Global Microfinance: Fighting against poverty in developing countries
Submitting Institution
University of Central LancashireUnit of Assessment
Business and Management StudiesSummary Impact Type
EconomicResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Public Health and Health Services
Economics: Applied Economics
Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services: Banking, Finance and Investment
Summary of the impact
This case study refers to the work of Professor Thankom Arun of the
Institute of Global Finance and Development (IGFD) at UCLan, who has been
working very closely with Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) and
international development agencies to understand and tackle the critical
issue of finance in the development process. The ingenuity and originality
of this type of research has had a profound impact on national and
international policy debates, challenging and disproving misunderstandings
about the inability of the poor to engage effectively with financial
services provision, such as savings and insurance. The research has had a
significant direct impact on the functioning of microfinance institutions
at the local and grassroots level and on the delivery of financial
services to some of the most vulnerable communities around the world.
Underpinning research
The research is built on the assumption that poor households are
detrimentally affected by limited access to, and an inadequate provision
of, financial services. Professor Arun's research provides a valuable
contribution to the evidence base of this area of research, incorporating
as it does detailed knowledge of the issues involved on the usage of
loans, risk management, asset accumulation, access and use of financial
services, and the regulation of MFIs.
The research on rural households in India (2010a) demonstrates the
importance of the role of clients' intended use of loans in determining
outcomes. This study points out the need for developing a consistent
framework to monitor the usage of loans, with adequate flexibility to
capture different levels of household participation. In Sri Lanka,
Professor Arun's research (2010b; 2012a) has established the significance
of the role that micro insurance plays as a preventive risk- coping
strategy, reducing the vulnerabilities of low-income populations. Even
though the poor have high incentives to secure against future shocks,
their ability and willingness to participate in micro- financial services
such as insurance increases with rising self-awareness of risk. Further to
this, we have noted the importance of a household's experience of shock
and its impact in prioritising and sequencing the type, number and the
combination of assets (2013). This finding from India has contributed to
the debates on asset accumulation strategies and the debates on
appropriate public policies for minimising the incidence of shocks,
ultimately improving household's livelihood choices. In South Africa (2012
b, c), our research demonstrates that values, perceptions and attitudes
affect demand for financial products. However, the relative importance of
prior perceptions and attitudes diminishes and ultimately disappears as
one moves up the financial access ladder.
Arguably, different types of micro interventions provide social
protection for the low-income populations by enhancing access to finance,
creating assets and helping to prevent slipping into poverty traps
(2010c). However, the arguments for regulation in the microfinance sector
seem appropriate when consideration is given to the level of uncertainties
to which clients are exposed, such as complex procedures and high
operating costs. Our research (2010c) in Africa found that the performance
of MFIs depends largely on the regulatory environment, which affects the
fabric of social protection, mainly through its effectiveness and
outreach. Professor Arun's research (2010c) recommends the development of
regulations within the context of a broader social protection framework,
developed in close partnership with microfinance institutions.
Over the period in which the research was undertaken, Professor Arun's
work mapped out a future agenda for improving microfinance institutions,
based on an institutional design that incorporates the varying and diverse
requirements of the poor for meeting their complex livelihood needs.
The underpinning research was developed across a number of publications
and research funding strands from the European Union, British Academy,
British Council and ESRC. The research was also supported by a Visiting
Professorship at the University of Rome, La Sapienza (2008), Honorary
Senior Fellowship at the University of Manchester (2007-to date) and a
Research Fellow position at IZA, Bonn (2010-to date).
References to the research
Publications
T. Arun, (2010 a) "Microfinance and Household Poverty Reduction: New
evidence from India," (with K.Imai and S.Annim) World Development,
38(12), pp.1760-74.
T. Arun, (2010 b) "Risk Management Among the Poor: The Case of Micro
financial Services" (with M.Bending), Journal of Economic Development,
36(4), pp.97-126.
T. Arun, (2012 a) "Bequest Motives and Determinants of Micro Life
Insurance in Sri Lanka" (with M.Bending and S.Arun), World Development,
40 (8), pp.1700-11.
T. Arun, (2012 b ) "Determinants of Access to Finance: An Investigation
into the Mzansi Intervention" (with P. Kostov and S.Annim), The
European Journal of Development Research, 24 (3). pp. 397-412.
T. Arun, (2012 c) "Effect of Perceptions and Behaviour on Access to and
Use of Financial Service: Evidence from South Africa" (with S.Annim and P.
Kostov), IZA DP No. 7042; pp.1-31.
T. Arun, (2013) "Overcoming Household Shocks: Do Asset-Accumulation
Strategies Matter?" (with S. Arun and S. Annim), Review of Social
Economy, 71(3), pp. 281-305.
Details of the impact
In many developing countries, less than half of the population has access
to formal financial markets (World Bank, 2008). The programme of research
has addressed this concern, and has made significant contributions to
understanding the impact of financial innovations (such as microfinance
and microinsurance) on low-income households. Following this, we have
researched the nature of regulation among microfinance institutions,
examining how regulation contributes to intended impacts.
Professor Arun's research asserted the positive contribution of
microfinancial services among households through extensive data-based
analyses in various countries. The study in India (2010a), based on a
nation-wide sample, addressed the impact of microfinancial services on
household poverty, utilizing an Index Based Ranking (IBR) method, which
correctly captures the multidimensional aspects of poverty. The study
established the poverty-reducing effects of access to microfinance and
loans used for productive purposes. We have found evidence (2010b, 2012a)
in Sri Lanka that microinsurance has provided greater opportunities for
the diversification of financial-risk exposure for the poor and enhanced
their capabilities in financial management. Based on a household survey,
supported by British Academy, this research found that the probability of
taking up financial services increased with rising household perception of
risk. The ESRC research project in South Africa employed a combination of
models and variable selection methods to reveal the effect of financial
perceptions and behaviour on access to, and use of, different types of
financial services. The findings reveal a robust relationship between
financial perception and behaviour on (a) access to and use of general
accounts and services, and (b) access to and use of insurance/assurance
products. Our research has enabled us to generate significant impact at
two levels - (1) impacts on practitioners and services (2) impacts on
international development and public policy debates.
(1)Impacts on practitioners and services
As part of a DelPHE project financed by The British Council, we
collaborated with Yaalex Microfinance Limited in Ghana (http://ww.yaalexfinance.com/joomla16),
one of the `A' category organisations in the Ghana Association of
Microfinance Companies (GAMC) Ratings; The research examined the
risk-coping mechanisms adopted by women entrepreneurs. Our research and
training collaborations have impacted on Yaalex as an organisation,
contributing to the expansion of the business and the development of
enhanced professional standards and training. Yaalex clients have been
enabled to take better financial decisions (Contact 3) with demonstrable
benefits in the areas of education and health. Our involvement with Yaalex
has facilitated the diffusion of research knowledge and current
best-practice throughout both the company and microfinance institutions
within this region of Ghana.
(2)Impacts on international development and public policy debates
Our research evidence has stimulated policy debates and international
agencies have been influenced by our research. We have been invited by the
European Commission to contribute a background chapter on "Microfinance
and Social Protection" for the European Report on Development (Source http://erd.eui.eu/media/BackgroundPapers/Arun-Murinde.pdf).
We have argued for sector-specific regulations in the microfinance sector,
to enable the distinctiveness of this sector to be captured. We have
advocated for the enhanced mobilization of savings and for developing
linkages with the formal sector. These findings have featured in the
report (4;5).
Arun has been invited to provide evidence to the All-Party Parliamentary
Group (APPG) on the impact of Microfinance as one of the three academic
expert members (Sources 1 and 3). The evidence has contributed to the APPG
report "Helping or hurting: What role for microfinance in the fight
against poverty?" (http://appg-microfinance.org/inquiry.php,2;
Contact 1 and 2). The report acknowledged Arun's contribution and
referenced Arun's work (2010c). The report set out to generate greater
interest and understanding amongst the legislature and there is evidence
to confirm that this has been the case (http://appg-microfinance.org/parliament.php,
part of 2; Contact 1 and 2). The microfinance related parliamentary
questions have nearly doubled since 2011, compared to 2007-11 period as
per the data available in the website.
Further to this, Arun has been invited by Dr. Duncan Green, strategic
adviser for Oxfam GB, to reply to Dr. Milford Bateman's criticism on the
impact of microfinance in the very popular blog `From Poverty to Power'.
Arun's critical engagement on this issue argues that the "one size fits
all" strategy does not work in relation to microfinance and that concepts
of microfinance need to be flexible and incorporate enhanced
understandings of the diverse needs of the poor. (http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?tag=microfinance
;3).
Sources to corroborate the impact
- http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/jun/10/microfinance-
friend-or-foe - Guardian article, 10th June 2011
- APPG enquiry with further details: website http://appg-microfinance.org/inquiry.php
- Oxfam blog on "From Poverty to Power" - http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?tag=microfinance
- European Report on Development - http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/public-consultations/documents/erd_2010_social_protection_for_inclusive_development_en.pdf
- Microfinance Regulation and Social Protection - http://erd.eui.eu/media/BackgroundPapers/Arun-Murinde.pdf
CONTACT 1 Mr. Aaron Oxley, Executive Director, RESULTS UK.
CONTACT 2 Annette Brook MP, Chair APPG on Microfinance, House of
Parliament
CONTACT 3 Mr. Alex K. Dadzie, Managing Director, Yaalex
MicrofinanceLimited