Driving Innovation in the Globalised ICT Ecosystem
Submitting Institution
University of EdinburghUnit of Assessment
Economics and EconometricsSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Information and Computing Sciences: Information Systems
Economics: Applied Economics
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
The integrated conceptual framework developed (1993-) by Martin Fransman
has influenced the way policy makers, regulators and analysts understand
the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector — the most
important driver of productivity and global economic growth since 1945. It
has improved their appreciation of how innovation happens, while
explaining why different countries and companies have been winners/losers
as the sector has evolved under conditions of globalisation. His framework
has been used to formulate integrated development policies in
telecommunications and science & technology in the UK, Brazil, South
Korea, Thailand and Vietnam, and has guided the construction of global
innovation ecosystems by several Japanese companies.
Underpinning research
Context: In addition to having been a member of University of
Edinburgh Economics for 35 years, Fransman is founder and Director of
the Institute for Japanese-European Technology Studies (JETS) at the
University of Edinburgh. JETS' establishment was sponsored by the
Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry and the UK DTI,
with financial support from NEC (¥ 40 million), Fujitsu (¥ 60 million)
and the Lothian Regional Council (£120,000).
Following years of field research carried out in Japan, Korea, Taiwan,
France and in the US - using JETS as his base — Fransman developed
an integrated conceptual framework that facilitates the analysis of the
dynamics of the ICT sector (semiconductors, hardware and software,
telecommunications, consumer electronics, the Internet, new media) with
important implications for government policy makers, regulators, analysts
and companies. This framework is based on the notion of an evolving
innovation ecosystem of groups of competing and cooperating "players" who
innovate through their symbiotic interactions and co-evolve with their
environment. In the ICT Sector players are situated in four layers:
Layer 1 — equipment providers;
Layer 2 — network operators;
Layer 3 — platform, content and applications providers;
Layer 4 — final consumers.
Players interact with players in the other layers, producing six
symbiotic relationships. It is through these that innovation happens as
players learn their own and others' needs and potential and respond to
them. Innovation, in turn, drives the evolution of the ecosystem
generating the variety that, together with the system's selection
mechanisms, fuels the process of Schumpeterian creation-destruction.
As innovation is the main driver of performance, how it happens in the
ecosystem as a whole is of particular interest. Fransman's research showed
that in 2004-08 84% of the R&D engine was located in Layer 1. However,
it is the network operators in Layer 2 who provide the bulk of investment
(67%) in the ecosystem. Understanding such characteristics of the ICT
Ecosystem helps policy-makers and regulators appreciate the likely
consequences of hypothetical measures.
Although firms are the engine of the ecosystem, universities, public
research institutes, financial and legal institutions are also important
determinants of its performance. The implications for policy making are
substantial. Most countries have science, technology and innovation
programmes, strategies and plans. How do these areas fit together and how
should policy makers evaluate policy options? The concept of an innovation
ecosystem provides a holistic method to analyse strengths/weaknesses and
to design optimal policies.
As an illustration, extract the ICT companies (about 50) from the Financial
Times Top 500. Divide them into Layers 1 to 3 and into regions. Some
key puzzles emerge: why does the US almost completely dominate Layer 3?
Why are Europe and Asia hardly present in this layer? Why is Layer 1
dominated by US and Asian companies with Europe becoming weaker and
weaker? Why is Layer 3 growing far more rapidly than Layer 1 and why is it
more profitable? Fransman's framework highlights these puzzles and it also
gives an insight into where the answers lie.
References to the research
Fransman, M. (2010) The New ICT Ecosystem: Implications for Policy
and Regulation. (Cambridge University Press) revised, second edition
of the book published by Kokoro (2007): The New ICT Ecosystem:
Implications for Europe, which was awarded the biennial Joseph
Schumpeter Prize in 2010. ISBN-10: 0-521-17120-2
Fransman, M. (2002) Telecoms in the Internet Age: From Boom to Bust
to ...? (Oxford University Press) winner of the Wadsworth
Prize 2003 as the year's best business history book
published in the UK. ISBN: 0-19-925700-0
Fransman, M. (1995) Japan's Computer and Communications Industry: The
Evolution of Industrial Giants and Global Competitiveness (Oxford
University Press). ISBN: 0-19-823333-7
Details of the impact
Following the high visibility of his books on the ICT sector (including
prizes and extensive press reviews) Fransman was sought after by
governments and international organisations, receiving numerous
invitations to give lectures, briefings and face-to-face discussions with
policy makers around the world.
The wide dissemination of Fransman's ideas and expertise has given his
research an international reach, influencing policy makers, regulators and
companies in the ICT sector across the world. It has impacted the OECD,
the UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, as well as
governments and firms in Brazil, China, Japan, South Africa, South Korea,
Thailand and Vietnam.
The impact has been of two types. First, Fransman's research furnished
policy makers and managers with a better understanding of the
relationships and interdependencies among the subcomponents of the ICT
Ecosystem. This contributed to better strategies even in developed
countries, such as those in the OECD:
"...the project that you undertook for the OECD on innovation in the ICT
sector...has been very useful in our internal discussions. Your work in
this area has helped in our deliberations on innovation." [see 5.1 below]
or in OFCOM of the UK:
"...Professor Fransman's work is well-known and respected amongst the
telecommunications regulatory and policy community in the UK... his
theorising in relation to what he characterised as the "ICT ecosystem" and
the consequential implications for industry and policy-makers as the
convergence between telecommunications, broadcasting and computing
continues to transform these industries. I have drawn on his work in
developing strategic analysis of the sectors Ofcom regulates..." [5.2]
Second, Fransman's research impacted policy-making and regulation in
developing countries through its implications for science, technology and
innovation (ST&I) strategy.
Vietnam provides a good example of this. Fransman visited the
country on three occasions in the 1990s funded by the Ministry of S&T,
the British Council, and the Canadian government, respectively. With his
new ecosystem theory fully developed, in 2011 he returned to Vietnam as a
member of the International Advisory Board appointed by UNIDO to advise
the Ministry of S&T on their ST&I Strategy, 2011-2020. He gave the
main presentation to the Council for S&T Policy, which reports to the
Prime Minister. Evidence of his recent impact is provided in the statement
by a leading member of the Vietnamese government:
"... the work of Professor Martin Fransman has been studied in our
organisations and used widely in the domain of S&T&I [by] policy
makers in Vietnam. ...[he] has been instrumental in shaping [the] thinking
of Vietnamese policy makers for [the] new S&T Strategy to 2010 while
working with [the] Ministry of S&T of Vietnam... His contribution was
valuable for [the] revision of [the] new Strategy for Vietnam in science,
technology and innovation up to 2020." [5.3]
Another recent example is South Korea. In November 2011 he gave
the lead-in keynote address to the global conference organised by the
Korea Information Society Development Institute as part of the process of
developing Korea's future strategy for its ICT sector. The conference was
based around Fransman's concept of the ICT Ecosystem.
In April 2012 Fransman was invited to address the Japanese
Techno-Economic Society (JATES) on the topic, "What should Japan do to
Survive and Thrive in the Evolving Global Economy?" JATES' membership
includes the Chief Technology Officers of many of Japan's leading
companies. We have the following testimonial:
"He has given us insights over the years that have helped us shape our
ideas about the future of telecommunications regulation, stimulated our
academic thinking, and helped us in formulating advice to Japanese
industry and the public sector... his works have had a broad impact on the
Japanese ICT sector. Recently his ideas about the ICT Ecosystem have been
influential in advancing my colleagues' thinking... the notion of an
ecosystem as Professor Fransman describes is becoming an accepted concept
in business circles [in Japan]." [5.4]
The Chinese edition of his book Japan's Computer and
Communications Industry not only increased the reach of his
research, but also lead to further impact:
"... the book is very popular not only among scholars but also policy
makers... More recently, his layers' model of the ICT sector has greatly
helped [our] thinking about local Chinese firms' rapid development of
technological capabilities and competitiveness." [5.5]
In the wake of his pivotal influence overseas, in 2012 Fransman was
invited by the UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills to
join the newly formed UK-China Innovation Network. This body advises the
UK government on the implementation of its agreements with the Chinese
government in the area of ST&I.
Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1. Head of Division Directorate for Science, Technology, and Industry,
OECD. Corroborates the quote in Section 4, full statement on file.
5.2. Former Competition Policy Director, OFCOM UK. Corroborates the quote
in Section 4, full statement on file.
5.3. Director of the Secretariat of the National Council for Science and
Technology Policy, Assistant to the S&T Minister, Vietnam.
Corroborates the quote in Section 4, full statement on file.
5.4. Executive Research Fellow, Centre for Global Communications, Tokyo,
Japan. Corroborates the quote in Section 4, full statement on file.
5.5. Vice Chair, Department of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Tsinghua
University, China. Corroborates the quote in Section 4, full statement on
file.