Evaluating regional food policy: Enhancing and embedding policy for the benefit of farming and food
Submitting Institution
Newcastle UniversityUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Human Geography
Summary of the impact
    Based on longstanding research strengths in food policy and marketing,
      Newcastle University was commissioned by the Department for Environment,
      Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) to review and evaluate England's Regional
      Food Strategy (RFS) and provide recommendations for ministers. The
      evaluation's recommendations resulted in £2 million of additional public
      sector investment to the food sector and inclusion within the priorities
      of the Rural Development Programme for England (2007-2013). The structures
      introduced as a result of the report were kept in place despite the
      abolition of the Regional Development Agencies. These structures included
      8 Regional Food Groups that provided specialist assistance to businesses
      and enhanced support by DEFRA for obtaining EU protected status for
      regionally distinctive foods. In terms of significance, the research
      influenced an important area of national policy, which has left an
      enduring legacy for the benefit of farming and rural development. In terms
      of reach, the impact of the research has extended beyond the EU to the
      development of local food networks in the Balkans.
    Underpinning research
    The changing nature of food: the emergence of local and regional food
        markets
      The significant body of research on regional foods at Newcastle University
      has its origins in the late 1990s. Led by Dr. Angela Tregear (1995-2005),
      and Dr. Matthew Gorton (1998-), Newcastle's contribution initially focused
      on providing a detailed assessment of consumer attitudes toward, and
      purchasing behaviour regarding, regional and local foods (1). The
      research segmented consumers, identifying the psychological and
      socio-economic characteristics of `concerned consumers' who buy local
      foods and/or engage in alternative food systems (2). The research
      was part-funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), in the
      wake of the foot-and-mouth crisis, and the Countryside Agency under their
      Eat the View programme (Grants 2 and 3). In addition, a development
      officer was funded to liaise with speciality food businesses in north east
      England in order to raise the profile of the sector. The research provided
      a theoretical framework for assessing the appropriateness of DEFRA's
      Regional Food Strategy.
    In 2003, as part of a strategic plan for the recovery of the farming and
      food sector in the wake of the foot-and-mouth crisis, a Regional Food
      Strategy (RFS) was agreed by DEFRA, Food from Britain (FFB), the Regional
      Development Agencies (RDAs) and the Countryside Agency. A key objective of
      the RFS was to enable farmers to add value to their produce and to
      re-establish connections with food consumers. Gorton and Tregear's
      analysis of the RFS (Grant 4) found that although the sector was a buoyant
      and growing component of the rural economy, there was still room for
      improvement. The study made several recommendations, principally:
    
      - There should be government support for Regional Food Groups in each
        English Region, with additional funding to Food from Britain to help the
        Groups develop new markets.
- There should be better promotion of the opportunity to apply for EU
        protected designation status for speciality, local foods (Protected
        Designation of Origin and Protected Geographical Indication) where
        geographical indication is used as a signal of quality.
- The RDAs should have responsibility for promoting regional brands as
        part of their regional strategies, including the tourism strategy (3-4).
Protected designations of origin
      In parallel, other research led by Tregear and Gorton investigated
      protected designations of origin. These limit the rights to using a
      regional food name (e.g. Parma Ham), to, typically, members of a
      producers' consortium. The research focused on the implementation of the
      EU's two main designation schemes (Protected Designation of Origin (PDO)
      and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI)) and was undertaken as part of
      two EU Framework projects: Dolphins (2000-2003 Grant 1) (5) and
      SiNERGI (2005-2008 Grant 5). Research evaluated the validity of economic
      arguments for government intervention to prevent market failure and the
      role that designations might play in regional development.
    Regional and local foods and the future of European small farms
      Gorton has subsequently led research on regional and local foods in the
      context of small farms in the enlarged EU. This has been undertaken as
      part of three EU framework projects on which he acted as principal
      investigator: SCARLED (2007-2009 Grant 6), Focus Balkans (2008-2011 Grant
      7) and COMPETE (2012-2015 Grant 8). Small farms, while still numerous in
      many EU member states, lack cost competitiveness and are increasingly
      marginalised from the `formal' supply chains which are dominated by
      rapidly expanding multiple grocery retailers. The production of regional
      and local foods has been promoted under the rural development pillar of
      the Common Agricultural Policy as a means to improve returns to farmers
      and stimulate rural development. Gorton's research evaluated the economic
      state of small farms, their engagement in short food supply chains and
      potential for stimulating rural economic development, as well as consumer
      attitudes to local foods in the Western Balkans (6).
    The on-going programme of research on small farms and regional/local
      foods has included a study on agri-food supply chains for the World Bank
      (2005), input into a report on the future of small farms for a high-level
      European Network for Rural Development event (2010) and contributing to a
      study of semi-subsistence farming for the European Parliament (2013), the
      latter underlining the importance of local and regional foods to the
      future of these farms within an expanded EU.
    References to the research
    
1. Weatherell, C., Tregear, A., Allinson, J. (2003). `In search of the
      concerned consumer: UK public perceptions of food, farming and buying
      local'. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(2), 233-244.
      DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00083-9
      (ABS List 2010 3*).
     
2. Tregear, A., Ness, M. (2005). `Discriminant analysis of consumer
      interest in buying locally produced foods'. Journal of Marketing
        Management, 21(1-2), 19-35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/
        10.1362/0267257053166811 (ABS List 2010 3*).
     
3. Elliott J., Temple, M., Bowden, C., Gorton, M., Tregear, A. (2005),
      `Economic Evaluation of the Regional Food Strategy'. Report to Department
      for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Wolverhampton and Newcastle: ADAS
      Consulting Ltd. and the University of Newcastle. Available at:
      http://archive.defra.gov.uk/evidence/economics/foodfarm/evaluation/regional/ackabri.pdf
      (accessed 24/09/13).
     
4. Gorton, M., Tregear, A. (2008). `Government support to regional food
      producers: An assessment of England's Regional Food Strategy'. Environment
        and Planning C: Government and Policy, 1047-1060. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c0724r
      (ABS List 2010 3*).
     
5. Tregear, A., Arfini, F., Belleti, G., Marescotti, A. (2007) `Regional
      foods and rural development: The role of product qualification. Journal
        of Rural Studies, 23(1), 12-22.
      DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.010
      (ABS List 2010 3*).
     
6. Davidova, S., Fredriksson, L., Gorton, M., Mishev, P., Petrovici, D.
      (2012). `Subsistence farming, incomes, and agricultural livelihoods in the
      new member states of the European Union'. Environment and Planning C:
        Government and Policy, 30(2), 209-227.
      DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c1195r
      (ABS List 2010 3*).
     
Table of Relevant Grants
    
      
        
          |  | Principal Investigator(s)
 | Grant Title | Sponsor | Period of Grant | Value to Newcastle | 
        
          | 1. | Angela Tregear | Dolphins | European Union (EU) | 2000-2003 | £18,684 | 
        
          | 2. | Angela Tregear | Eat the View | Countryside Agency | 2001-2002 | £43,892 | 
        
          | 3. | Philip Lowe | Learning from the foot- and-mouth disease crisis
 | ESRC | 2001-2005 | £41,197 | 
        
          | 4. | Matthew Gorton | Evaluation of Regional Food Strategy | DEFRA | 2005 | £5,715 | 
        
          | 5. | Angela Tregear / Mitchell Ness | SiNERGI (Strengthening international research on geographical
            indications) | EU | 2005-2008 | £10,875 | 
        
          | 6. | Matthew Gorton | SCARLED (Structural change in agriculture and rural
            livelihoods) | EU FP6 | 2007-2009 | £72,116 | 
        
          | 7. | Matthew Gorton | Focus Balkans | EU FP7 | 2008-2011 | £58,085 | 
        
          | 8 | Matthew Gorton | COMPETE (International comparisons of product supply
            chains in the agro-food sectors) | EU FP7 | 2012-2015 | £240,000 | 
      
    
    Details of the impact
    Although the impacts of the research began outside the current REF
      period, the recommendations in the report to DEFRA on the Regional Food
      Strategy (RFS) have left a significant and enduring legacy that has
      continued into the period 2008-2013. This is in spite of a change of
      government policy and the withdrawal of state financial support for its
      delivery. Additional impacts have also arisen as a result of recent
      research with the new EU Member States, thus spreading the reach of the
      impact beyond the UK.
    Implementing recommendations from the evaluation of the RFS
      The recommendations of the evaluation were accepted by DEFRA and
      implemented from 2006 onwards. Additional funding of £2 million was
      provided to FFB to support a programme of activities (years 2006/7), with
      the study cited as justification (IMP1&2): "Following an
        economic evaluation of its Regional Food Strategy, Ministers announced
        during the year that Defra would continue to support producers of
        quality regional food and drink through a programme of activities aimed
        at creating trade development opportunities, raising consumer awareness
        and improving business competitiveness" (IMP2p129). The
      study was also cited in parliament by Lord Bach, the Parliamentary
      Under-Secretary of State responsible for Sustainable Farming and Food, as
      part of a justification for additional resources to deliver the RFS (IMP3).
    Continuing the impact in a changed policy environment
      Government funding for FFB was withdrawn in July 2008 (and FFB ceased
      operations in 2009) but support for the sector continued at a regional
      level, thus continuing to deliver on the recommendations of the
      evaluation. An important legacy of the RFS remains in the existence of the
      eight Regional Food Groups (RFGs) (IMP4&5) that continue to
      support the activities of the sector via initiatives such as the
      development of local food supply chains to supermarkets (IMP6).
    The Chair of TASTECLUB, the legacy organization of the north east RFG,
      commented that "the [Newcastle] research informed the sustainable food
        and farming policy that led to the establishment of the RFGs" (IMP4).
      The reach of this impact can be further evidenced by comments from
      TASTECLUB's users, such as: "At last there is an organisation really
        promoting North East produce!" and "I am sure that all of the
        producer members will benefit from the increasing awareness of local
        food which is being created by their enthusiastic use of social media
        and the other marketing endeavours which are being undertaken'' (IMP4).
      Users of other food groups confirmed the efficacy of this approach: "The
        food group also introduced me to a contract manufacturing company that
        can help boost production capacity so that we can fulfil our exciting
        new listing with Booths supermarkets" (Food NorthWest) (IMP5p4)
      and "Taste of the West is a very professional organisation with really
        good routes to market." (IMP5p7).
    Another important recommendation was that the UK government should take
      applications for protection of origin for regionally distinctive food
      products more seriously. Evidence that the revised policy has been
      effective can be seen in the fact that since the evaluation, the number of
      applications for protected status in the UK has roughly doubled (IMP7)
      and DEFRA is actively supporting capacity building among producers to make
      further applications with staff dedicated to this task (IMP8). The
      evaluation was also influential in justifying the inclusion of support to
      the regional food sector within the Rural Development Programme for
      England (RDPE) (2007-2013) (IMP9), a major programme of support
      for food, farming and rural development funded by the Common Agricultural
      Policy (CAP). The RDPE programme document specifically mentions the
      evaluation and makes clear recommendations for measures to support local
      value added production in the delivery of the £5bn programme (IMP9).
    Extending reach to the New Member States
      As part of the FOCUS Balkans project (2008-11), Newcastle has contributed
      its strengths in consumer research to the analysis of the consumption of
      regional and other types of foods. Post-project, a Balkan Network for Food
      Consumer Science has been established, of which Newcastle is a founder
      member (IMP10). The network brings together academics, policy
      makers and industry practitioners to stimulate regional and
      interdisciplinary co-operation and knowledge exchange in the field of
      consumer science. It thus helps to develop an alternative economic model
      for food production and marketing that supports the competitiveness of the
      small farms, which are the bedrock of the rural economy of the Balkans. A
      representative of Zvijezda, a company specialising in edible oil products,
      commented "all the findings that have been presented to us...are
        useful to us to better understand food consumers and their needs. In
        this way, we can know how to better respond to those needs and who are
        the clients we target and what is the way to project our products" (IMP10).
    Sources to corroborate the impact 
    (IMP1) Evidence of support for recommendations of evaluation. Available
      at:
      http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/food/industry/regional/index.htm
      (accessed 19/07/13).
    (IMP2) Evidence from DEFRA Annual Review Departmental Report, 2006,
      (p.129) that cites the evaluation report and the additional investment to
      support delivery of the Regional Food Strategy. Available at:
      http://archive.defra.gov.uk/corporate/about/reports/documents/2006deptreport.pdf
      (accessed 19/07/13).
    (IMP3) Evaluation as evidence for RFS (Parliamentary debate). Available
      at:
      http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldhansrd/vo051208/text/51208w04.htm
      (accessed 10/09/13).
    (IMP4) Testimonial and business plan evidence from Chair, TASTECLUB
    (IMP5) Case studies from the Regional Food Groups organised as the
      English Food and Drink Alliance. Available at: http://www.tastesoutheast.co.uk/upload/Alliance.pdf
      (accessed 19/07/13).
    (IMP6) Evidence from Waitrose website on use of Regional Food Groups and
      their role in facilitating supply from small producers. Available at:
      http://www.waitrose.com/home/inspiration/food_issues_and_policies/origin_of_our_food/sourcing_british_food/regional_and_local_sourcing/do_you_want_to_supply_waitrose.html
      (accessed 12/03/13).
    (IMP7) Evidence of increase in PDO and PGI applications, taken from the
      Database of Origin and Registration (DOOR). Available at:
      http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/list.html;jsessionid=vQMBR1MWn1mnRmhG2LNy8hYRYj1hhsmvwy3Zg2vvdbZvQVpJ8WsN!823015983 (accessed 12/03/13).
    (IMP8) Evidence of support for PDOs and PGIs in recent DEFRA policy:
      Hansard 6th March 2013. Available at:
      http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm130306/text/130306w00
        02.htm#130306w0002.htm_wqn38 (accessed 12/03/13).
    (IMP9) Evidence of impact on the English Rural Development Programme
      2007-2013 and mid-term evaluation of the programme, 2010. Available at:
      http://archive.defra.gov.uk/rural/documents/rdpe/progdoc/chapter3.pdf
      http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/countries/uk/mte-rep-uk-england_en.pdf
      (accessed 10/09/13).
    (IMP10) Evidence of impact from the Balkans research: establishment of
      food policy network, as part of European Framework 7 programme. Available
      at: http://www.focus-balkans.org/res/files/upload/file/Leaflet_end_final.pdf
      and
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jgxBz-Jsb4
      (accessed 03/10/13).