Delivering sustainability: natural resource management for social and ecological benefit
Submitting Institution
University of LeicesterUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management
Studies In Human Society: Policy and Administration
Summary of the impact
Effective, equitable natural resource management poses increasingly
complex challenges for policymakers and local communities in the context
of climate change, population growth and potentially conflicting agendas
on biodiversity conservation, livelihoods and economic growth. Leicester
research on socio-ecological, culturally appropriate approaches to
environmental governance and sustainability has been integral to:
- The development of evidence-based policy and practice on land use,
tenure, conservation and pastoralists' livelihoods in Mongolia,
by i) empowering herders to communicate with newly-elected government
officials; ii) input to policymakers and donors and iii) enhancing
herders' understanding and implementation of collaborative management.
- Improved water access amongst marginalised communities at Lake
Naivasha, Kenya, with tangible impacts on water poverty
and well-being, through i) rehabilitation of infrastructure, ii)
environmental education and capacity building and iii) new strategies
for sustainable development across the Naivasha basin.
Underpinning research
This case study is underpinned by Leicester research on, and support of
participatory approaches to natural resource management, environmental
governance and sustainability. Innovative theoretical research has been
practically applied within specific projects to achieve substantial
impact.
In Mongolia, post-Soviet transformations in natural
resource management, pastoral community organisation and land tenure have
created critical policy and livelihood concerns. The burgeoning mining
economy adds further challenges. Since 1999 Dr Upton has conducted
innovative research on land rights and tenure and the social and spatial
organisation of post-Soviet pastoralism, supported by multiple grants of
£4000-£235,000.(1-3) Key resultant publications identify the
limitations of state, donor and community-led land reforms and
institutional transformations, herders' strategic constructions and
reworking of customary rights and their resulting livelihood impacts.(A1,2)
Recent major projects (e.g. Leverhulme Trust: 2010-2012) have contributed
enhanced knowledge of the sustainability and efficacy of (donor-driven)
herder groups, cultural environmental values and implications for
conservation and livelihoods. Other recent work, with scholars at the
National University of Mongolia through the Open Society's Central
Asia and Caucasus Research and Training Initiative (CARTI) and with
environmental activist groups, offers critical insights into mining
impacts on herding-based livelihoods and cultures, and the emergence of
localised anti-mining resistance.(3-4, A3) Collaborative links
with the Mongolian Academy of Agricultural Sciences and leading in-country
environmental NGOs have been further developed through Darwin Initiative
funded work (2012-2015) which is generating innovative theoretical
contributions to debates around valuation of ecosystem services. These
ideas are now being applied practically; both to enhance local livelihoods
and to facilitate realisation of conservation goals, including through
national commitments to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).
Upton's Darwin project is recognised by Mongolia's Special Envoy for
Climate Change, Ministry of Environment and Green Development, as `one
of the pioneering studies which is looking at prospects for carbon
sequestration in Mongolian rangelands...' (D. Dagvadorj, 2013).iv
Since 2009, Upton has further developed these research agendas through a
productive collaboration with Professor David Harper (Department of
Biology, Leicester). Harper's 25 year track record of ecological research
at Lake Naivasha, Kenya have been brought together with
Upton's established work on issues of resource governance, institutional
and community development, to examine links between ecohydrology,
ecosystem services and political ecology, supported by funding from both
academic and commercial sources. Specifically, Upton and Harper currently
lead a team of researchers, including their former PhD student Ed
Morrison, in the project `Sustainable water and roses from Naivasha',
funded through the Swiss COOP retailer (2012-2014). Here Leicester's
applied research on ecosystem services, values and socio-ecological
systems is linked to their community-based education and capacity building
activities and practical interventions in improved water infrastructure,
to deliver enhanced resource use and livelihood solutions. Published
outputs are amongst the first to analyse local ecosystem service values
and perceptions, their implications for livelihoods and for restoration of
papyrus wetlands. (A4) Morrison has recently completed an
ESRC/NERC funded PhD through cutting edge research on the social and
ecological dimensions of papyrus restoration. Complementary research
through the ESPA funded East African Great Lakes Observatory (EAGLO)
project (2010-2012) has enabled Upton et al. to provide further
new, policy-oriented insights into non-economic valuation of ecosystem
services, trade-offs between ecosystem services and their changing
livelihood contributions across diverse stakeholder groups at Naivasha.(A5)
References to the research
Research Articles, Chapters and Reports
The work was supported by the following Grants. Upton was PI for the
first four. (1) British Academy: `Development and Change: Institutional
Innovation and Mongolian Pastoralism', (2006);
(2) Leverhulme Trust: `Community, Place and Pastoralism: Nature and
Society in Post-Soviet Central Asia'. £151,000 (2010-2012)
(Leverhulme Country report for Mongolia available at link):
(3) Darwin Initiative: `Values and valuation: new approaches to
conservation in Mongolia'. £235,000 (2012-2015); (4) RGS/IBG: `Mining
and Resistance: New Struggles on Mongolia's Pastoral Commons' (2007-2008);
(5) Swiss COOP funded research; £172,000 (CO-I); (6) ESPA Programme
Framework Grant (ESRC/DFID/NERC) for East African Great Lakes (EAGLO)
project (2010-2012), Harper (PI), Upton (CO-I); UOL £25,000.
A1Upton, C. 2008. Social capital, collective action and
group formation: developmental trajectories in post-socialist Mongolia. Human
Ecology 36: 175-188. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10745-
007-9158-x.
Output and continued research supported by Grants 1, 2 and 3.
A3Upton, C. 2012. `Mining, resistance and pastoral
livelihoods in contemporary Mongolia'. In Dierkes, J. (Ed). Change in
democratic Mongolia: social relations, health, mobile pastoralism and
mining. Netherlands: Brill, pp. 223-248. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004231474.
Output supported by Grant 4.
A4Morrison, E.H.J., Upton, C., Pacini, N.,
Odhiambo-K'oyooh, K., and Harper, D.M. 2013. Public perceptions of
papyrus: community appraisal of wetland ecosystem services at Lake
Naivasha, Kenya. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 13(2): 135-147.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.03.008.
Output supported by Grants 5 &6.
A5Upton, C. Harper, D., Morrison, E. et
al. 2013. Ecosystem Services and Livelihoods for the African Great
Lakes: Overview and Case Studies. Report for ESPA EAGLO project (link).
Output supported by Grant 5 & 6.
Details of the impact
Effective, equitable natural resource management poses increasingly
complex challenges for (inter)national policymakers and local communities
in the context of climate change, population growth and potentially
conflicting agendas on biodiversity conservation, livelihoods and economic
growth. Local participation, knowledge and environmental justice are
increasingly seen as integral to sustainable solutions and trade-offs
between multiple goals, but their realisation through policy and practice
remains a major challenge. Leicester research is making important
contributions here in diverse geographical contexts:
A. Mongolia: Shaping the debate on environmental and pastoral
development issues
Since 1999, Dr Upton has worked collaboratively with herding communities
from across a 600,000km2 area of central and southern Mongolia
and with government officials, policy makers and international donors, to
explore critical issues in livelihood and ecosystem sustainability and
appropriate policy responses.
Key stakeholders including government officials, herding communities and
donors, have been brought together to debate critical issues such as land
legislation, collective action, mining and development. Associated
workshops and activities have created new interfaces and forms of
knowledge exchange between rural resource users and policymakers, through
mapping, participatory video-making and workshops, notably at the end of
project Leverhulme workshop.i,ii The significance of this and
earlier underpinning research is in enhancing herders' understanding of
working as community groups, barriers to collective action and ways in
which these may be overcome, shown by revival of collective activities
post-project.i,ii According to local governors, these workshops
and other research activities have helped to share valuable knowledge on
pasture management, community development and implementation of government
policy. Project outputs are also informing further development of policy
on herders.ii As one local governor stated `The (Leverhulme)
research project ... was very successful and helped us and our local
people...it will help us to develop an efficient policy on animal
husbandry...'ii Processes of participation and community
engagement are being further enhanced through identification of
`ambassador herders', who will work with other herding communities to
spread learning outcomes from Upton's projects. In addition to academic
papers, Upton's publications have been cited in project and
policy-oriented reports in-country.
As well as being supported by Mongolia's Special Envoy for Climate
Change, the current Darwin Initiative work is recognised by the Mongolian
Ministry of Nature, Environment and Green Development as `significant
in bringing new approaches to biodiversity conservation by valuation of
ecosystem services and efficacy of PES (payment for ecosystem services)
schemes...it is important to develop conservation practice and policy in
Mongolia... I fully support the efforts of Dr Caroline Upton.....'
(D. Enkhbat, 2011).iii, iv This clearly highlights the reach
and significance of the project which is the first to link herders' groups
in Mongolia to the voluntary carbon market, through development of an
innovative tri-partite Plan Vivo certificate, incorporating soil carbon
sequestration, livelihood benefits and cultural/ biodiversity values.
B. Addressing water poverty and promoting well-being; Lake Naivasha,
Kenya
Leicester's participatory research involves local water user groups,
women's groups and pastoralist communities in collaborative work on
ecosystem services, capacity building and livelihood security across the
Lake Naivasha catchment, from where 70% of Kenya's cut flowers are
exported, providing livelihoods for at least 100,000 people. Over recent
years, serious degradation of the lake and wider basin have raised
national and international concerns over its capacity to sustain
livelihoods and ecosystem service functions into the future.
In 2009 Harper was invited to address a consortium of European retail
flower buyers to advise on how they could sponsor sustainable water use,
livelihoods and ecological restoration activities at Naivasha.
Subsequently Upton and Harper led projects funded by two supermarkets
(Swiss COOP, 2012-2014; German REWE 2011-2013), collectively delivered
through the Leicester-initiated Naivasha Basin Sustainability Initiative
(NBSI). The significance of this research include a) behavioural changes
in terms of sustainable resource management, water use and conservation
practices amongst local stakeholders,vi,vii and b) reductions
in water poverty amongst the most marginalised communities.vi,vii
Its reach extends to influencing new national strategies for sustainable
development in the basin, notably the Imarisha Naivasha (`Arise Naivasha')
Sustainable Development Action Plan 2012-2017 (SDAP, 2012),
`Imarisha' being supported by the Kenyan government and the Prince of
Wales' International Sustainability Unit. Imarisha produced its 5-year
Sustainable Development Action Plan (SDAP) in 2012, funded by Asda,
Sainsburys, Tesco and M&S. Imarisha was further awarded (September
2013) 400,000 Euro by GIZ, the German Development Agency, partly to
organise knowledge transfer from the scientific community to the Naivasha
stakeholders (November 2013). In 2013, Imarisha, in partnership with WWF
with 900,000 Euros Dutch Government funding launched the Integrated Water
Resource Action Plan.v,vii
Research workshops have brought together decision-makers with community
members across the basin to facilitate development of consensual planning
and governance solutions.v Environmental education workshops
designed, developed and led by Leicester, have trained over 100 `Water
Ambassadors' and `Water Friendly Farmers' from marginalised communities on
wise water use and resource management. Training evaluation returns show
that trainees rate these as excellent.vi Project beneficiaries
further state, `The projects we have completed in partnership with NBSI
have all been very successful and enlightening...after attending the
Water Friendly Farmers training workshop.. our thinking was greatly and
positively challenged and now we have implemented most of the ...
techniques on our own farms' and `ever since some of our Youth
Group members and I attended the Water Friendly Farmers training
workshop we have implemented a lot on our small piece of land... this
has caused our neighbours to come and learn from our success...'. viSignificant
improvements in knowledge amongst workshop attendees and reductions in
water poverty are evident.v,vi The introduction of ecosystem
services-based assessments and valuations have provided a valuable tool in
planning (Morrison et al., 2012, cited in SDAP, 2012). In addition
to citing key papers by the Leicester team, the SDAP repeatedly highlights
the contribution of Leicester/NBSI work to sustainable lake management and
livelihoods and identifies them as one of the Critical Research
Organisations operating in the basin.vii
Sources to corroborate the impact
A. Mongolia: Shaping the debate on environmental and pastoral
development issues
i Contact details for Professor Nyamaa Nyamsuren, Mongolian
State University of Agriculture.
ii Supporting statement from soum governor, Bogd soum,
Bayankhongor aimag.
iii Supporting statement from Director General for the
Department of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Management,
Ministry of Environment and Green Development.
iv Supporting statement from Special Envoy for Climate Change
and Chairman of Climate Change Coordination Office, Ministry of
Environment and Green Development, Mongolia.
B. Addressing water poverty and promoting well-being; Lake Naivasha,
Kenya
v Contact details for Chairman of LaNaWRUA (Lake Naivasha
Water Resource Users Association)
vi Supporting statement from Community Leaders, Mariba WRUA
community self help groups, Lake Naivasha.
vii Contact details for Chairman of Imarisha Naivasha and
Sustainability Manager, Finlays Flowers.