Increasing Public Engagement and Involvement with Psychological Research Through the Creation of 'Summer Scientist' Events
Submitting Institution
University of NottinghamUnit of Assessment
Psychology, Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Neurosciences, Public Health and Health Services
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences: Psychology
Summary of the impact
Summer Scientist Week (www.summerscientist.org)
is an innovative public engagement event held at the University of
Nottingham that increases public understanding of the psychology of child
development. Families with children aged from 4 to 11 years experience the
research process first-hand by participating in ongoing studies. Research
findings and their impact are disseminated through posters at the event
and follow-up newsletters. Summer Scientist Week (SSW) has increased
public understanding of psychology research within the community and has
increased interest in psychology and child development topics in the media
and has increased attendance at other science and research-based events.
Underpinning research
The research that underpins this impact comprises a range of
psychological research conducted between 2005 to 2013 across both the
Division of Psychiatry and the School of Psychology at Nottingham, forming
the platform for engaging members of the public in science. This research
encompasses 6 key research themes: social cognition, mathematical
cognition, spatial cognition, perceptuo-motor development, attention and
executive function, and hearing. The underpinning research was carried out
by researchers in the School of Psychology (Drs. Lucy Cragg, Camilla
Gilmore, Antonia Hamilton, Roger Newport, Danielle Ropar, Alastair Smith)
and Division of Psychiatry (Drs. Madeleine Groom and Elizabeth Liddle).
All are research active members of staff appointed between 2003 and 2007
and all remain at Nottingham with the exception of Gilmore who left in
2010 and Hamilton who left in late 2013. Examples of the key research
themes and underpinning research are outlined below.
Social cognition: Dr Antonia Hamilton, Dr Roger Newport and Dr
Danielle Ropar
This research programme investigates imitation; specifically who and what
individuals choose to copy. So far, the findings suggest that imitation is
influenced by the social situation, social standing and social cues such
as eye gaze1. This topic is particularly suited to public
engagement.
Mathematical cognition: Dr Camilla Gilmore
This research investigates how children's basic sense of quantity is
related to the formal maths skills that they learn at school. It has been
found that children can connect both number words and number symbols to
their sense of quantity from the start of school2.
Spatial cognition: Dr Alastair Smith
Dr Smith studies how children and adults deal with large-scale tasks such
as learning a new environment. Studies have examined children and adults'
ability to learn to search effectively for a hidden object and remember
useful landmarks to help navigate routes3.
Perceptuo-motor development: Dr Danielle Ropar, Dr Alastair Smith
This research programme uses children's drawings to study skills such as
fine motor control, mental imagery, perceptual analysis, planning and
memory. Children's knowledge about the object they are drawing appears to
be the biggest influence on how well they can copy an image4.
Attention and executive functions: Dr Lucy Cragg, Dr Madeleine Groom,
Dr Elizabeth Liddle, Professor Chris Hollis
This research addresses how children develop the skills to ignore
distractions and suppress impulsive actions as well as adapt their
behaviour to changes in the environment. There is a dramatic increase in
the ability to overcome distraction between 4 and 11 years, and children
of different ages experience, and deal with, distraction in different ways5,6.
One of the key features of SSW is that the data collected at the event
feed back into underpinning research. SSW research has produced high
quality publications7 in four of the five research themes
outlined above. This research is disseminated to parents at the event and
also underpins future research at the event, sustaining the cycle of
research, engagement and education.
References to the research
1. Wang Y, Newport R, & Hamilton AF de C. (2011). Eye
contact enhances mimicry of intransitive hand movements. Biology
Letters, 7, 7-10. DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0279. IF: 3.348; Citations:
16
2. Gilmore CK, McCarthy SE & Spelke E (2007). Symbolic
arithmetic knowledge without instruction. Nature, 447, 589-591.
DOI: 10.1038/nature05850. IF: 38.597; Citations 71
3. Smith AD, Hood BM. and Gilchrist ID. (2010). Probabilistic
cuing in large-scale environmental search. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(3), 605-618. DOI:
10.1037/a0018280. IF: 2.918; Citations 10. Also available on request.
4. Sheppard E, Ropar D, & Mitchell P. (2005). The
impact of meaning and dimensionality on the accuracy of children's
copying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(3),
365-381. DOI: 10.1348/026151005X27605. IF: 1.33; Citations 4
5. Cragg L. & Nation K. (2009). Shifting development in
mid-childhood: The influence of between-task interference. Developmental
Psychology. 45(5), 1465-1479. DOI: 10.1037/a0015360. IF: 2.976;
Citations 9. Also available on request.
6. Liddle EB, Scerif G, Hollis CP, Batty MJ, Groom MJ,
Liotti M. And Liddle PF. (2009). Looking before you leap: a theory
of motivated control of action. Cognition. 112(1), 141-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.006.
IF: 3.523; Citations 14
7. Marsh, L., Pearson, A., Ropar, D., & Hamilton, A. (2013) Children
with autism do not overimitate. Current Biology, 23 (7),
R266-R268. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.036. IF: 4.949; Citations: 0
Selected Funding
Antonia Hamilton (RA2974 — £78,756)
Should I mimic you? : Social control of mimicry (ESRC, 2011-2012, PI: A. Hamilton)
Camilla Gilmore (Postdoctoral fellowship £208,778)
The roots of arithmetic: Linking numerical cognition with mathematics
education (British Academy, 2008 - 2014, PI: C. Gilmore)
Antonia Hamilton (RA2946 — £275,500)
Action and interaction in the social brain (ESRC, 2007-2011, PI: A.
Hamilton)
Camilla Gilmore (£71,843.81)
Uncovering the sources of arithmetic (ESRC, 2009 - 2010, PI: C.
Gilmore)
Chris Hollis (£513,196)
Interaction of inhibitory control and reward mechanisms in attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).) (MIDAS: Wellcome Trust, 2005-2009,
PI: C. Hollis).
Alastair Smith (A1H106 — £5000) Improving the outreach capacities of
Summer Scientist Week (HEIF HERMES, PI: A. Smith)
Details of the impact
Summer Scientist Week is a research and public engagement event for
families with children aged between 4 and 11 years and has been running
annually since 2007. Summer Scientist Week was developed in order to
create a cycle of involvement, engagement and education in psychological
research within the local community. The two key aims of Summer Scientist
Week are:
i) to stimulate interest and excitement in how the mind and brain work
ii) to support informal learning about the research process and research
outcomes in the fields of psychology and cognitive neuroscience.
Families visit the University of Nottingham for a three-hour session
during which time they take part in a range of fun activities with a
psychology theme. Each session brings together up to 50 children in a
single location with a mixture of hands on psychology games and
experiments. Researchers and postgraduate students run a range of studies
informed by the previous underpinning research described above, which
showcase the research questions and methods involved. Parents experience
the research process first-hand by watching their child take part in the
studies and by talking directly with the researchers. They are also
informed about findings from the underpinning research, in addition to
current studies, through posters displayed at the event, student helpers,
a newsletter sent out to all families in December each year and a booklet
summarising the research undertaken by the group. This allows parents and
children to link the findings to the research they experienced, gaining a
deeper understanding of the outcomes as well as how it links to the
process of carrying out psychological research. As this is an annual event
the participants are able to learn about continuing developments within
the field. It is particularly interesting for parents to see that some of
the research they learn about at the event has arisen from data collected
at previous SSW meetings and has led to scientific publications. In
2012/13, five journal articles were published using SSW data in journals
including Development Psychology and Current Biology7
(available upon request).
Since 2007 over 1,000 children aged between 4 and 11 years from the
Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire area have attended the event with their
parents. The event attracts people from a range of backgrounds
(Deprivation Index range from 0% to 100%, mean = 64.7%). The majority of
attendees are of white ethnic origin (81.5%). Over a quarter of
participants have attended more than once (26.3%). The event is
sustainable and has a lasting legacy, as evidenced by the steady increase
in registrations each year (from 120 in 2007 to 550 in 2012)a.
See Facebook page for updated registration detailsb.
Parent evaluation data from 2012c showed that 99% of parents
rated their experience at the event positively (68% very positive, 31%
positive; 2011d: 67% very positive, 33% positive; 2010e:
73% very positive, 27% positive) and 100% of children enjoyed taking part.
Moreover, 99% of parents and 100% of children would come to Summer
Scientist Week again, and 100% of parents would recommend it to a friend
(2011: 100%; 2010: 100%). In addition, demonstrating increased engagement
with research developments, 68% agreed that they had become more
interested in psychology/child development news items and programs in the
media and 40% agreed that they have attended more University or
science-based events in the local area due to their involvement with
Summer Scientist Week. Together this demonstrates that Summer Scientist
Week has led to increased engagement with science and research by the
families who take part.
Summer Scientist Week has increased public understanding of research, as
evidenced by the fact that in 2012, for example, 92% of parents stated
that the event itself had improved their understanding of psychology
research at the University of Nottingham (2011: 80%; 2010: 84%). For the
newsletter, 93% of parents agreed that it had increased their
understanding of psychology researchc,f. At Summer Scientist
Week 2012 parents also indicated how much individual posters had increased
their understanding of the research topic covered, on a scale of 1 to 5
from `not at all' to `a lot'. From a total of 149 responses to 17 posters,
the average rating was 4.5, indicating that their understanding had been
increasedc,g.
Qualitative feedback received from parents and children, such as the
comments below, illustrate their increased understanding of psychological
research and engagement with science and research. [source: 2012
evaluation forms, available on request]
"I have enjoyed bringing my child; not only for his experience but
also for the knowledge I have gained from attending the event, looking
at the website, and reading the newsletter."
"Fantastic! Both my boys loved it and had a great time. The research
`games' are pitched really well so that they enjoy playing them and had
lots of fun. I've found the whole morning really informative too. We'll
definitely come next year!"
"Tom aged 7: `Today was super. I learned a lot about science and words
I didn't know. I liked collecting the token. It was awesome! I'm glad we
came.'
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. Registration numbers
b. www.facebook.com/summerscientistweek
c. Parent evaluation forms 2012 (Note: Contact details for individual
parents who have filled in evaluation forms can be provided if necessary)
d. Parent evaluation forms 2011 (as above)
e. Parent evaluation forms 2010 (as above)
f. Summer Scientist Week Newsletter
g. Posters for parents and children to demonstrate shift in understanding
of research topic