Policy Support for Wildfire Management & Contingency Planning in the United Kingdom
Submitting Institution
University of ManchesterUnit of Assessment
Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologySummary Impact Type
EnvironmentalResearch Subject Area(s)
Earth Sciences: Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
Environmental Sciences: Environmental Science and Management
Summary of the impact
Wildfire was barely recognised as a significant hazard in the UK prior to
University of Manchester
(UoM) research, that significantly changed stakeholders' and national
policy-makers' awareness.
This work on mapping and forecasting moorland wildfire risk has informed
the Cabinet Office, and
has demonstrated clear impact on fire preparedness planning in the Peak
District National Park
(where it is estimated that a large fire is potentially avoided each
year). Following an ESRC-NERC
seminar series (FIRES), the England and Wales Wildfire Forum (EWWF) was
established, with
EWWF persuading Government to further amend national policy on wildfire.
This impact is
ongoing, with DEFRA including wildfire in its `National Adaptation
Programme', and the Cabinet
Office recently including wildfire within the `National Risk Assessment'
framework.
Underpinning research
This impact case is based upon research that has taken place at UoM
(2004-), led by geographical
information scientist, Julia McMorrow (Geography, 1991-), and an
interdisciplinary team including:
meteorologist, Dr Gina Cavan (Geography, 2009-2012); economist, Jonathan
Aylen (Manchester
Business School, 2001-); geographical information scientist, Dr
Sarah Lindley (Geography, 2001-);
and econometrician, Dr Kevin Albertson (Manchester Metropolitan
University).
Wildfires are unwanted vegetation fires requiring intervention. UK
response costs are estimated at
£55m a year, with up to £1m per single big moorland fire. The initial aim
of the research was to
understand the spatial distribution and timing of moorland wildfire risk.
Beginning locally, a spatial
model was developed to predict wildfire risk in the Peak District National
Park (PDNP) as part of
the DEFRA-funded `Climate Change and the Visitor Economy' project [E]. It
was recognised that
wildfires are also a social and environmental issue, spanning economics,
psychology, ecology,
physical and human geography and fire science. Accordingly, this was the
first time that human
(access) and biophysical factors (fuel, topography) were modelled
holistically for UK fires.
Furthermore, the research was an example of successfully co-produced
knowledge, as model
inputs and parameters were developed in two risk workshops alongside key
stakeholders from the
PDNP `Fire Operations Group', including fire officers, PDNP rangers and
Natural England. Taken
as a whole, the research produced:
-
A novel method to extrapolate sparse path popularity data over the
whole footpath
network, as fire occurrence showed a strong positive correlation
with distance from popular
sections of footpaths [D].
-
Outputs with direct policy relevance, through the production of
fire risk maps and
recommendations around minimising risk and contingency planning for
fire prevention,
preparedness and response. These included: identifying high risk
areas where new fire
ponds and fire watches were needed [D]; protocols to improve fire
recording (i.e. ignition point
and locational precision); and cross-referencing to Fire and Rescue
Service (FRS) records.
-
A temporal model for forecasting the probability of wildfire
occurrence in the PDNP
based on temperature and rainfall data and visitor activity [C].
This was novel as it
included human factors (e.g. school and bank holidays), and was also the
first application of an
advanced time series econometric technique (Probit) to fire
occurrence data. The model was
further developed (combined with UKCIP simulated weather data) in order
to assess impacts of
climate warming on wildfire incidence [B]. Put simply, the model
predicted increased incidence
of moorland wildfire under conditions of warmer, drier summers,
signalling the consequent risk
of significant damage to moorland ecosystems and associated ecosystem
services.
As a whole, the PDNP research demonstrated a new approach to determining
wildfire risk and
management options. It also demonstrated the importance of climatic and
land use factors in
determining overall risk and assessed management options within this risk
framework. The impact
of this research led to a second research phase — national action research
within three knowledge
exchange initiatives: EWWF, FIRES and a NERC `Knowledge Exchange
Fellowship' [A]. Taken
together, a two-way cyclical knowledge exchange has demonstrated direct
and indirect impacts of
national reach and significance.
References to the research
(all references available upon request — AUR)
The research has been published in academic journals, such as the highly
regarded Journal of
Environmental Management, and as specialist research and
peer-refereed book chapters.
[A] (2011) McMorrow J. "Wildfire in the UK: Status and Key Issues" in
McCaffrey S.M, & Fisher
C.L. (eds.) Proceedings of Second Conference on the Human Dimensions
of Wildland Fire
(U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service) 44-56 (AUR)
[B] (2010) Albertson K., Aylen J., Cavan G. & McMorrow J. "Climate
Change and the Future
Occurrence of Moorland Wildfires in the Peak District of the UK" Climate
Research 45 (Special
24) 105-118* doi:10.3354/cr00926
[C] (2009) Albertson K., Aylen J., Cavan G. & McMorrow J. (2009)
"Forecasting the Outbreak of
Moorland Wildfires in the English Peak District" Journal of
Environmental Management 90(8)
2642-2651* doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.011
[D] (2009) McMorrow J., Lindley S., Aylen J., Cavan G., Albertson K.,
& Boys D. "Moorland Wildfire
Risk, Visitors and Climate Change: Patterns, Prevention and Policy" in
Bonn, A., Allott, T.,
Hubacek K. & Stewart J. (eds.) Drivers of Change in Upland
Environments (Routledge:
London) 404-431 (AUR)
[E] (2005) McMorrow J., et al `Climate Change and the Visitor
Economy — Technical report 3:
Moorland Wild Fires in the Peak District National Park' (CURE: UoM) 88pp
(AUR)
[* Albertson contributed to forecasting research — first-named
alphabetically, but not lead author]
Details of the impact
Context: Prior to this research, wildfire was barely recognised as
a significant semi-natural hazard
in the UK, despite UK Fire and Rescue Services recording on average 70,000
`grassland' fires a
year [1]. The research outlined above, undertaken alongside PDNP, has led
the way in gaining
recognition by national policymakers of wildfire as a hazard, ultimately
changing the way wildfire is
recorded. The Cabinet Office acknowledges the importance of this change,
noting that McMorrow
was "one of the first experts consulted by the CCS Olympic Team about
possible wildfire risk to the
Olympics... [her] work has been paramount in getting wildfire and
its management recognised on
the National Risk Assessment" [2].
Impact 1 — PDNP: More specifically the research has had tangible
direct impacts on fire
preparedness planning in the PDNP. As they attest, this has led to radical
policy change:
The mapping and forecasting work was based on our unique >37 year
record of wildfires
recorded in the PDNP Rangers fire log. We have taken up Julia's
recommendations for
improving the way in which we record the geo-location of fires and fire
perimeters, and for
linking our records to Fire Service incident data. It has added value to
the Rangers fire log for
further GIS analysis, and is an example of how co-produced applied
research can feed back
to improving capacity for future research. Other local fire groups have
also taken up these
recommendations (for instance, West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service
now record wildfire
perimeters)... We have also published a Research Note on the wildfire
risk mapping as a
way of reaching other practitioners. [3]
In particular, risk mapping has assisted in three key ways:
-
Forming the basis for planning the `ranger early wildfire warning
system' which has
already been estimated to have averted five large fire incidents, each
with potential fire-fighting
costs of up to £1M, and threatening >£16M investment in peatland
restoration (£8M to date;
£8M to 2015). UoM research provided the evidential basis for siting fire
ponds and a full
assessment of water resources for fire fighting [D]; PDNP's Science
Programme Manager
subsequently verifying that: "This best practice in turn is leading
to economic and societal
benefits in operational cost and protection from loss of amenity,
extending well beyond the
Peak District to other National Parks and upland areas of the United
Kingdom" [3].
-
Recommendations on recording wildfire geo-location and
cross-referencing were
followed, resulting in a more spatially robust, co-ordinated
database [3].
-
Forecasting and mapping outputs are now being combined by
contractors, towards the
development of an interactive exhibit for the Moorland Centre. The goal
is to raise public
awareness of the increased wildfire risk resulting from climate change
[3].
Impact 2 — FIRES/EWWF: Work with PDNP led to the ESRC-NERC funded
Fire Interdisciplinary
Research on Ecosystem Services (FIRES) seminar series, convened by
McMorrow, with the
PDNP's `Moors for the Future' stakeholder partnership as co-investigators.
FIRES brought together
scientists, policy-makers and practitioners, and for the first time
included significant input from the
regional Fire and Rescue Services. The output from this series was an
influential co-produced
policy brief [1], circulated within the Cabinet Office [2]. As the Chair
of the `Chief Fire Officers
Wildfire Group' confirms: "Such was the quality of the Policy Brief,
that I used it to raise the
awareness of wildfire issues affecting UK FRS's by circulating it to all
Chief Fire Officers and
members of the Chief Fire and Rescue Advisors Unit at the Department for
Communities and Local
Government (DCLG). This continues to be the case, and the work is as
relevant now as it was
when first produced in 2010. The FIRES Policy Brief also formed a
cornerstone of the initial CFOA
Wildfire Group's initial Action Plan" [4].
FIRES created impact in the form of social capital, building a wide
community of stakeholders that
ultimately helped the English Wildfire Forum to expand into a new England
and Wales Wildfire
Forum (EWWF) and become a more pro-active `community of practice', unusual
by virtue of its
`cross-sector' composition [4]. EWWF now has >25 members from: English
and Welsh Central
Government (the Cabinet Office, Department for Communities and Local
Government {DCLG},
Ministry of Defence, etcetera); Department for Environment, Food
and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
agencies (the Met Office, the Forestry Commission, Natural England); Fire
services; NGOs; and
private sector land management groups. Currently led by the Northumberland
Fire and Rescue
Service, it has quickly become the `go to' body that Government turns to
for advice on wildfire.
McMorrow was one of only two academics invited to join, based on her key
role within FIRES
(including a follow-on survey of stakeholder priorities, emerging from the
key messages within the
policy brief). In the words of the Cabinet Office: "She has
been an important and influential member
of that group ever since [joining], giving it academic vision and
authority and contributing to many
of the excellent products from the group. It is clear that her knowledge
and expertise has been
invaluable in moving the group into an evidence-based, cross-cutting
body, on whom the UK may
come to rely during any wildfire outbreak... She has already offered the
Cabinet Office, DCLG and
DEFRA great assistance with regard to wildfire" [2]. Additionally,
EWWF:
-
Distributed the FIRES policy brief to all Chief Fire Officers
and members of the Chief Fire
and Rescue Advisors Unit at DCLG [4]
-
Cited recommendations from the FIRES policy brief in their
written evidence to the
Select Committee on Rural Affairs on the Natural Environment White paper
in 2011 [5]
Impact 3 — FIRES/NERC: One of the key findings of the FIRES policy
brief was that fire reporting
standards were a barrier to evidence-based policy delivery. This finding
was strongly influenced by
experience gained from stakeholder-driven data collection. As a result of
this finding, McMorrow
was invited by the Chief Fire Officers Association wildfire group: to work
on improvements to the
FRS Incident Recording System (IRS); to ensure robust wildfire reporting
in support of `Community
Risk Registers' and `Integrated Risk Management Plans'; and to evaluate
IRS data for GIS
analysis of national wildfire risk. As confirmed, McMorrow is "currently
one of only two experts
invited to advise this group... [her] experience of working with
Incident Recording System (IRS)
data and using GIS to analyse it, has been integral to the current IRS
review process" [6]. This
approach has since been taken up by the Forestry Commission for DEFRA.
This led to subsequent
invitations to join DCLG's Fire and Rescue Statistics User Group — a group
who advise on changes
to IRS — as well as the Fire Sector Federation's `Fire Research and
Statistics Forum' [4]. In 2013,
Natural England invited McMorrow to join DEFRA's Best Practice Burning
Group — the stakeholder
group tasked with developing the `Heather and Grass Burning Code' for
moorland managers — where
she is currently co-developing a best practice guide on the reduction of
moorland wildfire
risk.
FIRES has promoted a step-change in partnership activity [3], with UoM
setting up a number of
experimental field burns, alongside three regional Fire and Rescue
Services (Northumberland,
Greater Manchester and Dorset) and five UK universities. This led to KCL's
NERC project and a
new SME (FireLab) [4], which would have been unlikely without FIRES
bringing together Fire
Officers and academics, notably at the FIRES3 meeting on modelling and
forecasting. Moreover,
the Dorset experimental burns were featured on the CBBC `Fierce Earth'
programme [4].
Impact 4 — International Influence: Through her research, and the
subsequent links developed
between the policy and practice aspects of wildfire research, McMorrow was
appointed as an
NERC Knowledge Exchange Fellow in order to further exploit her unique
standing [3]. This has
served to progressively integrate research findings into policy and
practice, propagating the
research more widely. In addition to a treatise on `Wildfire in the UK'
being included in a U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service report [A], the Irish Forest
service have also noted that:
"the recent direct involvement of Ms. McMorrow with one of our current
wildfire policy actions... led
to a rapid acceleration and completion... and considerable savings to
our department in terms of
time and public resources... a direct consequence of Ms. McMorrow's
knowledge" [7].
Impact 5 — National Policy: In 2009 McMorrow was asked to assist
in the drafting of a response
to DEFRA's Climate Change Risk Assessment. This resulted in a change of
national policy, with
DEFRA including wildfire in its National Adaptation Programme [8]. Two
years later, McMorrow's
expertise proved vital after the April 2011 fires across the home nations
(e.g. Swinley Forest in
Berkshire, Anglezarke in Lancashire and the Highlands and Islands of
Scotland). In the words of
the Cabinet Office's Civil Contingency Secretariat (CCS): "Fire and
Rescue Services were
stretched to respond. A select and trusted group of the EWWF were called
upon to advise
government, both to the response and recovery aspects of this event and
Julia was one of the first
people called. Her mapping skills and knowledge were extremely
important". In 2012, the Cabinet
Office agreed to include wildfire in the `Olympic Risk Register', and as
noted McMorrow was one of
the first experts contacted by the Government [2]. Finally, in 2013 it was
announced that wildfire
would be included in the `National Risk Assessment' — a move directly
attributable to McMorrow's
research. As noted by the CCS, the increasingly use of data from space was
a catalyst for this
decision, with McMorrow's `long-standing involvement' in the UK Earth
observation Community a
key factor [2][4]. Research impact continues to grow as risk assessments
are rolled out through
`Local Resilience Forums' and regional Fire and Rescue Authorities.
Furthermore, McMorrow's
research and knowledge exchange activities around wildfire continue to
influence local practice
and national policy, with an increasing emphasis on the link between
climate change and risk
management, as "the risk of wildfires... is expected to increase in
future, with hotter, drier
summers" [9].
Sources to corroborate the impact
(all claims referenced in the text)
[1] (2010) McMorrow, J. et al `FIRES: Policy Brief', University of
Manchester
[2] Testimonial from Civil Contingencies Secretariat, Cabinet Office
(April 2013)
[3] Testimonial from Science Programme Manager, PDNP (7th July
2013)
[4] Testimonial from Chair, Chief Fire Officers Wildfire Group (8th
July 2013); (2011) Hedley P
`Towards a New Lexicon' Wildfire Magazine (1st May)
pp.14-17
[5] (2011) Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee `Written
evidence submitted by the
England and Wales Wildfire Forum' (26th September)
[6] Testimonial from Senior GIS developer, Dorset County Council (8th
July 2013)
[7] Testimonial from Forestry Inspector, Irish Forest Service (25th
October 2011)
[8] (2009) DEFRA `Adapting to Climate Change: UK Climate Projections'
(p.21)
[9] (2009) ENPA `Statement on Climate Change in National Parks' (p.12)