The Recognition and Implementation of Improvements to Patient Dignity and Care
Submitting Institution
London South Bank UniversityUnit of Assessment
Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacySummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Clinical Sciences, Nursing, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
The research has led to a clear and accepted definition of dignity which
have been adopted by health care organisations and professionals. It has
raised the awareness of professionals and carers of the needs and means to
enhance patient's dignity. Resources have been developed and used to train
and support staff to improve attention to patient dignity. The research
has also influenced changes in national policy such as reducing use of
mixed sex accommodation, and changes to healthcare practices such as
improved hospital gown design and use of bed curtain clips and notices.
The resources on patient dignity continue to be disseminated and adopted
and inspired the Velindre Cancer Centre group which won the 2013 Nursing
Times Dignity Award.
Underpinning research
Patient dignity is a complex and multi-factorial phenomenon. WHO research
identified the importance of dignity to patients (Valentine et al. 2008,
Soc Med Sci., 66(9), 1939-50) and respecting people's rights to dignity is
a core health care value. Despite increasing concern about hospital
patients experiencing indignity, little research about patients' dignity
in acute hospital settings, particularly from the patient perspective, had
been performed.
The research underpinning this Impact case was conducted by Lesley
Baillie (Principal Lecturer) at London South Bank University (LSBU)
between September 2004 and April 2007.
Baillie's study investigated the meaning of patient dignity, threats to
patients' dignity, and how patient dignity can be promoted in acute
hospital settings. A qualitative, multi-method case study was carried out
in an acute hospital in England, focused on adults. Data were collected
from: post discharge interviews with 12 patients; participant observation
of patient care (n=12 of 4 hours each) with follow-up interviews with 12
patients and 13 staff; observation of 12 staff handovers; interviews with
6 senior hospital nurses; and analysis of hospital documents. The data
were analysed thematically using the framework approach (1-4).
Key insights emanating from the research were:
- Patients felt that dignity primarily related to their feelings
(feeling comfortable, in control and valued), their physical
presentation (being dressed appropriately, not having their bodies
exposed) and behaviour to and from others.
- Patients' impaired health threatened their dignity due to loss of
function, psychological impact and intimate procedures. Patients
promoted their own dignity through their attitudes and relationships
with staff.
- Lack of privacy in hospital threatened dignity, heightened by bodily
exposure and mixed sex accommodation. The exposing nature of hospital
gowns was a key issue from patients' perspectives.
- Staff behaviour had an important effect on patients' dignity and
related to interactions with patients and provision of privacy. Threats
to dignity arose from staff interactions that were curt or
authoritarian, and from breaching privacy, for example, entering
curtained bed spaces while patients were exposed, without warning. Staff
behaviour promoted dignity by providing privacy and through interactions
that made patients feel comfortable, in control and valued. While few
staff recognised that their interactions affected dignity, patients
considered that staff interactions had a major effect on their dignity.
- Hospital systems threatened dignity, mainly due to bed management
issues, while a conducive physical environment and a dignity-promoting
culture and leadership promoted patient dignity.
Patients' dignity is diminished or preserved by staff behaviour and
interactions and by privacy in hospital. Educating staff to recognise
patients' vulnerability to indignity in hospital, for example, the impact
of hospital gowns, mixed sex accommodation and lack of vigilance in
keeping bed curtains closed, was an important aspect of improving patient
dignity. The research concluded that there is a need for staff to be
proactive about reducing patients' bodily exposure, to bring about
increased privacy and for staff to reflect on their interactions with
patients in ways that preserve dignity by helping patients to feel
comfortable, in control and valued.
References to the research
1. Baillie, L. (2009) Patient dignity in an acute hospital setting: a
case study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 22-36.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.003 (also submitted as Output in REF2).
2. Baillie, L. (2008) Mixed sex wards and patient dignity: nurses' and
patients' perspectives. British Journal of Nursing 17:19, 1220-5.
3. Baillie, L. (2007) The impact of staff behaviour on patient dignity in
acute hospitals. Nursing Times 103:34, 30-31.
4. Baillie, L. (2007) The impact of urological conditions on patients'
dignity. International Journal of Urological Nursing; 1:1, 27-35.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-771X.2006.00003.x
Details of the impact
In 2008, as a direct result of her research into patient dignity, Lesley
Baillie was approached by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), the leading
professional body for Nursing in the UK, and invited to be an expert
consultant to its campaign `Dignity at the heart of everything we do'. The
Director of Nursing and Service Delivery, RCN, has provided a statement to
evidence Baillie's contribution and the reach (410,000 nurses, midwives,
healthcare support workers and students) and impact of the campaign (1)
Drawing on Baillie's research, the RCN commissioned a scoping survey of
the nursing workforce to explore barriers and facilitators to dignified
care. Baillie devised the survey questions and developed a working
definition of dignity for the survey. The results of the survey of 2000
RCN members was instrumental in the planning and direction of the campaign
(2).
The dignity definition, published in the survey report (2, page 8) has
led to a clearer understanding nationally of the meaning and scope of
dignity in health care and has been adopted by NHS Trusts and used to
inform dignity policies, for example Royal Lincolnshire Hospitals (3).The
survey results were presented at a national conference to launch the
campaign in 2008, which was attended by over 100 senior nursing
representatives (1). The campaign featured at the RCN's 2008 Congress
attended by Alan Johnson MP (Secretary of State for Health at the time).
Baillie's team sought clarification from the Minister about when mixed sex
accommodation would be eradicated. Johnson promised that they would be and
this was widely reported in the press (4). Following on from this, in
January 2009, Johnson announced that from April 2010, the standard
contract for NHS patients would be same sex accommodation and this policy
has been fully implemented with hospitals having to report any breaches
monthly.
Baillie worked on the campaign resources for the RCN (supported
financially by Smith and Nephew and Help the Aged). Based on her research,
Baillie led the development of a practice support pack, which comprised a
DVD with facilitator's guide and additional resources e.g. pocket guides
(5). In 2008-2009, the packs were distributed widely across the UK, to
nursing teams in both NHS and private healthcare organisations (1). In
total, 3,746 packs were distributed and a further 1,087 packs were
purchased subsequently by other UK and overseas organisations (1); the
packs remain available to purchase, with supporting resources free to
download (5). A key feature of the campaign was local launch events where
the RCN's campaign team prepared local campaign leaders to use the
campaign pack with their nursing teams. As an example, the Supportive Care
Lead Nurse at the Velindre Cancer Centre in South Wales (which provides
specialist cancer services to over 1.5 million people in South East Wales)
attended a local session and took away the practice support pack. They
found the materials so `powerful' that they formed a Patient Dignity
Group. The resource prompted them to think more deeply about what dignity
really meant and to feel that, as nurses, they could do something to
improve dignity for their patients (6). An article in a professional
journal reviewing the campaign reported that the practice support pack was
being used by health and social care practitioners across the UK (7), and
quoted the RCN Dignity Campaign lead reflecting that "anyone with a little
confidence has been able to run a training and development session. These
sessions are about enabling other people so that they can change their
practice" (7). The article reports examples from NHS Trusts that had made
improvements as a result of the campaign resources, for example, in the
Isle of Man, staff improved bed curtains so that they maximised privacy
and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust promoted improvements in staff
interactions with patients (7). The active campaign finished in 2009 but
the RCN's Dignity section and resources remain on the RCN website (5).
Baillie, together with another consultant, conducted an early stage
evaluation of the campaign in 2009 at seven UK sites, using a multi-method
case study approach (8, 9). The evaluation indicated that the campaign
resources were well-received with the practice support pack triggering
staff to reflect on their own practice and behaviour, for example,
becoming aware of talking over patients during ward rounds (8, 9). A
Deputy Chief nurse at one of the NHS Trusts said: `The very clear feedback
that we've had is that it's enabled staff to actually realise and have
more insight into their own practice' (8). The evaluation found that as a
result of the campaign resources, some changes in practice had already
been made and these related to improvements in privacy, the care
environment and staff interactions with patients and families (8, 9).
Improvements in privacy included: obtaining dressing gowns for patients to
wear over their theatre gowns when walking to theatre, implementing
`do-not-disturb' signs for curtains, taking patients to the bathroom
rather than them using a commode at the bedside, and instigating a policy
to ensure that inpatients attending outpatient appointments were dressed
in their own clothes rather than gowns whenever possible (8, 9). Care
environment improvements included improving facilities for families in
intensive care, personalising the care home environment, and developing a
private room for breast feeding mothers on a children's ward (9).
Further examples of change as a result of the campaign include, for
example, one large hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' (GST) which introduced
120 Dignity Champions and adopted a "no interruption" rule (7).
Independent Consultants interviewed staff at the Heart Hospital, London,
who introduced Dignity Champions and a "goody bag" scheme allowing older
patients to bring comfort items from home, they provide patients with hot
drinks throughout the night and wherever possible provided patients with
food and drink of their choice (10).
The Velindre Cancer Centre's Patient Dignity Group was inspired by the
RCN Dignity campaign and has continued to develop (6, 11), indicating the
sustainability of the campaign and its impact on practice. The Group, now
multi-disciplinary, meets four-monthly and works on continued
improvements. The group's work led to the Centre being short-listed for
the 2013 Nursing Times Dignity award (12), which they subsequently won.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Statement: Director of Nursing and Service Delivery, Royal College of
Nursing
- Baillie, L., Gallagher, A., Wainwright, P. (2008) Defending
dignity: opportunities and challenges for nursing. London: Royal
College of Nursing. Available from:
http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/166655/003257.pdf
- Dignity in care definition, Royal Lincolnshire Hospitals website:
http://www.ulh.nhs.uk/for_patients/dignity_in_care/definitions.asp
- Carvel, J. (2008), The Guardian. May 1st. Available from:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2008/may/01/alanjohnson.nhs
- Royal College of Nursing. Dignity — publications. Available from:
http://www.rcn.org.uk/development/practice/dignity/rcn_publications_and_resources
- Contact: Supportive Care Lead Nurse at the Velindre Cancer Centre.
- Duffin, C. (2009) Dignity in all we do. Nursing Standard
23(49), 18-19.
- Baillie, L., Gallagher, A. (2010) The RCN Dignity campaign: exploring
enablers and challenges. Journal of Research in Nursing 15:1,
15-28. DOI: 10.1177/1744987109352930. Available from:
http://jrn.sagepub.com/content/15/1/15
- Baillie, L., Gallagher, A. (2011) Respecting dignity in care in
diverse care settings: strategies of UK nurses. International
Journal of Nursing Practice, 17, 336-341. DOI:
10.1111/j.1440-172X.2011.01944.x
- Independent Consultants Report (The Innovation Partnership, 2013).
Contact: Managing Director, The Innovation Partnership.
- Velindre Cancer Centre. Dignity Code. Available from:
http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/page.cfm?orgid=357&pid=57561
- Velindre Cancer Centre. Patient Dignity group short-listed for (and
winners of) the 2013 national Nursing Times Award for enhancing patient
dignity.
http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/news.cfm?orgid=357&contentid=28640