5 Professionalising sport coaching
Submitting Institution
Leeds Metropolitan UniversityUnit of Assessment
Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and TourismSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Education: Curriculum and Pedagogy, Specialist Studies In Education
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Other Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Summary of the impact
Our research has transformed UK and international thinking, policy and
practice in sport coaching. The result is an emerging international
consensus on sport coaching as a blended profession encompassing a
segmented workforce with defined coaching roles. We have had a significant
impact on UK and international sport coaching systems, coach development,
education and qualifications. Our research work has impacted on more than
30 countries, and directly on the work of at least 26 international
agencies and sporting bodies, directly enhancing the lived experiences of
many thousands of coaches, participants and performers.
Underpinning research
Our research has been driven by a collaborative team of sport coaching
academics, policy and programme developers, and practitioners (Abraham,
Duffy, Lara-Bercial, Lyle, Morgan, Muir, Norman, North, amongst others)
dating back to 2005.
This research has focused on five key areas:
Sport coaching as a blended professional area: Our research has
highlighted the contribution of sport coaching to a range of sporting and
societal outcomes, including those related to sporting performance,
participation, and health and well-being [3]. Our work has conceptualised
sport coaching as a blended professional area and created a conceptual
basis for policy development. Situated within a broader agenda of
professionalising practice, this approach recognises the extant structural
and resource conditions impacting on and influencing change in sport
coaching. This is with particular reference to the extensive and valued
contribution of community volunteers in addition to that of the more
visible full-time paid high-performance coach [2].
Sport coaching as a segmented workforce: Historically, sport
coaching has been treated as homogeneous or synonymous with
high-performance coaching. Our research has critically challenged and
redefined sport coaching as a segmented workforce with four main roles
identified - children's coaches, adult recreational coaches, performance
development coaches, and high performance coaches — closely aligned to the
specific wants and needs of identified participant and performer groups
[3]. Further, this segmentation has been augmented by work on expertise
development and existing staged educational approaches, which has led to
the development of the internationally recognised 4x4 Coach Development
Model [3].
Sport coaching workforce development, education and qualifications:
Our research has examined the implications of a blended and segmented
workforce for coach development, education and qualifications. Thus, we
have produced cutting edge role definitions, curricula and development
methodologies; for example, for children's coaches and performance
development coaches. Particular attention has been given to the higher
levels of the development and qualifications continuum (known as Level 4)
[4]. This work has established the roles, attributes, capabilities and
professional competences of coaches, broadly aligned at a post-graduate
level, which has provided the basis for recent qualification submissions.
The mechanisms of sport coach development and education: We have
established mechanisms and tools to facilitate coach development and
education. Our work has conceptualised coaching practice as a
multi-layered relational phenomenon [5] which focuses attention on the
cognitive, behavioural and social dimensions of practice, and with it a
range of learning philosophies and developmental approaches. Aligned with
this, our research has provided thinking tools for coach developers and
coaches to reflect on the knowledge bases, problem solving and decision
making repertoires used within complex, dynamic and politicised coaching
environments [1].
Sport coaching in context: Our research has developed an
understanding of, and given a voice to, the contexts, conditions and
constraints of less well represented coaching populations within the
professionalisation agenda, and the implications for coach development and
education. This includes studies on unpaid and community coaches, women
coaches, coaches of women and girls, and coaches of disabled athletes [6].
References to the research
[2] Duffy, P., Hartley, H., Bales, J., Crespo, M., Dick, F.,
Vardhan, D., Curado, J. (2011). Sport coaching as a `profession':
Challenges and future directions. International Journal of Coaching
Science, 5(2). The output is listed in the RA2 or can be supplied by
Leeds Metropolitan University.
[3] Duffy, P., North, J., & Muir, B. (2013).
Understanding the impact of sport coaching on legacy. International
Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 5(2), 165-182.
DOI:10.1080/19406940.2012.665380 / The output is listed in the RA2, can be
supplied by Leeds Metropolitan University, or abstract at:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19406940.2012.665380
[5] North, J. (2013). A critical realist approach to theorising
coaching practice. In P. Potrac, W. D. Gilbert & J. Dennison (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Sports Coaching (pp. 133-144). London:
Routledge. The output is listed in the RA2 or can be supplied by Leeds
Metropolitan University.
Details of the impact
Our research has transformed UK and international thinking, policy and
practice in the areas identified above:
Sport coaching as a blended professional area: We have led the
international sport coaching policy community, including leadership
positions in the International Council for Coaching Excellence (ICCE) and
the European Coaching Council (ECC). We host the ICCE Global Coaches
Office, and hosted the London 2012 Global Coaches House with 50+ speakers
and 500+ participants. We also led on a successful bid to the European
Commission to rethink and redesign the institutional infrastructure for
coaching representation and service provision across Europe [A].
Our research has been used to inform national and international sport
coaching policy and practice. For example, our work on professionalisation
has informed system building work in Ireland, the UK [B], South Africa
[C], and the Philippines [D]. A partnership with the ICCE and Association
of Summer Olympic International Federations has led to the development of
the International Sport Coaching Framework [E]. This provides a global
framework and benchmark for the development and delivery of coaching
systems, and the development and deployment of coaches, with impact
already identified in Switzerland and the United States [E]. We have
recently worked with the Football Association to benchmark its coaching
system against UK and international good practice both within and outside
sport.
Sport coaching as a segmented workforce: Our segmentation
proposals have had a significant influence on sports policy in the UK [F]
and South Africa [C]. They have also impacted on three of the top five
participation sports (swimming, football and golf) and many other
mainstream sports in the UK: archery, canoeing, cricket, gymnastics, rugby
league, rugby union, squash and triathlon [F]. This segmentation/modelling
approach assists governing bodies of sport to review and reorganise their
sport coaching systems. For example, British Gymnastics has based its
Sport England funding submission, Participation `Gymnastics for All'
Strategy, and revised coaching structures on segmentation work
developed at Leeds Metropolitan University [G].
Sport coaching workforce development, education and qualifications:
Our research has underpinned coach development systems thinking in the UK
(the Coach Development Model) [H]. In particular, this research work has
helped to define the children and performer development coaching roles and
the Level 4 expertise associated with these roles [4]. The national lead
agency for coaching, Sports Coach UK, has based its Level 4 provision on
this work, and Level 4 programmes have been developed in basketball,
cricket, hockey, rowing, rugby league, rugby union, squash, and table
tennis, with development work currently taking place in canoeing,
equestrian sport, and judo.
The mechanisms of sport coach development and education: Our
research on coach development has led to professional development
programmes for the Football Association's Youth Coach Educators and High
Performing Coaches Academy [I]. Similar programmes have been put in place
for UK Sport and the Royal Yachting Association. We have also undertaken
research work to examine and inform the Football Association's player
development pathway. Research work in gymnastics and rugby league has led
to a redesign of their United Kingdom Coaching Certificate (UKCC) Levels
1-3. We have undertaken ground breaking and highly regarded 1:1 coach
development work using audio-video capture and a reflective framework in
hockey, rugby league and sailing.
Coaching in context: Our research work on women and girl's,
disability, and black and minority ethnic sport has led directly to a
number of coach development resources utilised by Sports Coach UK and the
Women's Sport Foundation [J]. These are now being accessed through Sports
Coach UK workshops and resources by thousands of practising coaches.
Overall
- Our central and very visible place in the UK and international sport
coaching policy environment and our very active research programme
situate us as very strong contenders for the world's leading university
in sport coaching policy, practice and development.
- We estimate our research ideas, tools and resources have had a policy
and practice impact in over 30 countries, and directly on the work of at
least 26 international agencies and sporting bodies. This will have
impacted on many thousands of coaches in terms of improved systems and
on sports participants and performers in terms of improved sporting
experiences.
Sources to corroborate the impact
[A] Duffy, P., North, J., & Curado, J. (in draft) The Further
Development of a Co-ordinated Network for Sport Coaching in Europe —
CoachNet, EAC-2011-0452: Final Technical Report and Financial Statement.
See also: http://ec.europa.eu/sport/preparatory_actions/results-eac-18-2011_en.htm
[B] Sports Coach UK. (2008). The UK Coaching Framework: A 3-7-11 year
action plan. Leeds: Coachwise; Sports Coach UK. (2012). The UK coaching
framework: Embedding excellent coaching practice. Leeds: Sports Coach UK.
See also: http://www.sportscoachuk.org/uk-coaching-framework-overview
[C] South African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC)
(2012) South African Coaching Framework, Johannesburg: SASCOC. See also:
http://hp.sascoc.co.za/the-south-african-coaching-framework/. South
African Sports Confederation and Olympic Committee (SASCOC) (2012) Long
Term Coach Development, Johannesburg: SASCOC. See also:
hp.sascoc.co.za/files/2013/02/LTCD.pdf
[D] Lara-Bercial, S., & Duffy, P. (2013) Philippine Academy of Sport:
Full scoping report, Department of Education in the Philippines, the
British Council and Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds. See also: http://www.philstar.com/sports/2013/09/09/1189161/poc-supports-sports-academy-plan
[E] ICCE, ASOIF, & LMU. (2013). International Sport Coaching
Framework v1.2. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics. See also: http://www.icce.ws/projects/international-sport-coaching-framework.html.
See also: `For Coach Education Switzerland, the ISCF is a very important
reference document to benchmark and refine our coach education and
development programs. This excellent work developed by Leeds Metropolitan
University and its partners ASOIF and ICCE has a very high significance in
the development of quality sport coaching systems around the world'. Head
Coach Education Switzerland, Federal Institute of Sport
Magglingen/Switzerland.
The LMU-ICCE Framework has been very instrumental in how our Coaching
Education Department is working to re-frame how coaching education and
coaching development are viewed in the United States. It is great to have
such organizations working to build resources that can make an impact in
every corner of the world in the area of coaching and sport' Director
of Coaching Education, United States Olympic Committee
[F] North, J. (2009). The coaching workforce 2009-2016. Leeds: Sports
Coach UK. See also:
http://www.sportscoachuk.org/resource/coaching-workforce-2009-16-0
[G] North, J. (2012). Further development of the gymnastics participant
model Commissioned report for British Gymnastics. Leeds: Sport Coaching
Innovations, Leeds Metropolitan University. See also: "The research
provided within the `Further development of the participant model' has
enabled us to better understand the motivation of our participants and
therefore strongly evidence and shape our `Gymnastics for All' mass
participation and retention strategy for the next four years" Gymnastics
For All Manager, British Gymnastics
[H] Sports Coach UK. (2009). The coach development model user guide.
Leeds: Sports Coach UK. See also: http://www.sportscoachuk.org/resource/coach-development-model-user-guide
[I] "We asked the Sport Coaching Innovations team at Leeds Metropolitan
University to research a series of concepts surrounding the coaching of
the game. The information and materials that were supplied were
comprehensive, thoroughly-researched and clearly amplified during
discussions surrounding the findings. I would have no hesitation
whatsoever in engaging the services of Leeds Metropolitan University for
further projects in the future" (former) Elite Coaching Director, The
Football Association.
[J] Fitzgerald, H. (2013) Disabled Performers Reflections of Sports
Coaching. Sports coach UK: Leeds. See also:
http://sportscoachuk.org/sites/default/files/Reflections%20of%20disabled%20atheltes_0.pdf