Religion and Peacebuilding in Nepal
Submitting Institution
University of WinchesterUnit of Assessment
Theology and Religious StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Political Science, Sociology
Philosophy and Religious Studies: Religion and Religious Studies
Summary of the impact
This case study describes an iterative cycle of research and impact in
relation to work in the area of religion and peacebuilding in Nepal.
King's and Owen's research in Buddhism and conflict transformation, Islam
and gender violence, and their work on developing a framework for
analysing the potential of religion for peacebuilding in a given context,
has informed the development of a participatory workshop on the role of
religious actors in peacebuilding which has been delivered to a number of
communities in the Terai region of Nepal, and the facilitation of a larger
networking event in Kathmandu in June 2013 which resulted in the
formulation of an action plan to which participating religious groups and
faith-based NGOs have committed.
Underpinning research
The research which underpins the impact of this study has been undertaken
by King and Owen since 2004, and brings together a variety of strands
which they have worked on separately and in partnership. King is a
recognised authority on South Asia Religions, and has published on
Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam (2004, 2006, 2009, 2010). Since 2004 King's
work has examined structural violence within religion, with particular
reference to gender and Islam. From 2006 — 2010 Owen worked extensively
within Tibetan Buddhist communities in India, Nepal, Tibet, China, and
Mongolia, including working with the Tibetan Centre of Conflict Resolution
and supporting their capacity development. In addition Dr Owen's work on
Buddhism and ethnography has informed the methods of interaction by the
research team in Nepal (2008, 2010). His work has strongly influenced the
collaborative and reflexive nature of engagement with religious leaders,
organisations and faith-based NGOs (seeing them as active and
collaborative participants in the research community of practice), and the
modes of knowledge exchange used in workshops and seminars.
Since the launch of the `Winchester Centre of Religions for
Reconciliation and Peace' (WCRRP) in 2009 Owen and King have been engaged
in carrying out a comprehensive review of academic literature in the area
of religious peacebuilding and conflict transformation; and in assessing
the applicability of a range of Conflict Assessment Frameworks used by
peacebuilding organisations and actors. The have also collaborated with
academics and peace practitioners throughout the world (including Kosovo,
Sri Lanka, Nepal, India, Burma, Sierra Leone); engaged with religious
organisations and faith-based NGOs; and contributed to policy debates,
acting as consultants on religious peacebuilding to the Foreign and
Commonwealth Office.
The findings from this process which underpin the action research project
in Nepal include that:
- Identification of the most effective areas of religious peacebuilding
requires a thorough understanding and analysis of the conflict context;
- The construction of effective religious peacebuilding hierarchies and
networks needs to take account of the local history and context;
- An effective tool for analysing the potential of religious
peacebuilding in a given context or conflict is urgently needed, and
considered essential and necessary by donors and aid organisations, and
religious groups and organisations involved in peacebuilding.
More specifically since 2011 Owen and King have conducted three periods
of field work in Nepal assessing the problems and potentials of engaging
religion more effectively in the continuing peace process. The research
has been carried out in collaboration with the Department of Conflict,
Peace and Development Studies, Tribhuvan University, and the Nepalese NGO
Religions for Peace Nepal. The first phase of the project culminated in
June 2013 with a series of `problem solving' workshops attended by
religious leaders in areas of Nepal which have a history of
inter-religious violence, and a consultation in Kathmandu attended by key
national level stakeholders including religious actors, civil society
representatives, academics, policy makers and government officials.
Research insights and findings include: the identification of good
practice by faith-based NGOs and organisations involved in development and
peacebuilding; the need for the development of a non-hierarchal religious
peacebuilding network for sharing knowledge and resources; skills and
capacity building among grassroots religious leaders; a more co-ordinated
effort by government and faith groups to engage with religious militants;
more aid assistance for Muslim communities at risk of radicalisation; the
establishment of a national level `Commission for Religious Affairs';
reservation for religious representation on Local Peace Committees.
References to the research
*King, Anna. 2004. `Dalit Theology: a Theology of Outrage', in Bocken,
Inigo, Wilhelm Dupré, and Paul van der Velde (eds.): The Persistent
Challenge. Religion, Truth, and Scholarship. Essays in Honor of Klaus
Klostermaier. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing; 53-78.
*King, Anna. 2006 (ed). Indian Religions: Renaissance and Renewal
. London: Equinox.
**King, Anna. 2009. `Islam, Women and Violence', Feminist Theology,
17.3, 2009, 292—328. (Top for 4th year of all articles downloaded in Sage
publications).
King, Anna. 2010. Review of Mohammad Mazher Idriss and Tahir Abbas (eds)
Honour, Violence, Women and Islam, Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, Religion
and Human Rights 8 (2013) Martinus Nijhoff. ISBN 978-0-415-56542-4.
248pp. 2013 May, 93-105.
**Owen, Mark. 2008. `Old Traditions, New Techniques; The Bodily
Preservation of Kyabje Ling Rinpoche'. Religions of South Asia, 2.2:
215-237.
**Owen, Mark. 2010. `Tibetan Buddhist Ethnography: Deficiencies,
Developments, and Future Directions'. Buddhist Studies Review,
Vol. 27, No 2: 221-238.
(* = included in University of Winchester UoA 61 submission in RAE 2008.
** = included in REF 2 in the present submission.)
Details of the impact
Owen's and King's work on developing a conflict specific framework for
analysing the potential of religious peacebuilding within a given context
has led to increased engagement between themselves and policy makers both
in Nepal and in the UK. In 2012/13 the WCRRP was invited on three
different occasions to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to talk to
staff and senior officers about religious peacebuilding, both in Nepal and
several other contexts including Syria. Their work in this area has also
been presented to Lord Alderdice at the House of Lords in May 2013 and as
a result he has offered to convene a meeting of Lords interested in this
area, with a view to establishing a working committee with representation
from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Department for International
Development, as well as academic institutions working in this area. Whilst
difficult to quantify precisely, their research and the growing reputation
of WCRRP has increased the awareness and willingness of civil servants and
policy makers to more seriously consider the necessity and importance of
engaging religious leaders, groups and organisations in situations of
conflict.
The impact of their research within the Nepalese context is much clearer
and more tangible. During the first two periods of fieldwork Owen and King
initiated dialogue with a wide range of religious and non-religious actors
involved in the peacebuilding process to survey the current state of
religious peacebuilding in Nepal and collect baseline data for the
project. This interactive assessment initiated a process of knowledge
exchange, and drawing on insight from previous research; in-depth
knowledge of the relevant religious traditions; and an enhanced
understanding of the Nepal context, Owen and King were able to facilitate
change for a variety of stakeholders. For example, religious stakeholders
consistently reported a clearer understanding of the potential of
religious actors within the peace and development processes, and the type
and nature of engagements necessary to their being seen as legitimate
actors by other stakeholders. `Secular' organisations (such as Saferworld,
UNODA) reported a greater understanding of the potential roles of
religious groups and communities, and increased confidence in how to
approach them.
The research data collected during the first two periods of field work
was subsequently used to devise a participative and facilitative workshop
which was delivered in June 2013 to several inter-faith organisations
based in the Terai region, where inter-religious conflict has
traditionally been a problem. Workshops particularly in Neplagunj and
Biratnagr were very well-received, with religious actors reporting a range
of benefits including:
- Increased understanding of the roles of religious actors in
peacebuilding;
- A greater appreciation of the problems and potentials of religion in
the Nepalese context;
- Increased advocacy skills particularly in relation to engaging
national and state actors;
- Better insight into the barriers to participation in peacebuilding for
religious actors at national and international level.
In addition to the workshops, a national level symposium and consultation
was held in Kathmandu on 17th and 18th June 2013 in
association with Religions for Peace Nepal and the Department of Conflict,
Peace and Development Studies, Tribhuvan University. The consultation was
the direct result of the relationship building process carried out by King
and Owen, and brought together religious actors, faith-based
organisations, `secular' peace practitioners, INGOs/NGOs, as well as
policy makers and government representatives including the Minister for
Peace and Reconstruction. King's and Owen's research informed the
structure and content of the symposium, and they facilitated much of the
dialogue process.
As a result of the two day discussion a wide range of stakeholders agreed
and signed up to the `Kathmandu Declaration' an action plan identifying
specific areas of religious peacebuilding on which religious and
non-religious organisations and actors would collaborate
(http://www.winchester.ac.uk/academicdepartments/theology/Research/Documents/Kathmandu%20Declaration%20final.pdf).
Additional
impacts include:
- The initiation of network of stakeholders working in peacebuilding;
- The opportunity for grassroots peacebuilders (from Biratnagar,
Neplagunj, and Muslim communities) to address for the first time a high
level national audience and inform them of their problems;
- A shift in recognition of the importance and potential of religious
actors at government level;
- A report summarising the last three years research has been compiled
and on invitation submitted to the Minister of Peace and Reconstruction
and we are awaiting his response; particularly in relation to assisting
in the establishment of a national level `Commission on Religious
Affairs' which would act as an advisory body to the government to act as
an early warning system for identifying potential problems within and
between religious groups
(http://www.winchester.ac.uk/academicdepartments/theology/Research/Documents/Religion%20and%20Peacebuilding%20in%20Nepal%20Report.pdf).
Sources to corroborate the impact
Owen, Mark & King, Anna. August 2013. `Religion and Peacebuilding in
Nepal'. WCRRP Report (Submitted by invitation to the Ministry of Peace and
Reconstruction, Government of Nepal).
(http://www.winchester.ac.uk/academicdepartments/theology/Research/Documents/Religion%20and%20Peacebuilding%20in%20Nepal%20Report.pdf)
`Kathmandu Declaration'. Kathmandu 2013.
(http://www.winchester.ac.uk/academicdepartments/theology/Research/Documents/Kathmandu%20Declaration%20final.pdf)
Image Channel, Nepal National Television. Interview with Dr Mark Owen 18th
June, 2013.
Consultation contribution, Former Assistant Secretary General, United
Nations -
http://www.kulgautam.org/2013/06/role-of-religion-in-peace-building-and-development-in-nepal/
Corroborating Statements and Contacts:
Minister of Peace and Reconstruction, Nepal.
Former Assistant Secretary General, United Nations.
United States Institute for Peace, Nepalese Advisor, (including
statements from the All Religion coordination Committee (ARCC),
Biratnagar, and the Inter Religious Coordination Committee, Birgunj).