British Productivity Measurement and Pro-growth Policymaking
Submitting Institution
University of WarwickUnit of Assessment
Economics and EconometricsSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Economic Theory, Applied Economics
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
    Professors of Economic History Steven Broadberry and Nicholas Crafts
      benchmarked historical
      British productivity performance against other modern economies and
      determined the factors
      which most influenced productivity growth, highlighting the important
      roles played by supply-side
        policies including education, innovation, competition, and labour
      relations policies. Their research
      has impacted both public and policymaker understanding of pro-growth
      responses the current
      government could make to the 2008 financial crisis. Their findings
      underpinned many Thatcher
      government policies and supported the retention of these policies by
      governments that followed.
    Underpinning research
    Broadberry and Crafts' expertise in the history of British economic
      growth has had a sustained
      impact on policy making, most visible in New Labour policies of the 1990s
      and in post-2008
      policies.
    In a series of articles spanning 20 years, Broadberry and, especially,
      Crafts, analysed post-war
      British productivity performance, benchmarking it against other modern
      economies, and
      investigated the micro-economic foundations of differential growth
      outcomes. Based on this
      research, they articulated "supply-side" policies designed to foster
      economic growth.1
    Bean and Crafts (1996) documented the decline in British productivity
      relative to a 12-country peer
      group between 1950 and 1973. Their research revealed Britain's relative
      economic decline to be
      due to low investment and low total-factor productivity (TFP) growth,
      probably because of shortfalls
      in workforce training and a lack of product and process innovation. They
      further found that
      fragmented bargaining and the frequent presence of multiple unions reduced
      TFP growth in the
      period. These findings were confirmed in Broadberry and Crafts (1996),
      which analysed patterns in
      labour productivity in the manufacturing sector and found that British
      manufacturing suffered from a
      lack of human capital formation and that British industrial relations
      induced "overmanning" and a
      failure to obtain the full productivity gains from new technology.
    Broadberry and Crafts (2003), citing 19 papers by one or both of the
      authors, summarise their
      research between 1992 and 2003 to conclude that British productivity
      growth was lower than it
      could have been between 1950 and 1973 by about 1 per cent, causing Britain
      to fall behind other
      European countries (notably West Germany) in manufacturing and services.
      It confirmed that this
      poor performance was driven particularly by poor British labour relations
      and a lack of competition
      in British product markets.
    This research was noted for its early advocacy of policies that are now
      common in pro-growth
      economic reforms. For example, Crafts (1996) recommended policies (1) to
      stimulate investment,
      (2) to enhance workforce skills acquisition, e.g. by investing in
      education, (3) to promote
      innovation, (4) to enhance appropriability through the reform of corporate
      law and regulation, and
      (5) to promote competition. All of these proposals were implemented by
      Labour and Coalition
      governments and continue to be a policy focus today. Crafts' recent
      research has reinforced the
      particularly important role played by competition in enhancing
      productivity growth (Crafts (2012)).
    As public and policy debate intensified over the slow recovery of the
      British economy from the
      2008 financial crisis, Professor Crafts synthesised the implications of
      this literature for
      contemporary policy-making in an influential Royal Economic Society (RES)
      Policy lecture and
      companion research paper (Crafts (2013)). Drawing on lessons from
      macroeconomic and growth-oriented
      policy responses in the 1930s and 1980s, Crafts advocated for policies
      reversing the
      decline in government infrastructure investment and promoting road
      pricing, enhancing incentives
      in education, shifting taxes from income to consumption and property,
      relaxing planning
      regulations, and discouraging competition-distorting industrial policy. He
      concluded that despite
      the constraints placed on fiscal policy by the need to reduce government
      debt, and on monetary
      policy by the Zero Lower Bound to nominal interest rates, targeted
      supply-side policies could
      enhance productivity and growth.
    References to the research
    The research:
    
1. Crafts, N., 1996, 'Post-Neoclassical Endogenous Growth Theory': What
      are its Policy
      Implications?, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v12n2, pp 30-47,
      DOI:
      http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/12.2.30.
     
2. Bean, C. and N. Crafts, 1996, British Economic Growth Since 1945:
      Relative Economic Decline... and Renaissance?, Chapter 6 in N. Crafts and
      G. Toniolo (eds.), Economic Growth in Europe
        since 1945, Cambridge University Press, pp 131-172, DOI:
      http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758683.
     
6. Crafts, N., 2013, Returning to Growth: Lessons from History, Fiscal
        Studies, v34, pp255-282,
      edited version of Crafts's Royal Economic Society Policy Lecture of 17th
      October, 2012,
      DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2013.12005.x
     
Evidence of research quality:
    There are six academic papers listed above. Those targeting an academic
      audience ([2], [3], and
      [4]) are all published in excellent (3* or 4*) outlets. The book in which
      [2] appears is published by
      Cambridge University Press, a leading academic press. Business History
      is the best business
      history journal in the Association of Business School (ABS) rankings, and
      Economic History
        Review is the second-best Social Science journal in the ABS rankings
      and 76th best economics
      journal in the Kalaitzidakis et. al. (2003, JEEA) rankings. [1] is
      in the Oxford Review of Economic
        Policy, which targets both academics and policymakers. It is a
      "Grade Two" journal in the ABS
      Economics rankings (which only considers the first of these potential
      audiences) and 69th in the
      JEEA rankings. Explorations in Economic History and Fiscal
        Studies are (n/a, 57th, and 163rd) and
      (99th, n/a, 154th) in the (ABS, JEEA, Repec)
      rankings.
    Details of the impact
    Broadberry and Crafts' early research and 1990s policy influence has a
      current, continuing impact,
      which is enhanced by their contemporary impact on public attitudes
      and government policies.
    In the late 1990s, Broadberry and Crafts' research contributed to New
      Labour's response to
      Thatcherism, for example, in HM Treasury's `Productivity Agenda' from 1999
      and 2000. Crafts
      regularly met with and presented to policymakers; as early as the 1997
      Wincott Lecture Crafts
      highlighted pro-growth policies (from Crafts (1996)) which were reflected
      in the `Five Drivers of
      Productivity Performance' (investment, skills and human capital,
      innovation, competition, and
      enterprise) which Labour presented in its policy statements from 1999
      onwards (cf. HM Treasury
      (2000)).
    The impact of this research continues into the current period. Dr Charles
      Bean, Deputy Governor
      for Monetary Policy at the Bank of England, commented, "The historical
      perspective afforded by
      [Crafts'] research into Britain's comparative economic performance ... has
      provided policymakers
      with a unique perspective on the engines of growth and the [supply-side]
      policies to support it...
      While the importance of supply was contentious in the 1980s during the
      Thatcher years, I think it is
      fair to say that it is now accepted by all the main political parties and
      Crafts' work has played into
      providing the hard evidence to support that belief" (Bean (2013)).
    Ken Warwick, former Director General at the Department for Business,
      Innovation, and Skills (BIS),
      commented "[Crafts] is the economist of choice for anyone working on
      economic policy in the field
      of productivity, economic growth, and a wide range of supply-side
      policies... Nick's research and
      his participation in Whitehall debates helped ensure that... economic
      policy during 1997-2007
      continued to emphasise a market friendly approach" (Warwick (2013)).
    John Kingman, Second Permanent Secretary and Conrad Smewing, Deputy
      Director, Corporate
      Finance, Business, Innovation, and Skills, both at HM Treasury, noted
      Crafts' continuing impact:
      "Crafts' research... had a clear impact on the Treasury's approach to
      supply-side economic policy
      in the 1990s and 2000s. Particular areas where he has been influential in
      policy thinking include
      competition policy — where for example his work had direct impact on
      policy development for the
      1998 Competition Act ...and approaches to the labour market and industrial
      relations. This
      thinking continues to have an impact on the Treasury's prioritisation and
      policy approach in a
      number of areas, [f]or example a renewed Treasury focus on competition and
      competition policy is
      currently being set in train" (Kingman and Smewing (2013)).
    The 2008 financial crisis, change of government, and sluggish economic
      performance in the last
      few years have revived interest in pro-growth economic policies. Crafts is
      notable for targeting
      academics, policymakers, and the broader public through his writing.
      Crafts is one of the most
      highly-read authors on VoxEU, a leading economics blog which publishes
      research in non-technical
      language for a general-interest audience. His eight articles since 2008
      attracted over
      150,000 page views. Dr Bean concurs, "I think it is worth recording
      Crafts' efforts to engage with
      policymakers and the wider public. For instance, he delivered last year's
      well-received Royal
      Economic Society Policy Lecture [and] is a regular contributor to the Vox
      website ([where] his
      recent contributions... have garnered over 30,000 hits each) and to the
      quality press."
    Crafts' research has also had a contemporary policy impact. The economic
      and policy analysis
      team at BIS (and its predecessor BERR) have relied on Crafts (2013) to
      motivate the Coalition
      Government's pro-growth policies limiting the adverse impacts of
      regulation and continuing to
      invest in transport infrastructure (BERR (2008), BIS (2010a), BIS
      (2010b)). Indeed, three of the
      `four pillars' of the current Government's Plan for Growth — lowering
      regulatory and legal barriers to
      starting and growing a business, encouraging investment, and creating a
      more educated workforce
      — are identical to those in Crafts (1996) and repeated throughout
      Broadberry and Crafts' research.
    Lord Gus O'Donnell, former UK Cabinet Secretary 2005-2011, concluded,
      "The Treasury has
      struggled for years to understand the determinants of growth and
      productivity. Crafts' work has
      been fundamental to putting this policy area on a much stronger footing...
      His emphasis on the
      importance of the right structural reforms had a big impact on the
      Treasury's thinking and directly
      influenced the debates about what should go in various budgets.
      Governments have taken on
      board many of his points such as the need to improve the planning system
      and to strengthen
      competition" (O'Donnell (2013)). Warwick added, "With the global financial
      and economic crisis in
      2008-09, the Government's approach to economic and industrial policy
      shifted somewhat — with a
      greater emphasis on strategic intervention, countercyclical policy and
      sectoral strategy... [Crafts']
      work has proved a salutary reminder of the dangers of excessive
      intervention and the risks
      associated with trying to `pick winners' [in industrial policy]. [This]
      helped analysts in Government
      shape the new approach to industrial policy in ways that were consistent
      with the literature and the
      lessons from past experience" (Warwick (2013).
    Kingman and Smewing add, "Crafts' more recent work continues to shape
      thinking at the Treasury.
      In particular his Royal Economic Society lecture of 2012 [Publication (6)
      above] and associated
      work has contributed to internal policy debate and policy development on
      crucial supply-side
      issues. One notable area is planning reform, where his research fed into
      the policy development
      leading up to the publication of the "Plan for Growth" alongside Budget
      2011. Other areas where
      he has been influential include the importance of infrastructure spending,
      which formed a major
      part of the 2013 spending review, the role of the housing market and
      housing policies in recovery,
      and the Treasury's approach to industrial policy as part of the
      Government's Industrial Strategies.
    The reach and significance of Broadberry and Crafts' research is
      considerable. Direct
      beneficiaries include UK policy makers and members of the private sector
      they consult with, while
      indirectly their research touches virtually every sector of the British
      economy, making all UK
      households, firms, and workers beneficiaries of their work.
    Broadberry and Crafts (2003) estimate that economic growth in the
      post-war period was between
      0.75 and 1 percentage point lower than it could have been due to the
      inefficient structure of
      education, labour relations, and competition policies in place at that
      time. Crafts (2013) argues
      that further changes in supply-side policies could help the current
      economic recovery and close the
      output gap, a primary consideration given output (as of end-2012) is still
      3 percentage points below
      its 2008 level.
    Sources to corroborate the impact 
    Deputy Governor, Monetary Policy, Bank of England, email to Professor
      Gregory Crawford,
      Director of Research Impact, Department of Economics, University of
      Warwick, received 14 June
      2013.
    BERR, 2008, BERR's role in raising productivity: new evidence, p12. URL:
      http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file44504.pdf
    BIS, 2010a, Learning from some of Britain's successful sectors: An
      historical analysis of the role of
      government, pp vii, 1-17, 35, 77, 82, 85, 118, 121, 127. URL:
      http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/economics-and-statistics/docs/10-781-bis-economics-paper-06.pdf
    BIS, 2010b, Economic Growth, pp 52, 77, 122. URL:
      http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/economics-and-statistics/docs/e/10-1213-economic-growth.pdf.
    Crafts, Nicolas (1997), "The Conservative Government's Economic Record: An
        End of Term
        Report", Wincott Lecture, The Institute for Economic Affairs,
      London.
    HM Treasury, 2000, Productivity in the UK: The Evidence and the
      Government's Approach, p32.
      URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/ent_prodevi_index.htm
    HM Treasury, 2007, Productivity in the UK: 7 — Securing long-term
      prosperity, pp 15, 22, 47, 48,
      59. URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/ent_prod7_index.htm
    HM Treasury and BIS, 2011, Plan for Growth. URL: http://cdn.hm-treasury.gov.uk/2011budget_growth.pdf
    Former Second Permanent Secretary at HM Treasury & Deputy Director,
      Corporate Finance,
      Business, Innovation, and Skills, HM Treasury, 2013, email to Professor
      Gregory Crawford,
      Director of Research Impact, Department of Economics, University of
      Warwick, received 18 July
      2013.
    Former UK Cabinet Secretary, email to Professor Abhinay Muthoo, Head of
      Department,
      Department of Economics, University of Warwick, received 17 February 2013.
    Former Director General and Director of Analysis, Department for
      Business, Innovation, and Skills
      (BIS), 2013, email to Professor Gregory Crawford, Director of Research
      Impact, Department of
      Economics, University of Warwick, received 18 July 2013.
1 Note that Professor Crafts was on the Warwick faculty from 1988
to 1995 and again from 2006 to the current time. All of the research
referenced here was either conducted while he was at Warwick or is
co-authored with Professor Broadberry, who was on the Warwick
faculty at the time.