Assessment tools and the impact on learners’ ‘understanding and use’ of mathematics in schools, colleges and higher education
Submitting Institution
University of ManchesterUnit of Assessment
EducationSummary Impact Type
SocietalResearch Subject Area(s)
Education: Curriculum and Pedagogy, Specialist Studies In Education
Summary of the impact
The research improved the design and distribution of educational tests
and software, textbooks, teaching materials, qualifications, and
associated guides and research briefings in mathematics education. The
MaLT project test papers have achieved sales of 350,000, with 382
interactive software versions. Some 27,000 certifications have been
awarded using the Free Standing Mathematics qualifications. Research has
influenced courses designed to aid transition into STEM in higher
education, especially 13 programmes in seven universities engaged in a HE
STEM funded mathematical modelling project.
Underpinning research
The impact is based on research that took place in Manchester from 1997,
with the first major research output in 2000. The key researchers
(returned staff names in bold): Black (2004-date); Farnsworth
(2006-2010); Hernandez-Martinez (2006-2010); Hutcheson
(1998-date); Harris (2002- date); Pampaka (1999-date); Pepin
(2008-2009); Petridou (2003-date); Prevett (nee Davis) (1997-
date); Ryan (1996-1997); Wake (1994-2010); Williams (1984-date);
Wo (2001-date). This case study is located in the Mathematics Education
team within the Mathematics Education and Critical Pedagogies (MECP)
Thematic Programme of Research (TPR) in the UoA25 submission.
The team have worked on a range of projects with a total funding in
excess of £1.5m from the Leverhulme Trust, Nuffield Foundation,
Astra-Zeneca, and the publisher Hodder Murray, and four ESRC projects
known as the `Transmaths Projects': Mathematics learning, identity and
educational practice: the transition to higher education
(RES-062-23-1213), Mathematics teaching and learning in secondary
schools: the impact of pedagogic practices on important learning
outcomes (RES- 061-25-0538), Mathematics learning, identity and
educational practice: the transition into post- compulsory education
(RES-000-22-2890); a follow on project, Promoting participation and
engagement in post-compulsory mathematics education for STEM
(RES-189-25-0235); an ESRC seminar series Developing a `how things
work' research agenda in education (RES-451-26-0576); plus two ESRC
funded doctorates and two ESRC post-doctoral fellowships.
The aim of the research is to understand how mathematics can be learned
and assessed for understanding and `use'. This has two connected strands.
The initial strand of research demonstrated how diagnostic assessment and
summative, age-standardised measurement could be integrated into
mathematics assessment (for ages 5-14) [3.1, 3.3, 3.4]. This research
benefited from ESRC doctoral and post doctoral research projects
(Petridou) which validated the constructs [3.3]. The research involved
developing new assessment tools usable by classroom teachers in order to
improve assessment for learning. The research required to do this involved
scaling and validating test instruments that are modified from items
designed for research into the psychology of learning mathematics; this
included trialling modifications in classroom application, and test
standardisation, using new methods of validation through models of `person
misfit' [3.3].
The second strand of research is focused on `Mathematics in Use' [3.2]
and was funded by Leverhulme (2000-2002), with further research and
development supported by the Nuffield Foundation (2003-7). This involved
introducing `real world modelling' into `Use of Mathematics'
qualifications and assessment. The validity of these developments was
subsequently researched and evaluated as part of the four aforementioned
ESRC (2006-11) projects which showed how students were more persistent on
`Use of Mathematics' courses largely because of the opportunity to learn
through modelling assessment. These findings have in turn led to a second
wave of research (and impact) on post- 16 mathematics education, including
university programmes, known as the Transmaths Projects (Transmaths.org).
A key finding was that teacher centred mathematics is associated with
declining student dispositions to study more mathematics: learner centred
mathematics (of the sort promoted in `modelling' courses) is associated
with slower declines in students' dispositions to study mathematics [3.5].
Findings show that students with lower grades (B and C) in GCSE
Mathematics are significantly less likely to survive the traditional AS
qualification than those following the `Use of Mathematics' programme,
largely due to the assessment and curriculum design (i.e. not the pedagogy
per se); on the other hand we also showed that students with very
high A level grades now often struggle with the mathematics they are
expected to understand in first year university courses in STEM, which we
showed is associated with dysfunctional learning in traditional A-level
mathematics courses [3.4, 3.5].
References to the research
(AOR- Available on request)
The high quality of the research is evidenced by peer review of
competitive grant applications, the monitoring by project Advisory Groups
and, if applicable, final report grades. The ESRC grants have been graded
(good, very good, outstanding, the fourth review is pending). The research
has been published in leading international journals for research in
education.
Key outputs:
[3.1] Williams, J. S. and Ryan, J. T. (2000) National testing and the
improvement of classroom teaching: can they coexist? British
Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 1-40. DOI:
10.1080/014119200109516
[3.2] Williams, J.S., and Wake, G.D. (2007) Black boxes in workplace
mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 317-343.
DOI:10.1007/s10649-006-9039-z
[3.3] Petridou, A., and Williams, J.S. (2007) Accounting for Aberrant
Test Response Patterns Using Multilevel Models, Journal of Educational
Measurement, 44(3), 227-247. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00036.x
Other relevant outputs:
[3.4] Ryan, J.T. and Williams, J.S. (2007) Children's mathematics 4-15.
OUP/McGraw-Hill. (AOR)
[3.5] Pampaka M., Williams, J., Hutcheson, G., Wake, G., Black, L.,
Davis, P., and Hernandez- Martinez, P. (2012) The association between
mathematics pedagogy and learners' dispositions for university study. British
Educational Research Journal 38(3), 473-496. DOI:
10.1080/01411926.2011.555518
Details of the impact
Context: Traditional programmes in mathematics in schools,
colleges and universities involve teacher/lecturer-centred delivery, with
timed and summative test-centred assessment, leading to a high drop out
from mathematics at age 16, 17, and later. The impact of the programme of
research by Professor Williams and his team involves changes to
professional practice, learner approaches to learning, and improvements to
the context and design of commercial texts.
Pathways to impact. Following the approach outlined in REF3a this
case study illustrates both an instrumental change model based on the
direct reporting of findings and a constructivist approach through working
with stakeholders in schools, colleges, higher education, and publishing
companies. This enabled both the translation and transmission of findings,
and attention to research legibility enabled the use of those findings
with various interested groups. User engagement was furthered through
networking and the building of partnerships in the production of e.g.
textbooks, and the development of new examinations. Specific pathways to
impact include the:
(a) development of new assessment tools for Schools and Colleges via the
Hodder-tests, MaLT project, together with the marketing and sales provided
by Hodder Murray publishers;
(b) real world mathematical modelling research was used by the
researchers in partnership with external organisations in the design of
the new `Use of Mathematics' qualifications and assessment materials and
teaching texts, and shaped the assessment and written support materials
published in texts and on websites to support teachers (partnerships with
and funded by AQA and Nuffield Foundation);
(c) Transmaths projects (2006-11) — and of particular relevance is the
fourth ESRC `Follow-on' project which is devoted to social impact of the
three earlier research projects — researched the effect of the new
qualifications and teaching of `modelling' in `Use of Mathematics' and
other qualifications in FE and in transition to HE. The findings from this
work have been widely disseminated through the relevant professional
bodies, notably the NCETM, and HE-STEM networks, inter alia, through a set
of research briefings and edited HE-STEM books, and this has been
confirmed by the former Director of the National HE-STEM programme [5.9].
This activity involved the research team in collaborative partnerships
with professionals and publishers in originating new texts, the writing of
qualifications and assessments (e.g. via QCA, AQA, and others) and the
development and evaluation of new resources and courses. This has led to
an improvement in the base of resources and qualifications and assessments
that teachers and institutions can use to help provide for better
education and to widen participation. Further research also has provided
some supporting evidence and evaluation of this impact.
The productive nature of the interactions regarding the use of research
evidence is illustrated by a witness statement: "at QCA I was the project
leader for the development of Free Standing Mathematics Qualifications.
The contract for development of these qualifications was awarded to the
team at Manchester under Professor Julian Williams and his then colleague,
Geoff Wake from your department. Geoff Wake developed the actual FSMQ
units and the corresponding Level 3 textbooks that were funded by the
Nuffield Foundation. These FSMQs have proved hugely influential. Professor
Williams was also commissioned to write a special report as evidence to
Professor Adrian Smith's inquiry (commissioned by the government) on
post-14 mathematics education" [5.3].
Significance and reach. The impact of research on new educational
provision is significant through the novel approaches to learning, and
reach is evidenced in the take up of new qualifications and access to new
texts:
(a) Materials were developed for classroom use through the MaLT project,
and published by Hodder Murray [5.1]. The Hodder Murray website states
that: "a tried and tested approach to standardised mathematics assessment
for ages 5-14, developed for Hodder Education by the University of
Manchester. Nationally standardised on over 12,500 pupils, MaLT can be
used at any time during the school year — for screening, monitoring and
tracking progress, as well as for individual diagnostic profiling.
Available in both pencil-and-paper and interactive computer-adaptive (CAT)
formats, these nationally standardised tests — for groups or individuals -
also yield diagnostic information which will directly support individual
and whole-class teaching" [5.1]. A representative from Hodder Murray
confirms the quality and impact of the research: "the Mathematics
Assessment for Learning and Teaching (MaLT) series developed for classroom
use by Professor Williams and his team offers a ground-breaking approach
to Mathematics assessment. The tools are designed to support better
teaching and learning for understanding and using mathematics, and hence
impact on how learners learn" and he goes on to evidence the wider
commercial impact during the REF2014 audit period: "that Hodder Education
sales (from publication in 2005 to June 2013) of printed test papers are
approaching 350,000 copies, with a total value (including supplementary
manuals and scorer/profiler CDs) of £534k. In addition, we have to date
sold 382 interactive versions (value £118K) for pupils to take the tests
on stand-alone computers and school networks" [5.2]. These innovative
tools afford improved assessment practices; the detailed profiling of
pupils test responses and specific diagnostics can support better teaching
and learning [5.2].
(b) The real world mathematics modelling research was funded by
Leverhulme and the Nuffield Foundation, and led to impacts on: (i) the
development of new qualifications (Free Standing Mathematics
Qualifications) with confirmation that "from 2000 to 2010 the figures for
all levels 2 and 3 FSMQs totalled some 53,000, including permitted
aggregations into the pilots of AS and A level Use of Mathematics, which
were built up of some core level 3 FSMQs together with a synoptic final
examination paper... they (i.e. the qualifications) have played an
important role in influencing the thinking of policymakers about less
academic routes of mathematical progression form level 2 to level 3"
[5.3]. Additionally "the significant impact of this work is evidenced by
the number of certifications in FSMQs and `Use of Mathematics'
qualifications each year. In 2013 across all the units that have been
developed at the three major levels of the National Qualifications
Framework (i.e. Levels 1, 2 and 3) there were over 27,000 certifications
awarded" [5.4]. The witness from QCA confirms that "unfortunately, the
present government decided, for political reasons, not to continue with
the Pilot A level Use of Mathematics" but he gives an account of
how the government is reviewing qualifications, and states: "there is no
doubt that the methods pioneered by the Level 3 FSMQs will still play a
significant role in the discussions that are about to take place" [5.3];
(ii) the development of new resources accessible from the Nuffield website
[5.5] where "the Nuffield Foundation supported the development at all
levels by providing support materials at a bespoke website...The
Foundation continues to support these qualifications in their drive to
support the application of mathematics across disciplines" [5.4]. The
research continues to influence professional development work for the
development of the `Uses of Mathematics' A-level (A2) qualification,
piloted in 2011-12 and rolling out in 2013; and, (iii) the production of
new textbooks by Haighton, Howarth and Wake: AS: The Use of Maths
Calculus (2004); AS: Use of Maths Algebra and Graphs (2003);
and, AS: The Use of Maths Statistics (2003) (Nelson Thornes), and
"these texts continue to sell in significant numbers even some ten years
after their first publication, averaging some £14,000 worth of sales per
year" [5.4].
(c)The fourth ESRC, `Follow-on', project was devoted to social impact of
the three earlier ESRC funded research projects. This `Follow-on' project
developed materials to disseminate the research findings and transmitted
knowledge about the effect of the new qualifications and teaching of
`modelling' in `Use of Mathematics' and other qualifications/courses in FE
and in transition to HE. The findings from this work have impacted on
members of relevant professional bodies, notably HE-STEM networks, through
a set of research briefings [5.6] and edited HE-STEM books and other
materials [5.7]. The Transmaths research influenced development work on
modelling in new post-16 (AS and A2) and first year university curricula.
This work is currently impacting on HE-STEM `Mathematical modelling and
problem solving' courses currently being taken up under HE-STEM funding in
seven universities, including 13 STEM Programmes in Mathematics, Physics
and Chemistry, and several engineering schools [5.8, 5.9, 5.10].
Importantly the impact of the research is recognised by users in higher
education: "the substantive results of the Transmaths projects showed how
student learning of mathematics can be significantly affected by
`connectionist' pedagogy, which has been important in our development of
more active learning and problem solving in first year courses in science,
technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)" [5.8]. Another research
user adds that "we have been able to make the case at policy level for
investing in the development of Mathematical Modelling and Problem Solving
(MMPS) courses to aid transition into STEM across the University of (name)
in the Schools of Physics, Chemistry, Civil Engineering, Electrical
Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and the Department of Applied
mathematics. These programmes involve between them nine academic staff and
approximately 700 first year students...this work has also been taken up
by 7 other project partners from universities across the HE sector.
Finally, it has to be emphasised that the main impact of this work is in
helping to bring about a sea-change in HE policy towards courses that
deliver key skills. We are increasingly looking for evidence and case
studies showing how such skills can be taught within mainstream academic
disciplines. The Transmaths research has hit this nerve well and in a
timely fashion." [5.9]
Sources to corroborate the impact
All claims referenced in text
[5.1] http://www.hoddertests.co.uk
[5.2] Witness statement from Hodder Murray.
[5.3] Witness statement from QCA.
[5.4] Witness statement from higher education.
[5.5] http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/free-standing-mathematics-activities-fsmas-2002
[5.6] Transmaths and TLRP Research Briefings, on project website: www.transmaths.org
[5.7] Grove, M. and Williams, J. (eds) (2013) The Transition into
Higher Education in STEM Subjects: Case Studies of Research and Practice,
Birmingham: National HE STEM Programme, 2013. eScholarID:194604
[5.8] Witness statement from the former Director of the National HE-STEM
programme.
[5.9] Witness statement from higher education.
[5.10] Croft, A.C., Grove, M.J., Kyle, J., and Lawson, D.A. (eds) (2014)
Transitions in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, London: Higher
Education Academy.