International Human Rights: hate speech, minority rights, racial discrimination and indigenous peoples
Submitting Institution
Keele UniversityUnit of Assessment
Politics and International StudiesSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Studies In Human Society: Political Science
Law and Legal Studies: Law
Language, Communication and Culture: Cultural Studies
Summary of the impact
Patrick Thornberry's research on human rights, particularly regarding
international standards on
racial (including caste) discrimination, minority rights, rights of
indigenous peoples, and hate
speech, has (1) influenced the development of legal principle through
advice on policy and
participation in the authorship of international standards, particularly
those of the United Nations;
(2) influenced the development of national legislation and practice
including legislation in the UK;
(3) facilitated the human rights work of international and national
non-governmental organisations
(NGOs) working to defend the rights of minority, indigenous and caste
communities.
Underpinning research
Dates: Professor Patrick Thornberry was employed at Keele
University from 1990-2010 (when he
became Emeritus Professor). He has carried out research on minority rights
throughout his career.
The principal insights and findings from research between 1993 and 2010
are in the following
areas:
(a) On minority rights: Thornberry demonstrated that their
expression had been largely
subsumed under international standards on discrimination, which, while
functioning as starting
points for protection of cultural, religious and linguistic identity,
lacked appropriate indicators for
the expression of identities. He suggested that lacunae were particularly
evident in minority
education and language, on recognition of the status and membership of
minorities, and on the
participation of minorities in decisions affecting them, and analysed key
principles and
instruments to move the discourse forward (references 1 & 5). This
accounted for the
relationship between specific principles and general international law,
and apparatuses for the
implementation of rights. His approach aimed to facilitate understanding
the status and role of
minority rights in the corpus of international standards on human rights.
(b) On racial discrimination: his research concentrated on
exploring the concept and grounds of
discrimination, the aims and objectives of international standards,
affirmative action, the work
of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), and
the integration of
discrimination standards with those on minorities and indigenous peoples
(references 4 & 6).
Research findings clustered around the relationship between
anti-discrimination and equality
standards and the norms embodying freedoms, including cultural and speech
freedoms, the
lack of attention to the rights of particularly vulnerable groups,
including caste groups, and
dilemmas over collective rights in contexts animated by individualist
paradigms.
(c) On indigenous peoples: Thornberry researched extensively into
the place of indigenous
peoples in the history of international law, understandings of
`indigenousness', the applicability
of general and specific norms to advance their interests,
self-determination, and standards on
lands, territories and defence of indigenous cultures (references 2 &
4). The research highlights
the stresses under which indigenous peoples endeavour to survive and
defend their cultures.
These necessitate urgent action to adopt and implement existing standards
of human rights as
well as broadening of paradigms to accommodate indigenous world-views.
(d) On hate speech, his research has focused on moves to
proscribe `defamation of religions', in
light of events such as those following publication of `The Satanic
Verses', and the `Danish
cartoons'. He concluded that proscribing `incitement to hatred' fitted
into networks of human
rights standards less equivocally than proscribing 'defamation of
religions', but that it was not
always easy to distinguish attacks on believers from attacks on doctrine.
He cautioned that
readings of freedom of expression should recognise that the boundaries of
speech
acceptability vary among nations and cultures and that international
standards should take this
into account (reference 6).
In practice there is overlap and convergence between the above four
areas, as is evidenced in
Thornberry's published research.
References to the research
1. Thornberry, P. (1995) `The Rights of Minorities', in D. Harris and S.
Joseph (eds.), The
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and United Kingdom
Law. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, pp.597-627.
2. Thornberry, P. (2002) Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights.
Manchester University Press,
Manchester, 484 pp.
3. Thornberry, P. (2005) `Combating Racial Discrimination: A CERD
Perspective', Human Rights
Law Review, 5, pp.239-69. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngi015
4. Thornberry, P. (2005) `The Convention on the Elimination of Racial
Discrimination, Indigenous
Peoples and Descent-based Discrimination', in J. Castellino and N. Walsh
(eds.), International Law
and Indigenous Peoples. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp.17-52.
5. Thornberry, P. and de Varennes, F. (2005) `Two chapters on education
rights, and one on
language rights' in M. Weller (ed.), The Rights of Minorities: A
commentary on the European
Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities.
Oxford University Press, Oxford,
pp. 365-428.
6. Thornberry, P. (2010) `Forms of Hate Speech and the Convention on the
Elimination of All
Forms of Racial Discrimination', Religion and Human Rights, 5, pp.
97-117.
DOI: 10.1163/187103210X528138
Evidence of quality: (3) and (6) were subject to the journals'
anonymous peer review systems. (2)
was favourably reviewed, inter alia in: British Yearbook of
International Law (2003) 74 (1): 457-458
and the Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 2004.
Details of the impact
Patrick Thornberry's research has had significant impact on the
development of international and
national human rights law, and the work of non-governmental organizations
(NGOs). This is bound
up with the public positions he has occupied since the 1990s, which in
turn, has also informed his
research. Thus, the insights of his research in the 1980s and 1990s led to
the Chairmanship of the
NGO Minority Rights Group International (1999-2002), followed by
membership (2001-2014) of UN
CERD (the monitoring body of the International Convention on the
Elimination of Racial
Discrimination — ICERD). This was on the nomination of the UK government
and confirmed by
votes of the States parties to the Convention, most recently in 2010 when
Professor Thornberry
received 144 votes. He served as rapporteur (independent expert) for six
years up to 2008 (with
responsibility to prepare the annual report of CERD to the UN General
Assembly); country
rapporteur for 21 reporting States (9 States since 2008); chairman of the
Early Warning and Urgent
Action Group (2008-2010); and follow-up rapporteur on State party periodic
reports (from 2012), in
which he was responsible for monitoring progress made by States parties in
implementing the
recommendations of the Committee. Membership of CERD has been coterminous
with additional
UN advisory engagements and work with regional bodies such as the Council
of Europe, and with
NGOs and civil society groups.
Professor Thornberry was the first rapporteur of the UN Forum on Minorities
(2008), initiating the
discussion and preparing the initial draft of the Forum's Recommendations
on Minority Education,
which will influence governments worldwide. This stemmed from a request
from the then UN
Independent Expert on Minorities, specifically on account of Thornberry's
research on minority
rights in the field of education (see Thornberry, 2005, above); this work
is clearly reflected in the
Recommendations of the Forum. The former President of the Council of
Europe Advisory
Committee on National Minorities (2006-10) comments: `no other academic I
know has had such a
positive influence at the UN on minority issues as Professor Patrick
Thornberry.' In addition, in his
capacity as a former Chair of Minority Rights Group (MRG), Professor
Thornberry has maintained
a relationship with the Group. A spokesperson, writing on behalf of MRG,
notes: `Patrick's research
has most certainly had an influence on our work here at MRG. His books are
standard texts for us
in our promotion of minority and indigenous rights worldwide. Arguments at
MRG on finer points of
minority rights law can be definitively settled by reference to
Thornberry.'
Professor Thornberry was primary or shared rapporteur/author of several
General
Recommendations (GRs) on racial discrimination. These include GR
29 on discrimination on the
grounds of caste or descent (2002), GR 32 on special measures/affirmative
action (2009), and GR
34 on discrimination against persons of African Descent (2011); the latter
were informed by
research developed from his publications in 2005. Regarding Thornberry's
work on the Committee
for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, a senior representative
says: `While the work of CERD
is a collective one, contributions made by individual experts are highly
important to the overall
results of the work of the Committee. In this regard, Professor Thornberry
has effectively
contributed to the jurisprudence of CERD by using his academic research,
particularly on
minorities and racial discrimination'. She highlights in particular his
`crucial role in preparing initial
drafts of General Recommendations'. These provide guidance to the
governments of the 176
States parties to the convention and influence the work of civil society
in those countries. `He was
the key member of CERD involved in producing the Committee's
ground-breaking
recommendations on caste or descent GR 29, 2002' (spokesperson for
Minority Rights Group).
This remains `a major influence on UN and governmental approaches'
(President of the Council of
Europe Advisory Committee on National Minorities). GR 29 has been
extensively employed by
Dalit and Buraku groups in advocacy strategies (for example the Dalit
Solidarity Network's 2011
report recommending implementation of GR 29 in the UK) and has also
influenced legislative
changes in the UK, where caste discrimination has recently been recognised
as a form of racial
discrimination.
Thornberry's earlier work in developing the UN Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples
`where he was the leading intellectual thinker' (President of the Council
of Europe, Advisory
Committee on National Minorities, 2006-10) led to further research on indigenous
education rights
(reference 5, section 3) which informed the UN Expert Mechanism on
Indigenous Rights and its
`Advice' to governments in 2009. Its impact has extended to indigenous
NGOs. For example, his
research was cited in a recent (2012) submission to CERD in support of the
Sami people's claim
that self-identification principles were leading to the dilution of Sami
identity in Finland: CERD
agreed with the submission and changed its advice to the government. Sami
organisations
incorporated this advice into their lobbying of the Finnish government in
order to defend their rights
to land and culture.
On hate speech, Professor Thornberry's research has contributed
to moving UN efforts on from
`defamation of religions' to addressing `incitement to hatred'. In 2011,
following the publication of
his article in Religion and Human Rights (reference 6 in section 3), CERD
appointed him as co-rapporteur
for the discussion on racist hate speech, which took place in 2012. The
text of a general
recommendation was presented to CERD in 2013 and was adopted as GR 35 on
`combating racist
hate speech'. Initial reaction suggests that the recommendation is being
treated as a ground-breaking
development and it is cited by a senior representative of the Rule of Law
and Democracy
section, UN OHCHR, as one of `numerous occasions [in which] Patrick
Thornberry has been able
to bring findings from his own research into the work of CERD and by so
doing influenced its work
positively.'
Sources to corroborate the impact
Corroborators:
Chief of the Rule of Law and Democracy section (former UN CERD Secretary)
UN Office of the
High Commissioner for Human Rights (impact of Thornberry's research on UN
hate speech
recommendation).
Secretary of UN CERD (on contribution of research to work on CERD).
Former UN Independent Expert on Minorities (impact of research on
minorities and education to
UN Forum on Minorities)
Director, Minority Rights Group International (use of research by MRG)
Independent human rights consultant, President of the Council of Europe
Advisory Committee on
National Minorities (2006-10) and former Director of Minority Rights Group
(impact of research on
minorities on UN and Council of Europe)
United Nations documents (available on request or from
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CERD/Pages/CERDIndex.aspx):
GR on Persons of African Descent:
UN Document A/63/18, para. 554
On moving from `defamation of religions' to addressing `incitement to
hatred':
UN Document A/HRC/10/31/Add.3 (2009) `Report of the United Nations High
Commissioner for
Human Rights and Follow-up to the World Conference on Human Rights' —
Report on Expert
Seminar (Geneva, 2008) on "Freedom of expression and advocacy of religious
hatred that
constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence".
For the UN Expert Mechanism on Indigenous Rights and its `Advice' to
governments in 2009:
UN document A/HRC/12/33 `The UN Expert Mechanism Advice No. 1 on the right
of indigenous
peoples to education, annexed to the Study on lessons learned and
challenges to achieve the
implementation of the right of indigenous peoples to education
For the 2012 discussion on racist hate speech:
UN document A/67/18, p. 87, para. 62.
For General Recommendation 35 on Combating Racist Hate Speech:
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CERD/Pages/CERDIndex.aspx
(General Comments)
Other sources:
For the UN Forum on Minorities 2008:
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Minority/Pages/ForumIndex.aspx
On the Dalit Solidarity Network's recommendation to implement GR 29 in
the UK: Dalit Solidarity
Network (2011) Caste Based Discrimination in the United Kingdom
On the UK ban on caste discrimination: International Dalit
Solidarity Network News, `Britain Bans
Caste Discrimination', 24th April 2013: http://idsn.org/news-resources/idsn-news/read/article/britain-bans-caste-discrimination/128/
For the Sami self-identification case:
http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CERD%2FC%2
FFIN%2FCO%2F20-22&Lang=en (Sami Council_ alongside `Finland' The
concluding observations
of the Committee (CERD/C/FIN/CO/20-22, para. 12).