Submitting Institution
University of CambridgeUnit of Assessment
PhysicsSummary Impact Type
TechnologicalResearch Subject Area(s)
Physical Sciences: Atomic, Molecular, Nuclear, Particle and Plasma Physics
Chemical Sciences: Macromolecular and Materials Chemistry, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry
Summary of the impact
CASTEP is a parameter-free and predictive quantum mechanical atomistic
simulation code
developed by Professor Payne in the Department of Physics at the
University of Cambridge.
CASTEP has been sold commercially by Accelrys since 1995, with more than
800 industrial
customers using the package. As part of Accelrys' Materials Studio, it can
be used by non-experts
to determine a wide range of physical and chemical properties of
materials. Companies can thus
perform `virtual experiments' using CASTEP. As quantum mechanical
simulations can be cheaper
and more flexible than experiments, CASTEP invariably reduces costs and
accelerates product
development.
Underpinning research
CASTEP is based on the so-called `total energy pseudopotential technique'
which uses a plane
wave basis set to represent the electronic wavefunctions, pseudopotentials
to represent the ions
and density functional theory to make the quantum mechanical calculations
tractable. Total energy
pseduopotential calculations had been applied to simple systems in the
early 1980s but were
restricted to small numbers of atoms from only a small part of the
periodic table. Progress from the
mid-1980s began to increase the capability of the calculations but (i)
only one or two chemists in
the world believed in density functional theory, (ii) there were concerns
about the applicability of
pseudopotentials to transition elements and (iii) it was not clear that
the method could address
complex problems. In 1991, Professor Payne (Department of Physics,
University of Cambridge
Assistant Lecturer from 1991, Professor from 2000), in collaboration with
Edinburgh Parallel
Computer Centre, ported his total energy pseudopotential code to parallel
computers. Subsequent
research exploited the increased computational performance of these
systems and, particularly,
the large amount of memory calculations that could be performed for larger
and more complex
systems. Thus, the concerns about the scope and capability of the total
energy pseudopotential
technique could be directly challenged through a series of innovative
scientific applications. These
applications not only proved that the criticisms of the total energy
pseudopotential techniques were
unfounded but also revealed the enormous scope of this approach. Amongst
many other
applications, these pioneering applications showed for the first time the
capability of the total
energy pseudopotential method to:
perform dynamical simulations of chemical reactions [1];
determine absorption energies of molecules on transition metal surfaces
[2];
model chemical reactions in extended solid state catalysts [3];
directly simulate experimental probes thus making a direct link between
experimental
measurements and underlying atomic structure [4].
By 2000 the model for developing CASTEP through a combination of academic
and industrial
inputs (some coming from companies other than Accelrys) was failing. Like
so many codes it had
become bloated and undevelopable. Between 2000 and 2003, under a major
research project, the
code was completely re-engineered from scratch by the CASTEP Developers
Group (CDG), with
most the members of CDG being based in the Department of Physics in the
University of
Cambridge during this time (see details below). The code re-engineering
made no re-use of
existing code and was carried out using modern software engineering
techniques to provide a
robust, efficient, and portable code [5]. The aim of this research project
was to provide a solid
platform for development of new capabilities and functionalities for the
total energy pseudopotential
method. One example of this was the development of a suite of Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance
capabilities and the use of this to relate experimental NMR spectra to the
underlying atomic
structure — something not possible using experiment alone [6]. This
research led to the
development of an additional module CASTEP-NMR which is sold by Accelrys
alongside the
CASTEP package for those who want this additional capability.
Cambridge has provided the intellectual leadership for the creation and
development of CASTEP.
Throughout the relevant period the vast majority of the research
underpinning CASTEP code
development, including the key central modules, was done in Cambridge by a
research group led
by Professor Payne. Smaller contributions came from the UK Car-Parrinello
consortium (UKCP),
which also performed many applications of the code. Of the CDG, the
following worked at the
University of Cambridge Department of Physics as researchers/fellows
during the census period
(dates in brackets): Dr. Matt Segall (1997-2000, 2002-2007), Professor
Chris Pickard (2000-2006),
Dr. Matt Probert (1996-2000), Dr. Phil Hasnip (1996-2000 in the Department
of Physics and then
2000-2005 in the Department of Materials), Dr. Jonathan Yates (2006-8).
Members of the CDG not
based in Cambridge: Professor Stewart Clark, University of Durham, Dr.
Keith Refson, STFC
Rutherford Appleton Technology Campus. Professor Francesco Mauri
(Universite Pierre et Marie
Curie, Paris) worked with the CDG on CASTEP-NMR.
References to the research
*[1] "Dynamics of dissociative chemisorption: Cl2/Si(111)-2x1" A De Vita,
I Stich, MJ Gillan, MC
Payne and LJ Clarke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1276 (1993). DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1276
[2] "Gradient corrections in density functional theory calculations for
surfaces: CO on Pd(110)", P.
Hu, D.A. King, S. Crampin, M-H. Lee and M.C. Payne, Chem. Phys. Lett. 230,
501 (1994). DOI:
10.1016/0009-2614(94)01184-2
*[3] "Understanding the catalytic behaviour of zeolites — a first
principles study of the adsorption of
methanol", R. Shah, M.C. Payne, M.-H. Lee and J.D. Gale, Science 271,
1395 (1996). DOI:
10.1126/science.271.5254.1395
[4] "Role of covalent tip-surface interactions in noncontact atomic force
microscopy on reactive
surfaces", R. Perez, M.C. Payne, I. Stich and K. Terakura, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 78, 678, (1997). DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.678
*[5] "First principles methods using CASTEP", S.J. Clark, M.D. Segall,
C.J. Pickard, P.J. Hasnip,
M.J. Probert, K. Refson and M.C. Payne, Zeitschrift fur
Kristallographie, 220, 567 (2005), ISSN
0044-2968
[6] "Theoretical investigation of oxygen-17 NMR shielding and electric
field gradients in glutamic
acid polymorphs", J.R. Yates, C.J. Pickard, M.C. Payne, R. Dupree, M.
Profeta and F. Mauri, J.
Physical Chemistry A 108, 6032 (2004). DOI: 10.1021/jp049362+
* References which best reflect the quality of the underpinning research.
Details of the impact
It is widely accepted that computation and simulation is a driver of
economic growth. The most
important requirement for industrial adoption of any simulation method is
that the method must be
accurate enough to be `useful', essentially that it can be relied on when
making decisions. This has
always been the overriding factor in, leading provider of atomistic
simulation software, Accelrys'
choice of codes to support within its modelling environment as it has been
determined to maintain
its position at the `high quality' end of atomistic simulations. CASTEP
has had significant impact
because it predicts physical properties to an accuracy of a few percent
using no adjustable
parameters and requiring no prior information about the system, thus
clearly fulfilling industry and
Accelrys' requirements for simulation codes. Accelrys' own success can
also be attributed to the
ease of use of its products. For instance, it was the first company to
provide access to materials
simulation methodologies through a graphical user interface. CASTEP is
completely aligned with
this philosophy, being the first quantum mechanical materials simulation
code that truly abstracted
all the complexity out of the calculations to make the methodology highly
accessible. Given the
combination of accuracy, predictive capability and ease of use that CASTEP
provides, the final
factor determining the level of industrial use, as with any simulation
method, depends on its cost
effectiveness compared to other methods for obtaining the same
information. Continuing research
has significantly decreased the computational costs of CASTEP calculations
over and above that
provided by Moore's Law, thus increasing the number of tasks that are most
effectively assigned to
CASTEP. Furthermore, the continuing decrease in the cost of computation
means that even if a
simulation method is not cost effective at a particular time it is likely
to become so at some time in
the future.
Quantum mechanical simulations using CASTEP have provided the ability to
perform `virtual'
experiments on materials. However, there are many different types of
materials and a vast range of
physical, chemical and materials properties of interest involving a wide
range of lengthscales and
timescales. Therefore, simulation is not yet capable of replacing
experiment to determine all
materials properties of interest. Accelrys stresses just how much CASTEP
offers in solving these
classes of problems, by advertising the software suite as able to `simulate
the properties of solids,
interfaces, and surfaces for a wide range of materials classes,
including ceramics, semiconductors,
and metals, with this premier density functional theory (DFT) quantum
mechanical code'. Such
simulations enable customers to gain information about impurities in
semiconductors, optical
properties of materials, chemical reactions in catalysts, surface and bulk
diffusion, refine atomic
structures and generate the `experimental' spectra associated with these
structures.
The separate package CASTEP-NMR has provided is capable of generating the
NMR spectrum
associated with a model structure and thus the combination of experiment
and CASTEP-NMR
allows unambiguous determination of structures of crystals. This is
particularly important in the
pharmaceutical sector where a drug patent has to not only specify the drug
molecule but also the
crystal structure (the particular crystal polymorph) of the drug in the
pharmaceutical product.
CASTEP-NMR helps to identify the actual polymorph and, importantly,
deviations in experimental
data from that predicted. CASTEP-NMR is also used to identify low levels
of other polymorphs in
the product. If these other polymorphs are not patented then competitors
may circumvent the
patent by marketing the drug in the form of the non-patented polymorph.
The greatest impact of quantum mechanical simulations is often when they
are used alongside
experiment, as in the pharmaceuticals example above. For competitive
reasons companies tend to
be very secretive about their detailed use of simulation codes.
Illustrative examples of the
application of materials simulation approaches can be found in the IDC
report "Modeling and
Simulation: The Return on Investment in Materials Science," and the
Goldbeck Consulting report
"Economic Impact of Molecular Modelling". These reports mention
many of the societal and
economic benefits clearly provided by CASTEP including (i) efficiency:
many different properties of
many different classes of materials can be determined using a single piece
of `apparatus', namely
a software package and computer; (ii) the broader exploration of materials
solution space possible
once simulation becomes significantly cheaper than experiment; (iii)
projects which had stalled
were restarted with information obtained from simulation and (iv) reduced
time to market.
That CASTEP has proved to be exceedingly useful to industry is reflected
in its use by more than
800 companies and its on-going sales in excess of £1million every year
since 1998, with
cumulative worldwide sales now over $30million, demonstrating the value
placed by commercial
clients on access to the software. Sales over the audit period have been
(US$): 2008 -
$2,349,254, 2009 - $2,067,239, 2010 - $2,527,064, [9]. The IDC research
[7] suggests that the
return on investment in atomistic simulation is of the order of a factor
of 7- which implies that the
total economic impact of CASTEP is £hundreds of millions with benefits in
many different sectors.
Accelrys has expressed its confidence in the importance of the CASTEP
suite to the materials
industry. With 830 unique customers, many of whom are household names
(Boeing, Toyota, GM
and DuPont for instance), the ability to make valuable predictions about
new materials being used
in new now ways offers huge scope to diverse industries to develop their
product portfolio, or have
confidence in the use of the materials in new applications. Product
innovation has been enhanced
very substantially by CASTEP's use.
There are a number of published patents for materials or processes which
have been designed
partially based on CASTEP calculations. The number of distinct (i.e. not
counting multiple filings in
different regions) published patents that have used CASTEP as part of the
inventive process in
recent years are: 2008 - 12, 2009 - 5, 2010 -1, 2011 - 21, 2012 - 7 [10].
Sources to corroborate the impact
[7] M. Swenson, M. Languell, and J. Golden, "Modeling and Simulation: The
Return on
Investment in Materials Science," IDC, Jun. 2004. Can provide an
electronic copy if needed.
[8] Goldbeck Consulting "The economic impact of molecular modelling",
2012. Can provide an
electronic copy if needed.
[9] CASTEP and CASTEP-NMR Sales figures can be verified by the Senior
Product Manager,
Materials Srudio, Accelrys
[10] Patent figures can be corroborated by a Goldbeck Consulting Ltd.
patent report (held on file)