H: Ovarian cryopreservation can restore fertility in women following cancer treatment that would otherwise irreversibly deny them children
Submitting Institution
University of EdinburghUnit of Assessment
Clinical MedicineSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
Summary of the impact
Impact: Health and welfare; policy and guidelines. Anderson and
colleagues demonstrated that cryopreservation of ovarian tissue could be
used for preservation of fertility following cancer therapy. This
step-change has been incorporated into guideline documents internationally
and has been adopted into clinical practice world-wide.
Significance: Ovarian tissue has been preserved from many hundreds
of women; this is now translating into a growing number of babies born
worldwide (currently 24 in nine countries).
Beneficiaries: Women at risk of fertility loss including
pre-pubertal girls newly diagnosed with cancer; clinicians; the NHS and
healthcare delivery organisations.
Attribution: The underpinning research was performed entirely at
UoE.
Reach: Worldwide: UK, Europe, US, Australia.
Underpinning research
Professors Richard Anderson (UoE, 1994-1997, Professor of Clinical
Reproductive Science, 2005-present), David Baird (Professor of
Reproductive Endocrinology, UoE, 1977-2000; now Emeritus) and W Hamish
Wallace (Honorary Professor of Paediatric Oncology, UoE, 2007-present)
were the first to show that ovarian tissue obtained laparoscopically could
be cryopreserved and used for fertility preservation in the context of
cancer therapy; leading ultimately to successful conception. This is a
step-change of profound significance to female survivors of cancer therapy
who would otherwise face a childless future.
The current use of cryopreservation of ovarian tissue to restore
fertility in women following cancer can be traced directly to the studies
carried out in Edinburgh by Dr Roger Gosden (Reader in Physiology, UoE,
1976-1994), Baird and colleagues using sheep as a model for human ovarian
function. The first publication of this approach in 1994 [3.1]
demonstrated that spontaneous ovarian cycles and fertility could be
restored by autotransplantation of ovarian cortex. Subsequent studies
(1994-1999) by Baird [3.2] investigated the long-term function of
frozen/thawed grafts up to 2 years after auto-transplantation,
highlighting the survival of primordial oocytes as key to success. This
procedure was introduced into clinical practice in Edinburgh in
collaboration with the Tissue Services directorate of Scottish National
Blood Transfusion Service (SNBTS) in 1997: the first clinical application
of this in the world.
Anderson, Baird and Wallace first demonstrated that this procedure using
minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery is also appropriate in
pre-pubertal girls and introduced this into clinical practice in a
research-based programme approach and decade-long case experience
described in [3.3, 3.4]. Their approach and criteria for patient selection
[3.3, 3.5] set an international standard.
Restoration of fertility by replacement of cryopreserved ovarian tissue
is not always appropriate, particularly if there are safety concerns
regarding malignant contamination of the tissue. This requires the
development of techniques for in vitro growth of early human ovarian
follicles, which has been pioneered by Professor Evelyn Telfer (Professor
of Reproductive Biology, UoE, 1992-present) and colleagues since 2005
[3.6]. Recent developments have demonstrated that follicles can be grown
from primordial stages right through to large antral stages, with oocytes
then matured further in vitro to metaphase II of meiosis (i.e., to a stage
at which they can be fertilised). This multi-stage protocol is
world-leading (reflected in numerous invitations of the researchers to
international meetings) and is being developed further with £610K MRC
funding. Safety in all aspects of assisted reproduction remains a key
concern: Wallace and colleagues recently demonstrated that children born
from assisted conception are not at increased risk of childhood cancer.
References to the research
3.2 Baird D, Webb R, Campbell B, Harkness L, Gosden R. Long term ovarian
function in sheep after ovariectomy and transplantation of autografts
stored at -196°C. Endocrinology. 1999;140:462-71. DOI:
10.1210/en.140.1.462.
3.3 Wallace W, Anderson R, Irvine D. Fertility preservation for young
patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet
Oncol. 2005;6:209-18. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70092-9.
3.4 Anderson R, Wallace W, Baird D. Ovarian cryopreservation for
fertility preservation: indications and outcomes. Reproduction.
2008;136:681-9. DOI: 10.1530/REP-08-0097.
3.5 Wallace W, Critchley H, Anderson R. Optimizing reproductive outcome
in children and young people with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3-5. DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2011.38.3877.
3.6 Telfer E, McLaughlin M, Ding C, Thong K. A two step serum free
culture system supports development of human oocytes form primordial
follicles in the presence of activin. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1151-8. DOI:
10.1093/humrep/den070.
Example Grant:
Telfer E, Anderson R, Thong, K. Activation of human ovarian follicles and
derivation of competent oocytes. MRC grant G0901839 July 2010 to Oct 2013;
£610,000.
Details of the impact
Impact on clinical practice
The first clinical application of transplanted frozen ovarian tissue was
in Edinburgh in 1993 and this led to an explosion of interest and activity
in this field around the world. The first human live birth was reported in
2004 from Belgium [5.1], using a procedure that exactly replicated the one
first validated in Edinburgh.
Since 2008, ovarian cryopreservation has become widespread in clinical
practice world-wide, and the term `oncofertility' is now in general use to
describe this developing clinical specialty, linking fertility
preservation and cancer treatment. Major centres of expertise and national
programmes operate in Europe (Denmark, Belgium, France, Spain, Israel and
Germany) and elsewhere (US, Australia). Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is
now regarded as a standard of care in the UK and elsewhere.
Clinical practice recommendations were published by the American Society
of Clinical Oncology (and updated in 2013 [5.2]) — on which guideline
group Wallace was the only UK representative — and led to the rapid
development of the field in the US. Both Anderson and Wallace have been
keynote guest speakers at the Oncofertility Consortium, founded in 2008
with funding from the National Institutes of Health to establish US
clinical care pathways and promote research in fertility preservation and
now covering 50 centres across the US.
While most of the impact has been in adult oncology, prepubertal and
adolescent girls have made up approximately one third of the patients for
whom ovarian tissue has been stored in Edinburgh and UoE remains the only
centre in the UK offering this clinical service. The UoE contribution in
paediatric oncology is widely recognised internationally with centres in
France and Denmark (and probably elsewhere) now offering this clinically
(e.g., [5.3]) with the team's approach widely adopted as indicated by 347
citations of reference [3.3].
Impact on public policy
Anderson and colleagues' pioneering contribution in this field is
recognised in Scottish (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
(SIGN), 2013), UK (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,
2013), Europe, and US (American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2008)
guideline documents [5.4-5.6], all of which cite the work of the Edinburgh
group. The importance of ovarian cryopreservation in girls is recognised
in the current SIGN guidance (2013), which states: `Cryopreservation of
ovarian tissue (within the context of a clinical trial) should be
considered in girls at high risk of premature ovarian insufficiency'
[5.5].
Anderson and Wallace were instrumental in establishing, and are key
members of, the International Society for Fertility Preservation (2009)
[5.7] and a task force for fertility preservation by the European Society
for Human Reproduction and Embryology (2010) [5.8], whose aims are to
develop ovarian tissue cryopreservation for much wider access to women
across Europe and worldwide.
In the UK, ovarian tissue storage requires a license from both the Human
Tissue Authority and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority
(HFEA). The Tissue and Cells Directorate of the Scottish National Blood
Transfusion Service in Edinburgh is currently the only tissue bank in the
UK with these licenses, although other centres (Oxford, Southampton) are
developing this. The UoE team's interactions with the HFEA helped develop
the latter's approach.
Impact on health and welfare
The cryopreservation of ovarian tissue has now been performed in many
hundreds of women and girls, initially in Europe and subsequently in the
USA, Australia and South Africa. Despite the time lag required to ensure
survival from their cancer, ovarian tissue has now been replaced in 60
women in three leading European centres (Denmark, Belgium and Spain) and
more elsewhere, and has resulted in a rapidly growing number of babies.
Twenty-four babies have now been born in nine countries around the world
since 2008 (Belgium, Denmark, Spain, Israel, France, Italy, Germany, USA,
Australia) [5.9, 5.10] and an increasing number of successful pregnancies
and new centres are reported every year.
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Donnez J, Dolmans M, Demylle D, et al. Livebirth after orthotopic
transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet.
2004;364:1405-10. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61172-6.
5.2 Loren A, Mangu P, Beck L, et al. Fertility preservation for patients
with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice
guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2500-10. DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2678.
5.3 Poirot C, Abirached F, Prades M, Coussieu C, Bernaudin F, Piver P.
Induction of puberty by autograft of cryopreserved ovarian tissue.
Lancet. 2012;379:588. DOI: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(11)61781-9.
5.4 NICE (2013): Assessment and treatment for people with fertility
problems. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/14078/62769/62769.pdf.
[Makes fertility preservation part of UK mainstream care (section
1.16).]
5.5 SIGN 132 (2013). Long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer.
http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign132.pdf.
Summarised by UoE authors in: Wallace W, Thompson L, Anderson R. Long
term follow-up of survivors of childhood cancer: summary of updated SIGN
guidance. BMJ. 2013;346:f1190. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f1190.
5.6 American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM Committee Opinion No.
405: ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation; 2008). Fertil Steril.
2008;90:S241-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert2008.08.039.
5.7 International Society for Fertility Preservation. http://www.isfp-fertility.org/.
5.8 ESHRE Task Force in Fertility Preservation. http://www.eshre.eu/Specialty-Groups/Task-forces/TF-Fertility-preservation.aspx.
5.9 Monash IVF, Australia (November 2012). "Monash IVF announces first
pregnancy in Australia from ovarian tissue freezing". http://monashivf.com/first-pregnancy-in-australia-from-ovarian-tissue-freezing/.
5.10 Donnez J, Dolmans M, Pellicer A, et al. Restoration of ovarian
activity and pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian
tissue: a review of 60 cases of reimplantation. Fertil Steril.
2013;99:1503-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert2013.03.030.