International Children’s Law
Submitting Institution
London Metropolitan UniversityUnit of Assessment
LawSummary Impact Type
LegalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Studies In Human Society: Social Work
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Summary of the impact
The case study is concerned with the issue of international family law
disputes, especially how the law affects those involved in such cases.
Over the last few years, the research has had extensive impact among
lawyers, mediators, judges and families. The stimulus for the research was
realisation that there was a pressing need for closer professional
collaborations in order to deliver improved outcomes for affected
families. To this end, the Centre for Family Law and Practice (CFLP) was
established at London Metropolitan University (LMU) in January 2009. Under
the auspices of CFLP, interdisciplinary experts worked on these issues.
CFLP assists courts, including the United Kingdom and United States
Supreme Courts, with amicus curiae briefs based in particular on
the research of Professor Marilyn Freeman, abetted by that of Dr Frances
Burton.
Underpinning research
Professor Freeman co-directs CFLP with Frances Burton, a
Barrister-Academic and Mediator with Chambers in Lincolns Inn. CFLP
emerged in response to the felt need for all those connected to the issues
of international Family Law and Practice to work much more closely
together in order to properly serve those who are involved in these cases.
CFLP is especially concerned with international child abduction and
relocation and forced marriages, themes of the Centre's inaugural
conference held in June 2010 at LMU, attended by more than 150
interdisciplinary specialists from 18 jurisdictions. David Hodson,
consultant at the International Family Law Group, called the conference
`perhaps the most important international family law conference ever to
take place in England' (http://www.familylaw.co.uk/articles/david-hodson-on-international-family-law-3).
Freeman has an international
reputation for her research into international child law, developed
since the late 1990s. She published her first peer-reviewed article on the
effects of international child abduction in 1998, in the US-based, Family
Law Quarterly. Until this time, while child abduction was the
subject of international concern and an international legal regime had
been created for its control, very little research had been undertaken on
how it impacted on the families concerned, specifically the children, and
thus whether the legal mechanisms for its control were appropriate and as
helpful as they could be.
Freeman's research on child abduction provides new insights into the
realities of abduction for the families involved. Her research informs
international and domestic policy debates in this area, is used by legal
practitioners during court proceedings in many different jurisdictions,
and is often cited by members of the judiciary in their judgements.
Knowledge gained from Freeman's research has been applied in the practical
development of international law in this area. Freeman provided the
academic input of an Amicus Brief in the US Supreme Court case in the
seminal case of Abbott v Abbott in 2009, and the CFLP submitted an
Amicus Brief which cites and uses Freeman's research to the US Supreme
Court in the case of Chafin heard in December 2012. Leading and
junior counsel from two of the most prominent English specialist
barristers' chambers represented the CFLP pro bono in this
important case which addresses Freeman's research concerning the welfare
of children who have been abducted. Freeman was also asked to work with
another specialist team of lawyers on a recent UK Supreme Court case
concerning relocation, in which Freeman's research was critical. Her most
recent research develops her earlier work by examining specifically the
long-term effects of abduction on adults and young people who were
abducted as children, an area which has not been researched on this scale
before, and which Freeman is able to do because of her long-established
involvement in this area, and the significant expertise which she is
recognised as having by the professionals, and the families, involved in
these cases.
References to the research
`The Effects and Consequences of International Child Abduction', Family
Law Quarterly, (1998) 32, 603. (11 citations on Google
Scholar as at 9 August 2013)
`International Child Abduction — The Effects', www.reunite.org
(2006) (3 citations on Google Scholar as at 9 August).
Baroness Hale, Justice of the UK Supreme Court, referred to this research
at the inaugural conference of the CFLP in 2010, expressing herself to be
"very grateful" for Freeman's research because she had found "that
research much more helpful, balanced, and illuminating than the research
which is referred to by the United State Supreme Court in the recent case
of Abbott v Abbott decided on the 17th May this year... So,
valuable though empirical research can be, citing it in judgment is
something that we judges find that we have to approach with considerable
care". Baroness Hales expressed herself to be "so pleased" with Professor
Freeman's `Effects of Abduction' research because it distinguishes between
primary carer and other abductions which is a "hugely relevant variable in
looking at the effects on the child of the abduction" and said that
"someone has to assess the benefits of the research from that point of
view as well". She continued: "One of the most interesting conclusions to
emerge from Freeman's research on the effects of child abduction is that
"children abducted by their primary carers usually do not perceive the
experience as one of abduction but, when abducted by their non-primary
carers, they do," and it's that sort of comment that leads me to be more
sceptical of the American research that was being quoted. It doesn't draw
those sorts of careful distinctions. And it's the return that seems to
produce the more profound effects, this is again Marilyn Freeman's
research, but it is the effects of the parental conflict which seem to be
the greatest problem of the children. Now, this study was of course
looking at the effects on the children who were returned, but we need more
research there because we need to look at the effects on the children who
are not returned, who are in the same position as relocated children, but
the relocation having taken place in a different context, in a different
way, and that we need to compare the two to see whether doing it in one
way is more or less damaging than doing it in another". Professor Freeman
has now undertaken work on the links between abduction and research, and
the lessons to be learned between our knowledge of both areas, as referred
to by Baroness Hale in this final quote (see M. Freeman, `International
Family Mobility, Relocation and Abduction, Links and Messages'¸ International
Family Law, March 2013 (http://www.familylawiclip.co.uk/articles/international-family-mobility-relocation-and-abduction-links-and-lessons).
`Relocation
— The reunite Research Project', www.reunite.org
(2009) Baroness Hale, at the 2010 CFLP inaugural conference, said: "We
know already from Marilyn Freeman's Reunite Research on Relocation that
there are often seriously negative results for the left-behind parent and
the family, but we know much less about the effects upon the children. As
she says, "we do not know whether, in general, relocation works well for
children who adapt quickly and suffer no significant emotional loss, or
whether, alternatively, relocation impacts negatively and substantially on
a child's life and development and, if so, in which ways. We do need much
more research which can tell us some of the answers, although, my
suspicion is that it will be...it depends. But even knowing that is
helpful and especially knowing what it depends on is the most helpful
thing of the lot
•`International Research Evidence on Relocation: Past, Present and
Future', co-authored with Dr. Nicola Taylor, University of Otago, New
Zealand, Family Law Quarterly (2010) 44(3), 317-339 (4
citations on Google Scholar as at 21 February 2013)
•`Relocation and the Child's Best Interests', International Family
Law, 2010 (4 citations on Google Scholar as at 21 February 2013)
referred to approvingly by Wall LJ, then President of the Family Division
of the High Court of London in re W [2011] EWCA Civ 345
•`University Responses to Forced Marriage and Violence Against Women in
the UK: Report on a Pilot Study', International Family Law,
September 2012.
Key grants
• In September 2011, Freeman was awarded a grant of £40,000 by the
Faculty of Law, Governance and International Relations (FLGIR) at LMU to
assist her in her research into the `Long-Term Effects of International
Child Abduction'. The research is due to be the end of 2013.
• Freeman was awarded a grant of £4,000 by FLGIR in April 2011 to
undertake research, together with Dr. Renate Klein of The Child and Woman
Abuse Studies Unit at LMU, on `University Responses to Forced Marriage and
Domestic Violence'. The research was completed in the summer of 2012.
• Freeman made a successful bid for £20,000 in July 2012 to the Forced
Marriage Unit's Domestic Programme Fund (the Forced Marriage Unit is a
joint initiative of the Home Office and the Foreign and Commonwealth
Office) to continue the work begun in the Pilot Project. The project will
be completed in autumn 2013.
• Freeman was Head of the reunite Research Unit for many years (reunite
is the International Child Abduction Centre). During this time, she
undertook research into `The Effects of International Child Abduction',
published in 2006, supported by a grant from the Department for
Constitutional Affairs.
• Freeman published her research on the UK-Pakistan Protocol in 2009
which was supported by a grant to the reunite Research Unit by the
Foreign and Commonwealth Office. She also published her Relocation
research in 2009 supported by a grant to the reunite Research Unit
by the Ministry of Justice.
Details of the impact
Following its inauguration in January 2009, CFLP quickly attracted the
attention of key international practitioners and academics working in the
area of International Family Law. This interest was particularly linked to
the impact of Professor Freeman's research, which has made a very
significant contribution to the knowledge and practice in this area,
including in relation to the lives of those affected by various related
issues, including: International Child Abduction, Relocation, Forced
Marriages, Mediation, Children's Rights, and Gender.
During the course of CFLP's existence and Freeman's research outputs,
public awareness has undoubtedly been raised in relation both to those
practising (legally and otherwise professionally), as well as those who
are affected by them, that is, victims and their families. Freeman has
made important contributions to scholarship in this field, producing key
peer-reviewed journal articles, delivering keynote conference papers, and
contributing by invitation to international policy debates. Further, her
work has influenced the development and shape of the law by the effect it
has had on legal practitioners and judges. It has been cited repeatedly by
members of the judiciary in their judgments, still a relatively rare
occurrence, which provides a cogent indication of its practical value,
reach and significance both domestically and internationally. The success
of the CFLP and its work has resulted in the appointment of Jacqueline
Mburu as Research Assistant on the University Responses to Forced Marriage
and Violence Against Women project from July 2012, and Sonalini
Gunasekera, as an Intern/Research Assistant on the Long-Term Effects of
Abduction project between November and December 2012.
Freeman is an internationally-renowned authority in international child
law, was a long-term member of the Legal Working Group advising the
All-Party Parliamentary Committee on International Child Abduction until
its recent dissolution, and has been approached to become involved with
the successor to that group. She publishes widely and is regularly invited
to address both national and international conferences on her work, often
as keynote speaker, and to participate in multi-disciplinary working
groups operating in her areas of expertise. She was invited to address the
prestigious International Judicial Conference on Cross Border Family
Relocation, Washington DC, March 2010, where she co-presented a paper
detailing the global research in this area for the international experts
in attendance which has become a welcome resource concerning the available
conflicted research in this area. The written and broadcast media have
been keen to disseminate information about Freeman's research and
associated activities.
Baroness Hale of Richmond, a former academic and a member of the Supreme
Court with a keen interest in the development of Family Law, is the very
active Patron of the CFLP and is often involved in its activities. Lord
Justice Thorpe, Head of International Family Justice, England and Wales,
is an important supporter of the CFLP and Professor Freeman's work. Many
academics and researchers are keen to contribute to the work of CFLP, and
many attended the inaugural CFLP Summer School on "Children and the Law"
in 2010.
The CFLP's on-line, peer-reviewed journal continues the aim of bringing
together the academic and practical perspectives of Family Law. It has an
editorial board which includes key academics, lawyers, and judges. The
regard in which the CFLP and Professor Freeman are held by the
international community is evidenced in the success of the
multi-disciplinary international inaugural conference which the CFLP held
in 2010 on the linked themes of International Child Abduction, Forced
Marriage and Relocation, and the overwhelming response to the follow-up
conference in July 2013 on Parentage, Equality and Gender, which attracted
over 200 delegates. The Call for Papers for the 2013 conference received
approximately 150 responses, with accepted presentations from 25 different
countries, and renowned academics and researchers so eager to participate
that a waiting list had to be created for speaking places.
Sources to corroborate the impact
- Details of Amicus Curiae brief filed in Abbott v Abbott and
intervention of CFLP in I (A Child) [2009] UKSC 10 http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed50871
http://www.4pb.com/index.php?item_id=1610
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed58902
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed45906
- Pakistan Protocol research
http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=text.display&tid=113
- Cairo Roundtable http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm78/7805/7805.pdf
- Inaugural conference, and The London Conclusions and Resolutions
http://www.familylaw.co.uk/articles/david-hodson-on-international-family-law-3
http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=text.display&tid=140
http://globaljusticeinitiative.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/conclusions-and-resolutions-published-from-inaugural-conference-on-child-abduction
- BBC reports:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8774000/8774819.stm
on CFLP's inaugural conference http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2011/09/child_abduction.shtml
on Freeman's current abduction research http://news.ffblog.net/child-abduction.html
- Specialist firm of family lawyers in South Africa which holds annual
conference in conjunction with University of Western Cape.
- Former Director of reunite, the leading NGO on International Child,
now a mediator on the practical use and importance of Freeman's research
in resolution of intractable international family mobility cases.
- Former Deputy Secretary General of The Hague Conference on Private
International Law, regarding the esteem in which Freeman's research is
held, and the contribution it has made to international debate and
policy.
- Counsel, 4 Paper Buildings, on Freeman's research. (`The UK's largest
chambers of family law barristers. We provide practical, expert legal
advice, and effective and assured advocacy, through the courts, other
forms of dispute resolution and through direct access')
- Editor of peer-reviewed journal, International Family Law,
published by Jordan Publishing (`As well as dealing with practical
issues affecting lawyers' case work, International Family Law
looks at some of the deeper issues concerning the rationale and
jurisprudence of existing law. International family law reform can best
go forward when practitioners and academics learn from and communicate
with each other';
http://www.jordanpublishing.co.uk/publications/family-law/international-family-law).