Mary Rose : Protecting our Heritage through Chemistry
Submitting Institution
University of KentUnit of Assessment
ChemistrySummary Impact Type
CulturalResearch Subject Area(s)
Chemical Sciences: Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Other Chemical Sciences
Earth Sciences: Geochemistry
Summary of the impact
The warship Mary Rose served Henry VIII's navy for 34 years, including
spells as the flagship. She sank while engaging the French navy in the
Solent in 1545, and unsuccessful salvage bids meant the ship remained on
the seabed for almost half a millennium. The University of Kent has been
the central academic partner of the 30-year and £35 million Mary Rose
salvage and conservation project. It received Heritage Lottery funds,
which the University of Kent used to develop new conservation chemistry,
underpinned by synchrotron studies. Kent researchers have subsequently
taken up permanent employment with the Mary Rose Trust to implement this
new technology. The Mary Rose exhibition opened at Portsmouth Historic
Dockyard in May 2013, is one of the most important additions to UK culture
in recent times. The research at Kent was critical to this achievement,
and the new chemical technology is subsequently finding new areas of
impact.
Underpinning research
Context and Traditional Conservation projects
Salvage projects, such as the Mary Rose, UK and the Vasa, Sweden, have
shown wooden ships can remain relatively intact while buried within silt
under sea beds for hundreds of years. However, this does not mean that the
environment is benign, which was first highlighted during the restoration
of the Vasa. The Swedish warship spent 333 years under the Stockholm
archipelago after collapsing on her maiden voyage. She was salvaged in
1961 and put on display in 1990; a project approximately 20 year ahead of
the Mary Rose. Although the oak beams were seemingly in excellent
condition when first raised above the surface, the ship dramatically
deteriorated while in the museum [Nature 415 893 (2002)]. The problem lay
in the nature of the treatment used to stabilise the wood after salvage.
In this process, a preservation solution of boric acid and sodium borate
was applied to neutralise the acidity, along with polyethylene glycol to
replace the water and prevent warping as the wood dries. What quickly
became apparent was that the acidity of the wood increased and sulphate
salts began to coat the surfaces, which "threatened the continued
preservation of the Vasa". It was suggested that the problem originated
from hydrogen sulphide produced by bacteria within the waterlogged wood
while submerged. The preservation solution initially lowered the acidity
on treatment, but the slow oxidation of the sulphur containing material,
catalysed by the presence of iron from structural bolts etc, was creating
an ongoing acidity problem, which "could produce 5,000kg of sulphuric acid
when fully oxidised." The University of Kent solved this issue by
understand the oxidation process [1, 2, 5], and developed a completely
different treatment that neutralises both the inherent acidity, as well as
acting as a buffer for the ongoing sulphur-related problem [3, 4, 6].
Key Research Findings at University of Kent
Dr Eleanor Schofield was appointed a postdoctoral research
scientist by Professor Alan Chadwick [Kent 1970-present] of the
School of Physical Sciences, University of Kent between January 2009 and
June 2011 to study "abiotic production of acid in waterlogged
archaeological wood and remediation strategies". She focused on addressing
the sulphur issue, while Aaron Berko, University of Kent, focussed
on iron removal for his PhD during the same time. The Kent team developed
detailed chemical mechanisms of how sulphates, naturally present in sea
water, interacted with bacteria to form reduced sulphur compounds, such as
hydrogen sulphide, which can undergo further reactions with iron to form
iron sulphides [1]. Although not particularly harmful themselves, lifting
the wood out of the water sets off a new set of reactions, where the air
oxidises the plethora of sulphur compounds formed under the seabed into
harmful sulphuric acid that attacks the wood. Using this knowledge, the
Kent scientists studied a number of alternative treatments, making use of
synchrotron beam lines at Stanford, USA and Diamond, UK, to characterise
their effectiveness [2]. It was shown that strontium carbonate
nanoparticles (in an isopropanol solution) reduced both the inherent
acidity (as achieved by the Vasa treatment), as well as the ongoing
acidity originating from the reduced sulphur compounds [4, 6]. This new
technique has been extensively implemented on the Mary Rose project and
represents a major achievement as the new treatment developed at the
University of Kent permanently stabilises waterlogged items, preventing
further degradation and requires no addition treatments.
References to the research
The conservation section of the Mary Rose website (http://www.maryrose.org/archaeology-and-conservation/mary-rose-publications/)
describes a total of 5 research publications (references [2]-[6]
below) directly impacting on the restoration of the warship. All 5
articles are work carried out in the School of Physical Sciences at the
University of Kent, and all have an author from the University of Kent as
first author, as well as the corresponding author. The work at the
University of Kent constitutes all of the research done to preserve the
Mary Rose. References [1], [5] and [6] best indicate the quality of the
underpinning research).
1. Wetherall, K. M.*, Moss, R. M., Jones, A. M., Smith,
A. D., Skinner, T., Pickup, D. M., Goatham, S. W.,
Chadwick, A. V. and Newport, R. J. "Sulfur and Iron Speciation in
recently recovered timbers of the Mary Rose revealed via X-ray absorption
spectroscopy", J. Archaeological Science, 35, 1317 (2008)
2. Berko, A., Smith, A.D. Jones, A. M., Schofield, E.J.,
Mosselmans, J. F. W. and Chadwick, A.V.* "XAS studies of
the effectiveness of iron chelating treatments of Mary Rose timbers",
Journal of Physics Conference Series: 14th International Conference on
X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (XAFSI 4), 190, 012147 (2009).
3. Chadwick, A.V.*, Berko, A., Schofield, E.J.,
Jones, A.M., Mosselmans, J. F. W., Smith, A. D. "How X-rays are helping
defeat the effects of micro-organisms in the preservation of Mary Rose"
L'Actualite Chimique, 356-357, 106 (2011).
4. Schofield, E.J., Sarangi, R., Mehta, A., Jones, A. M. and Chadwick,
A. V.* "Nanotechnology and Synchroton light in the service of Henry
VIII: preserving the Mary Rose" Materials Today,14, 354 (2011).
5. Chadwick, A. V.*, Berko, A., Schofield, E.J.,
Jones, A. M., Mosselmans, J. F. W., Smith, A. D. "Application of
Microfocus X-ray Beams from Synchrotrons in Heritage Conservation"
International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 6, 228 (2012).
6. Chadwick, A. V.*, Schofield, E.J., Jones, A. M.,
Cibin, G. and Mosselmans, J. W. F., "Ionic Nanoparticles in Heritage
Conservation", Solid State Ionics, 225, 742-746 (2012)
* Corresponding author. Bold signifies author from University of
Kent.
Key funding:
• Chadwick, A.V., Newport, R.J., "An investigation of remediation methods
for the sulphur problem in Mary Rose timbers.", Heritage Lottery Fund grant
administered by the Mary Rose Trust, 01/07/2008 to 30/06/2011.
Details of the impact
The research was supported by the Heritage Lottery Fund through an award
to Professor AV Chadwick, University of Kent that was administered by the
Mary Rose Trust. The project was specifically targeted to solve an
existing problem in the treatment of waterlogged wood that is described
above. Eleanor Schofield was appointed as a postdoctoral research
assistant during the period of the award. As a result of the training she
obtained at the University of Kent, and the progress she made with the
development of new chemical treatments, she subsequently became
Conservation Manager for the Mary Rose Trust, with overall responsibility
for chemistry related conservation. She has overseen the implementation of
the University of Kent technology to treat numerous salvaged items. The
figure below shows one of the many gun carriages on display that were
treated using the University of Kent method. These items would not be on
display if the University of Kent research had not been carried out.
Beneficiaries and Significance of the Conservation of the Mary Rose
The work led by the University of Kent has a local impact on the economy
of Portsmouth and the South East, a national impact in the position of the
Mary Rose within British history, and an international impact on the
conservation and heritage industry.
The restored Mary Rose forms a centrepiece attraction in Portsmouth's
Historic Dockyard: in its new purpose-built museum it is a major visitor
attraction and cultural asset to its region. The Dockyard attracts around
500,000 visitors a year, approximately 15-20% from overseas and it is
anticipated that these numbers will grow further with the opening of the
Mary Rose (Portsmouth Historic Dockyard Ltd.). The Mary Rose Trust
received £2m from visitors, in donations and trading income in 2012; it
also has an active learning and outreach programme (Mary Rose Trust Annual
Review 2013).
The preservation of Mary Rose has major historical significance as a
well-preserved example of Tudor history. Without the preservation of the
artefacts - of which the ship itself if the greatest - it would not be
possible for the museum to tell the full story of this period of history:
"In the original museum less than 10% of the recovered artefacts were on
display. In the new museum many thousands more artefacts will be displayed
in context, many never seen before. Preparing all this material has been a
huge task. The remarkable state of preservation of some of these articles
can be confusing because everything wooden on display in the new museum is
a conserved original. There are no organic replicas on display." (Mary
Rose Trust Annual Review 2013). The impact of the work is also evidenced
by interest from other conservators. Dr Emma Hocker, a conservator at the
Vasa commented on the research at the University of Kent: "We at the Vasa
Museum are always interested in new treatments to neutralise acids in
wood. What is intriguing about the University of Kent's method is that it
is not a one-off treatment, but since the nano-particles remain in the
wood, they act as a buffer ready to neutralise any new acidic outbreaks."
Sources to corroborate the impact
1. Professor Mark Jones, Head of Collections of the Mary Rose Trust.
[Contact 1]. Who can confirm the relationship of the underpinning research
from Kent to the Mary Rose project and the impact on the Mary Rose Trust.
2. Dr Eleanor Schofield, Conservation Manager at the Mary Rose Trust.
[Contact 3]. Who can confirm the detailed relationship between the
technical aspects of the Kent research and the conservation of the Mary
Rose ship.
3. Emma Hocker, Conservator, Vasa Museum. [Contact 2]. Who can confirm
the wider impact of the research on international conservation efforts,
and specifically for the Vasa ship.
4. The Mary Rose Trust has an extensive website describing the
extraordinary history of the ship, including a large section on the
Archaeology and Conservation process, a link is provided in the section 3
above. A section of the website is quoted below, that corroborates the
involvement of the University of Kent: "University of Kent -
development of strontium carbonate nanoparticle treatment to sequester
sulfate and neutralise the wood / exploration of chelating agents to
remove iron from the wood and therefore eliminate the catalyst for
sulphur oxidation and acid production." http://www.maryrose.org/archaeology-and-conservation/mary-rose-research/
5. Interview with Eleanor Schofield from the University of Kent on
nanoparticle preservation. The transcript of an interview with Eleanor
Schofield in Materials Today on the use of nanoparticles in the
conservation of the Mary Rose is given at : http://www.materialstoday.com/blog/2013/1/30/interview-with-eleanor-schofield-nanoparticle-preservation/783.aspx
A recording of the actual interview is given at : http://about.elsevier.com/media/MT_Schofield_maryrose.mp3
6. Website:
http://www.maryrose.org/archaeology-and-conservation/mary-rose-publications/
All 5 articles are work carried out in the School of Physical
Sciences at the University of Kent, and all have an author from the
University of Kent as first author, as well as the corresponding author.