Influence of stroke rehabilitation practice and assessment methods on national and international clinical guidelines
Submitting Institution
University of NottinghamUnit of Assessment
Psychology, Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSummary Impact Type
HealthResearch Subject Area(s)
Medical and Health Sciences: Neurosciences, Public Health and Health Services
Summary of the impact
Research at Nottingham, reviewing and evaluating best practice for care
of stroke patients since
1993, has influenced clinical practice by contributing to key national
clinical guidelines. Additionally,
research at Nottingham has developed and validated existing stroke
assessments with new
publications encouraging the uptake of these assessments globally in
Europe, North America,
China and Japan. Finally, Nottingham researchers have achieved impact
within the stroke
community by working directly with patients to develop care pathways and
building networks of
clinicians, occupational psychologists, clinical psychologists and
patients to ensure research
translates effectively into real-world practice.
Underpinning research
Since 2000, Prof. Nadina Lincoln has conducted research at the University
of Nottingham with the
broad theme of both developing and assessing the validity of assessment
methods and
determining the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation methods,
interventions and assessments
including:
- A series of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to summarise the evidence for
cognitive
rehabilitation for attention, memory and spatial neglect following
stroke
- Development and validity testing of stroke assessments for
international use (for
depression and screening for driving ability)
- Development of clinical trials to evaluate behavioural interventions
for stroke patients
including those with low mood
All these have important and ongoing impacts both in the UK and
internationally on practice
guidance, clinical practice and the re-development of assessment methods
1. Cochrane Systematic Review Library
From 2007 onwards, Lincoln and colleagues conducted systematic reviews
examining the effect of
cognitive rehabilitation on memory1, spatial neglect2
and attention3 following stroke, some of which
have recently been updated. One review evaluating cognitive
rehabilitation for memory problems
after stroke1, found insufficient evidence for its routine
use in clinical practice. Another examining
the persisting effects of cognitive rehabilitation on spatial neglect2,
as measured by disability level
and hospital discharge, concluded the evidence supporting its use in
standard clinical practice was
inadequate. These reviews highlighted the weak evidence upon which
practice of care for stroke
patients was based and informed a series of recommendations in the
fourth edition National
Clinical Guideline for Stroke by the Royal College of Physicians (2012).
2. Assessment and Questionnaire Development
Lincoln and colleagues identified a need for suitable measures to
evaluate psychological outcomes
following stroke. In 2000 they developed and validated the Stroke
Aphasic Depression
Questionnaire (SADQ) and in 2006 showed that it is a reliable and
sensitive means of assessing
mood in stroke patients with communications difficulties4.
The SADQ has both community and
hospital versions and French, Dutch, Greek, Italian, Japanese and
Chinese translations. In 2012,
Kneebone (University of Surrey) and Lincoln5 highlighted the
gap between the identification and
management of anxiety and depression in those with cognitive and mood
disorders following
stroke, resulting in an NHS improvement plan to tackle these issues
(section 4). Lincoln and
colleagues also developed the Nottingham Sensory Assessment test to
measure somatosensory
impairment after stroke6. The test was developed in
conjunction with a European study examining
the differences in rehabilitation practice in four European centres. In
addition to better assessment
of mood and sensory problems, they also went on to develop assessment
pathways in relation to
cognitive screening and the assessment of fitness to drive. As part of
this, the Stroke Drivers
Screening Assessment (SDSA) was revised, and based on research evidence
from other centres,
the SDSA has been adapted for use in the USA, Europe, Japan and
Australia.
3. Evaluation of Clinical Trials for Depression
An important strand of Lincoln's research, arising from identification
of the state of knowledge
regarding psychological problems after stroke5, is the
evaluation of psychological aspects of
rehabilitation, especially the treatment of cognitive deficits and low
mood. In 2008 Lincoln and
colleagues identified aphasia as a key risk factor for the onset of
depression, contributing to
communication difficulties6. Lincoln and colleagues also
found that psychological distress following
stroke was related to expressive communication impairment and level of
disability in personal
activities of daily living related to distress (measured by Nottingham
Extended Activities of Daily
Living Scale). Distress was persistent in the first 6 months after
stroke and it was concluded that
appropriate treatment strategies need to be developed and evaluated for
patients who have
communication impairments7.
References to the research
1. das Nair, RD and Lincoln NB (2007). Cognitive rehabilitation
for memory deficits following
stroke. Cochrane Systematic Review. DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD002293.pub2. IF: 5.705,
Citations 5.
2. Bowen A, Lincoln NB (2007). Cognitive rehabilitation for
spatial neglect following stroke.
Cochrane Systematic Review 2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003586.pub2.
IF: 5.705, Citations 81
3. Loetscher T, Lincoln NB (2013). Cognitive rehabilitation for
attention deficits following stroke.
Cochrane Systematic Review. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002842.pub2.
IF: 5.705
4. Bennett HE, Thomas SA, Austen R, Morris AMS, Lincoln NB
(2006). Validation of screening
measures for assessing mood in stroke patients. British Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 45: 367-376.
DOI: 10.1348/014466505X58277. IF 2.333, Citations 19.
5. Kneebone II, Lincoln NB (2012). Psychological problems after
stroke and their management:
state of knowledge. Neuroscience and Medicine, 3, 83-89. DOI: 10.4236/nm.2012.31013.
Citations
3.
6. Connell LA, Lincoln NB, Radford KA (2008) Somatosensory
impairment after stroke: frequency
of different deficits and their recovery. Clinical Rehabilitation
22 (8): 758-67.
DOI: 10.1177/0269215508090674. IF 2.191, Citations 22.
7. Thomas SA, Lincoln NB (2008). Predictors of emotional distress
after stroke. Stroke 39: 1240-1245.
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498279. IF 5.729, Citations 18.
Details of the impact
A key impact of Lincoln's research is changes to three different clinical
practice guidelines with
beneficiaries including clinicians, clinical psychologists, general
practitioners, occupational
therapists, stroke patients and their families.
Impact on Royal College of Physicians Guidelines and identification of
evidence gap
Based upon Lincoln's ongoing work with the Royal College of Physicians,
her research on intensity
of time spent on rehabilitation, measurement of sensory problems and
interventions for memory,
attention and spatial awareness following stroke was featured in the 2012
RCP National Clinical
Guidelines for strokea. The assessment methods developed as
part of the research (sensory test,
SADQ and SDSA) are recommended within the guidelines. For example: `All
patients should be
assessed for alteration in sensation. If indicated, a more formal
assessment of sensory loss should
be undertaken (eg using the Nottingham Sensory Assessment, Erasmus
medical centre version)'a.
Impact of better identification of psychological problems
Lincoln's research first highlighted the need for better identification
and assessment of
psychological problems after stroke and how these relate to cognitive
dysfunction5,7. This gap in
treatment contributed to the development of the NHS Improvement `Psychological
Care After
Stroke' reportb. This is a guide for clinical
practitioners to support the establishment and
development of services for psychological care of people with cognitive
and mood disorders
following stroke. In the report, and based upon her work, Lincoln outlines
a treatment and referral
pathway for stroke patients with cognitive dysfunction and mood disorders,
utilising the role of
occupational therapists and with better access to clinical psychologists.
Lincoln worked with stroke
patients to develop these strategies to ensure that changes put in place
were applicable within a
clinical setting. A stroke patient from Dorset, quoted in the Improvement
Plan, describes the impact
of these changes:
`I couldn't understand why things were so much harder... I couldn't
follow things. I worked before
my stroke and was...am... an intelligent man, but didn't feel that way
anymore. The tests were
interesting for me... some bits were so easy, other bits just made me
unravel... things I knew I
should be able to do. It really helped me and my wife that the girls
explained why this was
happening... that it was the stroke, not me. I guess I felt it gave me
some control to understand it...
now I just hope there will be some improvement'b.
NCGC Stroke Rehabilitation Guideline Change
Lincoln's work also contributed to the 2011 Stroke Rehabilitation
Guidelines produced by the
National Clinical Guideline Centre (NCGC)c. NCGC produce
evidence-based clinical practice
guidelines on behalf of the National Institute for Health and Clinical
Excellence (NICE), with the aim
of improving the quality of NHS patient care in England and Wales. The
guidelines cite Lincoln and
colleagues' research on spatial neglect as supporting evidence for their
recommendations on
assessment and interventions and the provision of occupational therapy
following stroke.
Finally, the group's influence on clinical guidelines and practice in
stroke rehabilitation can also be
seen internationally in the Australian National Stroke Foundation's
Clinical Guidelines for Stroke
Management 2010d, particularly in relation to recommendations
for the assessment and treatment
of those with cognitive and attention deficits, spatial neglect3,
mood disturbance5 and driving.
Development of Stroke Assessments and International Reach
The SADQ has also generated clinical service change. Clinicians in the UK
now use the SADQ
routinely for stroke patients and it is being used internationally with
translations in French, Dutch,
Greek, Italian, Japanese and Chinesee.
A key feature of Lincoln's work on assessment development also included
the SDSA, to assess
fitness to drive following a stroke. This has had an impact on clinical
services and Australian, North
American, European and Hebrew versions of the tests have been developede.
Researchers in
China and Japan are currently conducting translation and validation
studies to extend the Asian
market for this assessment. For the Japanese arm, the Manager of the
Department of
Occupational Therapy in Inobe Hospital reported in 2013 that: the
translation of SDSA to Japanese
has been completed with the support of KICTEC Co, one of the largest road
sign construction
companies in Japanf. A multi-centre trial to establish the SDSA
in hospitals and universities across
Japan is underway and data are due to be collected from 100 stroke
patients who have undergone
SDSA evaluationf.
Finally, the SDSA has played a role in informing overseas guidelines on
driving safety following
stroke in the form of Expert Panel Recommendations presented to the
Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration in the USAg.
Impact on engagement of the stroke practice community
Lincoln's research has achieved significant reach across the clinical
practice community working
directly with stroke patients through the setup of the Organisation for
Psychologists Researching In
Stroke group (OPSYRIS) in 2002. The OPSYRIS is the national body of
researchers and clinicians
in stroke in the UK (for psychologists based primarily in practice http://wfnr.co.uk/en/special-interest-groups/organisation-for-psychological-research-into-stroke-opsyris/)
and a sub-group of
the World Federation for Neurorehabilitation. Alongside annual meetings
across the UK, through
this network Lincoln developed a wide range of collaborative projects with
practising clinicians,
including the mood assessment project which led to direct impacts on
clinical practice. The Chair of
OPSYRIS Dr Bowen describes Lincoln's role in the growth of this group as
fundamental:
`Nadina Lincoln ensured the continuity and growth of the
group...during her chairmanship
OPSYRIS grew from a small group of psychologists to a current
multidisciplinary membership of
143, and attendance at annual meetings is usually about 50 people.
Through Nadina Lincoln's
strong leadership and international reputation OPSYRIS has become a
special interest group of
the World Federation for NeuroRehabilitation'h
Sources to corroborate the impact
a. Royal College of Physicians UK National Clinical Guideline for Stroke
(4th Ed) September
2012, Prepared by the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party.
b. NHS Stroke Improvement Plan Psychological care after stroke. Improving
stroke services for
people with cognitive and mood disorders
c. National Clinical Guideline Centre: Stroke rehabilitation, the
rehabilitation and support of
stroke patients. Methods, evidence and recommendations July 2011
d. Australian Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2010. National
Stroke Foundation.
Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council
e. SADQ and SDSA download links as well as all translated versions
available via the Institute's
website
(http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/medicine/about/rehabilitationageing/publishedassessments.aspx)
f. E-mail from Manager of the Department of Occupational Therapy in Inobe
Hospital, Japan
g. Expert Panel Recommendations Stroke and Commercial Motor Vehicle
Driver Safety. USA
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration January 2009
h. E-mail from Dr Audrey Bowen (Chair: Organisation for Psychologists
Researching In Stroke
group)