Case Study 6: Delivering the Good Governance Framework of the Scottish Health Informatics Programme (SHIP)
Submitting Institution
University of EdinburghUnit of Assessment
LawSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
Research on health information governance conducted by Laurie (2009-2013)
resulted in a
transformed and streamlined regulatory environment across Scotland through
design and
implementation of a state-of-the-art good governance framework for the
Scottish Health
Informatics Programme (SHIP). This interdisciplinary consortium promotes
the facilitation of
health-related research through data linkage to deliver new health
benefits to current and future
generations. Laurie's work overcame regulatory hurdles to effective data
linkage and put in place
a framework that has been widely adopted and endorsed by NHS stakeholders,
researchers, data
custodians and publics, as well as the Scottish Government in its
cross-sectoral data linkage
agenda.
Underpinning research
The ability to link health and health-related data is widely acknowledged
to be essential to
understanding disease processes, drug development and monitoring, and
health improvement.
This includes data from human tissues held in collections (biobanks). The
legal basis for such
practices has, however, been a matter of considerable dispute particularly
in the absence of
explicit consent from patients. While England & Wales have pursued a
legislative route to allow
linkages, the same is not true in Scotland. The concern among the research
community has been
a lack of clarity about the role of consent and the increasing regulatory
burden in linkage and
access procedures. Laurie's work tackles the myths and rhetoric of consent
as well as the
challenge of reducing regulatory burden. It confronts the pre-existing
paradigm of `consent or
anonymise' applied to research on patient data and tissues, demonstrating
that this approach is
neither necessary nor sufficient in a robust governance framework that
promotes responsible data
linkage under a well-defined public interest mandate.
These research findings stem from two overlapping projects on which
Laurie served as legal lead
and Co-Investigator responsible for information governance dimensions
(2009-2013, section 3).
The Scottish Health Informatics Programme (SHIP) built a world-leading and
state-of-the-art
infrastructure to facilitate the use of health-related records in medical
research through an
interdisciplinary collaboration involving the Universities of Dundee,
Edinburgh, Glasgow and St
Andrews, NHS Scotland and National Records Scotland. It was successfully
launched in 2012.
Laurie (appointed to Edinburgh in 1995) was responsible for the ethics,
law and governance
stream and worked with Sethi (Edinburgh Law Research Fellow) and
Cunningham-Burley and
Pagliari (Edinburgh, examining public engagement dimensions of SHIP).
Initial scoping studies on
existing legal landscapes and their inherent hurdles (3.1) were used to
engage the consortium, the
public, regulators, and medical researchers wishing to link data — the key
research users of the
programme. Parallel work on Reconsent to Research (3.3) was also fed into
the design of SHIP's
Good Governance Framework (GGF).
The research outputs argued that:
- It is important to understand and communicate the role and limits of
consent as a regulatory
mechanism and to exploit fully other legal mechanisms, such as public
interest, to legitimate data
linkage (3.1 and 3.3);
- It is necessary to consider the value of principles and best practices
in informing decision-making
within legal architectures when careful judgement and discretion are
required (articulated
in the GGF) (3.4);
- There is a need to elucidate mechanisms of proportionate and reflexive
governance to reduce
regulatory burden and enhance regulatory response (3.2 and 3.5);
- There is value in the design of a risk-assessment matrix to streamline
approval mechanisms
with respect to applications to conduct research by linkage of patient
data (3.4 and 3.5);
- It is crucial to involve robust public engagement exercises to deliver
good governance design in
ways that can engender and maintain public trust (3.1 and 3.3).
References to the research
Grants
`Scottish Health Informatics Programme' (Wellcome Trust Grant Ref No.
8211, PI: Andrew Morris,
University of Dundee; 2009-2013). £3,577,430 in total with £630,126 to the
University of
Edinburgh for information governance and public engagement (Laurie as
lead).
`Reconsent to Research: View of Participants' (Wellcome Trust Grant
WT097093MA, PI: M Dixon-Woods,
University of Leicester; 2012-13, extended to 2014. Laurie (Edinburgh)
Co-I with P Burton,
M Murtagh, C Tarrant and S Wallace (Leicester). £39,771 in total with
£7,500 to Edinburgh for
legal research.
Publications
(3.2) G Laurie, `Reflexive Governance in Biobanking: On the Value of
Policy Led Approaches and
the Need to Recognise the Limits of Law' (2011) 130 Human Genetics 347-56
[doi:
10.1007/s00439-011-1066-x]
(3.3) G Laurie and E Postan, `Rhetoric or Reality: What is the Legal
Status of the Consent Form in
Health-related Research?' (2013) 21 (Summer) Medical Law Review 371-414
[doi:
10.1093/medlaw/fws031]
(3.4) G Laurie and N Sethi, `Towards Principle-based Approaches to
Governance of Health-related
Research using Personal Data' (2013) 4 European Journal of Risk Regulation
43-57 [to be
supplied by HEI on request]
(3.5) N Sethi and G Laurie, `Delivering Proportionate Governance in the
Era of eHealth' (2013) 13
Medical Law International [doi:10.1177/0968533213508974]
Details of the impact
The research findings were used by Laurie to design, test and implement
the Good Governance
Framework (GGF) for SHIP. This is based on a series of principles and
instances of best practice.
The GGF was successfully launched in 2012.
The principal users of the GGF are: (i) custodians of health data, such
as NHS Scotland, National
Records Scotland (NRS), and Caldicott Guardians with special remit for
patient confidential data,
and (ii) medical and statistical researchers seeking to link data. All
were involved in the design of
the GGF. Accordingly, the impact can be considered (1) at the level of the
governance community,
and (2) at the level of the researcher community (5.1, 5.2 and 5.3). A
central feature of the claim to
impact has been success in overcoming a prevailing `culture of caution'
concerning data linkages.
There are three elements to impact.
(1) Impact on the governance community
Laurie was uniquely placed to act as a conduit between the academy and
the governance
environment because of his position as Chair of the Privacy Advisory
Committee (2005-2013)
(5.7). Scottish Chief Scientist (Health), Professor Andrew Morris, has
said: `In concrete terms,
Laurie's research since 2009 led to the adoption of entirely novel
proportionate governance
mechanisms by key data linkage decision-making bodies within Scotland,
such as the Privacy
Advisory Committee which acts as sole advisor to NHS National Services
Scotland and National
Records of Scotland — two of the largest and most influential data
custodians in the country. This
has resulted not only in faster turn-around times for linkage approvals,
but also to greater
transparency and accountability of the governance systems, leading — we
believe — to more trust in
health-related research as a crucial dimension of public benefit and
economic growth in Scotland.
These changes have been directly instrumental in securing Scotland's
position as a Go-To country
for safe, secure and effective health-research' (5.1).
(2) Impact on the health researcher community
The implementation of the SHIP GGF delivers faster, more transparent and
consistent access to
researchers, within and beyond the NHS. Furthermore, the research
identified an unmet need for
training on the legal, ethical and governance issues related to data
sharing in medical research.
This resulted in the design and delivery of an online training module to
accredited researchers to
use SHIP. This was piloted by Laurie and Sethi with twenty members of the
active research
community in March 2012 and launched in the same year. It has since
accredited 56 researchers
(5.8 and 5.9).
Dr Hester Ward, Medical Director in NHS Scotland National Services said:
`The online SHIP
Information Governance Training Course, which was developed by Professor
Laurie and
colleagues, has become integral to the process of becoming a "SHIP
approved researcher".
Completion of this course helps NSS to ensure that only "safe people" who
have been trained
appropriately and understand their legal obligations, gain access to
sensitive information.
Professor Laurie's work has helped NSS to both develop our information
governance processes
and ensure that researchers are aware of their legal obligations. These
contributions have had a
significant impact on making sure that research, which is in the public
interest takes place, whilst
also ensuring the ongoing maintenance of the privacy of citizens'
information' (5.2). Since
deployment of the GGF and to 31 July 2013, NHS Scotland National Services
had received 344
applications for data linkage to be subject to the GGF proportionate
approach.
(3) Impact beyond the health sector
The GGF has been recognised for its transferable value as a model to
promote data linkage and
key features have been taken up outside the health sector. The Scottish
Government public
consultation on a proposal for a National Data Linkage Centre focused on
the founding principles
for the Centre. These were directly taken and adapted from the Principles
and Best Practices
developed by Laurie (5.4, 5.5, and 5.6).
According to Dr Sara Grainger, Head of Statistics Policy, Scottish
Government: `The arguments
set out by Professor Laurie and colleagues in the SHIP Working Papers on
Good Governance
formed a crucial part of the evidence-base used in developing Scottish
Government policy on data
access and analysis, published in November 2012 as "Joined Up Data for
Better Decisions". The
specific influence can be seen in what is now Scottish Government policy
to encourage all public
bodies to a) adopt a more proportionate approach to managing the risks
associated with data
sharing and linkage and b) place more emphasis on safe people and safe
environments, rather
than over-reliance on consent and anonymisation (safe data)' (5.3).
Sources to corroborate the impact
(5.1) Testimonial from Chief Scientist (Health), Scottish Government;
also PI on SHIP initiative [to
be supplied by HEI on request]. Can corroborate the central importance of
the research in driving
iterative design of the good governance framework and its eventually
adopted within NHS
Scotland and by Scottish Government.
(5.2) Testimonial from Medical Director in NHS Scotland National Services
[to be supplied by HEI
on request]. Can corroborate the direct influence of the research in
delivering proportionate
governance of data linkage for research within NHS Scotland, as well as
the introduction of
training and accreditation of third parties those wishing to access and
link NHS-held data.
(5.3) Testimonial from Head of Statistics Policy, Office of the Chief
Statistician and Performance,
Scottish Government [to be supplied by HEI on request]. Can corroborate
the extended reach of
the research through its uptake and influence on government policy in
implementing a nation-wide
cross-sectoral data linkage initiative.
(5.4) Scottish Government Consultation based heavily on Laurie's
Principles:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2012/03/3260/4
or http://tinyurl.com/nepbmfq.
Provides
direct public acknowledgement of the influence of the research on the
government consultation
process.
(5.5) Scottish Government Strategy and Guiding Principles for Data
Linkage acknowledging
impact of Laurie's research (ISBN: 9781782562047):
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2012/11/9015/1
or http://tinyurl.com/nw52myj.
Provides
direct public acknowledgement of the influence of the research on the
principles that underpin the
government nation-wide cross-sectoral data linkage initiative.
(5.6) SHIP website with reports on progress (http://www.scot-ship.ac.uk/progress-reports
or
http://tinyurl.com/pawlhfc)
provides evidence of the central role of the research in the iterative
design of the SHIP good governance framework that was eventually adopted
within and beyond
NHS Scotland.
(5.7) Privacy Advisory Committee website and details of changes in
working practices:
http://www.nhsnss.org/pages/corporate/privacy_advisory_committee.php
or
http://tinyurl.com/llvkson.
Provides evidence of the direct adoption of the notion of proportionate
governance by a central body within the regulatory landscape, directly as
a result of the
underpinning research.
(5.8) Access to the SHIP online training module, which clearly
incorporates the GGF:
http://www.scot-ship-toolkit.org.uk/
or http://tinyurl.com/lov77rj.
Provides evidence of the nature
and scope of the training and accreditation scheme that operates to
improve standards for health
data linkage for any third parties, national or international, seeking
access to health data.
(5.9) Link to SHIP public-facing video: http://www.scot-ship.ac.uk/public-interest
or
http://tinyurl.com/onr2c4c.
Provides an illustration of the changes that have been brought about as
a result of the research in delivering effective and streamlined
governance mechanisms, and
explains these to health researchers and the public in an accessible
manner.