Decarbonisation of freight transport
Submitting Institution
Heriot-Watt UniversityUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
PoliticalResearch Subject Area(s)
Economics: Applied Economics
Summary of the impact
    Research undertaken by the LRC on `low carbon logistics' has informed UK
      government policy on the environmental impact of freight transport,
      altered the official method used in the UK to carbon audit road freight
      transport operations, provided guidance to industry on the measurement and
      management of freight-related CO2 emissions and resulted in the
      establishment of the first industry and government-endorsed target for
      cutting the carbon intensity of road freight transport.
    Underpinning research
    The research team comprised Professor McKinnon (in post throughout the
      period) and Dr Piecyk who joined the team in 2006.
    Heriot-Watt University has been undertaking research on the environmental
      impacts of logistics (i.e. all the activities associated with the
      movement, storage and handling of goods) since the early 1990s initially
      supported by an EPSRC grant. One of the early outputs of this research was
      an analytical framework for assessing the extent to which, at a country
      level, logistics-related externalities could be decoupled from economic
      output. This framework was subsequently adopted and refined by two large
      EU-funded projects in which HWU participated (REDEFINE and SULOGTRA) and
      applied in reports prepared for the UK Commission for Integrated
      Transport, set up to provide independent advice to the UK government, and
      the International Transport Forum (part of the OECD with around 30
      countries affiliated). It was further developed, over the period
      2007-2009, into a `freight decarbonisation model' during the EPSRC-funded
      Green Logistics project and operationalised as a forecasting tool. This
      model is based on a series of eight key parameters: average length of
      haul, handling factor, modal split, proportion of empty running, load
      factor, fuel efficiency and carbon intensity of the energy consumed. This
      tool was used, with empirical data collected from focus groups and a large
      online questionnaire survey, to predict the level of CO2 emissions from UK
      road freight transport in 2020 (Piecyk and McKinnon, 2010) and to
      construct a series of road freight - CO2 scenarios for 2050 (McKinnon and
      Piecyk, 2009b).
    In the course of the Green Logistics project, related research was
      conducted on the measurement of CO2 emissions from road haulage operations
      at both macro- and micro-levels. This reviewed the various approaches and
      methodologies that had been applied and discovered significant
      discrepancies in macro-level estimates quoted by different UK government
      departments and agencies (McKinnon and Piecyk, 2009a). The research
      examined the causes of these discrepancies and recommended the adoption of
      a new approach. Research conducted at the micro-level examined the ways in
      which individual companies could measure carbon emissions from their
      logistics operations and the feasibility of carbon foot printing
      individual products on an end-to-end supply chain basis. This involved
      writing case studies with particular companies and discussions with
      organisations that have developed carbon measurement methodologies and
      reporting standards (McKinnon and Piecyk, 2010). This research revealed
      wide differences in the methods and carbon intensity values that companies
      were using for logistical activities and cast serious doubt on the
      practicality and benefit of product-level carbon auditing (McKinnon,
      2010). The Green Logistics project also included a comparative carbon
      audit of the online and conventional retail channels for books. This work
      was conducted by Dr. Julia Edwards, Dr. Sharon Cullinane and Professor
      McKinnon. This showed that, on the basis of mid-range estimates, the
      carbon intensity of online retailing / home delivery was significantly
      lower than that of conventional store-based retailing (Edwards, McKinnon
      and Cullinane, 2010).
    References to the research
    
[1] McKinnon, A.C. and Piecyk, M. (2009a) `Measurement of CO2
        Emissions from Road Freight Transport: A Review of UK Experience.'
      Energy Policy, 37 DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.007
     
[2] McKinnon, A.C. and Piecyk, M. (2009b) `Logistics 2050: Moving
        Goods by Road in a Very Low Carbon World' in Sweeney, E. (ed.)
      `Supply Chain Management in a Volatile World' Blackrock Publishing,
      Dublin. Available on request.
     
[3] McKinnon, A.C. (2010) `Product-level Carbon Auditing of Supply
        Chains: Environmental Imperative or Wasteful Distraction?'
      International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management,
      40 DOI: 10.1108/09600031011018037
     
[4] Edwards, J.B., McKinnon, A.C. and Cullinane, S. (2010) `Comparative
        Analysis of the Carbon Footprints of Conventional and Online Retailing:
        A `Last Mile' Perspective' International Journal of Physical
      Distribution and Logistics Management, 40, 1 DOI: 10.1108/09600031011018055
     
[5] Piecyk, M.I. and McKinnon, A.C. (2010) `Forecasting the Carbon
        Footprint of Road Freight Transport in 2020' International Journal
      of Production Economics, 128, 1, 31-42 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.027
     
Research grants:
    [G1] EPSRC EP/D043328/1 £2,115,625 (PI Dr Whiteing at Leeds University,
      £465,754 share to HWU) `Green Logistics' 2006 -2010)
    [G2] EPSRC EP/C10R00003 £21,650, 'Pathways to Impact award (PIA)'
      2010-2011. (supplemented by payment from FTA) )
    Details of the impact
    Our research on CO2 emissions from freight transport has
      impacted on government policy and industrial practices in three ways:
    1. Measurement of CO2 emissions from freight transport:
    1.1 Macro-level:
      The underpinning research formed the basis of a report written by Prof
      McKinnon in 2007 for the Commission for Integrated Transport (CfIT) on `CO2
      emissions from freight transport in the UK'. This was the first study to
      carbon footprint the UK freight transport system and construct
      decarbonisation scenarios for the freight sector. In the course of this
      work, it was discovered that the figures quoted for CO2
      emissions from road freight transport in several government publications
      were much higher those calculated using data from the government's own
      `Continuing Survey of Road Goods Transport' (CSRGT). This was acknowledged
      in CfIT's summary report on Transport and Climate Change: `trend emission
      figures for lorries and vans can vary by a factor of 3' (p.24). As part of
      the EPSRC-funded Green Logistics project, McKinnon and Piecyk (2009a) then
      reviewed the various data sets, approaches and methodologies in an effort
      to explain why the discrepancies has arisen. They recommended that in
      future empirical data derived from the CSRGT, rather than laboratory test
      data, be used to carbon footprint road freight operations. The method used
      by AEA Technology to compile CO2 data for road freight
      transport for the National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (http://naei.defra.gov.uk/
      ) was subsequently changed to incorporate CSRGT data and the CO2
      estimates for road freight revised downwards by a factor of three. This
      indicated that the decarbonisation of the road freight sector would be
      less difficult than originally thought and not require the introduction of
      stringent policy measures.
    1.2 Micro-level:
      Our research on the comparison of the carbon footprints of online and
      conventional retailing is quoted by Amazon.com http://www.amazon.com/b/ref=gw_m_b_corpres?ie=UTF8&node=13786321
      and the UK online retailer Scotts of Stow as evidence that online
      retailing is better for the environment. The results of our research on
      the practicality and benefit of product-level carbon auditing of supply
      chains has been used internally by companies such as Procter and Gamble
      [S2] and Diageo to support their argument that they should not be
      compelled by retailers or legislators to put carbon labels on all their
      products. We were also invited by the European Council for the Chemical
      Industry (Cefic) [S2] to provide their member companies with guidance on
      how to measure CO2 emissions from their transport operations. http://www.cefic.org/Industry-support/Transport--logistics/Best-Practice-Guidelines1/General-Guidelines-/
      The report that we prepared for them (McKinnon and Piecyk, 2010) included
      industry-specific carbon intensity values for all the main freight
      transport modes and these are now widely used by chemical companies. Our
      report also formed the basis of a manual that Cefic prepared giving member
      companies guidance on how to calculate their freight-related CO2
      emissions (Cefic, 2010). These guidelines are now applied by many large
      European chemical companies.
    2. Forecasting future trends in CO2 emissions from road
        freight transport
    The `freight decarbonisation' framework and model have been used by the
      Dept for Transport (DfT), Dept of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and the
      Committee on Climate Change (CCC) to forecast future trends in CO2
      emissions from freight transport and map pathways for their reduction. In
      its 2008 policy document on `Delivering a Sustainable Transport System: A
      Logistics Perspective' the DfT outlined the results of a Delphi survey
      which we conducted to forecast business-as-usual freight-related CO2
      trends up to 2020 (p.36). These results were subsequently reported in
      Piecyk and McKinnon (2010). We also used the freight decarbonisation model
      to determine how the UK road freight system would have to change to meet
      the CO2 reduction target enshrined in the 2008 Climate Change
      Act (80% reduction by 2050 against a 1990 base line) (McKinnon and Piecyk,
      2009b). This study became an integral part of DECC's `2050 Pathways
      Analysis' as acknowledged its July 2010 report: `For domestic freight
      transport activity the levels have been based on DfT baseline projections,
      rolled out to future years, combined with similar work undertaken by
      Heriot-Watt University' (p.69). Both our 2020 forecasts and 2050 scenario
      analysis were used by the CCC in the derivation of its Fourth Carbon
      Budget as acknowledged on page 188 of its 2010 report[S10] Committee on
      Climate Change (2010) http://www.theccc.org.uk/reports/fourth-carbon-budget
      `Fourth Carbon Budget Report.' This built on an earlier paper that Prof
      McKinnon prepared for the CCC on the future trend in CO2 emissions
      from freight transport. http://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/building-a-low-carbon-economy-the-uks-contribution-to-tackling-climate-change-2/
      This advice was incorporated into the CCC's first report entitled
      `Building a Low Carbon Economy' (2008).
    3. Reducing CO2 Emissions from Freight Transport
    In 2010 the Freight Transport Association (FTA) (representing 12,000
      users and providers of logistics services in the UK) established a
      Logistics Carbon Reduction Scheme (LCRS) to help and encourage member
      companies to cut their freight-related CO2 emissions. With the
      support of an EPSRC `Pathways to Impact Award (PIA)', we have closely
      worked with the FTA to adapt our freight decarbonisation model to the
      needs of the LCRS. A version of the model was used to derive a target for
      reducing the carbon intensity of freight transport between 2010 and 2015.
      This target was declared in the 1st annual report of the LCRS and
      subsequently endorsed by the UK government. To the best of our knowledge
      this is the world's first industry-government target for cutting the
      carbon intensity of freight transport. Scheme members collectively
      committed to an 8 per cent reduction in the carbon intensity of freight
      operations by 2015 compared to 2010. We have also converted our original
      spread sheet model into a software tool that companies can use to
      determine how they can meet this target. This `carbon intervention
      modelling tool', which was developed in association with the FTA [S5] and
      DfT, can be downloaded free-of-charge from the FTA website and is being
      widely used by LCRS and over 85 companies to assess the potential savings
      in CO2 emissions from applying a range of 38 measures to their
      freight transport operations covering 61,000 commercial vehicles. Most of
      these measures reduce the distance travelled and / or fuel consumed,
      thereby cutting costs as well as carbon emissions.
    Sources to corroborate the impact 
    [S1] Head of Logistics in Cefic will confirm that the research provided
      the basis of a manual that Cefic prepared giving member companies guidance
      on how to calculate their freight-related CO2 emissions (Cefic, 2010).
    [S2] Head of Supply Network Innovation Centre, Brussels, Procter and
      Gamble will corroborate the application of the guidelines based on the
      report that prepared for Cefic in 2010, which included industry-specific
      carbon intensity values for all the main freight transport modes and that
      these are now widely used by chemical companies
    [S3] Economic Adviser at the Department of Transport will confirm the
      adoption and endorsement of the freight decarbonisation model and that
      version of the model was used to derive a target for reducing the carbon
      intensity of freight transport between 2010 and 2015. This target was
      declared in the 1st annual report of the LCRS and subsequently endorsed by
      the UK government.
    [S4] Analyst at the Committee on Climate Change the `freight
      decarbonisation' framework and model have been used by the Dept for
      Transport (DfT), Dept of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and the
      Committee on Climate Change (CCC) to forecast future trends in CO2
      emissions from freight transport and map pathways for their reduction.
    [S5] MD for Policy and Communications, Freight Transport Association will
      confirm that we have closely worked with the FTA to adapt our freight
      decarbonisation model to the needs of the LCRS. A version of the model was
      used to derive a target for reducing the carbon intensity of freight
      transport between 2010 and 2015 and will be able to report progress
      against target.
    [S6] Commission for Integrated Transport (2007) `Transport and Climate
      Change' http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110304132839/http://cfit.independent.gov.uk/pubs/2007/climatechange/index.htm
    [S7] Cefic (2010) `Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2
      Emission from Freight Transport Operations' http://www.cefic.org/Industry-support/Transport--logistics/Best-Practice-Guidelines1/General-Guidelines-/
    [S8] Dept for Energy and Climate Change (2010) `2050 Carbon Pathway
      Analysis'
	  http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/what%20we%20do/a%20low%20carbon%20uk/2050/216-2050-pathways-analysis-report.pdf
    [S9] Freight Transport Association (2011) `Logistics Carbon Reduction
      Scheme: first annual report' http://www.fta.co.uk/export/sites/fta/galleries/downloads/logistics_carbon_reduction_scheme/lcrs_annual_report.pdf