Improving Farming Strategies by Modelling Herbicide Resistance in Weeds
Submitting Institution
University of WarwickUnit of Assessment
Biological SciencesSummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Biological Sciences: Genetics
Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences: Crop and Pasture Production
Summary of the impact
Decreased crop yields caused by the evolution of herbicide-resistant
weeds are a global threat to agriculture and food security. Evolution of
weed resistance to the herbicide glyphosate is particularly prevalent in
North and South America, where genetically modified glyphosate-resistant
crops are widely grown. Research carried out at the University of Warwick
between 2008 and 2013 and led by Dr Paul Neve, in collaboration with
industry and academia, has resulted in the development of computer models
to simulate the evolution of glyphosate resistance in weeds. This
modelling research identified new, more sustainable farming strategies for
the use of this technology, such as avoidance of sole reliance on
glyphosate and more effective ways to manage the timing of herbicide
application. These recommendations have been disseminated widely
throughout North America by the attendance of Neve and project
collaborators at grower conferences, workshops and road shows, and have
also attracted associated press coverage. The research has fundamentally
changed farmer and industry management of genetically modified
herbicide-resistant crops by providing new plant growth guidelines that
are being used to combat herbicide-resistant weeds; for example, providing
the cotton growth guidelines used for 75% of this crop in the mid-southern
USA.
Underpinning research
Research by the Neve group focuses on the genetic, ecological,
evolutionary and agronomic factors that drive the evolution of herbicide
resistance. Neve has worked in this area for 14 years and is a recognised
international expert. In 2007, the company Syngenta wanted to fund
research developing modelling frameworks to address the economically
significant problem of evolution of resistance to glyphosate in North
America. Academic collaborators from several US universities, including
the University of Arkansas and Iowa State University, were identified. Key
underpinning research has included the identification and characterisation
of some the world's first glyphosate- resistant weed populations, and
studies on the genetic control of resistance and the fitness effects of
resistance alleles in the presence and absence of selection. This research
has provided fundamental insights into the genetics and evolutionary
ecology of glyphosate resistance.
Computer-based simulation models that incorporate current knowledge about
herbicide resistance can be used for both research and management of
farming strategies. By modelling the development of weed resistance,
researchers can investigate the effects of different management strategies
on the emergence and prevalence of herbicide-resistant weeds. The new
models developed by the Warwick team and their collaborators at the
Universities of Kansas and Iowa State have built on previous approaches to
develop complex demo-genetic models (based on population genetics) that
incorporate parameters to describe aspects of various species' life
histories, the genetic determination of herbicide resistance and
management factors. In doing so, the models have been able to examine how
selection pressure for resistance is moderated by the timing of herbicide
application in relation to the age distribution of the population, leading
to the identification of more effective strategies for the timing of weed
management interventions.
Mixture and rotation of modes of action of pesticides has been a central
tenet in resistance management, though often without substantive `proof of
concept'. Modelling work by Neve and collaborators has explored the basic
requirements for these strategies to work in reducing the evolution of
herbicide resistance. Selection pressure (in this case from glyphosate) is
clearly a major determinant of the probability and rate of evolution of
resistance. Reducing the use of this herbicide and retreating from a
system that relies totally on glyphosate-tolerant crop technology are key
requirements for sustainable management, but models have also clearly
demonstrated that management strategies that reduce glyphosate use at the
expense of overall levels of population control are counter-productive.
Despite the apparent reductions in selection pressure, the risk of
glyphosate resistance is elevated where weed population control is not
maintained, mainly because the mutation supply rate (the frequency of
beneficial mutations) for resistance is increased. Hence, underpinning
empirical research by Neve has provided insight into the genetics and
evolution of glyphosate resistance. Ongoing research, funded by Syngenta
(see section 3, Grant funding), has involved a postdoctoral researcher
within the Neve group. Current modelling research by the group is designed
to expand the context and application of these models by incorporating
quantitative genetic traits, fitness costs associated with resistance and
spatial aspects of the evolution of resistance. This modelling effort is
being complemented by a four-year BBSRC CASE studentship that is exploring
the molecular mechanisms, inheritance and fitness consequences of novel
resistance traits. This research has identified previously unreported
costs associated with resistance mechanisms conferred by massive levels of
gene amplification.
Warwick Staff
Dr Paul Neve, Assistant Professor, School of Life Sciences (2004
to present) has acted as the primary investigator on all grants
relating to this work, first conducting the modelling research and then
supervising postdoctoral researcher Melissa Bridges. Mr Andrew Mead,
Teaching Fellow, School of Life Sciences (1987 to present) has
provided statistical and modelling input to projects. Dr Melissa
Bridges, Post Doctoral Research Assistant, School of Life Sciences (2012
to present) worked on a Syngenta-funded glyphosate
resistance-modelling project.
Collaborators
Professor Jason Norsworthy, University of Arkansas, USA provided
expertise in biological and weed management inputs to the model and
disseminated modelling results to the agricultural industry in southern
USA. Professor Ken Smith, University of Arkansas, USA provided
expertise in chemical weed management in southern USA. Professor Mike
Owen, Iowa State University, USA provided expertise in weed
biological and weed management inputs to the model as well as
dissemination of modelling results to the agricultural industry in
mid-western USA. Mr Chuck Foresman, Dr Ian Zelaya, Dr
Deepak Kaundun and Dr Les Glasgow, Syngenta Crop Protection,
provided expert input on chemical weed management in genetically modified
herbicide-tolerant cropping systems in the USA.
References to the research
Peer-reviewed publications:
1. Neve P. et al. Modelling glyphosate resistance management
strategies for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in cotton. Weed
Technology (2011) Vol. 25, 335-343
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00171.1).
3. Neve P. Simulation modelling to understand the evolution and
management of glyphosate resistance in weeds. Pest Management Science
(2008) Vol. 64, 392-401
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.1495).
Grant funding:
1. Experimental evolution of resistance to herbicides in Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii. Leverhulme Trust, 2009-2013, Amount awarded £183,962
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/lifesci/research/weedecologyandmanagement/chlamydomonas/
2. Modelling evolution of glyphosate resistance in US cropping systems,
Syngenta Crop Protection, 2012-2014, £228,000
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/lifesci/research/weedecologyandmanagement/glyphosate/
3. Novel informed modelling approaches to investigate the evolution and
management of herbicide resistance in Alopecurus myosuroides,
BBSRC Industrial CASE studentship with Bayer Crop Science, 2011-2015,
(Grant Ref BB/I01652X/1) Amount awarded by BBSRC £91,932, amound awarded
by Bayer Crop Science £10,000
http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/pa/grants/AwardDetails.aspx?FundingReference=BB%2fI01652X%2f1
Details of the impact
Weeds present a major global challenge to food security, accounting for
more crop yield loss than both pests and diseases in many areas.
Glyphosate is the world's most important herbicide and genetically
modified glyphosate-tolerant (Roundup ReadyTM) crops are grown
on over 100 million hectares of land. A large increase in glyphosate use
occurred when Monsanto introduced Roundup Ready crops in the mid-1990s,
resulting in the widespread and often exclusive use of glyphosate for weed
control. These changing use patterns were accompanied by the widespread
evolution of glyphosate resistance in weeds, which is now estimated to
impact up to 60 million hectares of agricultural land. Neve's underpinning
research, modelling efforts and supporting data from subsequent fieldwork,
have increased our understanding of how herbicide resistance, and in
particular glyphosate resistance, evolve over time. Agritech companies
have traditionally used field trials to research the development of
herbicide resistance, but the limited success and lack of practicality of
this has led to large global companies such as Monsanto using Neve's more
efficient modelling approach (evidenced by letter of supporta).
The ability to assess hundreds of different management scenarios using
these modelling frameworks has ultimately resulted in recommendations for
the proactive management of glyphosate resistance. In particular, this
research has demonstrated that integrated weed management and the use of
herbicides with diverse modes of action can reduce the development of
glyphosate resistance. The disadvantages of over-reliance on genetically
modified glyphosate resistant crops and the need to adopt proactive
measures to mitigate the evolution of herbicide resistance have been made
clear. Modelling research has translated this knowledge and understanding
into practical `on the ground' management guidelines for farmers using
genetically-modified crops, including the adoption of more soil-residual
herbicides and the rotation of several modes of action (evidenced by
letter of supportb.
The results of this research have been widely and effectively
disseminated by Neve through interactions with US academics and the
agrichemical industry. In February 2008, Neve presented results to the
National Soybean Breeders Association in St. Louis, USA and to the
International Weed Science Congress in Vancouver, Canada. These
conferences, with over 500 delegates each, are attended by industry
representatives and academics. Many US academics have a role in outreach
and hence presentation to these audiences provides a very effective means
of ensuring that results are communicated to growers and their advisers.
During visits to the USA, Neve has frequently been interviewed by
specialist press outlets as well as taking part in field days and webinars
arranged for the press (evidenced by press coveragec-f). The
involvement of Professors Norsworthy and Smith from the University of
Arkansas has provided a way to communicate these results widely to farmers
in the areas worst affected by glyphosate-resistant weeds. Outreach
events, including workshops, field days and meetings, have enabled
important messages on the management of herbicide use to be conveyed to
thousands of producers, growers and consultants. The impact of this
extensive outreach work is substantial, with the current herbicide
recommendation for cotton, which is a "direct result" of Neve's
modelling work, being used on approximately 75% of cotton in the
mid-southern USA (evidenced by letter of supportf).
The results generated have been used internally and externally by Syngenta
to inform decisions related to marketing and product stewardship. The
research was nominated for a Syngenta research award. Syngenta and
Monsanto scientists and regulatory staff use modelling outputs to
demonstrate the value of resistance management to their marketing
departments. These recommendations have been formulated into product
stewardship recommendations that are widely disseminated at meetings and
conferences to growers, consultants and academics. Key personnel within
Syngenta and Monsanto are members of the Global Herbicide Resistance
Action Committee and results are also communicated through this platform
(evidenced by letter of supporta).
The evolution of resistance to herbicides is recognised as one of the
major threats to global food production, resulting in severe economic
hardship to farmers, loss of crop yield and a reduction in land values. In
extreme circumstances, where populations of weeds such as Palmer amaranth
get out of control, farmers must resort to hand weeding at an additional
cost of $50 to $100 per acre. More than 10 million acres of Roundup Ready
glyphosate-resistant cotton are planted in the USA each year. Over 150
million acres of corn and soybean are produced and results are currently
being extended to these cropping systems. Economic costs of evolved
glyphosate resistance are severe (evidenced by letter of supporth).
The herbicide models developed by Neve have provided new crop management
regimes to prevent evolution of resistance as well as providing evidence
recommending the benefit of more diverse, less environmentally harmful
integrated weed management.
As a result of development of these models and their application, Neve is
now recognised as a global expert on herbicide resistance management. He
is a member of the UK Weed Resistance Action Group and Chair of the
European Weed Research Society's working group on herbicide resistance,
both of which bring together famers, industry and government bodies to
coordinate management recommendations. Neve is regularly invited to speak
at a range of events, including industry meetings and multi-disciplinary
forums, such as the Global Herbicide Resistance Challenge International
Conference (Perth, February 2013).
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. Letter of Support; Global Herbicide Resistance Lead, Monsanto
(Identifier 1)
b. Letter of Support: Product Biology Herbicide Lead for Latin
America, Syngenta Crop Protection, Colombia (Identifier 2)
c. Press Article: Expert on resistant weeds researching Arkansas
case. Delta Farm Press (Aug 3, 2007)
http://deltafarmpress.com/expert-resistant-weeds-researching-arkansas-case
d. Press Article: Computer modeling shows importance of
early-season weed control in tackling resistance challenges. Delta
Farm Press (28 Dec 2012)
http://deltafarmpress.com/modeling-shows-importance-early-season-control-tackling-weed-resistance
e. Press Article: Looking for ways to beat the weeds. The New
York Times (16 Jul 2013)
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/16/science/earth/looking-for-ways-to-beat-the-weeds.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
f. Press Article: Weed worries won't wane. Crop Life (1
Mar 2012)
http://www.croplife.com/article/24935/weed-worries-won-t-wane
g. Letter of Support: Professor and Elms Farming Chair of Weed
Science, University of Arkansas (Identifier 3)
h. Letter of Support: Global R&D Crop Protection Lead-Corn,
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. (identifier 4)