within all 25
participating SMEs. The template that was produced to collect data also
provided a mechanism that the SMEs adapted for their data collection
activities to aid decision-making. Working on the basis of the MAS/NEPA
framework, the research reinforced the conclusion that it is difficult for
SMEs to find the time to undertake the necessary improvement activities.
In response to this, the research developed the `bite-size Lean' framework
(5). The framework comprises three phases: 1) pre-diagnostic, which
is a half-day event as an initial meeting with the company to give an
overview of Lean; 2) diagnostic, which determines the areas to focus on
for improvement in the company; and 3) improvement workshops, which
address the needs identified in phase 2.
References to the research
1. Herron, C. (2006). `A methodology to disseminate selected Lean
manufacturing tools into general manufacturing'. PhD Thesis. University of
Newcastle upon Tyne (available on request).
2. Herron, C., Braiden, P., (2006). `A methodology for developing
sustainable quantifiable productivity improvement in manufacturing
companies'. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(1),
143-153. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.10.004
(ABS List 2010 3*).
3. Herron, C., Hicks, C. (2008). `The transfer of selected Lean
manufacturing techniques from Japanese automotive manufacturing into
general manufacturing (UK) through change agents'. Robotics and
Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 24(4), 524-531. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2007.07.014.
4. Hicks, C., McGovern, T., Parry-Jones, C. (2007). `Productivity Needs
Analysis of companies in North East England assisted by the North East
Productivity Alliance'. Newcastle: NA Consulting. (Available on request).
5. Powell, D., Hicks, C., McGovern, T., Small, A. (2013). `A bitesize
Lean change methodology for small and medium-sized enterprises'. Lean
Management Journal, 5(3), 7-11. Available at: http://www.leanmj.com/2013/06/bite-sized-lean/
(accessed 24/09/13).
Table of Relevant Grants
|
Principal
Investigator(s) |
Grant
Title |
Funder/Sponsor |
Period
of Grant |
Value to
Newcastle |
1. |
Chris Hicks |
Evaluation of the North East Productivity Alliance |
One North East |
Jan-Dec 2007 |
£7,200 |
2. |
Tom McGovern |
European Regions for Innovative Productivity (ERIP) project |
EU (Interreg) |
June 2008-Dec 2011 |
€428,000 |
Details of the impact
The underpinning research detailed in Section 2 identified and addressed
key issues and barriers associated with the implementation of Lean
manufacturing for different sizes of business. The ERIP project enabled
participating companies to directly benefit through: 1) improved company
practice; 2) improved company performance; and 3) improved regional
infrastructure.
Company practice
The competences within each North Sea country have been strengthened by
executing transnational showcase events with SMEs as a more effective way
for small companies to share and transfer knowledge. A total of 236 people
undertook transnational training. A key difference in the design of the
Newcastle bite-size Lean approach was in the diagnostic and workshop
activities, which minimised the time a team and change agent would need to
commit to an improvement event. The framework additionally enabled SMEs to
more easily collect quantitative and qualitative organisational data and
to understand the need to do so in order to effectively measure the
benefits of their operations.
Key Performance Innovations Ltd. is a micro SME that was formed to
provide commercial solutions for productivity improvements within
businesses where previously there had been public aid and delivered the
training aspect of the ERIP project. As the Director, Key Performance
Innovations Ltd. commented: "Whilst the ERIP methodology drew on
aspects of the traditional MasterClass, the ... project was structured
around using local examples and empowering the workforce to identify
what activities the project would focus on, which provided a different
emphasis...The companies that I worked with who signed up to the project
received various benefits. One company displayed characteristics of a
larger manufacturer and wanted primarily to engage with the training of
change agents, two were looking to move into manufacturing and learnt
valuable lessons about how a Lean operation would need to be configured.
The final two companies were the most responsive to the programme. The
main challenge these companies faced related to freeing up staff to
participate in the improvement events. With a little tweaking to the
format of the improvement events, taking a more bite sized approach
seemed to work better...I think the most value came from the knowledge
exchange and the building of a network of SMEs trying to engage with
Lean" (IMP1). This was reinforced by the Production Manager,
Peacocks Medical Group Ltd.: "The development of a bite-size Lean
approach was more appropriate for our organisation as it allowed us to
meet our operational commitments as well as engaging with the ERIP
project" (IMP2). Established in 1903, Peacocks Medical Group
has been supplying medical equipment and services for over 100 years. They
have over 170 direct employees and over 60 indirect employees.
Company performance
The project developed a transnational best practice Lean change
methodology that is publically available via the ERIP website. As the
Production Manager, Peacocks Medical Group commented: "Knowing that
the ERIP web site and access to the ERIP materials is being made
available for the foreseeable future is also a benefit" (IMP2).
A final conference for the ERIP project was held in Newcastle, which
enabled the project partners to present their achievements and challenges.
The conference was also attended by representatives from regional
government, SMEs from Europe and the UK, public sector practitioners and
participants from each of the 6 regional Innovative Productivity Centres.
In total 52 people attended the conference, demonstrating their
willingness to commit time to sharing practice with one another. The
conference brought together for discussion and evaluation the experiences
of the both the partners and the SMEs in implementing Lean manufacturing.
The Production Manager, Peacocks Medical Group commented: "We were
able to bench mark where we were in comparison to other companies
involved in the project. We were also able to...potentially build a
network for any potential future collaboration with other SMEs" (IMP2).
Highlights of the impacts described at the conference and by participants
include the following:
- L-Druck is a printing company and the introduction of methods learned
through the ERIP project reduced the lead time of a quotation process
from 16 hours to 1 hour. The cost savings per year amount to more than
140,000€ (IMP3). The company employees 70 people and is based in
Germany.
- Based in Sweden and with 37 direct and 14 indirect employees, Falk
Graphic Media is a printing and graphic producer that had long setup
times due to incomplete customer orders, unclear quality levels and
down-time. Through ERIP, they reduced setup times, scrap levels and
down-time (IMP4).
- Based in Norway and employing 50 people, Noca produces printed circuit
boards and electronic products, and they improved their visual
management due to the 5S activity of the ERIP project, including the use
of toolboards (IMP5).
- In Belgium, one participating SME demonstrated a 32% increase in value
added per person (10€/hour) and a 20% increase in stock turns. Another
had a 52% increase in productivity and a third participating SME had a
10% increase in internal quality in their powder coating department (IMP6).
- In the UK, Peacocks Medical Group estimated that they have reduced
waste through improving materials requisition by 25% and improved their
floor space utilization by 15% (IMP2).
Regional infrastructure
As a legacy of the ERIP project, an infrastructure has been established
in the form of Innovative Productivity Centres (IPCs) (IMP7). Each
IPC comprises a university, an exemplar company and a regional development
agency. They were created to facilitate the development and spread of Lean
knowledge and the ERIP methodology. The transfer of knowledge is achieved
through a combination of change agent training, staff exchanges and
exemplar visits. SMEs are thus made aware of their competitive
competencies, allowing them to identify their own areas for improvement.
Communication between regional and national governments about Lean allows
the methodology to spread and potentially make the North Sea Region more
competitive. The IPCs in Holland and Belgium have already become spin-out
companies (IMP8).
In the case of the northern Netherlands, this initiative has been driven
by NPAL, the region's foreign direct investment agency. Its Manager
recognised the impact of ERIP: "as an outcome of the ERIP project we
have taken the learning forward and as a result established a Northern
Productivity Alliance (similar to NEPA founded in the North East of
England) called NPAL... We initially started with the four SMEs involved
in the ERIP project but this has grown and we currently work with 34
companies in three Lean6Sigma clusters...NPAL organizes also improvement
clusters in the field of safety, health and environment, Sustainability
and HRM issues. In total over 100 companies are participating in
different activities, represented by over 200 persons. In all the
clusters we use insights we generated by the ERIP project." (IMP9).
The Director of Key Performance Innovations Ltd. also commented, "I
felt the collaboration and knowledge transfer element was important and
helped support such small organisations implement aspects of Lean. By
setting up the regional hubs...the SMEs could be exposed to a regional
exemplar... To complement this learning, the SMEs could draw on each
other for help and advice as well." (IMP1).
Sources to corroborate the impact
(IMP1) Testimonial from Director, Key Performance Innovations Ltd.
(IMP2) Testimonial from Production Manager, Peacocks Medical Group Ltd.
(IMP3) Prof. Thorsten Litfin & Jens Mehmann (2011) The German
Experience. Available at: http://ir18.ugent.be/erip/?q=node/28
(accessed 30/08/13).
(IMP4) Dr. Birgitta Öjmertz & Björn Westling (2011) Comparisons
between different SME programme philosophies. Available at: http://ir18.ugent.be/erip/?q=node/28
(accessed 30/08/13).
(IMP5) Daryl Powell (2011) Applying Lean Practices in SMEs: The
Norwegian Experience. Available at: http://ir18.ugent.be/erip/?q=node/28
(accessed 11/09/13).
(IMP6) Prof. Hendrik Van Landeghem & Thomas Van Landeghem (2011) The
Belgian Experience. Available at: http://ir18.ugent.be/erip/?q=node/28
(accessed 11/09/13).
(IMP7) Innovative Productivity Centres http://ir18.ugent.be/erip/?q=node/26#h.7a56995a35c1
(accessed 11/09/13).
(IMP8) Spin-off Veltion reinforces the Flemish SMEs (01/08/13). Available
at: http://www.ugent.be/en/news/bulletin/veltion.htm
(accessed 01/10/13).
(IMP9) Testimonial from Manager, Noordelijke ProductiviteitsAlliantie
(NPAL)