1. Life After Stroke-Influence of Physical Fitness and Exercise
Submitting Institution
University of EdinburghUnit of Assessment
Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and TourismSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences
Summary of the impact
Every year 15 million people worldwide experience a stroke. Of these, 5
million die and 5 million
are permanently disabled. Life after stroke is never the same for many
survivors. The research by
Mead and Saunders from 2001 to 2012 has demonstrated that exercise
training improves the
physical fitness and physical function of stroke survivors and thus
improves their quality of life.
The research has influenced health policy by underpinning the production
of National Clinical
Guidelines for stroke in the UK (NHS England & Scotland) and
internationally (Australia, NZ,
Canada). It has also been used to design and develop exercise after stroke
services which have
been implemented in the UK since 2007.
Underpinning research
Physical fitness is reduced after stroke. Impaired fitness is associated
with post-stroke disability.
Many stroke survivors require rehabilitation, but fitness training was not
included in most
programmes.
This programme of research has:
- developed a rationale for physical fitness training after stroke;
- examined the evidence of effect for whether exercise is beneficial
after stroke; and
- explored the barriers and motivators for stroke survivors to
participate in exercise.
The key evidence was produced by Professor Gillian Mead and Dr David
Saunders (both at the
University of Edinburgh since 2001).
The methods used include observational studies, systematic reviews (which
collate all available
high-quality evidence), and meta-analyses which determine statistically
the various effects of
exercise after stroke. This research is designed to generate
recommendations for evidence-based
practice (and research).
a) Developing the rationale for exercise after stroke
Systematic review methodology demonstrated that aerobic fitness is
substantially impaired after
stroke (1). This is important because low aerobic fitness is likely to
increase the risk of recurrent
stroke and exacerbate post-stroke disability. Original research (2) showed
that impaired muscle
power in the lower limb unaffected by stroke is associated with important
functional impairments
e.g. time taken to rise from a chair. Furthermore, impaired lower limb
muscle power is associated
with fatigue (3), which affects about 40% of stroke survivors and is one
of the most distressing
post-stroke symptoms. These observational data justify the testing of
exercise training
interventions to improve physical function and disability after stroke.
b) Synthesis and meta-analysis of evidence for physical fitness
training after stroke
The principal research outputs are a series of systematic reviews
produced in association with the
Cochrane Collaboration (`Physical fitness training for stroke patients';
3, 4). These systematic
reviews and meta-analyses synthesised all available evidence from clinical
trials of exercise
training after stroke in order to determine whether exercise interventions
are beneficial for people
with stroke. Individual clinical trials generally do not provide adequate
evidence to form clinical
guidelines for exercise after stroke, whilst meta-analyses provide the
best level of evidence to
answer clinical questions like these. For the last 10 years Mead and
Saunders have led the
production and updating of this body of evidence.
These meta-analyses have identified the effects of physical fitness
training for patients. For
example, cardiorespiratory training leads to clinically important
improvements in mobility in stroke
patients when provided as part of their rehabilitation. This is important
because mobility is an
outcome which is valued by stroke patients themselves. The evidence from
the systematic reviews
and meta-analyses is of sufficiently high quality to justify the inclusion
of exercise training into
rehabilitation of stroke survivors.
Our research programme has also focussed on the implementation of this
evidence in practice.
For example, a systematic review found that key barriers to exercise were
lack of motivation,
environmental factors (e.g. transport), health concerns, and stroke
impairments; and the key
motivators were social support and the need to be able to perform daily
tasks (5).
References to the research
The role of physical fitness after stroke
1. Smith, A. C., Saunders, D. H. and Mead, G. (2012), Cardiorespiratory
fitness after stroke: a
systematic review. International Journal of Stroke, 7: 499-510. In REF 2
(Mead).
2. Saunders,D.H., Greig,C.A., Young,A., & Mead,G.E. (2008)
Association of Activity Limitations
and Lower-Limb Explosive Extensor Power in Ambulatory People With Stroke.
Archives of
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 89, 677-683. In REF 2 (Saunders).
Physical fitness training interventions after stroke
3. Saunders DH, Greig CA, Mead GE, Young A. Physical fitness training for
stroke patients.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003316. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub3
4. Brazzelli M, Saunders DH, Greig CA, Mead GE. Physical fitness training
for stroke patients.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 11. Art. No.:
CD003316. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub4
5. Nicholson, S., Sniehotta, F. F., van Wijck, F., Greig, C. A.,
Johnston, M.,McMurdo, M. E. T.,
Dennis, M. and Mead, G. E. (2012), A systematic review of perceived
barriers and motivators
to physical activity after stroke. International Journal of Stroke. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00880.x
Details of the impact
This research has influenced policy and practice in the UK and
internationally by contributing to
clinical guidelines and through training with health and exercise
professionals working with stroke
survivors.
The Cochrane Review on fitness after stroke: influencing clinical
practice
Cochrane systematic reviews help providers, practitioners and patients
make informed decisions
about health care, and are the most comprehensive, reliable and relevant
source of evidence (The
Cochrane Collaboration http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews).
The 2012 update of our Cochrane systematic review of fitness training
(Brazzelli et al. 2012) is the
4th most cited Cochrane review about stroke and the 7th most accessed
Cochrane review (2,164
full-text accesses during 2011) about stroke (5.1. Source: The Cochrane
Library Impact Data
Pack, 2011). One of the world's leading stroke journals `Stroke', aimed at
a clinical audience,
invited us to write summaries of each review (5.2).
The Cochrane review evidence directly informed clinical practice via the
following National Clinical
Guidelines for stroke:
i) Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) clinical
guideline for management of stroke
patients in Scotland, SIGN 118 (2010) (5.3)
Our review was part of the evidence labelled as 1++ (i.e. high quality
meta-analyses, systematic
reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a very low risk of bias). The evidence
resulted in the following
recommendation:
`Gait-oriented physical fitness training should be offered to all
patients assessed as medically
stable and functionally safe to participate, when the goal of treatment is
to improve functional
ambulation' (SIGN 118; Item 4.2.8 p17)
ii) Royal College of Physicians (RCP) Intercollegiate Stroke Working
Party. National clinical
guideline for stroke (2012) (5.4)
Our Cochrane reviews (Saunders et al. 2009; Brazzelli et al. 2011) are
cited as evidence to
support the recommendation:
`After stroke, patients should participate in exercise with the aim of
improving aerobic fitness
and/or muscle strength unless there are contraindications.' (RCP 2012;
Item 6.6 p82-83)
This evidence addresses a `patient-important' outcome (walking) with
large `reach' in terms of
numbers of patients (`all patients').
iii) NICE guideline. Stroke rehabilitation. Long-term rehabilitation
after stroke. Guideline 162 (23rd
May 2013). The Cochrane review (Brazzelli et al 2012) is cited as evidence
to recommend
exercise training is incorporated into the rehabilitation of stroke
survivors. (5.5).
iv) Best Practice Guidance for the Development of Exercise after
Stroke Services in Community
Settings" (Best et al 2010, www.exerciseafterstroke.org.uk).
The Scottish Government funded the development of this guidance to
increase Scottish provision
of Exercise after Stroke services. This guidance cites Saunders et al 2009
as evidence for fitness
training, and to guide the optimum type and frequency of training.
The guidance (http://www.exerciseafterstroke.org.uk/ (5.6)) has been
accessed over 15,000 times
on this website between 2009 and 2013. 50% of clicks on the main page
relate to `information for
professionals, which shows the demand for the guidance is high. The
guidance is also cited on the
UK Stroke Improvement website:
(http://www.improvement.nhs.uk/stroke/CommunityStrokeResource/CSRLifeafterstroke/CSRLifeafterstrokeexercisepoststroke/tabid/226/Default.aspx).
v) The Cochrane reviews Saunders et al (2009) and Brazzelli et al (2011)
are cited as evidence in
clinical guidance around the world (5.7); for example
- Australian National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management (2010)
- New Zealand Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management (2010)
- Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care (2011-2013)
Informs Training & Knowledge of Practitioners
The research forms key chapters in `Exercise and Fitness Training after
Stroke A handbook for
evidence-based practice' (Eds. Mead and van Wijck 2012). The book was
conceived to enable
health professionals to design and deliver safe and effective exercise
programmes for stroke
survivors. The book outlines the underpinning evidence (including research
by Mead and
Saunders) then describes how to translate this research into practice.
Between November 2012
and July 2013, 652 copies had been sold (5.8).
Informs Training Course for Practitioners`Exercise and
Fitness Training after Stroke'
The research is a key part of the evidence base for the only UK course
for exercise professionals
that has received professional endorsement from SkillsActive (Sector
Skills Council for Active
Leisure, Learning and Well-being): The course is endorsed by UK Stroke
Forum for training,
approved by Chartered Society for Physiotherapists. It is delivered
commercially in the UK by
LaterLifeTraining (5.9). By December 2012 over 170 exercise practitioners
were qualified and a
further 50 are in training. This course is recommend in NHS action plans
as follows:
`NHS Boards, through their stroke MCNs, should continue to work with
leisure industry
representatives to make best use of the new training course [Exercise
After Stroke] to improve
access to exercise and fitness training for people with stroke in their
area.'
"Better Heart Disease and Stroke Care Action Plan" (NHS Scotland,
2009). (5.10)
Sources to corroborate the impact
Webpages have been archived at: https://www.wiki.ed.ac.uk/display/REF2014REF3B/UoA+26
5.1 The Cochrane Stroke Group Impact Data Pack (2011)
http://www.dcn.ed.ac.uk/csrg/entity/stroke.pdf
Corroborates that Fitness after Stroke was the 4th most cited and 7th
most accessed
Cochrane review on stroke in 2011.
5.2 Brazzelli, M., Saunders, D. H., Greig, C. A., & Mead, G. E.
(2012). Physical Fitness Training
for Patients With Stroke Updated Review. Stroke, 43(4), e39-e40.
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/43/4/e39.short
5.3 Smith, L. (Chair.) et al. (2010) Management of Patients With Stroke:
Rehabilitation, Prevention
and Management of Complications, and Discharge Planning: a National
Clinical Guideline.
Series: SIGN publication, 118. SIGN. ISBN 9781905813636
http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign118.pdf
(cited section 4.2.8 p17)
5.4 Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for
stroke, 4th edition. London:
Royal College of Physicians (RCP), 2012. (cited section 6.6 `Exercise;
pages 82-83)
http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/national-clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-fourth-edition.pdf
5.5 National Clinical Guideline Centre. Stroke Rehabilitation Long term
rehabilitation after stroke
Clinical guideline 162 Methods, evidence and recommendations 29 May 2013
(http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/14182/64094/64094.pdf,
accessed 16.7.13) Brazzelli et
al is cited on page 339. Pages 340 to 397 cite the trials included in the
review.
5.6 Best C, van Wijck F, Dinan-Young S, Dennis J, Smith M, Fraser H,
Donaghy M, Mead G. Best
Practice Guidance for the Development of Exercise after Stroke Services in
Community
Settings 2010. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.
http://www.exerciseafterstroke.org.uk/resources/Exercise_After_Stroke_Guidelines.pdf
5.7 International sources
National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management
(2010). Melbourne
Australia. ISSBN0-978-0-9805933-3-4
http://strokefoundation.com.au/site/media/clinical_guidelines_stroke_managment_2010_interactive.pdf
Stroke Foundation of New Zealand and New Zealand Guidelines Group.
Clinical Guidelines for
Stroke Management 2010. Wellington: Stroke Foundation of New Zealand
(2010).
http://www.stroke.org.nz/resources/NZClinicalGuidelinesStrokeManagement2010ActiveConten
ts.pdf
5.8 Mead G.E., van Wijck F. & Donaghy M. (2012) Exercise after
stroke: a handbook for evidence-based
practice. Elsevier ISBN 978 0 7020 4338 3. Supplied on request.
Chapter 4: Saunders D.H. & Greig C.A. Fitness and function after
stroke. Pages 77-91
Chapter 5: Mead G.E. & Saunders D.H. Evidence for exercise training
after stroke.
Pages 93-107
For further information on how the research informs training and
knowledge of practitioners,
contact Institute for Applied Health Research and School of Health,
Glasgow Caledonian
University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA
5.9 `Exercise and Fitness Training after Stroke' course delivered by
LaterLifeTraining
http://www.laterlifetraining.co.uk/courses/exercise-for-stroke-instructor/
Contact: info@laterlifetraining.co.uk
5.10 "Better Heart Disease and Stroke Care Action Plan" (NHS Scotland,
2009).
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/06/29102453/2.
Summary of action; number 5.40